Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Suitonia
Gallente Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 11:02:00 -
[31]
I think the banning rule could be interesting if it's done to prevent specific ship types and done in advance, for example, I could ban 'rooks' from a match, and my opponent could decide to ban 'sliepnirs' and neither of us would be able to use those ships. That would make it fairly interesting and people who rely heavily on one setup will have to switch up, also, a lot of strategy and metagaming goes into banning thoughts such as banning a ship that counters your setup, or even banning a counter to a counter which you counter (if that makes sense) to bait the opponent into thinking you're bringing a different kind of setup or a specific setup like an EWAR strategy. It would also mean that scrubs would have to adapt instead of bringing one strategy.
Its terrible when it's done against a specific player and on grid for the reasons mentioned. ---
|
Trazis
UNKN0WN ENTITY
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 17:45:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Suitonia I think the banning rule could be interesting if it's done to prevent specific ship types and done in advance, for example, I could ban 'rooks' from a match, and my opponent could decide to ban 'sliepnirs' and neither of us would be able to use those ships. That would make it fairly interesting and people who rely heavily on one setup will have to switch up, also, a lot of strategy and metagaming goes into banning thoughts such as banning a ship that counters your setup, or even banning a counter to a counter which you counter (if that makes sense) to bait the opponent into thinking you're bringing a different kind of setup or a specific setup like an EWAR strategy. It would also mean that scrubs would have to adapt instead of bringing one strategy.
Its terrible when it's done against a specific player and on grid for the reasons mentioned.
I was thinking something along these lines as well, completely agree with you on both points.
|
Thingymawotzit
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams The KWFL Republic
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 22:15:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Suitonia I think the banning rule could be interesting if it's done to prevent specific ship types and done in advance, for example, I could ban 'rooks' from a match, and my opponent could decide to ban 'sliepnirs' and neither of us would be able to use those ships. That would make it fairly interesting and people who rely heavily on one setup will have to switch up, also, a lot of strategy and metagaming goes into banning thoughts such as banning a ship that counters your setup, or even banning a counter to a counter which you counter (if that makes sense) to bait the opponent into thinking you're bringing a different kind of setup or a specific setup like an EWAR strategy. It would also mean that scrubs would have to adapt instead of bringing one strategy.
Its terrible when it's done against a specific player and on grid for the reasons mentioned.
Even if your not trolling, were all just gonna call it a troll anyway cause lets face it - I cant even remember the last time HYDRA made a serious post.
+1 for getting rid of this terrible rule. - - -
| KWFL Killboard | |
SmashTech
|
Posted - 2011.04.13 14:55:00 -
[34]
Wouldn't it be cool if you could ban one member of the opposing sports team as soon as they stepped onto the field?
No wait, it would be idiotic.
Terribad rule. Terribad.
|
Terianna Eri
Senex Legio Get Off My Lawn
|
Posted - 2011.04.13 17:52:00 -
[35]
Originally by: SmashTech Wouldn't it be cool if you could ban one member of the opposing sports team as soon as they stepped onto the field?
No wait, it would be idiotic.
Terribad rule. Terribad.
:slowpoke: ________________
Originally by: CCP Incognito PS the "time to P*nis" is the shortest time recorded in human history. :)
|
smljdcgirggsgmxghrm
|
Posted - 2011.04.14 14:28:00 -
[36]
Banning specific players would be pretty pointless cause accounts within a team will get shared anyways.
Just watch the last tourney, there are players who appear with their main and like two of their alts in a match. And no they were not tripple-boxing for sure...
Also, I like the rule. Forces ppl to create new setups or redefine their old ones. EVE credo allways was adapt or die, it's the same in this case.
best of luck to all of u |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |