Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 29 post(s) |
Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1271
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 14:59:00 -
[241] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Could Pipa Porto now shut the hell up? We get it. You've posted it nearly a hundred times. New Eden is a big scary place for the professional highsec ganker when it is the ganker who may be ganked. Where have I ever asked for Suicide Ganking to be eliminated? I never said you did. But apparently you suck so bad, that anyone can get the drop on you. Caldari Militia |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
416
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:00:00 -
[242] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Malcanis wrote:At this stage the only advice I can give is that if you're such a bad PvPer that hunting you is "risk free", then you should perhaps try another profession. Hunting someone who cannot know you're coming for them, who cannot shoot first, and whose friends cannot effectively shoot at all, when you are not constrained by a guaranteed ship loss, is risk free, no matter who your target is or how skilled they are. I mean seriously, if you can't win and profit with those conditions against anyone, you're pretty pathetic. Do you realize that everything just just posted here applies the same to a miner as it does to the ganker?
You want the ganker/killrights victim to have a sort-of alarm system that allows them to know exactly who is after them when the ganker's victims themselves have no such thing.
Pipa, you are the posterchild of hi sec PVPers looking for risk-free PVP. |
Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1271
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:00:00 -
[243] - Quote
Pipa Porto is the first person I stick a bounty on come December 4th 2012. Caldari Militia |
Pipa Porto
1115
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:03:00 -
[244] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:.... and with no effort invested. It is that easy to kill you?
If game mechanics guarantee surprise, sure. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
416
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:03:00 -
[245] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Ok then. Let's make it so that before a suicide gank happens the ganker shall register his target's name and said target is automatically informed he is being hunted specifically by this ganker individual . Now both parties know exactly who's hunting them. What? Don't like it? You already can tell when someone's coming for you in a suicide gank. A half dozen destroyers showing up on d-scan isn't particularly subtle. What can a killright target d-scan for?
This is bull. I've witnessed gangs of frigs taking down mining ships. Battlehips can suicide and take down faction ships, freighters, and even jump freighters in hi sec. Battlecruisers are capable of doing the same. Why can't these victims be afforded the same 'mickey mouse' mechanic you'd like on yourself?
Or better yet, why are you asking for a silly mechanic that NO ONE else in Eve is afforded?
If you're so afraid of ships with guns hunting you down without you knowing (welcome to Eve, by the way) then stop generating killrights? |
Pipa Porto
1115
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:05:00 -
[246] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Malcanis wrote:At this stage the only advice I can give is that if you're such a bad PvPer that hunting you is "risk free", then you should perhaps try another profession. Hunting someone who cannot know you're coming for them, who cannot shoot first, and whose friends cannot effectively shoot at all, when you are not constrained by a guaranteed ship loss, is risk free, no matter who your target is or how skilled they are. I mean seriously, if you can't win and profit with those conditions against anyone, you're pretty pathetic. Do you realize that everything just just posted here applies the same to a miner as it does to the ganker? You want the ganker/killrights victim to have a sort-of alarm system that allows them to know exactly who is after them when the ganker's victims themselves have no such thing. Pipa, you are the posterchild of hi sec PVPers looking for risk-free PVP.
Really? How is the ganker not constrained by their guaranteed ship loss when the gank the miner?
The Gank victims have d-scan, which will give them plenty of notice of the impending gank. Where's the equivalent for blind transferable killright targets? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Pipa Porto
1115
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:08:00 -
[247] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Ok then. Let's make it so that before a suicide gank happens the ganker shall register his target's name and said target is automatically informed he is being hunted specifically by this ganker individual . Now both parties know exactly who's hunting them. What? Don't like it? You already can tell when someone's coming for you in a suicide gank. A half dozen destroyers showing up on d-scan isn't particularly subtle. What can a killright target d-scan for? This is bull. I've witnessed gangs of frigs taking down mining ships. Battlehips can suicide and take down faction ships, freighters, and even jump freighters in hi sec. Battlecruisers are capable of doing the same. Why can't these victims be afforded the same mickey mouse mechanic you'd like on yourself? Or better yet, why are you asking for a silly mechanic that NO ONE else in Eve is afforded?
Yes, each gank target has different things to watch for on d-scan. So?
You mean besides the current killright mechanic? I can pop up my killrights screen and find out who's allowed to kill me without consequence. Or the current wardec mechanic? I can pop up my war screen and find out who's allowed to kill me without consequence. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
417
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:23:00 -
[248] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Really? How is the ganker not constrained by their guaranteed ship loss when the gank the miner?
The miner's friends ARE constrained. They can do nothing about it until the suicide ganker takes his 10-million-isk shot on a 100-million-isk ship. He decides when, where, and how **** is going down because he's already calculated the constants (including ship loss). The suicide gank will be on the ganker's terms.
Quote:The Gank victims have d-scan, which will give them plenty of notice of the impending gank. Where's the equivalent for blind transferable killright targets? I've told you already. Learn who the bounty hunters are the same way miners must learn who's hunting them. Learn the ships that will most likely go after you the same way miners must do the same. And I've already told you what ships to look for but you refuse to acknowldege that as well. |
Shandir
Indigo Archive
167
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:27:00 -
[249] - Quote
Your point has been made. Over and over and over. No-one seems to agree with you. Can you stop s**tting up the thread with your double, triple and quadruple posts?
|
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University Minmatar Republic
417
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 15:27:00 -
[250] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Name a current mechanic where you can kill someone in HS without consequence by surprise. Again, you are NOT being attacked by surprise. You generated a killright. EXPECT retribution.
If you're so afraid of the boogyman you could always choose NOT to generate a killright. No one is forcing you to gank in hi sec. |
|
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3297
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:38:00 -
[251] - Quote
did you see the team photo?
don't these faces say "trust us!"? Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Ascendance.
385
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:44:00 -
[252] - Quote
Yes but maybe after these last 3 player meets we can actualy get some devblogs published |
|
CCP Masterplan
C C P C C P Alliance
620
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:45:00 -
[253] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:did you see the team photo? don't these faces say "trust us!"? So that's what was going on when I walked past the room. I think Five-0 is going to have to one-up this "This one time, on patch day..." CCP Masterplan -á| -áTeam Five-0: Rewriting the law |
|
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3298
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:51:00 -
[254] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:did you see the team photo? don't these faces say "trust us!"? So that's what was going on when I walked past the room. I think Five-0 is going to have to one-up this
aww maybe not one-up it but you can match it Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
786
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 19:56:00 -
[255] - Quote
Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Valari Nala Zena
Perkone Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:03:00 -
[256] - Quote
Why pay out the bounty in one kill, why not just get payed depending on the ship your target was flying (minus a percentage). The pilot with bounty should in no way be able to make money out of it, blowing himself up with alt + insurance & bounty.
For example: Pilot A has a bounty of 500 mil. Pilot B kills pilot A who was flying a Tengu.
Pilot B gets payed ~100 mil. The bounty of Pilot A is now 400 mil. |
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3298
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:05:00 -
[257] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff.
wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
786
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:08:00 -
[258] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? I'm mainly just grumbling, but generally if there's a thread discussing upcoming content and there are dev posts in the thread, I'm hoping that the dev posts are actively discussing the content changes, answering questions, that sort of thing.
But I'm just impatient, I guess. You're all people too. Maybe. http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3298
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:10:00 -
[259] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? I'm mainly just grumbling, but generally if there's a thread discussing upcoming content and there are dev posts in the thread, I'm hoping that the dev posts are actively discussing the content changes, answering questions, that sort of thing. But I'm just impatient, I guess. You're all people too. Maybe.
we're kind of just waiting to get the dev blog out, but I still wanted to take part in the discussion and "show" that I'm lurking.. or well not really lurking anymore
I'll be answering questions about the UI part of the bounty system as soon as we get some update on a test server. it's a promise! Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
baltec1
Bat Country
2345
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:11:00 -
[260] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious?
Never stop posting fluff. |
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
786
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:15:00 -
[261] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? I'm mainly just grumbling, but generally if there's a thread discussing upcoming content and there are dev posts in the thread, I'm hoping that the dev posts are actively discussing the content changes, answering questions, that sort of thing. But I'm just impatient, I guess. You're all people too. Maybe. we're kind of just waiting to get the dev blog out, but I still wanted to take part in the discussion and "show" that I'm lurking.. or well not really lurking anymore I'll be answering questions about the UI part of the bounty system as soon as we get some update on a test server. it's a promise! Fair enough. You're still my favorite dev. :P http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3302
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:46:00 -
[262] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? I'm mainly just grumbling, but generally if there's a thread discussing upcoming content and there are dev posts in the thread, I'm hoping that the dev posts are actively discussing the content changes, answering questions, that sort of thing. But I'm just impatient, I guess. You're all people too. Maybe. we're kind of just waiting to get the dev blog out, but I still wanted to take part in the discussion and "show" that I'm lurking.. or well not really lurking anymore I'll be answering questions about the UI part of the bounty system as soon as we get some update on a test server. it's a promise! Fair enough. You're still my favorite dev. :P
yessssssssssssssssssss:3 Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
251
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 20:58:00 -
[263] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? I'm mainly just grumbling, but generally if there's a thread discussing upcoming content and there are dev posts in the thread, I'm hoping that the dev posts are actively discussing the content changes, answering questions, that sort of thing. But I'm just impatient, I guess. You're all people too. Maybe. we're kind of just waiting to get the dev blog out, but I still wanted to take part in the discussion and "show" that I'm lurking.. or well not really lurking anymore I'll be answering questions about the UI part of the bounty system as soon as we get some update on a test server. it's a promise! Fair enough. You're still my favorite dev. :P
Indeed.
Anyone who's worked at a company with more than 3 people employed should know that j.random people can't speak in public about their work.
The devs are probably more annoyed over having to wait until their data is handled by marketing than the rest of us.
Hmm, I wonder if some of the more obnoxious posters are actually devs alts venting steam ...
|
|
CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3304
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:26:00 -
[264] - Quote
Lors Dornick wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:CCP Punkturis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Oh look, another serious thread where every dev post is fluff. wait, I'm not allowed to post unless it's serious? I'm mainly just grumbling, but generally if there's a thread discussing upcoming content and there are dev posts in the thread, I'm hoping that the dev posts are actively discussing the content changes, answering questions, that sort of thing. But I'm just impatient, I guess. You're all people too. Maybe. we're kind of just waiting to get the dev blog out, but I still wanted to take part in the discussion and "show" that I'm lurking.. or well not really lurking anymore I'll be answering questions about the UI part of the bounty system as soon as we get some update on a test server. it's a promise! Fair enough. You're still my favorite dev. :P Indeed. Anyone who's worked at a company with more than 3 people employed should know that j.random people can't speak in public about their work. The devs are probably more annoyed over having to wait until their data is handled by marketing than the rest of us. Hmm, I wonder if some of the more obnoxious posters are actually devs alts venting steam ...
Pipa and Poetic are my alts, everybody knows that!
Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries Solar Assault Fleet
251
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:29:00 -
[265] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Pipa and Poetic are my alts, everybody knows that!
Poetic I could guess, Pipa was more of a stretch ;)
|
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
795
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:44:00 -
[266] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Pipa and Poetic are my alts, everybody knows that! You are one troubled woman, then. :P http://themittani.com/features/local-problem A simple fix to the local intel problem |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4793
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:53:00 -
[267] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Pipa and Poetic are my alts, everybody knows that!
You are a bad person!
(We need more like you)
MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
1194
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:54:00 -
[268] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:Pipa and Poetic are my alts, everybody knows that!
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
4793
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 21:54:00 -
[269] - Quote
CCP Punkturis wrote:did you see the team photo? don't these faces say "trust us!"?
SO MUCH TRUST
brbr cancelling all my bank cards MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
602
|
Posted - 2012.10.03 22:09:00 -
[270] - Quote
so i think i figured out how to exploit the new system... well maybe exploit.
from what i understand its simular to what FW does in its calculations..
but what happens if you put a bounty on someone who is in FW?
could there be a senario where the total payout from bounties and FW LP would = a greater amount then what the ship is worth...
if so CCP needs to make a work around this or else people will just join FW when they get a bounty on them and kill themselves with an alt in the opposing FW corp... Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |