Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
I'thari
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 17:34:00 -
[151]
My guess it'll end up as "excellence" threads...
|
Natalie Dorgiers
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 18:54:00 -
[152]
Originally by: Kaelie Onren Having it optional is fine. BUT it can't be optional 'just because of preference' in GUI. There should be things that you can do in CQ that you cannot do in the pod hanger. Interact with station people in a pub, take part in station poker games, buy vanity items for your clone. These you need to decant for.
Have you never had a cell phone? Heard of video poker? Online shopping? Suddenly we lose these technologies when we develop interstellar flight? As it stands, I can chat with people from across the star cluster, but things from anywhere in the region. WTF would I suddenly need to be there in person!?
Yes, to interact using our avatars should require leaving the pod. Playing poker with physical paper cards probably should. Maybe the Aurum clothes are so ridiculously fancy (probably cost as much as a mid-size ship don't forget) that the tailor absolutely must measure me in person with absurdly high-precision instruments. But even then, one measurement should be enough. I'm a clone of a clone of a clone. I will be physically identical every time my tailor sees me, and I'm sure his futuristic computer has the space for the few dozen bytes needed to store my measurements.
|
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War DarkSide.
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 19:15:00 -
[153]
---
Originally by: CCP Greyscale Is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?
|
Salomei
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 20:44:00 -
[154]
My computer won't be an issue at all. I might even walk around occasionally. But for immersion and simplicity's sake, it's best to stick to the lore and let the capsuleer decide whether what needs to be done is worth leaving the pod for. People are interested in leaving the pods because the chronicles described it as a thing we sometimes do.
Alternatively, why not just go nuts with it and give us a frogger-like mini game that represent pushing our cargo around on the deck! Watch out for that sleeping janitor! Give us a Kinect extension that forces us to gesture eat virtual hamburgers before undocking so our character won't starve! (Screw you so hard if you take that seriously)
+1 for hanger by default, HUD button to decant.
|
Kerrisone
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 00:06:00 -
[155]
Grr.
|
Carol June
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 03:46:00 -
[156]
Supported.
|
Eclorc
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 09:15:00 -
[157]
+1 for optional decanting
|
Sellendis
The Ares project
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 18:18:00 -
[158]
I agree. Let us choose CQ or hangar view (static also if anyone wants it). Dont just cut us off CCP. CQ eats 90%+ of my CPU and GPU while in space EVE hangs at around 35-40% (both CPU & GPU). While i could live with increased req. for the game, show us you care for your customers by not kicking hangar view out. We like our hangar views, ship spinning, looking from all angles and enjoying it.
|
SHADOWVOX
NECESSARY RESPONSE
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 18:24:00 -
[159]
Edited by: SHADOWVOX on 16/06/2011 18:24:23 I actually love ship spinning in Hangars
|
Mr Popeil
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 18:33:00 -
[160]
Edited by: Mr Popeil on 16/06/2011 18:32:54 +1 also stop ruining my game
|
|
Xonus Calimar
CaeIum Incognitum
|
Posted - 2011.06.16 21:19:00 -
[161]
Until I hear a good reason as to why the CQ is replacing the old hanger, I support this.
I don't have any trouble running it (as it presently exists on SiSi), but I can't think of a (gameplay/technical/lore) reason why the CQ would be mandatory.
If CCP has one, I would love to hear it. |
Aessaya
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2011.06.17 01:50:00 -
[162]
Support this.
Also, as someone else in other thread noted, there is no point storyline/immersion-wise in deploying a capsuleer from his/her capsule (which is supposed to be a tedious process) every time he/she docks and throwning the said capsuleer back into the pod upon undocking, especially if he/she docked just to change the ship.
Make it optional, with a button "enter CQ" or something like that, while retaining the hangar view we're used to while not in CQ for those who like shipspinning (or are just passing by to take some wares from the hangar and are in no way interested in renting a fully-fledged CQ because their visit qwill be _really_ short).
|
Vincent Mayer
West Genetics
|
Posted - 2011.06.17 06:50:00 -
[163]
Supported.
I want it to be an optional feature like it was in the very first preview of it at fanfest some years ago.
Its pretty much impossible to run multiple clients across 2 monitors now with CQ, even if only 1 is docked and the other is in space. massive FPS hit. and i am not a fan of a static BG image with an overlayed UI.
|
Sha Dar
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
|
Posted - 2011.06.17 23:41:00 -
[164]
It SHOULD be so, but knowing ccp and past screwups, it won't be. -
|
Vaschel Novak
|
Posted - 2011.06.18 01:40:00 -
[165]
iirc, CCP said somewhere that, at least initially, CQ will be optional
|
Dante024781
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2011.06.18 04:15:00 -
[166]
Signed
|
Commissar Kate
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2011.06.18 14:22:00 -
[167]
Supported, please give us an disembark capsule option. It makes sense and I think is the ultimate solution to satisfy the majority of players on the issue at hand.
|
Sader Rykane
Midnight Sentinels Midnight Space Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 03:05:00 -
[168]
I actually like the CQ; but more options are good.
|
Halcyon Ingenium
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 09:43:00 -
[169]
I like Incarna, but I don't want it to have its way with me. /signed
|
Samuel Wess
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 10:11:00 -
[170]
CQ ruined my game experience, I logged on SISI to test something and i had to log off after 5 minutes. And not because of technical problems but because of anoying game experience!
Out of the topic, I love this game and ive been playing for 4 years now and i dont like the way is going, making it more and more 'stupid user friendly' each day to become like one of the milion user mmorpgs on market, and that only ruins the game experience for the player base that is here for other reasons.
/signed
me |
|
Chloe Ordimus
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 11:53:00 -
[171]
Supported
|
Wyvern Eden
Firebird Squadron Terra-Incognita
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 11:54:00 -
[172]
Please CCP, make CQ OPTIONAL.
|
Rebel sTuFF
Rebel Inc
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 14:58:00 -
[173]
Please make CQ an optional feature where u don't need to go by default after logging in.
Cheers, Rebel ----- Recruiting Trading |
Geksz
|
Posted - 2011.06.19 23:58:00 -
[174]
Edited by: Geksz on 19/06/2011 23:58:54 Please CCP make CQ optional, and leave the hangar view in!
|
von Diel
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 00:06:00 -
[175]
Supported. Not that they'll listen, but you know.
|
San Severina
Minmatar Autocannons Anonymous
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 05:24:00 -
[176]
I would hate to see the hangar view lost forever, I believe CCP is making a very very BIG mistake
|
Omira Tan
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 05:48:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Vaschel Novak iirc, CCP said somewhere that, at least initially, CQ will be optional
Far as I heard, you'll get a fixed (ironically also called 'stationary') image of a hangar, when you choose not to load CQ. No more spinning in station, boys and girls. :(
|
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 07:10:00 -
[178]
No brainer. Supported.
|
rimpula
Rehtirepen pisnes ja pilkkiseura
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 11:50:00 -
[179]
|
Shandir
Minmatar Brutor Tribe
|
Posted - 2011.06.20 14:33:00 -
[180]
+1 to optional CQ, button to decant, OLD HANGAR VIEW remaining. -
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 16 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |