Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Durnin Stormbrow
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 21:21:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Durnin Stormbrow on 15/12/2010 21:23:57 Argumentative and off topic, withdrawn.
|
Xel Set
|
Posted - 2010.12.15 23:09:00 -
[32]
This could be put under the category of "CSM engagement", last listed topic. I would like the CSM to ask itself this question on a regular basis:
What is the CSM doing to consistently improve its processes such that those voices which go must unheard or get most trampled upon are being ever more brought to the fore?
|
PC l0adletter
|
Posted - 2010.12.16 17:44:00 -
[33]
Looking forward to hearing what CCP plans to do about botting, aside from that pitiful GM-blog.
Here's what I'd consider to be a reasonable solution:
1) An unambiguous policy statement: bots are against the TOS, they disincent player engagement, we plan on taking them even more seriously, and there will be lots of bans coming.
2) Some intelligence gathering and forensic data analysis, targeting not only the bots but their customers and affiliated 'clean' accounts.
3) Publicized bans and asset forfeitures. If people aren't losing titans, moms, and 50 million SP toons from ill-gotten gains and *****ing about it, you're doing it wrong. Pick a D-day, provide for some sort of appeals process if you like.
4) Client-side work to prevent easy exploitation and ongoing server-side behavioral analysis. Punkbuster etc.
5) A commitment to improve game mechanics so that they are less bottable and/or more dangerous/engaging/fun, particularly concentrated on PI, mining, ratting, and missions, in roughly that order (PI placed first as a giveaway since you're already doing that for January). A preliminary timetable on deliverables (hint: 18 months sounds like never)
Although I honestly don't know how they could achieve all this along with space barbie given their current resource commitments. By the way, CCP: who do you think is going to be interested in playing your new games when your only current one has all these problems? If I were you, I'd shift resources to the only revenue-producing product I had. It's your dime, though. Maybe there's a large, untapped market for a scifi 3d chatroom with boring and repetitive minigames. Like second life, but uh, more primitive and constrained?
@Xel: What exactly does some post about social media consultants trying to manipulate reddit have to do with RMT/macros/botting?
|
Argus Kell
Gallente Global Economy Experts Stellar Economy Experts
|
Posted - 2010.12.17 13:36:00 -
[34]
While I can understand people's want to be better informed about CCP's method of controlling RMT you can understand why they aren't forthcoming with details of what they're doing. Imagine asking a bank's anti-fraud department questions on how they do and the similar blank-face response you'd get.
Personally I'd like to know if Incarna is truly on target or whether it is likely slip again. I know that it could and understand why, but i'd like to know so i don't get my hopes up. A list of implemented features in the incarna expansion so far would be great as well.
Argus
|
Di'Mise
|
Posted - 2010.12.17 16:10:00 -
[35]
I myself would like to see some thing done with mission ninjas. to and many other mission runners salvaging a wreck should make them a target the same as tiping a can. alot of you miners in here crying about bots. well your 1 month old alt that you use to ninja missions with gets old aswell. i should not get concorded for stoping a thief. that or make it so that the skills to scan and probe missions take as long as it doese to train to do missions. there is no risk to what they do at all. a lvl 4 mission bs is not going to risk getting concorded for shotting a ninja in a a t1 frig ****ing there salvage. they gave us a new salvager that almost never gets used due to the fact if there is more than 2 gates in a mission by the time i"m done with the mission there has been a ninja one gate behind me clearing it out. if they are going to ninja salavge make them as red as a can tiper and the problem is fixed.
|
Trebor Daehdoow
|
Posted - 2010.12.19 15:04:00 -
[36]
Thanks to everyone who contributed to the thread. When you see the summit minutes around New Year's Day, I think you'll find that many of these topics were touched upon.
Confessions of a Noob Starship Politician The most expensive free trip to Iceland you'll ever win!
|
|
CCP Adida
C C P C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.12.19 16:31:00 -
[37]
Unstickied by request
Adida Community Rep CCP Hf, EVE Online
|
|
Joss56
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.12.19 16:56:00 -
[38]
Fix hybrids/gallente ship line up ________________________________________________
"You do realise you live on a globe, right? And that there places outside the USA/UK?"
|
Alias 6322A
|
Posted - 2010.12.19 22:14:00 -
[39]
My Topic
This is just one topic in regards to graphic updates that could reduce lag for the game. I'd like to ask the CSM to bring up my topic as well as questions in general about graphic updates to older structures in the game. For example:
1)Since Incarana features the stations, will the exterior if stations see a face-lift as well? 2)The return or newer/better cyno graphic? 3)My topic I linked discusses the ancient 'poof launch' of missiles and how the FB fix could be incorporated.
All in all, I'd like it if CCP (or the CSM, or both!) could produce a list of graphic updates they and the players are interested in that don't affect the actual mechanics of the game. I believe this is important because half of a game is the way it looks, the other half being how it plays. EVE is a fantastic game to play but I think the game could use some love in certain graphical areas. Perhaps the CSM could create a quick poll of "What graphics bug you?" or some such to see if the player base can point out any sore-thumbs.
Thanks folks!
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |