Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Siiee
Recycled Heroes
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 08:19:00 -
[61]
Edited by: Siiee on 13/01/2011 08:42:28 Edited by: Siiee on 13/01/2011 08:27:22 Edited by: Siiee on 13/01/2011 08:27:04 Edited by: Siiee on 13/01/2011 08:25:36
Originally by: CCP Sisyphus
Originally by: ArmyOfMe
Originally by: CCP Sisyphus
If you really want to TEST something like this, take your ships out of FD to somewhere quiet with the people you are testing with the ensure there are no idiots around.
so your agreeing that the op is an idiot, but u still banned the other guy for using a pretty standard weapon on a cap ship, in the cap ship ffa?
5) No bombs in FFA's.
Smartbombs are not bombs.
The official (Marked as CCP Moderated) evelopedia version of the Sisi rules hotlinks the item database entry for real bomber bombs on that particular rule entry. Linked by hand by CCP Lemur 15 January 2009 http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Test_server_rules
Originally by: CCP Oneiromancer
NOTE: If you got podded on purpose (smartbomb poddings might be accidental) but did not lose any SP's, please contact a Bug Hunter to report the incident.
Originally by: CCP Oneiromancer
If the attacker podkilled someone on purpose, he/she will be banned. If it was an accident (e.g. trying to clean drones at beacons using smartbombs) he/she will be given a warning and then temporary banned for repeated offense, if such is the case.
23/04/2007 http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=510254 http://www.eve-search.com/thread/510254
This has always been the official interpretation of the rules for as long as I can possibly remember. If the official interpretation of the rules has changed recently then you need to be sure to announce it in the rules thread so that people can be aware of it, since it goes against years of precedent.
|
Lee Janssen
CONCARD
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 12:14:00 -
[62]
Edited by: Lee Janssen on 13/01/2011 12:14:30 Now we are getting somewhere. - Damn it, out of duct tape again. |
Jowen Datloran
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 12:58:00 -
[63]
Originally by: CCP Sisyphus
1) NO PODDING!
You should have left it at that.
-- Mr. Science & Trade Institute - EVE Lorebook - Mysteries of W-space |
Freyja Asynjur
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 13:12:00 -
[64]
Best. Thread. Ever. So much LOL and irony.
And I support Lee Janssen. Anyone having spent a few time in FD on sisi would understand why.
|
Lee Janssen
CONCARD
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 14:30:00 -
[65]
oh yea, forgot to paste this:
User MyNameHere is banned Last login: 2011.01.09 18:14 Number of visits: Overninethousand Reason: Smartbombing in FD-MLJ Until: 2011.01.20
Reason is win.
EVERYONE, CEASE SMARTBOMBING, IT'S ALL DANGEROUS AND WUT NOT!!!! - Damn it, out of duct tape again. |
CANHAZNAMECHANGE
|
Posted - 2011.01.13 14:38:00 -
[66]
Edited by: CANHAZNAMECHANGE on 13/01/2011 14:39:42 Edited by: CANHAZNAMECHANGE on 13/01/2011 14:38:34
Originally by: CCP Sisyphus
5) No bombs in FFA's.
Let me add to that Sisyphus,
SiSi Rules
Within said rules the word Bombs is linked to the following page- Bombs This being an official moderated page it would be conceivable that one would expect, seeing that smart bombs are not listed here, that smart bombs are not against any rules.
You should update that page and inform players of rule changes if this is not that case.
Edit: Added url Edit: Added the other url that i forgot.
|
Lee Janssen
CONCARD
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 10:56:00 -
[67]
Originally by: CANHAZNAMECHANGE Edited by: CANHAZNAMECHANGE on 13/01/2011 14:39:42 Edited by: CANHAZNAMECHANGE on 13/01/2011 14:38:34
Originally by: CCP Sisyphus
5) No bombs in FFA's.
Let me add to that Sisyphus,
SiSi Rules
Within said rules the word Bombs is linked to the following page- Bombs This being an official moderated page it would be conceivable that one would expect, seeing that smart bombs are not listed here, that smart bombs are not against any rules.
You should update that page and inform players of rule changes if this is not that case.
Edit: Added url Edit: Added the other url that i forgot.
Wait... CCPfail? - Damn it, out of duct tape again. |
Valarre
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 11:36:00 -
[68]
okay to be honest who cares if he podded you? Everything on this server costs 100 isk. I mean really, you spend less energy just putting together another ship rather than posting a huge mess on the forums. *sniff* but it's against the rules *sniff*
Whatev, grow up.
|
Seras Athran
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 12:27:00 -
[69]
Originally by: Lee Janssen Wait... CCPfail?
Who'da thunk it?
|
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 12:34:00 -
[70]
Hm.. hadn't been in FD for some time now.. does CCP force the rules there now more often? If so I'd say get over it already, let Chris have his questionable win (and his cowardly reputation from here on) and wait for the next mirror.
As for CCP Sisyphus.. you got played by Chris Bailey there. I can understand that you take less care for each case with the state rule-breaking is in on Sisi (or was), but so far it was ok that if someone got podded that the killer was let off the hook if it happened by accident. support Public Idea Tracker | 24hr PLEX |
|
Lee Janssen
CONCARD
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 12:38:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Tres Farmer Hm.. hadn't been in FD for some time now.. does CCP force the rules there now more often? If so I'd say get over it already, let Chris have his questionable win (and his cowardly reputation from here on) and wait for the next mirror.
As for CCP Sisyphus.. you got played by Chris Bailey there. I can understand that you take less care for each case with the state rule-breaking is in on Sisi (or was), but so far it was ok that if someone got podded that the killer was let off the hook if it happened by accident.
Not the point, i needed to be active AT THIS TIME for testing, after the mirror i dont feel like it, wont have the time, and effort. Cause yea, people acutally test what they will fly on TQ and several types of game mechanics included. I want to hear Chris say he's gonna fly his Ragnarok on TQ btw, i just have to!!! - Damn it, out of duct tape again. |
NightmareX
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 16:53:00 -
[72]
Edited by: NightmareX on 14/01/2011 16:57:27
Originally by: Valarre okay to be honest who cares if he podded you? Everything on this server costs 100 isk. I mean really, you spend less energy just putting together another ship rather than posting a huge mess on the forums. *sniff* but it's against the rules *sniff*
Whatev, grow up.
If something is against the rules, then it's against the rules. Simple as that.
But you sounds like a guy that actually likes to break the rules on Sisi. And therefor deserves a 1 year ban just by your post.
And if you please can tell me where i can find a Typhoon Navy Issue, Megathron Navy Issue, Tempest Fleet Issue and other faction stuffs to 100 isk on Sisi, then you are cool.
Peoples use faction / officer / deadspace stuffs on Sisi all the time, and you can't just replace that just because someone found it funny to kill a Megathron Navy Issue with a deadspace and officer setup in a Titan in BF1.
I hope this message goes to your head and stays there from now on. If you don't understand this, then you don't deserve to be on Sisi.
And secondly, you are posting with an alt. Wow, you really are scared to reveal who your main is lol. Maybe you are scared to let us find out who your main character is so we can't find out if you are podding others or are breaking other rules on Sisi.
If you actually would follow the rules on Sisi, you would never post that **** as you did.
|
Valarre
|
Posted - 2011.01.14 21:44:00 -
[73]
If it's a pirate battleship than that does kinda suck, however can't you get that back after the next mirror? As long as you have one on tq right? In the mean time find something else to fly. BTW this is my main, you wont find any pod kills or anything of that nature on my record so don't even try, nor have I broken any of the rules. As for a 1 year ban for me? LOL
|
Nika Dekaia
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 01:08:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Valarre okay to be honest who cares if he podded you? Everything on this server costs 100 isk. I mean really, you spend less energy just putting together another ship rather than posting a huge mess on the forums. *sniff* but it's against the rules *sniff* Whatev, grow up.
The only one needing to grow up is you. Just try to use that brain of yours for a second (if attendant). Try to imagine real hard what Sisi would become if the rules (which happen to be in place fo just that reason) would not be enforced on Sisi. ONLY poeple podding and griefing would still be there. No one would test or bughunt anything.
Originally by: Valarre If it's a pirate battleship than that does kinda suck, however can't you get that back after the next mirror? As long as you have one on tq right?.
Yes. He will most likely get it back. In 2-3 months. During which time he can not test whatever he wanted to test with that pirate ship and help improving the game. Don't give me that: "He only wanted to PvP, anyways." It's not upon you or anyone else to tell what he did or did not want to do. He has been interupted in improving the game. One way or another. He might have stumbled over a bug if someone hadn't poded him. Period.
Originally by: Valarre In the mean time find something else to fly.
Yeah. He could fly a ship that he knows is NOT bugged but can't fly and test a ship that to his knowledge *might* be bugged - just because some moron blew it up. That#s how to get people to test stuff.
Quote: As for a 1 year ban for me? LOL
Truth to be said, I don't really like the "like" and "dislike" buttons that will come with the new forums. But they *might* at least get rid of some of those real amateur trolls like you.
Anyway. if podding and blowing up other players is no biggie for you and you like to promote it - just go ahead and do it. Enjoy your ban like anyone else doing so does.
|
Valarre
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 01:28:00 -
[75]
I never stated that I promote podding other players. I in fact don't pod other players, nor have I pvp'd on sisi.
|
Kalle Demos
Amarr Hysteria Nexus
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 02:46:00 -
[76]
CCP need to remove PvP from sisi UNLESS the people are in a fleet.
Majority of the kids that go on sisi go on to PvP and dont actually test anything, "testing a fit" is a bad excuse, imo unless CCP have changed something to affect combat (like they did with supercaps) or unless your group is training for something PvP related (alliance tourny) there literally is no need to PvP on sisi since well IT WONT BE ANYTHING LIKE TRANQ EVER!!
Amazing how many people chest beat and gloat about something they killed on sisi, it truly is sad.
Sisi is for testing stuff NOT PvPing because you dont have the balls to undock on Tranq
Originally by: Kool StoryBro <---
Originally by: CCP Spitfire Spam post removed.
Random forum moments <0> |
Alysseas Mac'larn
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 09:14:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Kalle Demos CCP need to remove PvP from sisi UNLESS the people are in a fleet.
Majority of the kids that go on sisi go on to PvP and dont actually test anything, "testing a fit" is a bad excuse, imo unless CCP have changed something to affect combat (like they did with supercaps) or unless your group is training for something PvP related (alliance tourny) there literally is no need to PvP on sisi since well IT WONT BE ANYTHING LIKE TRANQ EVER!!
Amazing how many people chest beat and gloat about something they killed on sisi, it truly is sad.
Sisi is for testing stuff NOT PvPing because you dont have the balls to undock on Tranq
I agree somewhat, But yea, let's not get off track here. kthx
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |