Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 .. 19 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Atum
Eclipse Industrials STR8NGE BREW
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 22:40:00 -
[511] - Quote
Idris Helion wrote:Which is pure win in my view. Cargo-fit Hulks were pure FAIL nine times out of ten, and I secretly rejoiced every time a ganker killed one. If you can't be bothered to tank your ~400M ISK ship properly, you deserve to lose it. I'll meet you halfway on this one.... I also got a laugh every time a cargo-fit hulk got popped, especially in highsec, even though I did the same to mine. The big difference, to me, is that I knew exactly what tradeoff I was making, and that if a hostile came within two systems of me, I'd be passively aligning, getting ready to spam that warp button as soon as they showed up in local.
Quote:If you're a solo miner (or a dual-boxer), then of course the Mack is better than the Hulk. That's the point. The Retriever/Mack's role is a solo/small-gang mining hull. And it's actually possible to tank it properly without sacrificing yield, which is a huge plus over the old Hulk. Only so far... I'd still rather have the output of the hulk, since my dual-boxing config is generally me in the hulk, never leaving the belt, while my command ship alt either tanks or chains (depending on what spawned) and makes the change to a hauler every 1h55m. While I'm sure some will jump on me with "Well???!?! You've got your own personal hauler, why are you complaining about crystals???!!" comments, they're still missing the entire point that for a ship which is supposed to be the king of output, not being self-sufficient enough to carry the tools for the job is a pretty sorry state of affairs.
Quote:The Hulk used to be the end-all, be-all mining hull in EVE. Now it's not. The other hulls actually have a purpose in the game, and a smart miner is going to pick and choose which one to use depending on the mining op. Yes, lots won't and will simply use a Mack for everything, but lazy miners are a feature of EVE and always have been. Gankers will find a way to profitably kill them and I will continue to rejoice when this happens. Were people really using hulks for ice and mercox that much? Lots of folks keep harping on "hulks were the answer to everything," but I never saw it. Seems an awful waste to leave profit on the table.
|
Zigne Nardieu
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 22:40:00 -
[512] - Quote
Idris Helion wrote:Zigne Nardieu wrote:stuff Yet another dumbass who didn't read the patch notes, didn't actually think about what the mining ships do now, and can only express themselves in a badly-spelled stream-of-consciousness rant. CCP just gave you a massively pimp set of new ships for mining, and all you idiots can do is complain.
why are u even in this post? it is not aboute spelling dude? But great comment or not
What patch note did i not read :)? link, show? |
Dave stark
Black Nova Corp.
452
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 22:46:00 -
[513] - Quote
Zigne Nardieu wrote:Idris Helion wrote:Zigne Nardieu wrote:stuff Yet another dumbass who didn't read the patch notes, didn't actually think about what the mining ships do now, and can only express themselves in a badly-spelled stream-of-consciousness rant. CCP just gave you a massively pimp set of new ships for mining, and all you idiots can do is complain. why are u even in this post? it is not aboute spelling dude? But great comment or not What patch note did i not read :)? link, show?
you mean all the dev blogs, sisi, etc...
the fact you people love to ***** and moan about things yet where was your feedback when it was on the test server, when the announcements came out in BOTH dev blogs etc?
honestly, the vast majority of people who are complaining about the barge changes are like people who complain about the government, and when you asked who they voted for tell you that they didn't vote.
well guess what, if you don't give your feedback saying you're unhappy with the proposed changes you have nobody but yourself to blame when the game gets changed in a way that you perceive to be negative. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
Idris Helion
University of Caille Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 22:51:00 -
[514] - Quote
Atum wrote:Only so far... I'd still rather have the output of the hulk, since my dual-boxing config is generally me in the hulk, never leaving the belt, while my command ship alt either tanks or chains (depending on what spawned) and makes the change to a hauler every 1h55m. While I'm sure some will jump on me with "Well???!?! You've got your own personal hauler, why are you complaining about crystals???!!" comments, they're still missing the entire point that for a ship which is supposed to be the king of output, not being self-sufficient enough to carry the tools for the job is a pretty sorry state of affairs.
So anchor a secure can (or several) in the damned belt and stuff it full of crystals before you start your op. Of all the things to **** and moan about with the changes to the Hulk, this still strikes me as the lamest one.
|
Zigne Nardieu
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 23:00:00 -
[515] - Quote
[/quote]
why are u even in this post? it is not aboute spelling dude? But great comment or not
What patch note did i not read :)? link, show?[/quote]
you mean all the dev blogs, sisi, etc...
the fact you people love to ***** and moan about things yet where was your feedback when it was on the test server, when the announcements came out in BOTH dev blogs etc?
honestly, the vast majority of people who are complaining about the barge changes are like people who complain about the government, and when you asked who they voted for tell you that they didn't vote.
well guess what, if you don't give your feedback saying you're unhappy with the proposed changes you have nobody but yourself to blame when the game gets changed in a way that you perceive to be negative.[/quote]
Well sorry i play on the real server and do not play on the test server? I KNOW aboute the dev blogs? but? how does that help me? " ohh i do not help me a all great anwser"
well it is just a bad patch? the way ccp want it to work is just supporting poor/bots/ afk miners... it is not improving the game a all... u are probaly just a happy carebear... great for u to be able to be afk in a ice belt in a h whit out doing any thing...
hulk's in 0.0 in small gank or solo miners die very fast if they get agro now from a bs... :/ the way i see it... it is just supporting the wrong things in the game... |
Atum
Eclipse Industrials STR8NGE BREW
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 23:02:00 -
[516] - Quote
Idris Helion wrote:[So anchor a secure can (or several) in the damned belt and stuff it full of crystals before you start your op. Of all the things to **** and moan about with the changes to the Hulk, this still strikes me as the lamest one. Way back on page 4, I addressed this option. Basically, for a fixed planetary belt, using anchored secure works perfectly fine. You can (usually) strip the entire belt with only two or three warp-in bookmarks. For grav sites, though, it's a pain in the rear, since you'll need to either shuttle back and forth to the can in a ship slower than a freighter (well, ok, not quite THAT bad, but it feels like it sometimes), or re-ship either yourself or your multibox alt to move the stupid thing around. No matter which solution you choose, it's additional pain for negative return on time invested. |
BellaSina
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.15 23:11:00 -
[517] - Quote
The Hulk name doesn't really seem fitting any more. |
Dave stark
Black Nova Corp.
457
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 04:15:00 -
[518] - Quote
Zigne Nardieu wrote: Well sorry i play on the real server and do not play on the test server? I KNOW aboute the dev blogs? but? how does that help me? " ohh i do not help me a all great anwser"
well it is just a bad patch? the way ccp want it to work is just supporting poor/bots/ afk miners... it is not improving the game a all... u are probaly just a happy carebear... great for u to be able to be afk in a ice belt in a h whit out doing any thing...
hulk's in 0.0 in small gank or solo miners die very fast if they get agro now from a bs... :/ the way i see it... it is just supporting the wrong things in the game...
i actually want to respond to you, but jesus christ google translator is your friend. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |
Sigras
Conglomo IMPERIAL LEGI0N
160
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 05:56:00 -
[519] - Quote
Atum wrote:Idris Helion wrote:[So anchor a secure can (or several) in the damned belt and stuff it full of crystals before you start your op. Of all the things to **** and moan about with the changes to the Hulk, this still strikes me as the lamest one. Way back on page 4, I addressed this option. Basically, for a fixed planetary belt, using anchored secure works perfectly fine. You can (usually) strip the entire belt with only two or three warp-in bookmarks. For grav sites, though, it's a pain in the rear, since you'll need to either shuttle back and forth to the can in a ship slower than a freighter (well, ok, not quite THAT bad, but it feels like it sometimes), or re-ship either yourself or your multibox alt to move the stupid thing around. No matter which solution you choose, it's additional pain for negative return on time invested. you mean like how the "Large Asteroid Cluster" (the most valuable belt and the only one that anyone bothers mining out anyway) can be mined from two warp in points? you mean like that?
And yes, I know the other belts cant be mined like that, but the optimal strategy is to cherrypick the ABCM from the other belts and only mine out the Large Asteroid Cluster. If you're doing anything else, youre already being sub optimal so it doesnt matter what you do, because everything you do is already less than the best you could be doing. |
Atum
Eclipse Industrials STR8NGE BREW
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.16 11:35:00 -
[520] - Quote
Sigras wrote:And yes, I know the other belts cant be mined like that, but the optimal strategy is to cherrypick the ABCM from the other belts and only mine out the Large Asteroid Cluster. If you're doing anything else, youre already being sub optimal so it doesnt matter what you do, because everything you do is already less than the best you could be doing. This is the problem faced by USTZ miners everywhere... the Aussies, Russians, and Euros cherry pick everything before we have a chance to get in there |
|
olan2005
Homicidal Tendencees Ethereal Dawn
6
|
Posted - 2012.08.17 11:10:00 -
[521] - Quote
after seing t what the changes have done have to say u need to buff the hulk as it is suppose to have the best yield for the lowest tank however the risk v reward ration is crap the yeild diffrence should be above 20% of the rest of the exhumers as it has the weakest tank and smalles hold . this would make it more atractive right now its safer using mac and u dont have hit station as much even with a orca so its greater effecieny than a hulk to use macs and a orca then it is a hulk and orca right now even witn multiple accounts |
Er Lik
Locals Only
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 18:14:00 -
[522] - Quote
All rigs from mining barges should be 'unfit' by Eve and placed into your hanger. Come on Eve, DO THE RIGHT THING! |
Chea Elohe
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.18 19:51:00 -
[523] - Quote
It is open season on miners and it would be nice to add a decoy vessel that can use a strip miner but ore capacity is limited to one cycles.
Ore Bay: 1,300 m3
Drone Bay: 10,100 m3 This would be suficient drone space for 2 fighters and 10 medium drones.
The following would be sufficient for the fittings
CPU 375 Power Grid 1175
Hi Power 4 Turrent Slots one for mining support one would be used for the strip minner. Med 6 Slots Low 5 Slots
Compaciter 1,400 gj 375 Refresh rate
Max Targeting Range 56 Km Max Lockable Targets 4
Procurrer and the Skiff both give the solo user a better chance of survival and as a a newbe I like that. I would like to see one of these vessels modified with some teeth. During Late WWI and throughout WWII the allied forces modified heavy destroyers and crusers to look like friethers. I would like to see either the Skiff or the Procurrer modified to work the belts to take on those who have gotten used to tarketing the miners. It would add significant PVP action and give these individuals reason to reconsider targeting every minner the see.
Skill Training would be the gate keeper for this vessel as it should require Ship Command of 5 along with all the skills required for fighter qualification. The Default has two Fighters and 5 medium Drones or 10 small Drones. Carrier Skill level 2 with the needed modivication capability are required training requirement. This will also add a respectable fleet repair support vessel for later Faction Warfare. It depends on how we can balance the ship out to meet the mission goal. Story Line is very believable as I realy want a chance to return to pain to those who are tarketing me and my fellow minners.
Second Recommendation:
Modified Jets Can with Sensor and Improvised Smart Bomb. Again it is second nature for some to steal the containers. If this was the real world I believe every minor would be trying to research how to place an improvised weapon in the container that responds when a non-authorized vessle off-loads the can. The use of the smart bombs as a basis of the booby trap is the best place to start. This can be a research item for minners. The counter to this for the Rats is a hardened or Shielded Cargo Area. Depending on the Payload of the Booby Trap and the amount of ore taken with the device the damage area will include all vessles within 2500 mm of the weapon activation. Deployment of this type of can must be annouched in the tag or its use is an act of aggression. If the Tag gives the warning and is tipped then there is no aggression. Secondary damage to others within 2500 feet of the can is the responsibility of the other pilots. How the devices is cloaked and activated dictate if aggression occures. These and the types of devices need to be determined and balanced for game play. This is another action that would make the minner much happier and give the newbe's a |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
530
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 03:32:00 -
[524] - Quote
Atum wrote:Sigras wrote:And yes, I know the other belts cant be mined like that, but the optimal strategy is to cherrypick the ABCM from the other belts and only mine out the Large Asteroid Cluster. If you're doing anything else, youre already being sub optimal so it doesnt matter what you do, because everything you do is already less than the best you could be doing. This is the problem faced by USTZ miners everywhere... the Aussies, Russians, and Euros cherry pick everything before we have a chance to get in there Tough
We have to put up with US spelling here so you can have depleted belts ingame Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Atum
Eclipse Industrials STR8NGE BREW
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 03:35:00 -
[525] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Atum wrote:Sigras wrote:And yes, I know the other belts cant be mined like that, but the optimal strategy is to cherrypick the ABCM from the other belts and only mine out the Large Asteroid Cluster. If you're doing anything else, youre already being sub optimal so it doesnt matter what you do, because everything you do is already less than the best you could be doing. This is the problem faced by USTZ miners everywhere... the Aussies, Russians, and Euros cherry pick everything before we have a chance to get in there Tough We have to put up with US spelling here so you can have depleted belts ingame At least I've got all my natural teeth |
Che Biko
Humanitarian Communists
104
|
Posted - 2012.08.19 17:52:00 -
[526] - Quote
I'm OK with the new the designs, but the way they were implemented on the old models is just plain fugly.
I know, this is mostly a rp thing again, but if you had designed these ships from scratch, you would not have done it like this, and you (hopefully) know it.
I mean, here is the Hulk: a ship designed for superiour mining yield. It lacks good defenses or a large cargo bay, but despite that and being the biggest ship of the three, is has the lowest yield per turret of the 3 ships. Now how does that make sense? The biggest ship has no room for the amazing 1-turret-mines-as-3 tech despite not having defenses or large ore bay?
It would have made more sense if you applied the Hulk stats to the Skiff model and vice versa (while keeping the Skiff 1-turret-as-3 bonus on the skiff of course), it would still be cheap and ugly, but at least it would make more sense.
And why so cheap anyway, you design combat ships quite regularly, why do the miners get this cheap solution? Aren't they worthy of new models? Got a need for speed? SRV race thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=134270 Sub-warp racing event thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=107164 |
Spice Flow
Spice Industrys
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 09:09:00 -
[527] - Quote
Idris Helion wrote:Zigne Nardieu wrote:stuff Idris Helion > said... Yet another dumbass who didn't read the patch notes, didn't actually think about what the mining ships do now, and can only express themselves in a badly-spelled stream-of-consciousness rant. CCP just gave you a massively pimp set of new ships for mining, and all you idiots can do is complain.
Look who's complaining and using derogatory statements. |
nardaq
Orion Expeditions
26
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 19:12:00 -
[528] - Quote
Spice Flow wrote:Idris Helion > [....] CCP just gave you a massively pimp set of new ships for mining, and all you idiots can do is complain.
"you idiots" You're a PVPer, or a ice/empire miner or a cheap abc farmer.
You've no idea how this small cargo is a logistic nightmare for multi boxers when I'm (read myself) is the hauler to.
|
Buzzmong
Aliastra Gallente Federation
221
|
Posted - 2012.08.20 21:29:00 -
[529] - Quote
Yesterday I saw a Retriever take on and win against a Catalyst outside of a station.
I lolled heartily and realised CCP have done a good job |
Spice Flow
Spice Industrys
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 04:10:00 -
[530] - Quote
Buzzmong wrote:Yesterday I saw a Retriever take on and win against a Catalyst outside of a station. I lolled heartily and realised CCP have done a good job
First. Must have been a younger player (character)... A properly made Catalyst with the proper skills can pump out some DPS... any good ganker knows this and how to fit right.
Second. An experienced ganker knows not to gank near stations or jump gates... this might have been a different story in an asteroid belt.
FYI... I am not a ganker but it pays to know a little on how things work to help defend myself. |
|
Buzzmong
Aliastra Gallente Federation
222
|
Posted - 2012.08.21 15:31:00 -
[531] - Quote
Spice Flow wrote:First. Must have been a younger player (character)... A properly made Catalyst with the proper skills can pump out some DPS... any good ganker knows this and how to fit right.
Second. An experienced ganker knows not to gank near stations or jump gates... this might have been a different story in an asteroid belt.
FYI... I am not a ganker but it pays to know a little on how things work to help defend myself.
Tbh, I think they were war targets rather than the Cat pilot being a suicide ganker, as there was no Concord involved as per a usual gank.
And from that I infer that the Cat was probably a rail cat for a newish PVE character.
Still was amusing to see though :) |
Yui Okane-Mochi
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 10:32:00 -
[532] - Quote
Chea Elohe wrote: It is open season on miners and it would be nice to add a decoy vessel...
Skiff already does a great job. Went mining during war in a skiff with long point, dual webs and the invulns off to appear like an easy kill. WT in cruiser decided to aggro and found himself tied down, and when backup arrived, very dead. Local was strangely free of the usual smack after that.
That the name of the skiff was Ackbar One should have raised some suspicions. :)
t¦ÉFíú |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
581
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 11:50:00 -
[533] - Quote
Yui Okane-Mochi wrote:Chea Elohe wrote: It is open season on miners and it would be nice to add a decoy vessel... Skiff already does a great job. Went mining during war in a skiff with long point, dual webs and the invulns off to appear like an easy kill. WT in cruiser decided to aggro and found himself tied down, and when backup arrived, very dead. Local was strangely free of the usual smack after that. That the name of the skiff was Ackbar One should have raised some suspicions. :) t¦ÉFíú
80k ehp and 188 dps isn't to be sneezed at, certainly
Sure, solo you'll probably die, but it's fun as bait. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
Chea Elohe
Sandline Industries Junk Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.23 11:52:00 -
[534] - Quote
Yui Okane-Mochi wrote:Chea Elohe wrote: It is open season on miners and it would be nice to add a decoy vessel... Skiff already does a great job. Went mining during war in a skiff with long point, dual webs and the invulns off to appear like an easy kill. WT in cruiser decided to aggro and found himself tied down, and when backup arrived, very dead. Local was strangely free of the usual smack after that. That the name of the skiff was Ackbar One should have raised some suspicions. :) t¦ÉFíú
Sounds good if you have a Corp that is Combat Smart. Many if not most miners do so alone or with an alt. Per the current CCP rules any one can steal a can and you have the right to attack. However, if you attack you get no support for anyone. I am talking about non-corporate players. There are also those corporations that include a collection of friends who want to mine and not to fight rigged battles. Yes the changes are spectacular as they stand it is a major step in the right direction. There is a mush better chance of survival for the lone user in the Skiff and the Procurrer. This is true and was needed. How ever CCP should be fair and real. If this were in any nation that had miners protecting their claim what would they do? I am a student of history and even a grammer school student could tell you of the traps used during the great meneral rushs in Alaska, Canada and the United States. Yes in our cities today setting up a death trap is illegal. I do not know the reason the game developers do not listen and give the miners a means of making us a less attrative target. Creation of a Decoy Vessel was used during Late WWI and WWII and it worked well for the Allies but the Acess adjusted there strategy and developed the pack to counter the threat of meeting up with an armed destroyer. That is real world this is a game. Some Gangers do it because it is easy credits. Those are the target of the decoy operation. Full trained, armed and fited teams will eat up even the best designed decoy vessel. The size of the ships prevent you from having a true carrier or battleship be modified to appear as a minning vessle. The vessle has to be able to mine as the easy test of the Ganger would be to sit around and see if it mines. As part of the Game the creation of the Decoy Vessel could be made part of a story line research that begines with one miner going from one research facility to another to develope an array of can tippers and gang deterants. Not as to off balance the game but as it is right now miners are the foot balls and anyone else can kick us around. |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
548
|
Posted - 2012.08.24 02:57:00 -
[535] - Quote
Atum wrote:At least I've got all my natural teeth I might, it just depends on your definition of "my" Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Tinytacohead
AirwolfSquad
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 17:58:00 -
[536] - Quote
Thanks CCP for totally ruining the Hulk for us little guys. May as well sell both of mine, as they're now parked indefinitely. (with their t2 cargo rigs) It seems every big patch brings negative changes these days. Not sure how much longer I'll put up with the BS this game's slowly evolving into, heh. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
582
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 18:07:00 -
[537] - Quote
Tinytacohead wrote:Thanks CCP for totally ruining the Hulk for us little guys. May as well sell both of mine, as they're now parked indefinitely. (with their t2 cargo rigs) It seems every big patch brings negative changes these days. Not sure how much longer I'll put up with the BS this game's slowly evolving into, heh.
How's the Mack working out for you? As it'll have a higher yield than a cargo fit hulk. FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities. |
Vanessa Vansen
Cybermana
47
|
Posted - 2012.08.25 21:03:00 -
[538] - Quote
Che Biko wrote:I'm OK with the new the designs, but the way they were implemented on the old models is just plain fugly. I know, this is mostly a rp thing again, but if you had designed these ships from scratch, you would not have done it like this, and you (hopefully) know it. I mean, here is the Hulk: a ship designed for superiour mining yield. It lacks good defenses or a large cargo bay, but despite that and being the biggest ship of the three, is has the lowest yield per turret of the 3 ships. Now how does that make sense? The biggest ship has no room for the amazing 1-turret-mines-as-3 tech despite not having defenses or large ore bay? It would have made more sense if you applied the Hulk stats to the Skiff model and vice versa (while keeping the Skiff 1-turret-as-3 bonus on the skiff of course), it would still be cheap and ugly, but at least it would make more sense. And why so cheap anyway, you design combat ships quite regularly, why do the miners get this cheap solution? Aren't they worthy of new models?
I mentioned that, too, but it was not heard by CCP |
Loose End
The Big Bambu
32
|
Posted - 2012.08.29 19:04:00 -
[539] - Quote
Been a miner since 07 and this is a wonderful change for the better and overdue. I think the gap between the Mack and the Hulk should have been wider for mining but since you tweaked the Hulk up for Ice then it's okay by me. Just a role reversal. By Jove's hairy nuggets you fish hugging technodorks did something right by my thoughts.
To you nice guys out there whinging about the changes? Adapt. This is EVE and not WoW. While Blizzard cuddles and nurses you until you want to vomit and waffles back and forth about decisions while charging you for expansions(at least they did in 06), CCP has been changing the field. I think the learning skills could have stayed. I think the racial bonus's should have stayed too. But we all adapted or we climbed out of our spaceships and put our diapers back on and went to suck a Blizzard nip.
To the guys who used to jump in a Catalyst and go gank someone?....now you have to train a little. And that was the point. No longer can you just jump in a account and train for a month to go kill a ship that it took months to qualify for and longer to really fly well. Exhumers are still killable....just not by three day old accounts.
Adapt or just go away....really far away....where I don't have to hear the whingeing.
Decoys. Great idea. I proposed one a while back. Proposed another one for POS's too. Still a good idea building ships out of wood and patching them with aluminium foil to make them look good on Radar.
Have an idea for a ship too...so does every other pilot out there. Wrong forum though.
Back to CCP...nice job. Now get rid of the inventory and put the real one back...April Fool is long over. |
Spice Flow
Spice Industrys
0
|
Posted - 2012.08.30 04:52:00 -
[540] - Quote
Loose End wrote:Been a miner since 07 and this is a wonderful change for the better and overdue. I think the gap between the Mack and the Hulk should have been wider for mining but since you tweaked the Hulk up for Ice then it's okay by me. Just a role reversal. By Jove's hairy nuggets you fish hugging technodorks did something right by my thoughts.
To you nice guys out there whinging about the changes? Adapt. This is EVE and not WoW. While Blizzard cuddles and nurses you until you want to vomit and waffles back and forth about decisions while charging you for expansions(at least they did in 06), CCP has been changing the field. I think the learning skills could have stayed. I think the racial bonus's should have stayed too. But we all adapted or we climbed out of our spaceships and put our diapers back on and went to suck a Blizzard nip.
To the guys who used to jump in a Catalyst and go gank someone?....now you have to train a little. And that was the point. No longer can you just jump in a account and train for a month to go kill a ship that it took months to qualify for and longer to really fly well. Exhumers are still killable....just not by three day old accounts.
Adapt or just go away....really far away....where I don't have to hear the whingeing.
Decoys. Great idea. I proposed one a while back. Proposed another one for POS's too. Still a good idea building ships out of wood and patching them with aluminium foil to make them look good on Radar.
Have an idea for a ship too...so does every other pilot out there. Wrong forum though.
Back to CCP...nice job. Now get rid of the inventory and put the real one back...April Fool is long over. Oh come on... you just get done insulting people about their opinion(s) on the changes calling them whiners and more, then to still have ideas to change the way it is now, then to ridicule past changes, and what makes you think CCP is going to listen to you for future changes , then you finish off with your own whining... unbelievable... maybe you should take your own advice and GÇ£Adapt or just go away....really far away....where I don't have to hear the whining.GÇ¥ Again, Unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 .. 19 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |