|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Bluebeard
Minmatar LoneStar Industries
|
Posted - 2010.07.31 18:28:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Akita T
Holy smokes that's a lot of thread spammage as (an almost direct) result of this thread's creation (posted 2010.07.29 00:01:00)...
2010.07.29 09:50:00 To people that want to KEEP T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why
2010.07.29 19:11:00 Standalone question to LHA (and for everyone elses pleasure ;)
2010.07.30 23:48:00 To the people discussing T2 BPO removal or keeping it (spam-locked)
2010.07.31 11:34:00 Make T2 BPO and Invention Same
ROFL
You forgot (All started by our favourite troller LHA Tarawa) Fixing invention Why T2 BPOs need to be removed from EVE. An alternate idea to "fix" some issues many see with th game. Why is the game better with T2 BPOs than it would be without them?
|
Bluebeard
Minmatar LoneStar Industries
|
Posted - 2010.08.11 11:06:00 -
[2]
Originally by: alittlebirdy
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: alittlebirdy Hmmm t2 bpo = money press...
A little bird told me you didn't really even bother to skim the thread, let alone read it. If you would have, you would have noticed your assumption debunked multiple times.
Are you stupid? If I can sit and run off copys... and sell them for omfg money... (go check contracts sometime, forgot who was selling +5me ishtar bpc for retarđed money...) ALL bpo's are money presses, however ALL bpos cept t2 ANYONE can buy...
If you somehow think a BPO is not a money press, well can I haz your drugs?
Confirming that the following threads do not really exist:
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1366725 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1365651 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1365603 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1367141 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1285353 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1364453 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1366442
|
Bluebeard
Minmatar LoneStar Industries Comatose Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.20 19:48:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Bluebeard on 20/09/2010 19:48:21
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 20/09/2010 19:36:02
Originally by: SurrenderMonkey By your logic, if CCP deletes all of your assets every day during downtime, it should not bother you.
No. Firstly is this your logic and because you came up with it, and secondly are we still talking of T2 BPOs.
Quote: Professional whiner that you are, however, we all know you would be able to float a battleship in the river of forum tears you would produce.
You are getting quite emotional here, which only makes you the whiner. If I had a T2 BPO and CCP would remove them would I ask for a compensation, and if I would not get one then I would just continue with the game.
You are arguing a case, as a person who doesn't have a T2 BPO.
Go and buy 500bil of T2 blueprints and then argue for their removal and I will take notice of you.
|
Bluebeard
Minmatar LoneStar Industries Comatose Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.20 20:36:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Whitehound
Originally by: Bluebeard Go and buy 500bil of T2 blueprints and then argue for their removal and I will take notice of you.
I do not need your notice as an owner just as I do not need T2 BPOs. If you think you deserve a compensation then why should I decide how high it is? That is not for me to discuss, or is it? So you go and buy T2 BPOs before you try to argue with me ...
You are whining "I haven't got, so you cannot have".
Put yourself into the position of a number of other people who have made substantial investments in T2 blueprints and then your position will have merit. Until then, you are just a whiny little child.
|
Bluebeard
Minmatar LoneStar Industries Comatose Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.20 21:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Berikath
Originally by: Bluebeard
You are whining "I haven't got, so you cannot have".
Put yourself into the position of a number of other people who have made substantial investments in T2 blueprints and then your position will have merit. Until then, you are just a whiny little child.
I think you're confusing merit with.... well, something. Not sure what. But the merit of a position has nothing to do with the status of the one proposing it. Your position seems to be "I'm biased- unless you make yourself just as biased in the same way, no position you take will have any merit". That's..... not really how things work.
*Everybody* is biased in one way or another.
Whitehound is biased from the position of having nothing to lose. As all the arguments he has put forward have been addressed and he is left with his assertion that he knows better and that T2 blueprints should go, then I want him to shift his bias to a position where he will lose if things go his way.
Somehow I think his argument would change, if that were to happen.
|
Bluebeard
Minmatar LoneStar Industries Comatose Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.20 22:22:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 20/09/2010 22:14:28
Originally by: Bluebeard *Everybody* is biased in one way or another.
No. If this was so then it would have no meaning for a discussion anyways.
As I thought, ignore the part where I assert that you are only arguing for removal because you have nothing to lose and reply with selective quoting.
To be honest, this thread should be locked to stop your continued trolling of it.
|
|
|
|