|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 13:24:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Algathas
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 09:41:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Glafri
ARE YOU MOVING PAST VANITY ITEMS FOR AURUM?: [ ] YES [ ] NO
In the last few blogs and CCP e-mails this question remained strangely unanswered. Is this a "yes"?
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 09:59:00 -
[3]
Can someone explain the gravity of the Hilmar e-mail to me? To me it doesn't even come close to admitting non-vanity items for cash.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 10:05:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Kharontos on 25/06/2011 10:05:56
Originally by: Agrikaan
Originally by: Kharontos
Originally by: Glafri
ARE YOU MOVING PAST VANITY ITEMS FOR AURUM?: [ ] YES [ ] NO
In the last few blogs and CCP e-mails this question remained strangely unanswered. Is this a "yes"?
You keep demanding answers. The problem is, why should we trust those answers? I need an answer to that.
The problem is that nobody can, but at least it's something. If CCP finally stops jerking around and just answers this particular question, we can all decide for ourselves what to do.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 22:45:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Morgan Polaris Latest numbers:
3091 accounts unsubscribed, at $15 this means CCP has now lost close to $556,000 revenue annually.
Note that I didn't do the math in euro's. This number could come out a lot higher, but I err on the side of caution.
Whatever the currency, the point stands. Let's just hope it gets across ...
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 11:54:00 -
[6]
Definately looking forward to answers in your next devblog, CCP.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 12:00:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Miilla Edited by: Miilla on 26/06/2011 11:57:36
May aswell send them on a golden goose chase.
FTFY
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 17:39:00 -
[8]
One less reason to pre-order the Vita, I guess.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 18:13:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Nishachara Update by Fallout in the sticky above: " P.S. I realized this does not answer what is most important to many of you at this time: yes, CCP Zulu is working on a new blog, as he posted on his @arnarhrafn Twitter a few hours ago. "
Will MT move beyond non-vanity items?
Hope remains, perhaps. The next devblog might just end all protests and discussion, either for the better or the worse.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 18:35:00 -
[10]
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=934
|
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 18:39:00 -
[11]
Quote: The tone and demeanor of my blog on Friday did not correctly portray my emotions towards the community and player base at large. I love and respect EVE and its community on a level that's hard to really do justice in words. However I let my frustration take charge of me, fueled by emotions that had built up due to a breach of trust we at CCP have been experiencing over the past few days. I know that sounds ironic considering those are the exact same feelings you have been having towards CCP.
For that I am sorry.
Having cooled off a bit and taken a solemn look at the situation, I see it's clear we need to strengthen the deep mutual trust and respect that's been so unique and descriptive of our relationship. There are certain questions you want answered and there isn't room for more error in our communication on those topics or our perception of the root causes.
Therefore we have asked the CSM to join us in Iceland for an extraordinary meeting June 30th and July 1st to discuss the events of past week, to help us define and address the real underlying concerns, and to assist us in defining and iterating on our virtual goods strategy.
The result of this meeting should be mutual agreement of how virtual goods and services will evolve in EVE. Other issues may be brought up and we urge you to contact the CSM with your comments and concerns so that they may be addressed at this session.
However, just to prove the point of the Fearless newsletter and give you a further understanding of what it is then there are no and never have been plans to sell "gold ammo" for Aurum. In Fearless people are arguing a point, which doesn't even have to be their view, they are debating an issue. This is another example of how information out of context is no information at all.
Due to the volatility of the topic we want to refrain from any further comments on this matter until after meeting with the CSM.
Thank you for your patience,
Arnar Hrafn Gylfason
Senior Producer of EVE Online
An internal breach of trust, could be the leaked e-mails OR infighting about incarna. We'll know after the 30th.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 13:07:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Kristina Vanszar Lady and genetleman, it's a honor to present: MONOCLEGEDDON WORK IN PROGRESS
I can't stop laughing; it's about time!
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.28 12:13:00 -
[13]
Bumpage for positive thinking!
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.30 16:56:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Maj Disaster Trebor_CSM Robert Woodhead @ @EVE_Svennig Unclear if formal minutes needed. Joint statement + clarifications in forums may be enough #tweetfleet #csm6 1 minute ago
A joint statement in which to avoid the big yellow question once again? It's becoming so much clearer now.
|
Kharontos
|
Posted - 2011.06.30 16:59:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Trebor Daehdoow The first day's meetings are winding down. We spent the whole day discussing first the CQ and performance issues, and the initial rollout of the NEX and vanity goods.
Some of the discussions were passionate but not angry. Some very positive things came out, and I think the groundwork was laid for a successful day 2, in which we will discuss the future of microtransactions in EVE.
We are trying to keep people updated on general progress on twitter (#csm6) but the details will have to wait until after the summit. We intend to get information out as soon as humanly possible.
Best, Trebor
We appreciate the update Trebor, looking forward to the outcome of tomorrow's meetings!
|
|
|
|