Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Skurven
Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:44:00 -
[121]
GM Lalouche: This had nothing to do with my alt in IT
|
Kais Fiddler
Caldari Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:45:00 -
[122]
Edited by: Kais Fiddler on 02/11/2010 19:47:16
Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Thread cleaned of spam.
Please explain why this instance is different from dropping a station before downtime or any other TCU being placed this downtime.
|
Wiawyr Hunta
Caldari Autistic Sharks Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:46:00 -
[123]
Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Thread cleaned of spam.
The post has been reported.
Return to forum
Repercussions man, repercussions
|
Marivauder
Amarr Did I just do that Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:46:00 -
[124]
we didnt want that sov anyways
|
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Amarr Dissonance Corp Circle-Of-Two
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:46:00 -
[125]
Edited by: Nicolo da''Vicenza on 02/11/2010 19:47:58 hey guys imma bit late and haven't read this thread, has IT been thoroughly owned and raged by whatever it was test did?
|
Sirhan Blixt
Gallente GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:51:00 -
[126]
Here's a newesflash for GM Lelouch:
Maybe a decision is "unpopular" because it is wrong?
Still waiting for all the other TCUs planted before downtime to also be nuked. -- This signature is witty. It makes you think that I am cool. |
Levarr Burton
Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:52:00 -
[127]
Originally by: Skurven GM Lalouche: This had nothing to do with my alt in IT
If IT wanted that sov so badly, they should have TCU'd it at some point in the previous months, or manned-up and shot our TCUs. Every space-holding alliance has used downtime to their advantage, and it has never been petitionable before.
So, CCP, will Sov timers and reinforce timers no longer count down during downtime? And will those other sov changes be reversed? Or, is this just a special case? If it is a special case, you must explain why.
Also, how can IT get 14 TCUs nuked in about 7 minutes, but I have to wait weeks for a reply on why my client ****s itself every 10 minutes? In ur engineering, fixin' ur warp core. |
Kaatje Thaxathinadin
Minmatar ElitistOps Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:52:00 -
[128]
How dare CCP pick on a small alliance attempting to make its way in the world. I am aghast.
You get'm, lil' TESTies!
|
Barwinius
Caldari Ars ex Discordia Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:53:00 -
[129]
never change, ccp |
Too Ducky
Caldari Did I just do that Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:55:00 -
[130]
Originally by: Levarr Burton
Originally by: Skurven GM Lalouche: This had nothing to do with my alt in IT
If IT wanted that sov so badly, they should have TCU'd it at some point in the previous months, or manned-up and shot our TCUs. Every space-holding alliance has used downtime to their advantage, and it has never been petitionable before.
So, CCP, will Sov timers and reinforce timers no longer count down during downtime? And will those other sov changes be reversed? Or, is this just a special case? If it is a special case, you must explain why.
Also, how can IT get 14 TCUs nuked in about 7 minutes, but I have to wait weeks for a reply on why my client ****s itself every 10 minutes?
|
|
Crias Taylor
Gallente GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:55:00 -
[131]
Originally by: CCP Zymurgist Thread cleaned of spam.
I saw that you deleted my comedy post to this instead of editing it and telling me how much I hurt your feelings. Please accept by deepest apologies, I just want to be friends and see fair treatment to other 0.0 alliances.
|
Sverige Pahis
Caldari Random Selection. Tactical Narcotics Team
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 19:59:00 -
[132]
Originally by: Marivauder Goat MacCallum: Hi there! I'd like to congratulate you on a job well done with those TEST TCUs. GM Lalouche: Hello. GM Lalouche: Thank you, it wasn't a popular decision but it wasn't fair for them to put them up in the first place. Goat MacCallum: Yeah, it definitely wasn't fair, we had no way to prevent their onlining, thanks! Goat MacCallum: Nobody's gonna find out about your alt in IT, right? (this toon is an alt, I'm in Destructive Influence) That could end badly if TEST finds out. GM Lalouche: This had nothing to do with my alt in IT, what TEST did was unfair for other players.
Please tell me this is fake. Damn it I WaNt it to be fake.
Please.
|
Kikki Di'je
Minmatar Lay Low
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:01:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Levarr Burton
Originally by: Skurven GM Lalouche: This had nothing to do with my alt in IT
If IT wanted that sov so badly, they should have TCU'd it at some point in the previous months, or manned-up and shot our TCUs. Every space-holding alliance has used downtime to their advantage, and it has never been petitionable before.
So, CCP, will Sov timers and reinforce timers no longer count down during downtime? And will those other sov changes be reversed? Or, is this just a special case? If it is a special case, you must explain why.
Also, how can IT get 14 TCUs nuked in about 7 minutes, but I have to wait weeks for a any type of reply.
quoting for truth and demanding an answer
|
Crias Taylor
Gallente GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:01:00 -
[134]
It's fake.
|
jagidrok
Minmatar Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:02:00 -
[135]
I believe!
|
Levarr Burton
Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:04:00 -
[136]
Also, posting in a CCPdot thread. In ur engineering, fixin' ur warp core. |
Too Ducky
Caldari Did I just do that Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:05:00 -
[137]
LOL, I can't post in the "YOU CAN'T STOP US CCP BY LOCKING THREADS"
|
TNT009
Gallente Rim Collection Productions Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:05:00 -
[138]
So any official response from CCP about this "issue"? As a paying customer, I DEMAND a response damnit!
|
Phain Death
Minmatar GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:09:00 -
[139]
There is no "issue". No threats have been made. No bans have been issued. Go about your business, and please stand aside - and off the rug - for the sweepers.
|
Levarr Burton
Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:13:00 -
[140]
GM Lelouche: I will not sacrifice Delve. We've made too many compromises already; too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They troll entire regions and we fall back. Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far, no further! And *I* will make them pay for what they've done.
>.< In ur engineering, fixin' ur warp core. |
|
BoodaBooda
Minmatar Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:25:00 -
[141]
A GM acting in the best interests of his own in-game character, going against established rules and precedents? What does this mean for the future of your game?
CCP just ****ed off some of the largest out-of-game communities with EVE representation, especially the gaming community on reddit.com. News of this is already getting plastered all over the internet. If there's an eve-related blog/podcast/message board that DOESN'T talk about this, I'll eat my god-damned hat.
Dreddit's founders are PERSONALLY responsible for about 1000 new eve-online accounts in the last 8 months. How many people will read about our corp on Reddit and decide NOT to join up simply because at any time a CCP GAME MASTER can destroy their assets in order to benefit said unnamed GM's own character? Not to mention the ongoing efforts of the Goons to recruit new members, and not to belittle the out-of-game recruitment pools/communities of other corps in TEST alliance.
Maybe you should act in your COMPANY's best interests instead of your own and resolve this in a FAIR way before millions of current and potential customers hear about yet another example of your game masters CLEARLY abusing their power. |
Iniquita
Caldari Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:25:00 -
[142]
Thank you for the information about those additional five systems. No petitions had been raised regarding the TCUs onlined in those systems so we were unaware of those. I've taken a look at these five systems now and some of the TCUs started their onlining procedure well before the extended downtime hit; what they all had in common with your TCUs was that they finished onlining after the downtime had hit.
The TCUs in NH-1X6, G-73MR and 5KG-PY started their onlining procedure close enough to the start of the extended downtime that a significant advantage was gotten and they have therefore now been removed in the same way as yours were removed. The remaining two TCUs started onlining early enough that most of the onlining process was done by the time the server went down and they will therefore not be intervened with.
I have placed the replacement TCUs in your hangar at OWXTez Was Here as you requested. Which wallet division do you want to have the 1,176B ISK refund for the sovereignty bills placed in?
Finally, it is not intended for players to be able to online their sovereignty structures in perfect safety by starting the process right before an extended downtime, be it a TCU in order to claim sovereignty or SBUs in order to dispute such a claim.
This is to my knowledge the first time TCUs onlined in this way have been brought to our attention following an extended downtime and a discussion within the department naturally ensued, the results of which you know. If we receive notice of TCUs or SBUs which have been onlined in a similar manner in the future with most or almost all of the onlining period being completed while the server is down, then we will handle such cases in the same manner as this one was handled.
I'd like to make one final clarification though in regards to regular downtimes. We would not consider a TCU or an SBU which starts onlining right before a downtime of regular length (roughly 20 minutes now on average) to be in violation of our rules as while a portion of the onlining time is taken up by the downtime, it is not enough to give a significant advantage in the same vein as having most of the 8 hour TCU onlining time taken up by an extended downtime.
Best regards, Senior GM Lelouch EVE Online Customer Support
|
Gerard Gendri
Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:27:00 -
[143]
So all those stations onlined during downtime are illegal.
|
Dr Caligo
Minmatar Did I just do that Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:30:00 -
[144]
no only those that affect IT. cuz CCP have their alts there
|
zero9300
Caldari Autistic Sharks Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:30:00 -
[145]
If I say his name three times...will he appear out of nowhere? **********juice, **********juice, **********juice...
|
Crias Taylor
Gallente GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:31:00 -
[146]
Originally by: Levarr Burton GM Lelouche: I will not sacrifice Delve. We've made too many compromises already; too many retreats. They invade our space and we fall back. They troll entire regions and we fall back. Not again. The line must be drawn here! This far, no further! And *I* will make them pay for what they've done.
>.<
You broke your Internet spaceships.
|
Levarr Burton
Gallente Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:31:00 -
[147]
Originally by: Gerard Gendri So all those stations onlined during downtime are illegal.
As well as all the POSes. In ur engineering, fixin' ur warp core. |
General Windypops
Gallente The Littlest Hobos Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:31:00 -
[148]
Magnificent tears, TAPI. If you REALLY want to try to be just like goonies why don't you now all threaten to leave en masse, then go absolutely nowhere at all like they did?
Exactly the same protocol as the last Goon threadnought, though even less amusing or witty. Make up some fabricated evidence against CCP, get found out, then try to trash the game and storm off in a huff.
How original.
Please resize your signature to no more than 120 x 400 pixels. - Adida Twitter:@genrlwindypops
|
Kais Fiddler
Caldari Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:32:00 -
[149]
Originally by: Iniquita Thank you for the information about those additional five systems. No petitions had been raised regarding the TCUs onlined in those systems so we were unaware of those. I've taken a look at these five systems now and some of the TCUs started their onlining procedure well before the extended downtime hit; what they all had in common with your TCUs was that they finished onlining after the downtime had hit.
The TCUs in NH-1X6, G-73MR and 5KG-PY started their onlining procedure close enough to the start of the extended downtime that a significant advantage was gotten and they have therefore now been removed in the same way as yours were removed. The remaining two TCUs started onlining early enough that most of the onlining process was done by the time the server went down and they will therefore not be intervened with.
I have placed the replacement TCUs in your hangar at OWXTez Was Here as you requested. Which wallet division do you want to have the 1,176B ISK refund for the sovereignty bills placed in?
Finally, it is not intended for players to be able to online their sovereignty structures in perfect safety by starting the process right before an extended downtime, be it a TCU in order to claim sovereignty or SBUs in order to dispute such a claim.
This is to my knowledge the first time TCUs onlined in this way have been brought to our attention following an extended downtime and a discussion within the department naturally ensued, the results of which you know. If we receive notice of TCUs or SBUs which have been onlined in a similar manner in the future with most or almost all of the onlining period being completed while the server is down, then we will handle such cases in the same manner as this one was handled.
I'd like to make one final clarification though in regards to regular downtimes. We would not consider a TCU or an SBU which starts onlining right before a downtime of regular length (roughly 20 minutes now on average) to be in violation of our rules as while a portion of the onlining time is taken up by the downtime, it is not enough to give a significant advantage in the same vein as having most of the 8 hour TCU onlining time taken up by an extended downtime.
Best regards, Senior GM Lelouch EVE Online Customer Support
So is this the new standard? Can we petition any POS, station or TCU that is placed shortly before DT which limits a corporation or alliance's response time to defend the system? What brought about the change? Was this planned by more than one GM?
|
Hedge Sapper
Caldari Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 20:32:00 -
[150]
Can we start petitioning all of those now?!?!?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |