Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
259
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
I am all for Modular Poses. Gave my opinion in many threads, sites or blogs. And what i see is that lot of players are asking for it. It d be first step in personal customization, housing.
But i want to ask a question which is a bit worrying.
Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are?
Personally i might be even up for Modular POSes but is a tough one. |
Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
28
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:I am all for Modular Poses. Gave my opinion in many threads, sites or blogs. And what i see is that lot of players are asking for it. It d be first step in personal customization, housing.
But i want to ask a question which is a bit worrying.
Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are?
Yes.
|
Ribs Smoker
13 Rocks and Wrecks LTD. Vindication Mob
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:I am all for Modular Poses. Gave my opinion in many threads, sites or blogs. And what i see is that lot of players are asking for it. It d be first step in personal customization, housing.
But i want to ask a question which is a bit worrying.
Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are?
Personally i might be even up for Modular POSes but is a tough one.
YES |
Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
28
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Nair Alderau wrote:Zloco Crendraven wrote:I am all for Modular Poses. Gave my opinion in many threads, sites or blogs. And what i see is that lot of players are asking for it. It d be first step in personal customization, housing.
But i want to ask a question which is a bit worrying.
Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are? Yes.It hardly is "giving up development" to develop one of the most crucial and at the same time most infuriatingly broken part of the game.
I don't care if nothing else get done in 2013 (continuing tiericide and small fixes excepted), if at the end we have a working, scalable POS system. |
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
1030
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yes. The potential is great, if done correctly. |
Kalk Drigand
Social Democratic Capitolists SOCDC
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yeah that sounds pretty awesome to me! |
Axe Coldon
Coldon Enterprises IMPERIAL LEGI0N
7
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 15:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:I am all for Modular Poses. Gave my opinion in many threads, sites or blogs. And what i see is that lot of players are asking for it. It d be first step in personal customization, housing.
But i want to ask a question which is a bit worrying.
Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are?
Personally i might be even up for Modular POSes but is a tough one.
YES I would be. I think they would be huge for the game. Especially if they empowered more players to have a POS. |
James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation RAZOR Alliance
3365
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are? I don't think anybody said anything about a full year, but a full expansion cycle yes.
In which case my answer is yes, I'm willing to wait longer for all of the other stuff that needs to be iterated and fixed (yes, even including sov) for a POS revamp. Phrases like "you can't nerf / buff X EVE is a Sandbox" have the same amount of meaning as "If this is a sack of potatoes then you can not carrot." - Alara IonStorm Want to enable BBcode on the forums? Here's how. |
Merlin Centarii
Sundown Logistics SpaceMonkey's Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:03:00 -
[9] - Quote
No question about it, YES! I want to build my LEGO house amongst the stars. |
Mia Restolo
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
86
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:04:00 -
[10] - Quote
Yes.
But they're specifically not doing that. The new development style calls for releases that cover a range of features aimed at all or at least most of the different play styles. I still can't figure out why so many think that there's only one person working at CCP doing all the development and that all resources need to be dedicated to a single task there. |
|
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
259
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:27:00 -
[11] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Zloco Crendraven wrote:Are u ready to give up on 1 year of EVE development (imagine 2 more expansions as Retribution) for a single feature (important one tough) as POSes are? I don't think anybody said anything about a full year, but a full expansion cycle yes. In which case my answer is yes, I'm willing to wait longer for all of the other stuff that needs to be iterated and fixed (yes, even including sov) for a POS revamp.
There was an interview or it was an article where was said that the basic feature would be doable in 1 expansion but another one d be needed for completing it. |
Toku Jiang
Jiang Laboratories and Discovery
120
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
If CCP introduced a modular POS system that had better security features for corp use and member interaction and you could anchor them in places besides moons, more corps would use them and more players would be apt to put them up.
I would give up 2 years of development or any type of new release if they could get his done and get it done right, I am 100% behind a new modular POS system and new POS interaction/use.
The fact that it sounds like they are going to abandon this venture as talked about in previous CSM meetings is very disconcerting and deflating and makes me question any further long term commitment to this game as that is what I have been looking forward too ever since they mentioned it. I was very sad reading that |
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
1960
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP said they were concerned with it only touching a small part of the players... Yet if they were to follow their own ideas laid out in their first modular pos CSM discussion about personal ownership and planting them anywhere, wouldn't that have been a striving goal for just about anyone? |
Toku Jiang
Jiang Laboratories and Discovery
121
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:CCP said they were concerned with it only touching a small part of the players... Yet if they were to follow their own ideas laid out in their first modular pos CSM discussion about personal ownership and planting them anywhere, wouldn't that have been a striving goal for just about anyone?
Exactly! |
handige harrie
Hedion University Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:CCP said they were concerned with it only touching a small part of the players... Yet if they were to follow their own ideas laid out in their first modular pos CSM discussion about personal ownership and planting them anywhere, wouldn't that have been a striving goal for just about anyone?
I think this is one of the reasons a lot of people are like;
what u say? Y NO POS? Baddest poster ever |
Zakarumit CZ
Zakarum Industries Exiliar Syndicate
37
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:30:00 -
[16] - Quote
Yes. Its together with ring mining one of the current most important topics. It will also attract a lot of new players when done and done properly. |
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
259
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:40:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tghe more ppl say yes. CCP might put few more thought on it. |
Lady Zarrina
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
51
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
There is no way this should take a year. It is pretty clear CCP is not in favor of a POS revamp. I am sure this large 1 year number was given solely to convince people it is not worth it.
Allocate resources to FiS |
Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
124
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
I can wait, I have plenty of time, more then one year of bought gametime. Inside mining barge, true story |
Finarfin
Immunity Syndrome
17
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:06:00 -
[20] - Quote
Yes, I would be willing to sacrifice a year worth of major new features. I assume that during this development time smaller ongoing initiatives like tiericide will continue. |
|
Chandaris
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
228
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:35:00 -
[21] - Quote
No.
Sucks to your posses. Fix the issues surrounding hangar access to keep the wormholers happy. Who cares about 'space housing' this is not Ken & Barbie online, it can wait. There are much larger issues to than giving us some pos eye candy (let's face it, they already look awesome and work fine, with the exception of hangar rights maybe, and the guns being a bit twitchy at times ;) |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2199
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:46:00 -
[22] - Quote
Bit of a cross post but I thought that this might go here:
Modular POS Thread from 2006
Another of many Modular POS threads in 2008 w/ more Dev response
Small holding Dev thread: 2011
Keynote from Fanfest 2012 that talks about POS's (linked at 46 min).
|
Liang Nuren
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
2697
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:54:00 -
[23] - Quote
Even if all of you were willing to wait 2 years with no features or improvements to the game, CCP isn't and can't be. That's not how you run a successful game company.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/LiangNuren/videos Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
1961
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 19:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Chandaris wrote:No.
Sucks to your posses. Fix the issues surrounding hangar access to keep the wormholers happy. Who cares about 'space housing' this is not Ken & Barbie online, it can wait. There are much larger issues to than giving us some pos eye candy (let's face it, they already look awesome and work fine, with the exception of hangar rights maybe, and the guns being a bit twitchy at times ;)
That's a pretty ignorant outlook for the scope of the change. Modular pos would then make them function more like outposts. What do outposts have? Docking. What does docking enable? Hanger and better outfitting for those POS upgraded to have hangers. Who would want docking most? Wormholers. A single central object with guns? Easier to manage. Are you one of the people who set up a death or dickstar? You know how much of a pain it is? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |