Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rivur'Tam
the united Negative Ten.
91
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 10:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
instead of nerfing gate guns and other tard ideas i have one
make all ships have selectable bonus ie ,
abaddon 5% damage 5% rof 5% cap usage dronebay and bandwidth +
5% resists % armor hitpoints % rep amount
etc etc gives us the option to chose the ships bonus make it so when the ship is packaged you can choose the bonus we want and to change them you have to repackage it or something like that
is that not a good idea
what about atts respec for plex ?
also i think ccp should advertise on tv using hot womem/men with alcohol then show some pew pew this will get more money for them and more people for us to shoot
c/d?
10 geeks points for each comment about grammer.
Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire
^^ my sig was awesome that naugty spitfire stole it for himself true story
United Recruitment Director. |
Shameless Avenger
Can Preachers of Kador
398
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 10:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
We already have that... it's called the fitting screen. "This is the Ninja. He will scan you down; he will salvage your wrecks and there shall be no aggro" |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
176
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 10:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
grammar is apparently for nerds. left disappointed. |
Rivur'Tam
the united Negative Ten.
95
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 11:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Shameless Avenger wrote:We already have that... it's called the fitting screen.
could you show me how to do that on the fitting screen i feel so stuiped now
Thor Kerrigan wrote:grammar is apparently for nerds. left disappointed.
eve online fourms is the only place i have ever seen anyone complain about it however if you seen some of my firends post on facebook you would have ageart attack or at least go bald Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire
^^ my sig was awesome that naugty spitfire stole it for himself true story
United Recruitment Director. |
Lexmana
642
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 12:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yeah, that would be great. Why not have the ability to choose class of the sip too? Then we only need one ship in all of EVE. |
Elvis Fett
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 13:00:00 -
[6] - Quote
You seemed so surprised and excited that you 'actually have a decent idea', which leads me to believe these ideas don't come to you all that often. That's why I feel even worse when I tell you that your idea is not all that decent, its pretty bad. |
Jonah Gravenstein
705
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 14:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rivur'Tam wrote:instead of nerfing gate guns and other tard ideas i have one
make all ships have selectable bonus ie ,
abaddon 5% damage 5% rof 5% cap usage dronebay and bandwidth +
5% resists % armor hitpoints % rep amount
etc etc gives us the option to chose the ships bonus make it so when the ship is packaged you can choose the bonus we want and to change them you have to repackage it or something like that
It's called a strategic cruiser.
War hasn't been fought this badly since Olaf the Hairy, High Chief of all the Vikings, accidentally ordered 80,000 battle helmets with the horns on the inside. |
Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2235
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 14:15:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ships have roles.
You pretty obviously want to pick a ship and make it do what you want. EVE does not work that way. You pick a role, find the ship that fits it best, and fit it with said role in mind. Some ships can fill a few roles depending on fit (like the Hurricane or Drake), and some can fill exactly none well (like the Hyperion). TEST Alliance BEST Alliance |
Braxus Deninard
AMLS Corporation COF Alliance
14
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 15:12:00 -
[9] - Quote
Thread title is incredibly misleading and flat out wrong 0/10 |
Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
784
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 15:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Your idea is bad, your spelling is bad, your grammar is bad, you posted in the wrong forum and you should feel bad about yourself. I understand why CCP don't read the forums often, if they have to wade through this manure. |
|
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
135
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 15:30:00 -
[11] - Quote
The fact that he coupled it with a "plex for respec" post makes it all the more adorable. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
1688
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 15:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
Quote: Rivur'Tam the united Negative Ten.
LOL
No wonder you are so upset. You've just had your corp, nay, your entire alliance nerfed out of the game.
Adapt, HTFU, tears, ETC.
Mr Epeen There is no excuse beyond fatalistic self-indulgence and sheer laziness for doing nothing --á Iain Banks |
Gulboy
Severasse Mining Severasse Militarized Mining Union
2
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 15:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
If that idea is implemented, I wonder what bonuses can a strategic cruiser acquire... |
Bernie Nator
4U Services Inc. Talocan United
387
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 16:37:00 -
[14] - Quote
The problem with this idea is that all the current ships have set roles. To properly implement this brilliant idea, we're gonna need a new race. Yep, only logical conclusion. |
Tarsus Zateki
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
868
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 16:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Quote: eve online fourms is the only place i have ever seen anyone complain about it however if you seen some of my firends post on facebook you would have ageart attack or at least go bald
I automatically assume anything posted on those sites is worthless semi-literate drivel anyway and not worth getting upset about. Monkeys will be drawn to monkeys.
These forums on the other hand are one of the highest quality MMO forums out there and have people in them having actual quality conversations. Your mindless monkey spew is offensive to that. You asked me once, what was in Room 101. I told you that you knew the answer already. Everyone knows it. The thing that is in Room 101 is the worst thing in the world. |
Maddie Gunslinger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 17:08:00 -
[16] - Quote
I notice people are not liking this idea much, and as it stands, it isn't looking very good to me either. As I see it this idea would only add to the ships with already solid roles or multiple roles, improving their performance in exactly those roles.
Ex. 5% of low damage output < 5% excellent tank. 5% of low tank < 5% of excellent damage output.
When any and all scaling is accounted for, find the best ship for the role, find the best attribute of the ship for the given role, enhance it by 5% pretty much.
With that said however, a 5 % increase is hardly noteworthy(unless you mean per level, in which case it is a game changer) for anything substantial and it could be a further customization option, it could actually be fine but I see little use in it. So while it does not solve the problem you mention, it does add another level of customization albeit a limited one, and I'm not really against it.
I was going to post a counter proposal in this thread, but then it evolved into a longer post with other areas of interest as well and I do want to allow people to troll me for what I'm worth as there has been little chance of that up to this point.
PLEX for attribute respec is a sound idea, and I fully support it. Hot women/men drinking alcohol and blowing stuff up, I fully support that as well.
Also my eyes hurt. What? No... |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1763
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 17:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
Maddie Gunslinger wrote: I notice people are not liking this idea much, and as it stands, it isn't looking very good to me either. As I see it this idea would only add to the ships with already solid roles or multiple roles, improving their performance in exactly those roles.
Ex. 5% of low damage output < 5% excellent tank. 5% of low tank < 5% of excellent damage output.
When any and all scaling is accounted for, find the best ship for the role, find the best attribute of the ship for the given role, enhance it by 5% pretty much.
With that said however, a 5 % increase is hardly noteworthy(unless you mean per level, in which case it is a game changer) for anything substantial and it could be a further customization option, it could actually be fine but I see little use in it. So while it does not solve the problem you mention, it does add another level of customization albeit a limited one, and I'm not really against it.
I was going to post a counter proposal in this thread, but then it evolved into a longer post with other areas of interest as well and I do want to allow people to troll me for what I'm worth as there has been little chance of that up to this point.
PLEX for attribute respec is a sound idea, and I fully support it. Hot women/men drinking alcohol and blowing stuff up, I fully support that as well.
Also my eyes hurt.
You appear surprised to see me... it's like your plot failed!
|
Maddie Gunslinger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 17:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:You appear surprised to see me... it's like your plot failed!
Who are you and what is this plot you speak of, there are many and this far they are all very successful. What? No... |
Garreth Vlox
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
37
|
Posted - 2012.08.04 19:13:00 -
[19] - Quote
Rivur'Tam wrote:instead of nerfing gate guns and other tard ideas i have one
make all ships have selectable bonus ie ,
abaddon 5% damage 5% rof 5% cap usage dronebay and bandwidth +
5% resists % armor hitpoints % rep amount
etc etc gives us the option to chose the ships bonus make it so when the ship is packaged you can choose the bonus we want and to change them you have to repackage it or something like that
is that not a good idea
what about atts respec for plex ?
also i think ccp should advertise on tv using hot womem/men with alcohol then show some pew pew this will get more money for them and more people for us to shoot
c/d?
10 geeks points for each comment about grammer.
Yeah, or you could just using a different ******* ship that already has those abilities. |
Adalynne Rohks
Tax Evasion Anonymous
161
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 07:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
Am I too late for smartass comment about decent ideas??? I really missed the boat on this one.
That gives me a great idea...
What if...
y'know..
I...
damn.
It left me.
If I remember it later, I'm gonna have to post it to the forums ASAP |
|
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
71
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 08:23:00 -
[21] - Quote
Bernie Nator wrote:The problem with this idea is that all the current ships have set roles. To properly implement this brilliant idea, we're gonna need a new race. Yep, only logical conclusion.
The Minmatar already exist, silly one. |
Shalua Rui
FEROX AQUILA
199
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 08:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
Adalynne Rohks wrote:Is that not a good idea?
I certainly didn't see that one coming... "I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
2061
|
Posted - 2012.08.05 17:01:00 -
[23] - Quote
Off topic posts removed.
Moved from General Discussion. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
Adalynne Rohks
Tax Evasion Anonymous
162
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 03:00:00 -
[24] - Quote
I guess my "I want Pandas!" post may have been a little over the top...
So I'll just say that allowing ships to modify their inherent values to do any job you want with them, for only the price of a repackage is one of the worst ideas I've heard here in my short month or so.
Women/Men with booze and pew pew? Fully endorsed, of course. |
mxzf
Blackened Skies
2024
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 05:33:00 -
[25] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Off topic posts removed.
I think you missed the OP when you were clearing out off-topic posts
This entire thread appears to be a troll (it's certainly not a decent idea, none of the things in it are and most of them are often repeated and shot down every time). |
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks The Omega Industries
216
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 11:22:00 -
[26] - Quote
From experience I can now say that gambling on the fact that any post starting with things like "Great idea", "World's best idea", "Fantastic idea", "I've had an awesome idea" etc.will be terrible will result in a net gain in profits.
Unless you have a completely pointless idea you should really at least try to create the title to be relevant. I completely understand that in this case it's a rubbish idea so you didn't want to make the title relevant otherwise no one would have bothered to read it but food for thought for the future.
|
mxzf
Blackened Skies
2027
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 12:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
Tchulen wrote:From experience I can now say that gambling on the fact that any post starting with things like "Great idea", "World's best idea", "Fantastic idea", "I've had an awesome idea" etc.will be terrible will result in a net gain in profits.
Unless you have a completely pointless idea you should really at least try to create the title to be relevant. I completely understand that in this case it's a rubbish idea so you didn't want to make the title relevant otherwise no one would have bothered to read it but food for thought for the future.
I actually have a theorem about that, how much the post's title declares that it contains a great idea is inversely proportional to how good the idea actually is. I have yet to be proven wrong.
(I think the reason being that the people who can't think of good ideas also can't think of good titles and feel the need to compensate by declaring the idea is good to try to convince you) |
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks The Omega Industries
217
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 13:50:00 -
[28] - Quote
mxzf wrote: I actually have a theorem about that, how much the post's title declares that it contains a great idea is inversely proportional to how good the idea actually is. I have yet to be proven wrong.
I like it and I agree. I can't remember reading a post that breaks that theorem. |
Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Mordus Angels
478
|
Posted - 2012.08.06 14:02:00 -
[29] - Quote
Tchulen wrote:mxzf wrote: I actually have a theorem about that, how much the post's title declares that it contains a great idea is inversely proportional to how good the idea actually is. I have yet to be proven wrong.
I like it and I agree. I can't remember reading a post that breaks that theorem. Then we need to look for a thread named something like: Awful Idea that makes people disgusted
In it will be something amazing, at least it will either be accurate or better than expected.
As for this idea, not really well thought out.
Even if you ignore the obvious impact of custom module loadouts, rigs themselves become a part of the hull, and basically do what you described already.
Better luck next time! Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |