Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jason Edwards
Internet Tough Guy Spreadsheets Online
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 00:39:00 -
[1]
AS PER CCP ADIDA's DEMANDS!
Who: EVERYONE WHO HAS RUN A MISSION!
What: A system that maybe once a week standings and LP decay toward 0 if there has been no recent transaction. It can be a slow process like 1% per week or so. The intent being to zero you out after about 2 years or whatever amount of time; as long as there hadnt been recent activity in said standings or lp. Moreover, could even be a curve so those with -10 to blood raiders will take a much longer time to reach 0.
Where: ANYWHERE THERE ARE STANDINGS OR LP.
Why: So right now I have 15 LP in Yrtria corp or whatever. I did a single mission for them years ago. This garbage lp is utterly useless to me. Clogging me up. I would gladly sacrifice the LP to get it off the list. No doubt this mechanic would clean up lots of entries in the database. Which makes it far more efficient. Moreover, I have A TON of entries in standings; most of which have nothing to do with me for the longest time. The net effects being: cleans up database and afterall the database is awful crashy as it is. This helps out improve database. The other net effects are all positive. Nobody is totally locked into being stuck in place from their current activities.
When: I think a weekly standings and LP modifier toward being 0'd out and getting the entry removed. ------------------------ To make a megathron from scratch, you must first invent the eve universe.
|
Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 01:22:00 -
[2]
Why, beside your love for bad suggestions?
The only effect is that people returning after a hiatus will have to restart from 0 standing.
Great way to get people to return.
|
Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 03:55:00 -
[3]
You can't get enough of grinding NPCs can you.
Not supported, horrible.
|
Jay Wareth
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 04:03:00 -
[4]
No.
|
Lt Whiran
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 04:28:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Lt Whiran on 21/12/2010 04:31:35 sounds good to me.
but erm should be if no recent activity has taken place between agent/corp within the last 30 days an automatic change of 0.25 will take place to the charactors standings between the agent/corp towards a neutral/0.0 standing
might have to increase standing gain/lose though, because it would take 3.3 years to lose 10 standing. or reach neutral standing towards a -10 corp/agent
but to be honest CCP could do quite a bit to reduce the database size, such as if someone has been inactive for 1+ years all their assets and their charactor be relocated to a high sec system that borders low/nullsec system. eve-mails be purged from inactive accounts. [items/ships not allowed in high-sec be placed in the nearest acceptable system]
trial accounts older than 1 year be purged from the system, previously subscribed accounts inactive 6+ years be purged from the system.
removal of skills like DED Connections from the system.
also would like to add, that it really does help if you describe why you do not support this idea instead of saying just "no".
|
Shin Dari
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 11:09:00 -
[6]
No, many of us don't like grinding.
If you want to get rid of that LP, we will be better of getting a way to donate LP to others/corp.
|
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 11:36:00 -
[7]
Time heals all wounds, eh?
I have killed thousands of Republic citizens, should they forgive and forget merely because I happen to find someone else to kill for while?
I have served the Imperial Militia for ages and accumulated a nice little stockpile of good-faith from their agents .. should they not honour their debts?
PS: 1% per week = -250k LP for me the first week, stopped running missions a long time ago.
Decaying anything -> GRIND!!! .. Hell NO!
|
MNagy
|
Posted - 2010.12.21 16:13:00 -
[8]
Not supported.
Logistics of trying to setup a wh and living in one / or going to 0.0 and living there for a while would be crazy.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |