Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Silver Hair Carson
|
Posted - 2011.04.19 23:55:00 -
[1]
I don't have any need nor any interest for incarna (captain's quarters, walking in stations etc). Instead, I'm worried that the new features will meddle with client stability and fps which will be harsh on multi client players. I would like to be able to run my 5 clients like I do now, on the same computer, after Incarna comes. Please make the upcoming features optional as making them mandatory would be poor design.
Oh well, I guess it would be too good design to expect.
|
sableye
principle of motion
|
Posted - 2011.04.19 23:56:00 -
[2]
its gonna be mandatory. ----------------------------------------- View The North Star! In All Its Glory!!
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 00:05:00 -
[3]
Originally by: sableye its gonna be mandatory.
if by mandatory you mean... have to see a different station view in which you never have to take a step.
|
Silver Hair Carson
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 00:10:00 -
[4]
For me personally the only use I could see of multi-client Incarna is chatting with your other alts in a bar. Not worth buying a second computer to make them run with. A large portion of players are running several clients. Incarna needs to be made optional so you don't have to bother with intensive new graphics on more than one client.
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 00:15:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Silver Hair Carson For me personally the only use I could see of multi-client Incarna is chatting with your other alts in a bar. Not worth buying a second computer to make them run with. A large portion of players are running several clients. Incarna needs to be made optional so you don't have to bother with intensive new graphics on more than one client.
so then don't load station interior.
|
Silver Hair Carson
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 00:21:00 -
[6]
Originally by: MotherMoon
Originally by: Silver Hair Carson For me personally the only use I could see of multi-client Incarna is chatting with your other alts in a bar. Not worth buying a second computer to make them run with. A large portion of players are running several clients. Incarna needs to be made optional so you don't have to bother with intensive new graphics on more than one client.
so then don't load station interior.
This is the excact option I'm campaigning for tonight. With CCP's design quality, it would not surprise me at all to have high graphics intensive stuff forced on your clients for no entertaining value, making many players buy additional computers to keep their clients running. I hope my concern is unfounded.
|
Nypheas Azurai
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 04:01:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Silver Hair Carson Please make the upcoming features optional as making them mandatory would be poor design.
Eventually the drugged-up hopes of the sci-fi MMO fanboy is to have something like Incarna mark the beginnings of a future MMO that encompasses every facet of a sci-fi simulator.
It's not something that should be "optional", so although I might share sympathies with those needing to upgrade, CCP should not be willing to compromise the potential simply because some wish it to remain stagnant. Sure, maybe the upcoming fluff features will do well to remain optional... but only so much as spaceflight is optional: in that I expect those who opt out of Incarna to be opting out of a good chunk of gameplay and will not be able to do significant things (that is if Incarna isn't just fluff).
--------------------
|
Mirabi Tiane
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 04:52:00 -
[8]
It would hurt absolutely nothing and no one if the following options were added to the settings window: [ ] Always show hangar when docking. [ ] Always show quarters when docking. [ ] Prompt to choose between hangar and quarters. This would allow Incarna to reach its potential. Forcing people to use CQ every time they dock would bring performance issues, multi-client issues, immersion breakage, and general resentment along with a further loss of faith in CCP's ability to develop sensibly and without being blinded by their excitement. _____________________________ [Sebiestor tattoos and Intaki hair: NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER.] |
Copine Callmeknau
Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams The KWFL Republic
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 05:38:00 -
[9]
ITT: Whine, disturbing lack of cheese
Hope you are aware that the current hanger view is far more resource intensive than actually flying around in space is. Don't really see how having a room instead of a ship is gonna be any worse...
...oh wait
Stunning EVE Online Theme for PS3 |
Niccolado Starwalker
Gallente Shadow Templars
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 05:56:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Silver Hair Carson I don't have any need nor any interest for incarna (captain's quarters, walking in stations etc). Instead, I'm worried that the new features will meddle with client stability and fps which will be harsh on multi client players. I would like to be able to run my 5 clients like I do now, on the same computer, after Incarna comes. Please make the upcoming features optional as making them mandatory would be poor design.
Oh well, I guess it would be too good design to expect.
1. It IS optional. Always have been. 2. It wont interfere with current game as it will run on its own node/server/whatever. So no lag will ever come from it. 3. This been confirmed by the devs aproximaely ∞ times.
Originally by: Dianabolic Your tears are absolutely divine, like a fine fine wine, rolling down your cheeks until they flow down the river of LOL. |
|
Mirabi Tiane
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 07:17:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Mirabi Tiane on 20/04/2011 07:19:20
Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker 2. It wont interfere with current game as it will run on its own node/server/whatever. So no lag will ever come from it.
You're confusing server lag with clientside graphical lag.
Originally by: Niccolado Starwalker 1. It IS optional. Always have been. 3. This been confirmed by the devs aproximaely ∞ times.
CQ being optional has only been implied. Furthermore, that implication was made just once, with one word in a single devblog. _____________________________ [Sebiestor tattoos and Intaki hair: NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER SURRENDER.] |
Rakshasa Taisab
Caldari Sane Industries Inc. Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 07:19:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Mirabi Tiane CQ being optional has only been implied and that only once.
If you haven't paid any attention, then yes, that is true.
|
Gavjack Bunk
Gallente Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 10:04:00 -
[13]
CCP said is was voluntary while they were vulnerable to popular opinion, but have since stopped blatantly lying and told us it is mandatory.
All of this has happened before... and all of this will happen again.
People that seek your money will lie to get it and for some of them it would be a late resort but for the vast majority it is the first port of call.
|
|
CCP StevieSG
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 10:47:00 -
[14]
Moved to Features and Ideas from EVE General.
|
|
sableye
principle of motion
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 10:49:00 -
[15]
it wil be optional as its your choice to dock or not, you can always live in space like a hermit and pay peopel to dump stuff at safe spot for you. ----------------------------------------- View The North Star! In All Its Glory!!
|
ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 10:57:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Copine Callmeknau Don't really see how having a room instead of a ship is gonna be any worse...
When will you people finally get it?
Every time you dock you¦re going to be loading a new client alongside EVE-space client!
It¦s not about the gfx performance, it¦s simply the waste of uselessly loading a 2nd client for gameplay that the current one manages with a couple of fncking buttons.
When by this time next year they have iterated on this Captain¦s "cupboard under the stairs" and have optimized the loading times for some months it can be friggen mandatory. ______________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦ |
Nika Dekaia
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 11:15:00 -
[17]
Edited by: Nika Dekaia on 20/04/2011 11:15:19
Originally by: sableye it wil be optional as its your choice to dock or not, you can always live in space like a hermit and pay peopel to dump stuff at safe spot for you.
Best advice I heard in any Incarna whine ever.
Yes, it's gonna be mandatory. But they promised it won't slow you down grinding your missions. It's just a new 3D interface.
It will come, so you could just get over it. Just test it on Duality in a few hours and provide some feedback instead of useless whining.
|
Brema Gangrel
Caldari b.b.k Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 13:50:00 -
[18]
Well just after doing a quick walk around... redocking and opening up fitting window APPEAR to take just a few seconds more to load up on my machine than TQ does.
Memory useage, that is another matter, especially as the developers have said that it isnt optimised yet. Even so, still about 50% more than what TQ uses
Now, if it was taking 45 seconds or more to load up, then yes i would be complaining about it. But as it only takes a few seconds more compared to normal then i can live with it.
((The amount of time that the market can take to load up/update on live though, that is another matter ;) ))
|
ivar R'dhak
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 18:09:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Brema Gangrel Well just after doing a quick walk around... redocking and opening up fitting window APPEAR to take just a few seconds more to load up on my machine than TQ does.
How long does it take for "Re-custom." to load for you on the normal client? Is it just as speedy?
Also what type of hardware do you have? Is it a hexa-core 4gazillion gigaHZ with a SSD? I¦m guessing you have more than 2GB memory too. ______________ Mal-¦Appears we got here just in a nick of time. What does that make us?¦ Zoe-`Big damn heroes, sir.` Mal-¦Aint we just.¦ |
Wilhelm Riley
|
Posted - 2011.04.20 20:26:00 -
[20]
I've actually noticed that performance is better in CQ than it was with just the character creator, god knows how that's possible though.
FPS in space is much better too, though that may just be all the optimizations they've been doing lately.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |