Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
34
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:07:00 -
[61] - Quote
Artanea wrote:I hope that as well as lens flares, the Eve future will be full of STABILITY. The CQ isn't much use when--even with a pretty hi-spec rig--having it enabled crashes my system with alarming regularity. I came within a hair of dumping EVE altogether out of disgust at the stability problems. The only way I can play the game is with CQ disabled.
It would be really nice if CCP would prioritize stability over cutting-edge CQ graphics.
What are your system stats? |
Jim Luc
Rule of Five Ultra Vires.
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:08:00 -
[62] - Quote
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Chaos Incarnate wrote:will those of us with CQ turned off be receiving updated door pictures? The door will be replaced by a ship spinning in a hangar,actually.
Hey Torfi, is it possible that when the "ship spinning" functionality comes out, we can have a checkbox in the options that will give us a choice where it opens into?
The reasoning I have behind this is because say I docked, then I'm in ship spinning mode, then got out of my ship. If I'm doing my thing in the CQ and eventually in the station, say I undocked from my CQ - the next time I dock, I will go directly to the CQ. Say I just wanted to do a quick salvage dump before going back out - this would defeat the purpose of having the ship spinning view in the first place.
It also fits with the immersion of the game. When someone docks, it's accepted that you see your ship in a hangar bay. Then to leave the ship into your CQ. It is nice to be able to undock from within your CQ though, it saves lots of time. But I don't think people would like to go back into their ship every time just to undock.
Personally I'd prefer the ship spinning as "default" when you dock ALWAYS. I love the CQ, and will definitely spend lots of time in the stations, however I prefer the freedom to choose, not based on what my previous actions were.
Thanks for your time. |
Lykouleon
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:08:00 -
[63] - Quote
Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed. The Gallente CQ looks almost exactly like the Minmatar CQ with different textures and the Caldari/Amarr look like re-textured versions of each other. I understand wanting to get the things out and working, but a little more variety in the actual room and the design of the space would have been nice.
And is it me, or does the character in the video have female leg/walking animations? Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER SO I CAN HIT THEM WITH MY SWORD |
EMPstrike
Insurrection Inc
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:09:00 -
[64] - Quote
Pro CCP, absolutely pro :)
Looking forward to more.
I cant believe you guys are working on space barbies rather than the stuff that matters liek FIXING THE DAMN BLASTERS.(Translation: Im glad to see incarna is still a priority :) Personally, i find blasters to be VERY effective at killing folks, if your excellent at managing range.)
This reply contains 50% more troll for that double trolled in goodness. We aren't renowned for our math skills(tm) |
Chaos Incarnate
Faceless Logistics
270
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:10:00 -
[65] - Quote
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Chaos Incarnate wrote:will those of us with CQ turned off be receiving updated door pictures? The door will be replaced by a ship spinning in a hangar,actually.
And this ship spinning re-feature will be coming back in at the same time as the new CQs, in october? |
Jim Luc
Rule of Five Ultra Vires.
2
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:10:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lykouleon wrote:And is it me, or does the character in the video have female leg/walking animations?
Perhaps he's Gallente? Jessayin... |
Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
905
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Does the Gallente CQ still have the combination jacuzzi and nuclear reactor core? It's hard to tell from the video... CSM - because I have not yet plumbed the depths of my inherent masochism! CSM 6 Activities Summary | My CSM blog |
London
14
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:13:00 -
[68] - Quote
Emoglee wrote:You still don't get that nobody gives a **** about CQ. We wanna play eve and not wow in stations
Your wrong. The more avenues to experience EVE as a sci-fi simulator the better. Sure, don't neglect FiS (the bulk of what makes up EVE), but why limit it to just that?
EVE: Create a Starship - Naga Frigate |
Sakaane Eionell
Intaki Liberation Front
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:13:00 -
[69] - Quote
I see it appears the other races have taken a cue from the Minmatar of not including private washrooms in their quarters either. Shall we have communal facilities then that we can access when WiS launches? Nekkid avatars taking showers together?
It might sound silly but it's a small detail good for added realism. For example, the Normandy in ME2 includes three washrooms which are semi-interactable, fun for the lulz-factor and simply a "nice touch". If "EVE Is Real", you don't honestly expect us to suspend disbelief about being spat from our pods fully clothed and dry? You don't even need to have a full bath, just an indication (a door!) there is one. If this was near the pod gantry it'd be easier to swallow that during the docking "blackout" the avatar is cleaning him- or herself up. :)
Otherwise, I like what I see and I'm looking forward to the Gallente quarters. The sofas in all iterations look pretty stiff though, more like something you'd sit on in the waiting area of a doctor's office than what you'd want to lounge around on at home. I'm not sure anyone would be really comfortable on them (does all of New Eden shop at IKEA?).
Emoglee wrote:You still don't get that nobody gives a **** about CQ. We wanna play eve and not wow in stations So you're calling a lot of the people who replied to this thread before you a bunch of nobodies? Kindly speak for yourself rather than pretending you are an authority on the entire EVE community. I for one am looking forward to balancing my in-game time between FiS and WiS. Sakaane
- Solitary Pilot | @ILFCorp | @Sakaane - |
EMPstrike
Insurrection Inc
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:14:00 -
[70] - Quote
London wrote:Emoglee wrote:You still don't get that nobody gives a **** about CQ. We wanna play eve and not wow in stations Your wrong. The more avenues to experience EVE as a sci-fi simulator the better. Sure, don't neglect FiS (the bulk of what makes up EVE), but why limit it to just that?
Youve earned a +1 +like from me my friend. Dont worry, i have a girlfriend >.> |
|
Bienator II
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
154
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:14:00 -
[71] - Quote
good work. also +1 for the hangar view. You fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail you fail to jump because you are cloaked |
Ugleb
Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
9
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
ergherhdfgh wrote:Holy crap in the spring you released an expansion that totally ****** the game. You have been loosing numbers ever since and your answer to that is more of the same? Do you guys have any clue what you are doing? What part of unfuck the game don't you understand? Your theories were wrong. You are loosing players not gaining. At what point will you re-evaluate? The only reason I even have account time to rant on this forum is because I was dumb enough to pre-pay a year thinking I'd be playing this game for ever.
You guy are clueless. Totally out of touch with reality and your customers. Your ploy to drop your customer base and chase after a new one did not work. Have fun in the unemployment line.
Yes. ditch years of investment in tech and months of work on CQ's because the first iteration face planted in its opening months. Seriously, WiS was announced at fanfest 2006 and CCP have been working towards it since then. Or, here's a thought, finish the job that was already 90% done and then move on. The question was never if they should finish the CQ's as it would have been an utter waste not to. Its about what comes next.
The changes the players want are primarily about game mechanics, finishing CQ's were always a job for the art department and the artists are not the people who should be dealing with rebalancing capital ships. http://uglebsjournal.wordpress.com/ |
mkint
88
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:15:00 -
[73] - Quote
Salpun wrote:Artanea wrote:I hope that as well as lens flares, the Eve future will be full of STABILITY. The CQ isn't much use when--even with a pretty hi-spec rig--having it enabled crashes my system with alarming regularity. I came within a hair of dumping EVE altogether out of disgust at the stability problems. The only way I can play the game is with CQ disabled.
It would be really nice if CCP would prioritize stability over cutting-edge CQ graphics. What are your system stats? Why should that matter? Going from "playing the game at the high end" to "the game nukes my computer" without any change in system requirements is Bad regardless of the system stats. That's one of my bigger pet peeves (besides the regular stuff), the constant decay of client-side performance. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
175
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:15:00 -
[74] - Quote
CCP Fallout wrote:For those of you inquiring or wondering about walking in stations via establishments: we will be releasing more information. I currently don't know the timeline for the info release. I do know that my answer will annoy some people, and I apologize. If I run into Guard later (he left for the day) I will see if he's familiar with when that info will be out (Guard is the new king of blog publishing :)).
You are a good poster and should post more. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous
55
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:17:00 -
[75] - Quote
ergherhdfgh wrote: I was dumb
*yawn*
|
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
176
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:18:00 -
[76] - Quote
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Chaos Incarnate wrote:will those of us with CQ turned off be receiving updated door pictures? The door will be replaced by a ship spinning in a hangar,actually.
This is good. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Masters of Flying Objects
34
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:19:00 -
[77] - Quote
SISI is up |
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Corporation RONA Directorate
116
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:21:00 -
[78] - Quote
FOR THE LOVE OF EVERYTHING!!!
Can we get the gallente pleasure hub station back?
Also, Amarr hangers need more singing!
other than that, I **** in my pants when i saw the gallente and ammar ones. Amarr, just looks spectacular! |
Anvil44
Independent Traders and Builders MPA
12
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:21:00 -
[79] - Quote
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:Chaos Incarnate wrote:will those of us with CQ turned off be receiving updated door pictures? The door will be replaced by a ship spinning in a hangar,actually.
I LIKEd this so much, I unliked it so I could Like it again! |
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
83
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:23:00 -
[80] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Sooo... what's 'The Door' in these three look like?
When you will open the DOOR ?
|
|
GeeShizzle MacCloud
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:24:00 -
[81] - Quote
quick question to Torfi if i can!
CCP t0rfifrans wrote:All of those rooms were built using modular assets, so that the investment made in building the CaptainGÇÖs Quarters will be capitalized on further when more environments get built. They have given us the start of a library of modules, which can be used to flesh out racially themed interiors for all sorts of interesting gameplay.
does this mean that as more assets are built for the station environments, you'll be able to augment your captains quarters to have more rooms/ a different layout or am i thinking the wrong way round??
If i am, have you thought about the possibilities i just eluded to? ie. for a price per room upgrade, u can upgrade ur captains quarters with different rooms and different layouts. |
WSmith
Farmers SRL AAA Citizens
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:25:00 -
[82] - Quote
So this is the big news that you made quite a hype in the past few days? Nevertheless the CQ for gallente looks pretty sleek at least it can compensate for the suckiness that they are in PVP. |
SerialTurd
APEX ARDENT COALITION NEM3SIS.
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:25:00 -
[83] - Quote
Awesome. Release these things asap so you can stop working on WiS and instead focusing on FiS. We want Eve not wow. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
178
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:27:00 -
[84] - Quote
WSmith wrote:So this is the big news that you made quite a hype in the past few days? .
Nah, there's a couple more things we should be seeing soon. This is just the appetizer course.
Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Ulair Memmet
ORIGIN SYSTEMS
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:27:00 -
[85] - Quote
London wrote:Emoglee wrote:You still don't get that nobody gives a **** about CQ. We wanna play eve and not wow in stations Your wrong. The more avenues to experience EVE as a sci-fi simulator the better. Sure, don't neglect FiS (the bulk of what makes up EVE), but why limit it to just that? WiS indeed is a great addition. But i personally am getting the feeling it's all they are currently focusing on. We want more content in space More missions, random events like incursions, real exploration. And ffs something that isn't so repetitive as 99% of the PVE content ingame is. We have PVP and it's great and i love it but still... |
Calipygian
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:28:00 -
[86] - Quote
They look nice, but until there is something to do, I'm not turning it on. |
Draca Maru
The Dark Space Initiative Revival Of The Talocan Empire
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:28:00 -
[87] - Quote
I must say, the quarters look really nice. I look forward to when you push it live.
Just one thing. Building Minmatar quarters first was... suboptimal. I'm still locked up in there until the release. |
Raneru
Combat and Recon The Last Chancers.
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:28:00 -
[88] - Quote
They look nice, But 4 rooms that do very little is still pretty much the same as 1 room that does very little.
I'm waiting for the next stage of incarna before I get excited. |
Jacob cirth
Ion Corp. Citex Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:29:00 -
[89] - Quote
Seleene wrote:WSmith wrote:So this is the big news that you made quite a hype in the past few days? . Nah, there's a couple more things we should be seeing soon. This is just the appetizer course. Isn't the point of an appetizer to make you want more? There's nothing I want to see more of in this. |
Blue Harrier
5
|
Posted - 2011.09.30 18:29:00 -
[90] - Quote
Seleene wrote:WSmith wrote:So this is the big news that you made quite a hype in the past few days? . Nah, there's a couple more things we should be seeing soon. This is just the appeasement course.
Think that reads better |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 .. 11 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |