Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1545
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:17:00 -
[151] - Quote
So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' |
Lord Zim
1341
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:19:00 -
[152] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:That was five years ago, this is now. James315 is a highsec player, as evidenced by his writings about him doing highsec things. PUH-LEASE......... The only thing which is PUH-LEASE about this whole thread is the people who think this'll actually be a problem for anyone. |
Jax Bederen
Dark Horse RM
176
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:22:00 -
[153] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?'
Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec.
|
Lord Zim
1341
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:26:00 -
[154] - Quote
Jax Bederen wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec. So, "hisec players" are players who has absolutely no clue about huge swathes of the game?
Sounds like the kind of player I want on the CSM, because they'll have good and balanced input on which direction to take the game. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1318
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:27:00 -
[155] - Quote
Jax Bederen wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec. So if a "nullsec" player is thinking about the interactions between the highsec production and their own use of the items in nullsec, they're not a "real" nullsec player either huh. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Pipa Porto
887
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:27:00 -
[156] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Then you'll be happy to show us, with a quote and a link, were CCP Ytterbium (or anyone else, for that matter) said either of those things, right? No need since I know attitude of nullseccers: I, Me and Myself! Hisec players should pay to their overlords!
Quote and Link that, then.
And again, you made a specific claim:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:It will be reduced to 50% because you nullseccers aren't happy with let's say 75%.
Why aren't you prepared with evidence to support it? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1545
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:28:00 -
[157] - Quote
in other words a 'true' highsec players is defined by mental myopia |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2106
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:31:00 -
[158] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:in other words a 'true' highsec players is defined by mental myopia
This is funnier because your avatar is blind! "A genius throws a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that he's going to die choking in a maze of smoke and flame. A hero drinks a Molotov cocktail and soon realizes that if he does a split in midair, he can hit twice as many zombies per kick. Drunk hero wins again, wusses." ~Cracked.com |
Pipa Porto
887
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:33:00 -
[159] - Quote
Jax Bederen wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec.
War Is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Power. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4562
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:36:00 -
[160] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jax Bederen wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec. So, "hisec players" are players who has absolutely no clue about huge swathes of the game? Sounds like the kind of player I want on the CSM, because they'll have good and balanced input on which direction to take the game.
hey remember when we had a pubsec CSM and they showed us how much they don't care about nullsec by talking to greyscale about things like jump bridges please leave |
|
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4563
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:40:00 -
[161] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:That was five years ago, this is now. James315 is a highsec player, as evidenced by his writings about him doing highsec things. PUH-LEASE.........
so james 315, whose main character resides in hisec, isn't a hisec player?
strange please leave |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1318
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 02:55:00 -
[162] - Quote
Andski wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:That was five years ago, this is now. James315 is a highsec player, as evidenced by his writings about him doing highsec things. PUH-LEASE......... so james 315, whose main character resides in hisec, isn't a hisec player? strange He doesn't seem to be pushing for more safety, less pvp... is he?
I mean he uses an NPC corp right? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Jax Bederen
Dark Horse RM
176
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:03:00 -
[163] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jax Bederen wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec. So, "hisec players" are players who has absolutely no clue about huge swathes of the game? Sounds like the kind of player I want on the CSM, because they'll have good and balanced input on which direction to take the game.
Don't get all dramatic. Question was asked how one would define a high sec player. |
Jax Bederen
Dark Horse RM
176
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:07:00 -
[164] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Jax Bederen wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:So how would you define a 'highsec player', if someone who plays in highsec doesn't necessarily qualify? Is there some sort of badpost quality that makes a highseccer who he is?
Tippia doesn't leave his/her trade hub station but sides against 'traditional' highsec positions all the time. Issler runs a highsec mining corp but (I'm fairly certain) feels highsec is too safe. Do they not count as 'highsec players?' Id define them as one's that don't give a rats ass about null or low sec. So if a "nullsec" player is thinking about the interactions between the highsec production and their own use of the items in nullsec, they're not a "real" nullsec player either huh.
Simply answered about a high sec player, they really for the most part don't care whats going on in low. As far as what defines a low sec player, don't know, answer it yourself.
|
Lord Zim
1342
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:10:00 -
[165] - Quote
Jax Bederen wrote:Don't get all dramatic. Question was asked how one would define a high sec player. If that'd been what the rest of eve's population called "a hisec player", then I'll go so far as to say that a hisec player should n ever, ever, even consider trying to get on the CSM, ever again. |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1724
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:12:00 -
[166] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Excellent, one less competitor for me.
Thanks to CCP helping you with changes to the game. This makes you a carebear. |
Lord Zim
1342
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:14:00 -
[167] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Excellent, one less competitor for me. Thanks to CCP helping you with changes to the game. This makes you a carebear. Aww, the "you're a carebear" insult.
How cute. Daddy, can I keep it? It followed me home. |
Laudenum Hayes
The Vogon Poet's Armada Punch Drunk Lemmings
1
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:15:00 -
[168] - Quote
OMAIGAWDD!! Whatever shall I do??!! I'll be in ruins!!
Wait.....
Nope, my industry will be fine.
Carry on. |
Jax Bederen
Dark Horse RM
176
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:15:00 -
[169] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Jax Bederen wrote:Don't get all dramatic. Question was asked how one would define a high sec player. If that'd been what the rest of eve's population called "a hisec player", then I'll go so far as to say that a hisec player should n ever, ever, even consider trying to get on the CSM, ever again.
There are exceptions, there are few absolutes, though really I don't care where they come from personally, just watching the train wreck from the sidelines. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1318
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:37:00 -
[170] - Quote
Jax Bederen wrote:Lord Zim wrote:If that'd been what the rest of eve's population called "a hisec player", then I'll go so far as to say that a hisec player should n ever, ever, even consider trying to get on the CSM, ever again. There are exceptions, there are few absolutes, though really I don't care where they come from personally, just watching the train wreck from the sidelines. Train Wrecks: In Space: Online is an excellent form of entertainment. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
|
Pipa Porto
887
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:39:00 -
[171] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Jax Bederen wrote:Lord Zim wrote:If that'd been what the rest of eve's population called "a hisec player", then I'll go so far as to say that a hisec player should n ever, ever, even consider trying to get on the CSM, ever again. There are exceptions, there are few absolutes, though really I don't care where they come from personally, just watching the train wreck from the sidelines. Train Wrecks: In Space: Online is an excellent form of entertainment.
Don't forget it's expansion pack: With Pixels. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1318
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 03:56:00 -
[172] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Train Wrecks: In Space: Online is an excellent form of entertainment. Don't forget it's expansion pack: With Pixels. At least CCP doesn't use the Gauge-U-4-DLC, or the MMO version "pay for the expansion pack which you pretty much need." Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4563
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 04:07:00 -
[173] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Excellent, one less competitor for me. Thanks to CCP helping you with changes to the game. This makes you a carebear.
which ones please leave |
Pipa Porto
887
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 04:29:00 -
[174] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Train Wrecks: In Space: Online is an excellent form of entertainment. Don't forget it's expansion pack: With Pixels. At least CCP doesn't use the Gauge-U-4-DLC, or the MMO version "pay for the expansion pack which you pretty much need."
To be honest, I don't really have a problem with a lot of DLCs, even day-0 DLCs. Done right, it allows the teams making the game to continue to work on it after the release candidate has to be finalized.
KOTOR 2 is the perfect example of a game that desperately hungered for the extra development time a Day-0 DLC would have given the production team. 13 months was clearly not enough time, and an extra month or two would have made an enormous difference (a giant chunk of the game was about 90% done, with voice acting and everything, but it got cut because 90%!=100%). Luckily, Obsidion has the type of fans who like making mods.
That said, a lot of Day-0 DLCs are pretty transparently content that would otherwise have been in the game anyway. And the "Free" DLCs designed to punish the used game market are even worse.
With the MMO market, I kind of get it, but I assume that the sharded MMOs already have lower overhead per sub, and they generally have the same ~$15 sub price, so I'm not sure why they feel the need to add an extra $5-$10 a month in expansion fees (assuming 1-2 expansions/year). Maybe it's just that theme park content is that much more expensive to develop than EVE's expansions. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Ghazu
138
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 05:24:00 -
[175] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:Overinflated sense of self worth How on earth you think hisec manufacturers could compete against you guys in any way if hisec prices would double? I thought we were always getting killed at gate camps and stuff? |
Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
813
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:09:00 -
[176] - Quote
Why am I starting to get the feeling some people had wish they had run for the CSM or voted.
Now I am pro education and pro-voting.
So I will resist the urge to yell "Suck it you apathetic scum" Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
1545
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:11:00 -
[177] - Quote
don't blame me i voted greene lee -a- for lyfe |
Josef Djugashvilis
The Scope Gallente Federation
552
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:28:00 -
[178] - Quote
Dear God, james was posting endless pages of 'stuff' even back then
I did not really read the forums back then. You want fries with that? |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
1061
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:29:00 -
[179] - Quote
EvE has to change or it will die. Adapt and stop jamming up the forums w/ this BS.
|
Conan theBarbarian
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.09.09 06:32:00 -
[180] - Quote
RAGE QU1T wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:RAGE QU1T wrote:ok, lets say for sake of argument i relocate to low sec. what incentives would be good enough for that kind of move? for instance places like Tama, Amamake, Sagain, and the infamous pirate haven Rancer. That's a stupid argument and you know it. There are plenty of quiet low-sec systems to do your business in. Not rly stupid when you consider those "Quiet" systems wont be so quiet and you would possible see corps/alliances blockade those systems to protect the use of those manufacuring lines in those stations.
So your description makes it seem like this will fix low-sec by giving corps more incentive to go there...how is this a problem? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |