Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Suddenly Forums ForumKings
Republic University Minmatar Republic
88
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 20:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
What is a CovOps Interdictor? There is a class of ships that can warp cloaked. These ships are very useful for black ops in enemy territory and add a lot of spice to the game. The only problem: They can't hold down many targets. They have no way of deploying a bubble in nullsec, therefore gimping them.
I propose that we add a new kind of ship to the game that can both warp cloaked and deploy an interdiction sphere. This destroyer sized hull would be a valuable asset to black ops operations and would greatly reduce blob warfare.
What role would this fill? It would fill the role of having stealthy tackle. Currently it is hard to use covops gangs because they can't deploy bubbles. This makes covops gangs less effective in nullsec and encourages traditional blob warfare.
Why? To break the nullsec stagnation and add a new dimension to black ops gameplay. |
Metal Icarus
Minmatar Defence Force
230
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
What would you sacrifice to make this ship fair?
it seems that throwing out a bubble, turn on mwd, cloak is a little bit... OP.
I think it should sacrifice the guns
Just imagine a huge fleet battle with 20 ppl able to deploy bubbles and cloak.
No capital would be able to leave the field.
Limit it to one bubble launcher and a recloaking delay of like 30 or 60 seconds.
No guns. Absolutley none. Maybe a smart bomb, but no effin guns on something like that. |
Uyeiu
Republic University Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
buff black op jump range, covops cloak on black ops, and this suggestion, and I would never field a non cloaky fleet.
there is simply no way they'll ever do it. The bubble is the only thing you need and its the only thing you couldn't sacrifice in the balancing act suggested above. cloak plus black ops jumpable ship plus bubble equals win button. |
Red Teufel
Blackened Skies The Unthinkables
62
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Metal Icarus wrote:What would you sacrifice to make this ship fair?
it seems that throwing out a bubble, turn on mwd, cloak is a little bit... OP.
I think it should sacrifice the guns
Just imagine a huge fleet battle with 20 ppl able to deploy bubbles and cloak.
No capital would be able to leave the field.
Limit it to one bubble launcher and a recloaking delay of like 30 or 60 seconds.
No guns. Absolutley none. Maybe a smart bomb, but no effin guns on something like that.
looks like someone doesn't like dic |
Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
27
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:What is a CovOps Interdictor? There is a class of ships that can warp cloaked. These ships are very useful for black ops in enemy territory and add a lot of spice to the game. The only problem: They can't hold down many targets. They have no way of deploying a bubble in nullsec, therefore gimping them.
I propose that we add a new kind of ship to the game that can both warp cloaked and deploy an interdiction sphere. This destroyer sized hull would be a valuable asset to black ops operations and would greatly reduce blob warfare.
What role would this fill? It would fill the role of having stealthy tackle. Currently it is hard to use covops gangs because they can't deploy bubbles. This makes covops gangs less effective in nullsec and encourages traditional blob warfare.
Why? To break the nullsec stagnation and add a new dimension to black ops gameplay.
need a new ship type because putting a cloak on the current hull has a drawback and thats not fair :( |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
8822
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
How would it break stagnation or add anything to blackops gameplay? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
CONCORD spawns: quick enough to save you?
|
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
739
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 21:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
no ship will break stagnation.
|
Jett0
Surface Warfare Tribal Band
218
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 23:21:00 -
[8] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:no ship will break stagnation.
Introducing the Amarr Psychedelica, and its technicolor mini-doomsday, the Disco Inferno!
Groovy! Occasionally plays sober |
Mishra Ninghor
Perkone Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 23:36:00 -
[9] - Quote
if you want a cloaky ship capable of holding down a supercap, you can always ship bump. But yeah, bubble would be overpowered.
Perhaps adding tackling scripts could work though. Basically you'd add a script to the warp distruptor II's that gave it the capability of holding down capital ships. But the capacitor usage would go through the roof, so that even a ship fitted for cap would only be able to hold em down for a minute, minute and a half or so. |
Bootleg Jack
Potters Field
212
|
Posted - 2012.07.30 23:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tippia wrote:How would it break stagnation or add anything to blackops gameplay?
Wondering same thing.
I SB and this seems scary op, we have a cloaky tackle, but of course the choice is great tackle, gimped cloak or great cloak, gimped tackle.
CovOps with bubble, omg
I'm an American, English is my second language... |
|
Gogela
Direct Action LLC.
906
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 00:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Came expecting a ship with a cloaking destabilization bubble... left disappointed.
|
Suqq Madiq
Amarr Empire
246
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 00:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
Oh, look who came up with another terrible idea. |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
559
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 00:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:What is a CovOps Interdictor?
Grotesquely imbalanced and hilariously overpowered ::eezybutan::, is what.
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote: It would fill the role of having stealthy tackle.
Arazu.
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:Why?
Because fail troll is fail, and really should feel ashamed of itself.
3/10.
Why am I dreaming of some strange woman who keeps telling me, "You fail at life because you are cloaked?" |
Ptraci
3 R Corporation The Irukandji
573
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 00:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Sounds like someone has a sore rear end because of the targeting delay on their cloak.
How about you accept the fact that you won't always be able to catch every single cloaky ship that passes by your gate, and leave it at that? |
Mors Sanctitatis
Death of Virtue
746
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 01:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
Suddenly Forums ForumKings wrote:What is a CovOps Interdictor? There is a class of ships that can warp cloaked. These ships are very useful for black ops in enemy territory and add a lot of spice to the game. The only problem: They can't hold down many targets. They have no way of deploying a bubble in nullsec, therefore gimping them.
I propose that we add a new kind of ship to the game that can both warp cloaked and deploy an interdiction sphere. This destroyer sized hull would be a valuable asset to black ops operations and would greatly reduce blob warfare.
What role would this fill? It would fill the role of having stealthy tackle. Currently it is hard to use covops gangs because they can't deploy bubbles. This makes covops gangs less effective in nullsec and encourages traditional blob warfare.
Why? To break the nullsec stagnation and add a new dimension to black ops gameplay.
LOL no. Intelligence shouldn't be free. -á Mining, reloaded. -á-áADDICTED. |
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
68
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 01:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Came expecting a ship with a cloaking destabilization bubble... left disappointed.
I did the same damn thing, too. Thought this was a counter to covops cloaks. |
Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1520
|
Posted - 2012.07.31 01:49:00 -
[17] - Quote
this already exists
simply buy anchorable bubbles and put them in a blockade runner EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |