Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DeathWingZero
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 13:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hey, I am coming up to level 4 missions and was wondering if Gila was still an option to run level 4's? if so i have been looking at PVE fits for it and there seems to be two major changes which one if any out of the two would do Caldari Navy level 4s?
This one was from Jester Trek [Gila, Missions] Damage Control II Beta Reactor Control: Shield Power Relay I Beta Reactor Control: Shield Power Relay I Beta Reactor Control: Shield Power Relay I
10MN Afterburner II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II EM Ward Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II
'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Mjolnir Rocket 'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Mjolnir Rocket 'Arbalest' Rocket Launcher I, Mjolnir Rocket [empty high slot] Drone Link Augmentor II
Medium Sentry Damage Augmentor I Medium Core Defense Field Purger I Medium Core Defense Field Purger I
Garde II x5 Ogre II x5 Hammerhead II x5 Valkyrie II x5 Hobgoblin II x5 Warrior II x5
[Gila, Gila: Efficient L3/L4 Mission Boat] Drone Damage Amplifier II Drone Damage Amplifier II Beta Reactor Control: Shield Power Relay I Beta Reactor Control: Shield Power Relay I
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Large Shield Extender II Large Shield Extender II 10MN Afterburner II Omnidirectional Tracking Link II
Prototype 'Arbalest' Light Missile Launcher Prototype 'Arbalest' Light Missile Launcher Prototype 'Arbalest' Light Missile Launcher Drone Link Augmentor II Empty
Medium Core Defense Field Purger I Medium Core Defense Field Purger I Medium Core Defense Field Purger I
Garde II
Read more: http://eve.battleclinic.com/loadout/62681-Gila-Efficient-L3-L4-Mission-Boat.html#ixzz2BAGiVsCU
Was just wondering if any of those two fits would work with Level 4 Missions? |
Frank Millar
38
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 13:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
I used similar fits (when I was somewhat active) in Gallente space (with different passive resists ofcourse, and with Wardens and Heavy Missile Launchers) with great succes.
I actually like the Gila better than a Dominix, for instance. Cruiser hull makes it a far more agile mission boat and the damage projection from the Drones is phenomenal.
Maybe fit an ECCM in the mids if you're fighting a lot of Guristas? |
Caleidascope
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 16:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
I had go with HAMsters or HML instead of frigate mods. Life is short and dinner time is chancy Eat dessert first! |
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
745
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 17:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
The latter fit is the more up to date. Before DDAs were released, SDAs were the only way to increase drone damage and almost mandatory on PvE boats. Since then, there's really not much reason to use them as they give a lower bonus than DDAs. This means you have to sacrifice SPRs, but you can add another purger.
Invulns on that fit are a little dicey due to cap use, but you'll obviously want to change those to mission-specific anyhow. Two kinetic hardeners should get you through for Guristas missions. If you'd like, upgrading to CN/DG hardeners will help you run cap stable and free up some CPU to upgrade to at least rapid light launchers instead of lights. I'd say this is a worthwhile investment. |
Dinsdale Pirannha
Pirannha Corp
389
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 19:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
Before you get into a Gila, you better read the Feedback thread on the new AI in the new Features Forums. Get onto Duality next time it is up and run some missions with drone boats. |
Marc Callan
Interstellar Steel Templis Dragonaors
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 20:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
The light-missile fit is close to one I've had success with in various endeavors. A good way to think about fitting out the Gila is this: it's basically a Drake, except with the roles of drones and missiles reversed. It's even got the same number of mid-slots and low-slots. (Granted, it's somewhat smaller and faster and more agile). Common fits will use Rapid Light Missile launchers to take down frigates while medium, heavy, or sentry drones are on the field attacking heavier ships. |
Col Arran
I don't pay taxes
26
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 08:54:00 -
[7] - Quote
Skip the Gila get a Raven or something that doesn't rely on drones for L4s.
Drone aggro is shaky enough on some mission as is; now just imagine what its going to be like when the NPC realize your drones are doing all the damage and switch their DPS to them?
That's basically the AI "upgrade" that's coming in the winter xpac, they WILL target swap to your drones. |
Boomhaur
106
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 05:46:00 -
[8] - Quote
Used to use a Gila, I ended up ditching all but one arbalest assault missile launcher just to draw aggro. The missiles on their own did too little DPS. After that it's all up to how you want to setup your tank/gank fit, my fit is out of date since it was before they introduced the new drone damage mods. Welcome to Eve. Everyone here is an Evil Sick Sadistic Bastard who is out to get you. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either trying to scam you or use you. |
DeathWingZero
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 12:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Hey guys thanks for giving me some insite into the gila I have looked at the Raven but it doesnt seem to be very cap stable and likes to suck it dry in less than 2 mins and the builds ive seen for it doesnt seem to be that good or is there just people hating on the raven? |
Marc Callan
Interstellar Steel Templis Dragonaors
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 13:01:00 -
[10] - Quote
DeathWingZero wrote:Hey guys thanks for giving me some insite into the gila I have looked at the Raven but it doesnt seem to be very cap stable and likes to suck it dry in less than 2 mins and the builds ive seen for it doesnt seem to be that good or is there just people hating on the raven?
Capacitor stability doesn't play to the Raven's strengths; it's best suited to a "burst tank" technique, where you fit a large or extra-large active shield booster (and a boost amplifier if necessary) and only activate it when your shields have dropped significantly. A common saying among mission runners is that the best way to improve your tank is to get better at wiping hostile DPS off grid, so the Raven's generally geared around absorbing lots of damage for brief periods of time, and then recovering capacitor for the next wave.
People may disparage the Raven, but it gets a lot of use because it's relatively cheap for a mission-capable battleship, and its weapons and defenses can be "tuned" to the enemies you're likely to face in a mission. |
|
DeathWingZero
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 14:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
so i would be looking at something like this for caldari navy missions
[Raven, L4 Missioner] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II
X-Large C5-L Emergency Shield Overload I Invulnerability Field II Caldari Navy Kinetic Deflection Field Caldari Navy Thermic Dissipation Field Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron Caldari Navy Shield Boost Amplifier
'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile Drone Link Augmentor I Small 'Arup' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction
Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I
Hammerhead II x5 Hobgoblin II x5
|
Caleidascope
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
141
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 15:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
DeathWingZero wrote:Hey guys thanks for giving me some insite into the gila I have looked at the Raven but it doesnt seem to be very cap stable and likes to suck it dry in less than 2 mins and the builds ive seen for it doesnt seem to be that good or is there just people hating on the raven? In this game, the bigger the ship, the harder it is to make it cap stable.
I fly Raven, Navy Scorp and Navy Raven for l4 missions, none of my fits are cap stable. If you want to make them cap stable, you can, just buy faction and deadspace mods. The cap stable fits are on Battleclinic, just go and copy them. Life is short and dinner time is chancy Eat dessert first! |
Marc Callan
Interstellar Steel Templis Dragonaors
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 15:29:00 -
[13] - Quote
DeathWingZero wrote:so i would be looking at something like this for caldari navy missions
[Raven, L4 Missioner] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II
X-Large C5-L Emergency Shield Overload I Invulnerability Field II Caldari Navy Kinetic Deflection Field Caldari Navy Thermic Dissipation Field Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron Caldari Navy Shield Boost Amplifier
'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile Drone Link Augmentor I Small 'Arup' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction
Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I
Hammerhead II x5 Hobgoblin II x5
There's debate between Semiconductor Memory Cells and Capacitor Charge Circuits for rigs, and I've seen people go either way. But I, for one, would absolutely not put faction hardeners and boost amps alongside a sub-Tech-II shield hardener. If you need to do faction fitting, I'd recommend starting with the shield booster itself, and leaving hardeners at Tech II, but that's for when you're more comfortable in missions and better able to gauge the risks. I'd advise that you train up for a full Tech II tank, and then think about faction fitting. |
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
232
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 18:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
DeathWingZero wrote:so i would be looking at something like this for caldari navy missions
[Raven, L4 Missioner] Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Ballistic Control System II Power Diagnostic System II
X-Large C5-L Emergency Shield Overload I Invulnerability Field II Caldari Navy Kinetic Deflection Field Caldari Navy Thermic Dissipation Field Phased Weapon Navigation Array Generation Extron Caldari Navy Shield Boost Amplifier
'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile 'Arbalest' Cruise Launcher I, Paradise Cruise Missile Drone Link Augmentor I Small 'Arup' I Remote Bulwark Reconstruction
Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I Large Semiconductor Memory Cell I
Hammerhead II x5 Hobgoblin II x5
I started out with a fit very similar to that. If you are going to spend money on faction modules the first you should invest in is a X-large booster. You will not have great DPS until you get T2 weapon systems. So your tank will have to work much harder until you get your DPS up.
The biggest applied DPS increase I saw with my Raven was swapping rigs out to 2 rigor and 1 flare. It makes your missiles hit so much harder the lost cap regen for the tank is a non issue. you really need to get your skills up to full T2 to run level 4 missions efficiently no matter what your fit. Even when fitting faction mods, the extra little bonuses from the higher skills really add up. Get all your T2 tanking skills, then all you missile support skills to 4. Then you will see why a raven is one of the most popular mission boats. Also don't forget about weapon upgrades and advanced weapon upgrades in the gunnery tree. They affect launchers as well, and make fitting much much easier. |
BlackPyroStorm
Teshnology Inc. Stealth Wear Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 10:28:00 -
[15] - Quote
If you do intent to try out a Raven using a burst tank the CCC would be much better for restoring cap between burst cycles than just having a large cap capacity to begin with with which once it goes too low your gonna have a bad time. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |