Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dostov
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:06:00 -
[2041]
NO
|
Alandra Borgia
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:08:00 -
[2042]
Cosmetic ONLY
Any game that tries to use MT for game-affecting items becomes crap.
|
Jaison Savrin
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:11:00 -
[2043]
No My vote, however
I can live with cosmetic only.
|
TheButcherPete
Blackbase Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:12:00 -
[2044]
Cosmetic only.
|
Silvetar Jones
The Amber Corporation
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:15:00 -
[2045]
NO
'nuff said...
|
Cz Ire
Minmatar The Partisan Brigade Republic Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:20:00 -
[2046]
No
|
Safaa
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:23:00 -
[2047]
NO
|
Swizzles Joe
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:24:00 -
[2048]
Cosmetic only. Anything else effects the game in ways that would mess up many things for many players. Indy for example, hard work missioning and etc.
I don't see why some one should be able to skip all that time and effort I've put into my toon to get were I am just because they are better off then me. Other game changing things are just as messy as well, i dont want to see a 1 month old toon bragging about their titan or what ever just because they have enough spare cash. Plex for remap meh but plex/aur for factions guns, ships or ammo? No thanks.
Ive also seen kids steal their parents cards to get into stuff like this so they can be better then their friend who plays it by buying all these in store things. It can make you lose players that way as well. You might have the kid being funded by the parent but they wont be spending money on the in store stuff. Am pretty sure most people dont want to be double billed either so you'd have to drop subs for it to be actually effective but with that you open eve even more to bots and annoying 12 year olds granted you will get a boost but it wont be a good one and I don't think you would get more money if did free to play with a market supporting it either.
My ú0.02 anyway.
|
Wookinator
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:32:00 -
[2049]
No |
Quidgo Amarr
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:36:00 -
[2050]
Cosmetic only.
If you say no, you are just being an idiot. What the hell is wrong with cosmetic only store?
|
|
Elljared
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:36:00 -
[2051]
Cosmetic Only"
|
Aria Carna
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:36:00 -
[2052]
[Cosmetic Only]
I don't see a problem with MT if they don't affect gameplay.
|
Stick Cult
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:36:00 -
[2053]
cosmetic only
Originally by: CCP Tuxford my bad. Rest assured I'm being ridiculed by my co-workers.
|
Rebel biscuit
Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:50:00 -
[2054]
NO NO AND THRICE NO!
|
Maryamdy Gailische
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:54:00 -
[2055]
COSMETIC ONLY Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items? |
GX307
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:54:00 -
[2056]
Cosmetic
|
Narumi
Takahashi Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:58:00 -
[2057]
No .. Director of [AGGR0] - Fanatical about Violence. |
Weeble Tauri
Caldari Battle Cattle
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 00:59:00 -
[2058]
Chalk me up for a Cosmetic Only
|
Isilathur Enthordam
Ceptacemia -Mostly Harmless-
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:00:00 -
[2059]
[COSMETIC ONLY]
Anything else would RUIN this game, which I don't want to see happen.
Also, the price needs to be slashed by 75% for vanity items, then people will actually buy them!
Why on day 1 have you already introduced an item costing 1.5 bil??!! maybe down the line put in several expensive things, but you've gotta have a range of cheap stuff too......
|
TheDoctorUK
Gallente BSC LEGION Split Infinity.
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:07:00 -
[2060]
NO
|
|
Usuotas
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:12:00 -
[2061]
No, But would not fight very hard against cosmetic only.
non-cosmetic would be completely different thing. ---------------- Women - can't live with them........the end. - Al Bundy |
Corrak
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:12:00 -
[2062]
NO
|
CaptKilo
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:12:00 -
[2063]
NO to MT's.
|
Arverni Schereau
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:13:00 -
[2064]
Cosmetic Only
|
Inigo Devereux
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:22:00 -
[2065]
Cosmetic Only
|
Salpad
Caldari Carebears with Attitude
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:24:00 -
[2066]
COSMETIC ONLY
I see no problem with buying standing with ISK, maybe 1 billion ISK per 1.0 standing for the first four, then 1B ISK per next five 0.4 standing, then 1B ISK per 0.1 after that up to 9.9.
No problem with that. But if standing can be bought for Aurum only, and the only way for me to acquire Aurum is to buy them with my credit cart, i.e. I can't buy them from other players (who bought them with their credit cards) by paying with ISK, then that's a huge problem. -- Salpad |
Bischopt
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:32:00 -
[2067]
no.
That's not cosmetics only, that's a no.
|
Hinata Onishi
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:35:00 -
[2068]
Cosmetic only.
|
Shiftless
Peanut Factory
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:39:00 -
[2069]
No
|
FiveOfFour
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 01:45:00 -
[2070]
NO
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |