Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jedyna
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 08:45:00 -
[1]
The idea is simple, an option for the CEO to make certain members of the corporation tax exempt.
I realize that this creates the possibility of abuse in the respect that some CEOs will create their "core" group of members who won't pay taxes and all the new people / low level people can pay taxes instead.
However, there are many corporations where some people provide a high level of valuable input to the corp via for example fuel, and then get taxed as well, while others don't do anything and get taxed the same amount.
Therefore, an option to create either tax tiers, aka levels of tax that could be attributed to members based on a rank or role system; or the option to completely excuse someone of the corp tax seems like a good idea.
What do you think?
|
Lojak 2501
Three Sails
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 08:47:00 -
[2]
an intrestin idea did u get it from the U.S. government?
|
Ancyker
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 08:50:00 -
[3]
I like this idea.
|
Jedyna
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 08:50:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Jedyna on 04/02/2011 08:57:46 Edited by: Jedyna on 04/02/2011 08:57:15 I got it from the want to start taxing corp members who don't do jack ****, while allowing those who do help the corp in their own way to remain tax free as is the current state in the corp.
For the record, your comment isn't very constructive. The U.S. government isn't the only ******ed one on the planet when it comes to taxes, pretty sure all governments are - in any case this is not a political debate channel so take it somewhere else.
And btw, I thought that the American government was the exact opposite? It taxes those who work hard more and more the more they work, and gives free stuff to those who don't do anything.
|
Lojak 2501
Three Sails
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 08:57:00 -
[5]
wasnt meant to start up a political argument rather a poorly worded question about how the idea came around. and i really wasnt aware that ppl actually run a corp on the tax alone all corps ive been is were just a gathering of like minded ppl. if a corp wanted income then they would drop a POS but it was just a group of ppl who were in and of themselves self suffiecient
|
Jedyna
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 09:00:00 -
[6]
Well ok, drop a pos.
So now you have to fuel the pos. You have a few people spending time and money to fuel the pos, and then some who just use the pos and dont contribute anything to the corp at all. These people should be taxed, while those helping out should be exempt. Don't you think?
|
Lojak 2501
Three Sails
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 09:03:00 -
[7]
true but after the POS is dropped and begins runnin in the black start payin back the ppl that provided the initial start up costs. granted thats how it should run and rarely is but u do have a point about who should and shouldnt be taxed.
|
Nikita Haley
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 09:19:00 -
[8]
If you only want some people taxed, charge them a membership fee. There's no reason to complicate the tax system because some people in a corp believe that they should be exempt from the corp's taxes because they donated something to the corp. If the CEO also thinks they should be exempt, then either have them remove the tax entirely or suggest that those who provided additional resources (ISK, fuel, ships, ammo, whatever) be reimbursed or otherwise rewarded at a later date. |
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
|
Posted - 2011.02.04 10:16:00 -
[9]
You could have the Corp pay its members for the fuel... That way those doing more work are being paid for it.
But I cant see a problem by allowing some members to be tax free (from an overall game perspective).
However this may breed resentment and inner corp issues that the CEO and leadership will have to manage themselves. ------------------------ Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum "I've got a couple of Strippers on my ship... and they just love to dance!" ------------------------ |
Jedyna
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 03:18:00 -
[10]
If the CEO doesn't want to deal with it, then they can opt to not use the feature, but I don't see why it shouldn't be made available. You can restrict who can access which tab of the corp hangar, why not who gets taxed?
|
|
Arraki Naumova
Caldari
|
Posted - 2011.02.06 03:51:00 -
[11]
I like this idea because its a more hands-free, automatic system.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |