Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cpt Greagor
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 11:48:00 -
[4051]
Two months ago I would have said cosmetic only, but now that I no longer trust CCP to keep it that way, I say none at all.
|
Endoril
|
Posted - 2011.07.07 17:25:00 -
[4052]
NO
|
Van Derka
|
Posted - 2011.07.08 04:47:00 -
[4053]
Edited by: Van Derka on 08/07/2011 04:48:22 NO
Originally by: Sumernight Cosmetic Only But only if the gear is player made, like in second life.
Making me turn into a 3d model, forcing me to wear clothes, and then asking me to pay $15 to a dev (who has already been paid) to make a cool shirt that should have been included from the beginning of your wacky 3d model idea is pretty lame.
Seriously, we were fine with a crappy portrait and spinning our ships.
that last line sums it up.
|
Sheena Takayanagi
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 09:26:00 -
[4054]
NO |
Riley Barbatos
GoonWaffe
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 16:20:00 -
[4055]
No. |
D'Leh Mannuck
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 17:13:00 -
[4056]
No.
Looking at the statements given by CCP there is too much playroom for introducing gold ammo or ships. There hasn't been a ferm no to that, only a lot of political jibberjabber which can be turned in any direction needed or wanted.
These aren't the Devs anymore I met back in 2004. They went from devoted gamelovers to bussinessmen. And bussinessmen don't love the game but the cashflow they get from it.
|
Sasaki Hiroshi
|
Posted - 2011.07.09 21:44:00 -
[4057]
No.
|
Lupus Hekki
|
Posted - 2011.07.10 08:33:00 -
[4058]
Edited by: Lupus Hekki on 10/07/2011 08:39:14 Well, Yes, as things are bound to show up on the market.
& i want those ship skins once they come out, getting plexes...
What the hell is so bad about MTs? If you don't want to spend real money for a in world currency, boohoo grow a pair and wait till someone sells them on the market for 1billion or more. Its not like the NeX store axe murdered your family and children Sure CCP lied to you, but people and so corporations change, like you never broke a promise. "Oh they're greedy, they're hunting for our money, we saw so in the leaked bulletin" - yeah real mature, CCP does one greedy action, maybe more, and thats enough for hundreds if not thousands of people to unsubscribe? Sometimes... I think EVE is filled with 13 year olds who got a hold of their parents credit cards and their parents won't allow the purchase of 6 PLEXes
Also Micro Transactions were always in the game, PLEXes, you pay for a item in game which can be sold for ISK. Why are you making such a big deal out of something that already exists? They just expanded it |
Tutskii
|
Posted - 2011.07.11 16:04:00 -
[4059]
No.
But really, what I want to say is that "No non vanity MT's" is the only line worth defending. |
TrimethylChromiumdioxide
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 02:42:00 -
[4060]
No.
|
|
Shu Jia
Gallente Tradewind Union
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 07:59:00 -
[4061]
Please check who is their new partner is. Nexon..who good in promoting free game and yet they will provide an in game purchase to power up or to enjoy certain services. Example you want to do rafting or incursion. You will need to buy licence to run Incursion with real money. That is nexon for. I lived in asia and I see a lot of free games and subs will paid huge amounti of money without knowing it because is blinded by the services to power up. Please if CCP wanna to follow the Nexon way of dealing , do it with care cause we have council. Please council monitor CCP closely.
Sincerely, Shu Jia Looking for future |
Icke Himal
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:32:00 -
[4062]
Edited by: Icke Himal on 12/07/2011 11:32:01
Cosmetic Only
|
Dreadmon
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:38:00 -
[4063]
COSMETIC ONLY
|
Amarrellah
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:40:00 -
[4064]
COSMETIC ONLY
|
Les McMeta
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 11:41:00 -
[4065]
COSMETIC ONLY
|
Agamenox
|
Posted - 2011.07.15 17:50:00 -
[4066]
NO
|
Candente
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.07.15 17:59:00 -
[4067]
Cosmetic Only
and to OP. If you can get rid of the obvious biased words from the original post you might earn a better attention to CCP. You might not like MT, but you don't need to be immature about it.
|
Alexia page
|
Posted - 2011.07.15 19:56:00 -
[4068]
Originally by: Lupus Hekki Edited by: Lupus Hekki on 10/07/2011 08:39:14 Well, Yes, as things are bound to show up on the market.
& i want those ship skins once they come out, getting plexes...
What the hell is so bad about MTs? If you don't want to spend real money for a in world currency, boohoo grow a pair and wait till someone sells them on the market for 1billion or more. Its not like the NeX store axe murdered your family and children Sure CCP lied to you, but people and so corporations change, like you never broke a promise. "Oh they're greedy, they're hunting for our money, we saw so in the leaked bulletin" - yeah real mature, CCP does one greedy action, maybe more, and thats enough for hundreds if not thousands of people to unsubscribe? Sometimes... I think EVE is filled with 13 year olds who got a hold of their parents credit cards and their parents won't allow the purchase of 6 PLEXes
Also Micro Transactions were always in the game, PLEXes, you pay for a item in game which can be sold for ISK. Why are you making such a big deal out of something that already exists? They just expanded it
It is not what is already in game that is the problem. Yes you can buy plex and sell them for isk and use that isk to buy what ever you want. but this does not hurt the game economy. You are basically buying game time, and trading it to someone for in game stuff/currency. This actually supports the game economy as the isk generated from the plex was worked for buy who ever bought the plex, and the items bought with that isk were made by someone else in game, so PLEX effectively remove isk from the game helping to curb market inflation. The items bought with that isk were made or looted by someone in game who put them up for sale. it comes full circle and supports to in game economy.
The thing many players are affraid of is MT directly for items means players willing to spend real life money can obtain them with no benifit to the other players in game. this is not a problem with vanity items, but what if you could buy the whole ship with the new skin for aurum? This puts a ship into the game that nobody built and with no benefit to the in game economy.
The current plan as I understand it, is for those new ship skins to cost aurum plus the normal skinned ship purchased or made in game. Which is not a problem. But every other MMO that has introduced MT has eventually started to sell items that did effect the game. it start with xp potions or in EVE's case probably some implant that speeds up training time. then moves on to unique weapons, and eventually the best in game items are only available through MT and can not be earned or made in game. This is what most of us are worried about. Not what they are saying now, but what will happen down the road.
|
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
|
Posted - 2011.07.18 21:42:00 -
[4069]
Originally by: Candente Cosmetic Only
and to OP. If you can get rid of the obvious biased words from the original post you might earn a better attention to CCP. You might not like MT, but you don't need to be immature about it.
What do you mean biast? It planely states that there are more logical arguments for than against, and each of the three examples specifically promotes itself.
Microtransactions? Click here and vote Yes, No or Cosmetic only
|
Rayohth
|
Posted - 2011.07.19 18:37:00 -
[4070]
YES
I really dont see what all the butthurt is about
Botting and RMT are the real P2W but everyone seems to put up with that so meh..
|
|
Hastling
|
Posted - 2011.07.26 09:32:00 -
[4071]
(COSMETIC ONLY)
If CCP manages to get some more revenue in vanity items that's fine by me. Everyone is entitled to spend their money has they think its best and if some player wishes to have a monacle and a golden BS I don't care, as long as that won't give a player an unfair advantage over other's. If on the other hand this items affect the gameplay in any other way other than visual then CCP's EULA and their stance on macro user's and ISK farmers will have no meaning at all. In business you "never change a winning horse". For EVE this basicly reflects what the players love most about this game which is the sandbox and the fact that you have to earn everything you have in game. |
ThekeeperOfTheCrypt
Caldari Ignorant Of Science
|
Posted - 2011.07.28 17:28:00 -
[4072]
no
|
Reaver Glitterstim
Legio Geminatus
|
Posted - 2011.07.29 06:20:00 -
[4073]
Cosmetic only. Or no. Either way, I'm not saying yes, and I want my vote to count against those who do say yes. --
Thousand Papercuts Project |
vixeyy
Gallente Procyon Enclave
|
Posted - 2011.08.05 20:34:00 -
[4074]
NO!
|
Oberine Noriepa
|
Posted - 2011.08.05 22:43:00 -
[4075]
Cosmetic only.
|
Alex Sinai
Mining And Probing Specialists
|
Posted - 2011.08.05 22:59:00 -
[4076]
NO
NoX shmoks whatever else CCP comes up with to introduce MT they will kill the game that way. They already miss millions of their income with cancelled accounts. Remove that ***t and fire idiots who proposed it and attempted to push it through. Otherwise they will propose more dumb things and you dear CCP will lose more millions or just break playerbase nerve and kill the game because people will leave by massive numbers. You don't have anything to offer more then it is now (was before MT) and wont have anything at all to offer to anyone if majority of players leave. Graphics are outdated. Sound not even mention, its laughable. All you have that attract us is unique gameplay and that what we pay for our subscriptions. Greed destroyed many things centuries ago and will destroy a lot more in centuries to come. Dont want to be a line in history of gaming industry instead of successful business? Make smart decisions instead of idiocy.
Oh and if you guys dare to raise the subscription cost after that MT stuff... do you think people wont see that all the MT thing was a smokescreen to raise subscription cost? You will see massive exodus and probably file bancroupcy. Nobody likes to be kept as an idiot. You made way wrong decision. I would suggest you to back off and make loud apologies before you destroy yourself completely. But who am I, just a paying customer. I hear you don't care about what we say, only about what we do. Well you lost a lot of money with that approach already. Happy CCP?
|
SuHwak
Eve Engineering Logistics Eve Engineering
|
Posted - 2011.08.10 11:48:00 -
[4077]
NO
However, the OP hasn't been updated in a while... ---- Diplomacy: Telling someone to go to hell in such a way, that he looks forward to the trip. |
Shahinez
|
Posted - 2011.08.21 09:15:00 -
[4078]
No.
That's getting worse and worse
|
Kane Echerie
|
Posted - 2011.08.25 19:01:00 -
[4079]
No |
Count Austheim
Third Return - Talons
|
Posted - 2011.08.26 15:57:00 -
[4080]
No No No Noooooo!
No....
God No... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |