Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 00:32:00 -
[1]
Since these things are flying coffins, would a fast T2 Destroyer with Small/Micro Smart-bomb bonuses be a good ship to introduce?
|
omgfreemoniez
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 00:34:00 -
[2]
How about letting it fit 8 Large smartbombs with a 90% cap use reduction.
|
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 00:35:00 -
[3]
because then it's op?
|
captain foivos
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 00:41:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Vladimiru because then it's op?
No, you're still the op.
Will pay cash monies for the confirmed destruction of Beachura and/or her property. |
Alara IonStorm
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 00:52:00 -
[5]
Wow this is a awsome idea about a new feature!
I enjoy discussions like this, in fact I think they need there own forum section. A Features and Idea's section or something along those lines.
Are you seeing where I am going with this. I will give you a hint OP, it is the same place you should have posted this!
-- Alara's Law!
As an online discussion on EVE ships grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Dominix approaches 1 |
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 01:02:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Alara IonStorm Wow this is a awsome idea about a new feature!
I enjoy discussions like this, in fact I think they need there own forum section. A Features and Idea's section or something along those lines.
Are you seeing where I am going with this. I will give you a hint OP, it is the same place you should have posted this!
Damn, the unpaid forum police got me!
|
Alara IonStorm
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 01:09:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Vladimiru
Damn, the unpaid forum police got me!
It is an unpaid job, the hours are horrible and I don't get any respect.
But the smiles on the faces of every little troll and grammar **** are all the thanks I need.
Your Welcome!
-- Alara's Law!
As an online discussion on EVE ships grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Dominix approaches 1 |
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 01:10:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Alara IonStorm
Originally by: Vladimiru
Damn, the unpaid forum police got me!
It is an unpaid job, the hours are horrible and I don't get any respect.
But the smiles on the faces of every little troll and grammar **** are all the thanks I need.
Your Welcome!
Put me in handcuffs hun and read me my Miranda rights.
|
Alara IonStorm
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 01:25:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Vladimiru
Put me in handcuffs hun and read me my Miranda rights.
The fun part!
You have the right to remain Trolled. Anything you say can and will be misquoted and taken out of context. You have the right a Meme. If you cannot afford an Meme, one will be dug up on 4Chan for you. Do you understand these rights as they have been read to you?
If found guilty you will be moved to Features and Idea's Penitentiary where you will be forced to live till 90 days of inactivity. You will be allowed few visitors.
If found that your forum crimes are serious you will be sentenced to locking by leathal injection. The Dev responsible will remain annonymous.
-- Alara's Law!
As an online discussion on EVE ships grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Dominix approaches 1 |
|
CCP Jericho
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 02:53:00 -
[10]
Moved from Ships and Modules to Features and Ideas Discussion. May the discussion go better here.
|
|
|
My Postman
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 09:41:00 -
[11]
Edited by: My Postman on 15/09/2010 09:42:15 Alara¦s post and Jericho¦s answer = HILARIOUS!
+1 Internetz to Alara and Jericho
OP: No. If you want to gank Hulks in Highsec bring moar dessys (at least to the 2 tanked hulks i¦ve seen in New Eden, and one of them is mine).
Edit: Spelling
|
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 16:39:00 -
[12]
So does anyone have a reasonable objection?
|
Dzil
Caldari Caldari Independent Navy Reserve OWN Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 17:40:00 -
[13]
I'm game. I think this game needs more AOE to counter massive blob warfare.
Retired from corp sales. Time to spend some of this on pretty explosions :) |
Alara IonStorm
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 17:58:00 -
[14]
http://eve-search.com/thread/1384323
I am trapped in here Help!
-- Alara's Law!
As an online discussion on EVE ships grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Dominix approaches 1 |
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 18:10:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Vladimiru on 15/09/2010 18:10:51
Originally by: Dzil I'm game. I think this game needs more AOE to counter massive blob warfare.
Again, counter mass blobs is not my intention, but drones/missles.
However, if a T2 Smartbomb Destroyer was implemented for this purpose, the Destroyer would need a damn good tank to withstand being the first primary target by a blob (sig radius reduction is a start).
|
Goose99
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 18:21:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Vladimiru Edited by: Vladimiru on 15/09/2010 18:10:51
Originally by: Dzil I'm game. I think this game needs more AOE to counter massive blob warfare.
Again, counter mass blobs is not my intention, but drones/missles.
However, if a T2 Smartbomb Destroyer was implemented for this purpose, the Destroyer would need a damn good tank to withstand being the first primary target by a blob (sig radius reduction is a start).
Of course it can't have a good tank, it would be OP. Paper thin fireboats ftw. And make it cheap t1 dessy. I want to see masses of noobs taking down nullsec blobs.
|
Vladimiru
Gallente Broken Cannon
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 19:13:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Goose99
Originally by: Vladimiru Edited by: Vladimiru on 15/09/2010 18:10:51
Originally by: Dzil I'm game. I think this game needs more AOE to counter massive blob warfare.
Again, counter mass blobs is not my intention, but drones/missles.
However, if a T2 Smartbomb Destroyer was implemented for this purpose, the Destroyer would need a damn good tank to withstand being the first primary target by a blob (sig radius reduction is a start).
Of course it can't have a good tank, it would be OP. Paper thin fireboats ftw. And make it cheap t1 dessy. I want to see masses of noobs taking down nullsec blobs.
Given the epic stalemates we've been in for the past three years. Yeah, you might be right.
|
Xorv
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 21:45:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Vladimiru So does anyone have a reasonable objection?
Such a ship would be a drone nerf, and I really don't think drones deserve such negative attention. ... maybe if it effected mostly just Fighters and Fighter Bombers, and some how smaller drones were able to avoid most of the damage. Then such a ship would have a fleet role without screwing over drones as a whole.
I prefer the ideas that make a heavy bomber out of destroyers, one that targets Cap ships.
|
DrysonBennington
|
Posted - 2010.09.15 23:05:00 -
[19]
Interesting idea but what a smartbombing drone that would increase with destructive power the larger one went?
small - 25 - 75 hp damage medium - 76 - 125 hp damage large - 126 - 150 hp damage
|
Vladimiru
Gallente Nanite Industries Important Internet Spaceship League
|
Posted - 2010.09.16 07:00:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Xorv
Such a ship would be a drone nerf, and I really don't think drones deserve such negative attention. ... maybe if it effected mostly just Fighters and Fighter Bombers, and some how smaller drones were able to avoid most of the damage. Then such a ship would have a fleet role without screwing over drones as a whole.
I prefer the ideas that make a heavy bomber out of destroyers, one that targets Cap ships.
Then the smart drone user would recall his drones away from the target with the Destroyer "Escort" that is protecting it. I think this would make the destroyer a nice escort vessel for cap ships in fleets. Maybe even an ECM burst bonus as well.
Of course none of this matters until the destroyer class's signature radius is reduced to sub-50.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |