Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Naomi Wildfire
Amarr Spricer
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 14:16:00 -
[1]
is that CCP put their old forum back online, EVEGate is just a hughe junk ob spacebook crap noone really needs. There are a few good funktions, but they could be easily implemented on an other way. The new forum look is really "everything to big" resulting in less overview and way more scrolling. Where was the reason for big avatar portraits in Posts? I never heard anyone complaining about that.
I also like the navigation more and the way it was implemented to the main page.
So basically .. please leave the forums the way they are now.
|
Reonetii
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 14:20:00 -
[2]
And so we need ANOTHER thread....
IBTL
|
sableye
principle of motion
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 17:36:00 -
[3]
the giant portraits were my favourite feature, should have been user controlled though.
----------------------------------------- View The North Star! In All Its Glory!! |
Naomi Wildfire
Amarr Spricer
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 17:40:00 -
[4]
Originally by: sableye the giant portraits were my favourite feature, should have been user controlled though.
Yupp
i think with the "Big Pictures Everywhere" initiative eve ingame (eg. ISK Transaction) and (new) forums got a bit more messy.
It would be okay if you can disable it, or make it small. But you could have also done that on the old board the other way around.
|
Morgan Polaris
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 17:40:00 -
[5]
... and missing a search function and probably connected to EVE in a way that's so legacy that someone wants their time machine back.
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 17:41:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Akita T on 10/04/2011 17:41:23
Originally by: sableye the giant portraits were my favourite feature
You know, I'm ALMOST willing to bet that somebody could whip up a quick userscript to replace all portraits here with larger versions. I mean, it's only a matter of replacing text that looks like this http://image.eveonline.com/Character/974920541_64.jpg with http://image.eveonline.com/Character/974920541_128.jpg
I mean... those that complained that the new forums can be modified by userscripts if you wanted used that as one of the excuses why we don't need to go back to the old forum, no ? I guess it then should also apply to not needing to go back to the new ones...
_
CCP LEADERSHIP MENTALITY NEEDS TO CHANGE FAST ! "New junky features sell, old polished content doesn't" ? KILL IT WITH FIRE. |
Panda Claw
principle of motion
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 17:44:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Panda Claw on 10/04/2011 17:45:13
Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 10/04/2011 17:41:23
Originally by: sableye the giant portraits were my favourite feature
You know, I'm ALMOST willing to bet that somebody could whip up a quick userscript to replace all portraits here with larger versions. I mean, it's only a matter of replacing text that looks like this http://image.eveonline.com/Character/974920541_64.jpg with http://image.eveonline.com/Character/974920541_128.jpg
I mean... those that complained that the new forums can be modified by userscripts if you wanted used that as one of the excuses why we don't need to go back to the old forum, no ? I guess it then should also apply to not needing to go back to the new ones...
my opinion is that nothing should require outside program/scipts to make the forum pretty for me it should all be included so we can all make forumd suit our individual tastes (when logged in).
but I have no issues with these forums, it just requiries a few tweaks to make them just about pefect for me like removing the 2 minute timer rule its annoying as hell.
edit: this is sableye, just my work browser does not remmber my posting character on these forums.
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 18:21:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Akita T You know, I'm ALMOST willing to bet that somebody could whip up a quick userscript to replace all portraits here with larger versions.
àshould have taken that bet. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Qoi
Exert Force
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 19:21:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Akita T You know, I'm ALMOST willing to bet that somebody could whip up a quick userscript to replace all portraits here with larger versions.
àshould have taken that bet.
You just killed the main reason for me to want the old new forums back.
|
sableye
principle of motion
|
Posted - 2011.04.10 20:11:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Akita T You know, I'm ALMOST willing to bet that somebody could whip up a quick userscript to replace all portraits here with larger versions.
àshould have taken that bet.
works very nice, thankyou :)
----------------------------------------- View The North Star! In All Its Glory!! |
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 00:13:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Akita T on 11/04/2011 00:15:47
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: Akita T You know, I'm ALMOST willing to bet that somebody could whip up a quick userscript to replace all portraits here with larger versions.
àshould have taken that bet.
MWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA
P.S. For ultralolz, manually edit it from "128" to "256" _
CCP LEADERSHIP MENTALITY NEEDS TO CHANGE FAST ! "New junky features sell, old polished content doesn't" ? KILL IT WITH FIRE. |
Irani Firecam
Lords 0f Justice Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 00:33:00 -
[12]
Image server serves up 1024x1024 portraits too. --- Click here for my high resolution renders. |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 00:39:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Irani Firecam 1024
That's just mean _
CCP LEADERSHIP MENTALITY NEEDS TO CHANGE FAST ! "New junky features sell, old polished content doesn't" ? KILL IT WITH FIRE. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 01:01:00 -
[14]
For those who want, I've updated the script to make better use of XPath and to beà wellà more elegant, I suppose. The link is still the same. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Titus Phook
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 01:06:00 -
[15]
oo sweet, thanks Tippia works a treat, gotta love greasemonkey ---------------------------------------------
|
Raiykjab
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 01:06:00 -
[16]
So much QQ about those new forums lately.... And you know what is the funniest in the story? When you actually stepped out of all these threads pointing every possible flaws and started to read something INTERESTING, they were totally fine to use.
I mean some ppl even complained they couldn't quote the quote of the quote of the quote of the quote of the quote +++ anymore. Dude most ppl will just stop reading the thread when they see you do this.
Another fact is the harder it is for you to read a text, the higher are the chances you'll focus and care on what you are reading. If that means less pointless QQ and arguments I take it anytime.
Anyway, it's fun to see the god populated eve community realize they are playing a game made by mere humans trying to make a living of it.
|
Kengutsi Akira
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 01:08:00 -
[17]
I think the quote boxes were too huge lol ------------------------------------ "You know, my foot oughta vandilize your ass" |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 01:13:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Tippia on 11/04/2011 01:14:30
Originally by: Raiykjab Another fact is the harder it is for you to read a text, the higher are the chances you'll focus and care on what you are reading. If that means less pointless QQ and arguments I take it anytime.
That's not really a fact so much as it is pure BS.
The harder it is for you to read a text, the higher the chances that you will only focus on the fact that it's hard to read the text. That's why typography, legibility and readability (and grammar and spelling, although the brain is far more lenient on those) are things that actually matter: the less you notice the text, the more you can focus on the content and the message. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡à you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki |
Raiykjab
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 01:40:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Tippia Edited by: Tippia on 11/04/2011 01:14:30 That's not really a fact so much as it is pure BS.
The harder it is for you to read a text, the higher the chances that you will only focus on the fact that it's hard to read "bla bla bla"
Still, pointless arguments are still pointless and boring to read. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |