Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Flaming Lemming
Puppeteer Press
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:08:00 -
[31]
I can't believe I'm agreeing with anything even vaguely related to Jade. But right is right, and must be supported ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime is death |
Phoebe Halliwel
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:11:00 -
[32]
|
Halfdan Xaerbe
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 17:12:00 -
[33]
|
Kaelie Onren
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 19:20:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Kaelie Onren on 25/06/2011 19:23:31 Not supported.
Most of what you are saying are just speculations at this point. I really don't think CCP will make anything but vanity items in the NeX. If they did, then that would be the day I would do/say something about it. For now, its all just hot air and FUD.
I do agree that there should be a 'disembark' option. But I think certainly it may be added going forward, but as they announced that they were going to release incarna on a certain day, they really couldn't have squeezed in that feature in time, so... meh, I can't blame them for that. (yet)
|
Drifnir
Mnemonic Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 20:47:00 -
[35]
+1
enough is enough
|
Cordo Draken
ABOS Industrial Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:48:00 -
[36]
Edited by: Cordo Draken on 25/06/2011 21:47:50 Supported -----
Whoever said, "You only get one shot to make a good impression," was utterly wrong. I've made plenty of great impressions with my Autocannons. |
Cordo Draken
ABOS Industrial Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:50:00 -
[37]
Originally by: Kaelie Onren Edited by: Kaelie Onren on 25/06/2011 19:23:31 Not supported.
Most of what you are saying are just speculations at this point. I really don't think CCP will make anything but vanity items in the NeX. If they did, then that would be the day I would do/say something about it. For now, its all just hot air and FUD.
I do agree that there should be a 'disembark' option. But I think certainly it may be added going forward, but as they announced that they were going to release incarna on a certain day, they really couldn't have squeezed in that feature in time, so... meh, I can't blame them for that. (yet)
Speculation... this is the path they are going down... why would you wait for it to happen? -----
Whoever said, "You only get one shot to make a good impression," was utterly wrong. I've made plenty of great impressions with my Autocannons. |
Pirokobo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 21:59:00 -
[38]
MEN SHALL BE CHARGED FOR SUBSCRIPTIONS, NOT FOR MONOCLES!
|
Reed Tiburon
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
|
Posted - 2011.06.25 22:30:00 -
[39]
support. ---
R.I.P.
EVE ONLINE [img]ht |
Mauryce
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 03:21:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Mauryce on 26/06/2011 03:21:04
|
|
Seirkanis
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 05:50:00 -
[41]
Support.
Perhaps the saddest part about all this is how delusional CCP is. I, for example, can afford to dump money into this kind of thing, but I'm not going to. Why? It's idiotic and stupid. It gets worse when CCP is clearly going to be sucked down the slippery slope of selling in-game non-vanity items.
If it's just a monocle? I don't care. All having one does is show me who to shoot and laugh at. But we all know it isn't going to stay that way.
CCP neglected to fix long-standing bugs and gameplay issues, and instead spent thousands of hours and countless resources to produce Incarna. Is it cool? Well, it looks cool, but after about 5 minutes I turned it all off. Part of that is I could probably boil an egg on my laptop after walking around the CQ for three minutes.
I also find it extraordinarily difficult to become excited by something like DUST 514 when CCP has already stated that it will require special hardware to use. (By "special hardware" I mean buying a PS3 just to play DUST.)
Make hybrids work. Get rid of the dumb bump mechanic which is nothing but a pain in the ass, and utterly worthless. And so on.
Instead of blowing all these resources on Incarna and ****ing everybody off in the process, did you even CONSIDER doing something like adding features to...oh, the internet spaceships bit? For less effort you could have implemented a better control system, maybe firing arcs, etc., making it a little more than getting a good fit and pushing F1. (And before someone says that it would kill the servers, most of that can be offloaded to the client.)
Sad.
|
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos Word of Chaos Undivided
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 06:09:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Kaelie Onren Edited by: Kaelie Onren on 25/06/2011 19:23:31 Not supported.
Most of what you are saying are just speculations at this point. I really don't think CCP will make anything but vanity items in the NeX. If they did, then that would be the day I would do/say something about it. For now, its all just hot air and FUD.
I do agree that there should be a 'disembark' option. But I think certainly it may be added going forward, but as they announced that they were going to release incarna on a certain day, they really couldn't have squeezed in that feature in time, so... meh, I can't blame them for that. (yet)
The point is to eliminate the speculation decisively. Speculation is what is doing damage right now, people have every right to think the worst, and yet also seem to be expected to think the best... for no apparent reason. And still some others don't even know what to think.
Not everyone likes to be a lemming following an mmo off the development cliff. Many of us do want to know what is going on and why.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~
Tiericide |
buck herrick
SS-20
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 10:26:00 -
[43]
yuppers
|
Jondo Marikesh
Masuat'aa Matari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 11:06:00 -
[44]
+1
|
von Diel
The Tuskers
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:13:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Kaelie Onren Edited by: Kaelie Onren on 25/06/2011 19:23:31 Not supported.
Most of what you are saying are just speculations at this point. I really don't think CCP will make anything but vanity items in the NeX. If they did, then that would be the day I would do/say something about it. For now, its all just hot air and FUD.
I do agree that there should be a 'disembark' option. But I think certainly it may be added going forward, but as they announced that they were going to release incarna on a certain day, they really couldn't have squeezed in that feature in time, so... meh, I can't blame them for that. (yet)
So, you **** yourself before you go to the bathroom?
Surely features should be realised when they're ready, not an arbitrary date. Testing on SiSi showed that these issues would occur and CCP pushed on with it anyway.
|
Kripnlock
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 14:30:00 -
[46]
"CCP could have made it optional and given us the option of keeping the old hanger view and added a ôdisembark shipö option to the UI but ôoh noö to do that would have meant we werenÆt being forced to look the vanity display case that marketing insisted must be front and centre if weÆre to even think about buying these ridiculously overpriced items from the Noble store."
I agree with you 100% Manfred , but i dont think its meant for us to have that yet.but if you rich , why not. i do like the option, but you dont need to participate, if you want to see your ship , just face the hanger bay when you dock . otherwise you can do any of the things you usually do from menu. They are trying to increase the game play . keep people interested in eve . missions get old and some of us dont like to participate in other player ober fights
|
Baron vonDoom
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 15:21:00 -
[47]
Support
|
Sar Ferredj
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 20:06:00 -
[48]
CCp is turning Eve into a social/casual game. This is illustrated with CQ & Aurum to get the goods(ships, fit & skills) instead of a functional dock & training time.
I want new ships, rebuild models, fixed blasters/railguns, fixed POSes . . .
Not a new way to throw my money into virtual trousers.
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 20:23:00 -
[49]
Originally by: Allestin Villimar Also, if your bookmarks are too far out, they can and will ban you for it.
Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive.
|
Goodluvins
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 20:53:00 -
[50]
To CCP from the community: Fvck you too, *****.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |