Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Zenith Intaki
Zzz Zzz Zzz
14
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 13:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
Character with low enough sec status shouldn't allowed into high security empire space at all. I am fine with suicide ganking when character has neutral or high sec status, but it's just bad for the game that -10.00 sec status player can do 50 ganks per day if he wants to.
Concord should terminate their pod and ship straigth away and remove their clone into closest lowsec station without cloning facility.
And no, I can't mine ice. |
Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
268
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 13:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
someone is getting grumpy at the ~dread pirates~ of goonswarm
i'm buying an orca tonight :3: |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 13:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zenith Intaki wrote:KOS system doesn't work
Yes, it does. You can kill them on sight.
Quit asking for NPCs to do it for you. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Elyssa MacLeod
GloboTech Industries
9
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:00:00 -
[4] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Zenith Intaki wrote:KOS system doesn't work Yes, it does. You can kill them on sight. Quit asking for NPCs to do it for you.
This I think you may get sec status for it too
Quote:There are also plenty of player characters with bounties on their heads. If you wish to bounty hunt, only attack characters with a security status of -5 or worse (because then CONCORD considers them to be criminals) and only do it in low security areas of space (0.4 or lower). Otherwise, you will be in trouble with CONCORD for trying to take the law into your own hands against someone whom they do not consider to be a criminal (if the character's security is higher than -5), in a secure area of space that is patrolled by CONCORD (if the system you are in is 0.5 or higher).
or maybe not meh... **** FiS Its Called EVE |
Kengutsi Akira
19
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:09:00 -
[5] - Quote
funny how CONCORD really protects the criminals not the innocent huh?
|
Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Pirates are fine. Ganking is fine. Both are part of the game.
However, reading these forums of late, it is blatantly evident that an obvious Concord exploit is being abused. Either CCP chooses to turn a blind eye and leave the code for Concord reaction fully exploitable as it currently is, or they fix it to make it work as it should. The Op makes a valid point.
Seems that a few players are happy to exploit the code in the claim for tears. Go ahead and claim tears, but exploiting code? You are doing wrong and know it. The fact that nothing is being done about it speaks volumes by the very silence in this matter by CCP.
Botting, from what I have been reading, is rife and should be stopped - there just has to be a better way of doing it (stopping it, that is), without exploiting code.
No, I do not mine ice either, nor do I care for it.
In b4 thread is closed. The door is not real. |
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
There is no exploit abuse dummy, CONCORD deals with criminal aggression, they are not designed to completely negate ganks. High sec is not intended to allow invulnerability. GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |
KaarBaak
59
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kitty McKitty wrote:There is no exploit abuse dummy, CONCORD deals with criminal aggression, they are not designed to completely negate ganks. High sec is not intended to allow invulnerability.
^^This.
|
Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
It is an exploit.
I do not feel the need to start insulting people, Kitty. If you run out of words, try to stop posting.
By insulting others you prove nothing other than your lack of ability to counter with concise criticism.
The door is not real. |
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
Point out how 'it' is an 'exploit'. Otherwise I will continue to laugh at you for being clueless.
Remove the nasty word 'dummy' and you have your concise response GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |
|
Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
42
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:It is an exploit.
I wish you'd run out of words for sadly most if not all of them are drivel.
Just like the quoted text. |
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
46
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 14:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
Zenith Intaki wrote:Character with low enough sec status shouldn't allowed into high security empire space at all. I am fine with suicide ganking when character has neutral or high sec status, but it's just bad for the game that -10.00 sec status player can do 50 ganks per day if he wants to.
Concord should terminate their pod and ship straigth away and remove their clone into closest lowsec station without cloning facility.
And no, I can't mine ice.
Character with such utopian view of a police state shouldn't allowed to post their opinions at all. I'm fine with character posting opinions I like, but it's just bad for the forums that opinions like yours get posted 50 times per day.
Concord should terminate your keyboard and mouse straigth away and remove your account into kugu-tsumen boards.
And no, I can't mine ice either.
P.S. Wow, ********** is censored? Censorship, best ship in Eve! This is my signature.-á There are many others like it, but this one is mine. |
March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
Kitty McKitty wrote:There is no exploit abuse dummy, CONCORD deals with criminal aggression, they are not designed to completely negate ganks. High sec is not intended to allow invulnerability. problem is: planes for attack of suicide ganker are invulnerable. No one can really stop him. Only option is: evade of defend.
Isn't it against "high-sec isn't supposed to give invulnerability"? |
Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
77
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
From EVElopedia - Security Status
"Once your security status reaches -5 you are considered an outlaw and can be attacked by players anywhere without CONCORD intervention. "
Looks like you have options to me.
Capitals (Balancing and Roles) |
Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:06:00 -
[15] - Quote
Oh dear, I seem to be upsetting the players who like the exploit just as it is and will say anything to brush away the truth.
Most popular mode of retort among a lot of forum posters comprise of snide remarks, insults and general attempts at belittlement and denigration. I feel sorry for you. I will not enter into further discussion with unarmed folks.
Oh wait, you say "these are forums, that's what forums are for."
" Stop being so self-righteous" So funny coming from the self-righteous
Please take the bait, you'll just further cement my theory.
I'll leave this thread now and just remark in passing - point proven.
It's an exploit.
The door is not real. |
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Kitty McKitty wrote:There is no exploit abuse dummy, CONCORD deals with criminal aggression, they are not designed to completely negate ganks. High sec is not intended to allow invulnerability. problem is: planes for attack of suicide ganker are invulnerable. No one can really stop him. Only option is: evade of defend. Isn't it against "high-sec isn't supposed to give invulnerability"?
The suicide ganker is not 'invulnerable', and I don't just mean that they lose their ship in the end. Just because miners are MORE vulnerable does not mean killing gankers is impossible.
You also pointed out two methods that can be used to avoid suicide ganking. GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
287
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:
It's an exploit.
You have yet again failed to point out what is an exploit, and how. 3/10 for the troll effort though.
GÖÑ Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children GÖÑ |
Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
268
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Oh dear, I seem to be upsetting the players who like the exploit just as it is and will say anything to brush away the truth. Most popular mode of retort among a lot of forum posters comprise of snide remarks, insults and general attempts at belittlement and denigration. I feel sorry for you. I will not enter into further discussion with unarmed folks. Oh wait, you say "these are forums, that's what forums are for." " Stop being so self-righteous" So funny coming from the self-righteous Please take the bait, you'll just further cement my theory. I'll leave this thread now and just remark in passing - point proven. It's an exploit.
mommy make the bad man stop |
Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
268
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
he's exploiting, i just know it!
the people asking what the exploit is are mean too make them go away! |
Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Zenith Intaki wrote:Character with low enough sec status shouldn't allowed into high security empire space at all. I am fine with suicide ganking when character has neutral or high sec status, but it's just bad for the game that -10.00 sec status player can do 50 ganks per day if he wants to.
Concord should terminate their pod and ship straigth away and remove their clone into closest lowsec station without cloning facility.
And no, I can't mine ice.
I meant to stick that in my last post. Most of you posting here are not reading the "-10" part. The rest of the stuff you are inventing in your own mind.
The door is not real. |
|
Jokerface666
Ever Flow Northern Coalition.
32
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
woooooow..... "Character with low enough sec status shouldn't allowed into high security empire space at all"
hello kitty online is somwhere else dude.... ------------------------------w00t w00t rapetrain------------------------------ |
Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
269
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Zenith Intaki wrote:Character with low enough sec status shouldn't allowed into high security empire space at all. I am fine with suicide ganking when character has neutral or high sec status, but it's just bad for the game that -10.00 sec status player can do 50 ganks per day if he wants to.
Concord should terminate their pod and ship straigth away and remove their clone into closest lowsec station without cloning facility.
And no, I can't mine ice. I meant to stick that in my last post. Most of you posting here are not reading the "-10" part. The rest of the stuff you are inventing in your own mind.
you mean where we evade faction police designed to be evadable? you poor baby |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Thorn Galen wrote:Oh dear, I seem to be upsetting the players who like the exploit just as it is and will say anything to brush away the truth. Most popular mode of retort among a lot of forum posters comprise of snide remarks, insults and general attempts at belittlement and denigration. I feel sorry for you. I will not enter into further discussion with unarmed folks. Oh wait, you say "these are forums, that's what forums are for." " Stop being so self-righteous" So funny coming from the self-righteous Please take the bait, you'll just further cement my theory. I'll leave this thread now and just remark in passing - point proven. It's an exploit. mommy make the bad man stop
You should post more. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:18:00 -
[24] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:Most of you posting here are not reading the "-10" part.
It is INTENDED game mechanics that a -10 player can enter highsec if he choses. He has to suffer the fact that anyone and everyone can shoot him, and the faction police will spawn within about 3 seconds, wherever he goes.
Where is the exploit? Did he a) Find a way to stop you pointing his ship? b) Find a way to stop you shooting his ship? c) Find a way to stop CONCORD from destroying his ship? d) Find a way to evade the faction police indefinitely?
Please post the exact exploit, please.
Them being a "bad man" is not an exploit, FYI. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Serial Chi
DeathStar Systems
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
if ccp took away their invulnerability when undocking in high sec stations and their cloak when jumping high sec gates, this wouldn't be an issue anymore.
fact is ccp isnt good at risk vs reward. if ccp were good, you wouldn't see scammers who never have to leave their stations have such fat wallets.
make a macro to spam your scam all day long, come back to the pc, instant riches, no risk whatsoever.
gg
RISK vs REWARD needs rebalancing. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:18:00 -
[26] - Quote
If you have the balls to run in high sec at neg ten, you should have the opportunity to try it.
You should not, however, be invulnerable.
Making gates not function for flashy pods would be a good compromise to my thinking. If you are in a ship you get through. If you are in a pod you don't.
That is the only way to make bounty hunting a viable profession while still still giving criminal scum a chance at survival.
Mr Epeen
If you can read this, you haven't blocked me yet. |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:22:00 -
[27] - Quote
Serial Chi wrote:fact is players arent good at risk vs reward. if players were good, you wouldn't see players who never have to leave their stations get scammed out of their fat wallets I fixed your typos - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Weaselior
BUTTECORP INC Goonswarm Federation
269
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote: You should post more.
i'm posting as fast as I can! |
Serial Chi
DeathStar Systems
5
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:35:00 -
[29] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Serial Chi wrote:fact is players arent good at risk vs reward. if players were good, you wouldn't see players who never have to leave their stations get scammed out of their fat wallets I fixed your typos
you obviously don't understand how the risk vs reward system is SUPPOSED to work. there's all the risk for one side. theres no risk for the other side.
broken |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery Situation: Normal
54
|
Posted - 2011.10.05 15:43:00 -
[30] - Quote
Serial Chi wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Serial Chi wrote:fact is players arent good at risk vs reward. if players were good, you wouldn't see players who never have to leave their stations get scammed out of their fat wallets I fixed your typos you obviously don't understand how the risk vs reward system is SUPPOSED to work. there's all the risk for one side. theres no risk for the other side. broken
There's no risk at all for one side, unless you're ******** enough to be scammable.
If the other side is truly using a bot, they risk permanent bans.
But, they're not using bots in most cases. If you try engaging them in conversation, they're there. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |