Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
Bloodpetal
Sal's Waste Management and Pod Disposal The Mockers AO
1172
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:48:00 -
[61] - Quote
I would like to point out you're being disinformative.
"settle our difference in single combat without interference..."
That's a lie. You really need to phrase that more accurately.
Otherwise, I think it's a great step to blappage. Where I am. |
Aurelius Harrison
Aperture Harmonics K162
10
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:49:00 -
[62] - Quote
Namagon wrote:As no one else mentioned it
OFF GRID BOOSTS
disable them while dueling or something - its not honourable to cheat as many do now.
I like the idea, but how it works in Eve is often different kettle of fish
Advantages within the confines of the system aren't cheats. They may not be fair but they aren't cheats. Boosters can be beaten, you just have to know how.
Also, please fix pos's. |
Arias Menlar
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:49:00 -
[63] - Quote
Just to point out, in the screenshot in the blog it says "we will enter into an Limited Engagement" where it should be "we will enter into a Limited Engagement", proper use of "a" and "an" is the sign of a caring and professional dev |
Dograzor
The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
27
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:50:00 -
[64] - Quote
In before command link booster alts. |
Iogrim
Kaer Industries
21
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
I already see how I go out the first day this implemented and spam on random people in high-sec! There must be a numbers of suckers who will click "Accept" without reading the text ;) |
Gisander
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
6
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:51:00 -
[66] - Quote
Looks simple and solid. Thank you.
I agree that kill mails should have a tag and that you should be able to completely opt out of the system. |
DuckDodgers en Chasteaux
Dreak Enterprise's Aerodyne Collective
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:52:00 -
[67] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:How many developer hours were spent on this?
How many developer hours do you think it would take to fix just the most egregious elements of POS management (such as adding manageable access lists to a SMA)?
Do you see the problem, here?
It might come as a giant surprise to you, but when people see Eve marketing (trailers, etc) they don't then start playing the game to have childish slap-fights in a market hub. The sooner you get on with creating a game which meets player expectations at the door, the better off you'll be.
however.. thanks to those childish slap fights THERE IS A MARKET this should be welcome change for anybody involved in marketing /manufacturing and even mining . more destruction = more ships and modules that need to be replaced = PROFIT!!!! |
KillaMcgee
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:52:00 -
[68] - Quote
in all fairness to CCP, they did remove the whole jetcan method of dueling, I suppose it is a fill in for removing a feature used by many... As much as I don't totally like the idea, it'll bring back pvp training for the new guys in a more... obvious (?) manner.. that and this doesn't affect low/null/wh so I shouldn't really have an opinion. |
Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
302
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:53:00 -
[69] - Quote
Commissar Kate wrote:The comments link on the blog does not lead to this forum. It just redirects to the blog.
That's a common error, in the first few minutes after a new Dev Blog has been published. AFAIK it's automatically corrected. Or if not then CCP has a manual procedure for fixing it.
|
Seetesh
Hand of the Sword
18
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:54:00 -
[70] - Quote
Bitter vet tears here, i don't want to play this game any longer. |
|
|
CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
3139
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:54:00 -
[71] - Quote
This is not a thread about the POS system, thanks. Please allow this thread to be about the contents of the blog. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
Salpad
Carebears with Attitude
302
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:55:00 -
[72] - Quote
Malrock wrote:All fine for fun, but please, put under game client generic options a checkmark for auto declining all duel requests.
Yes, that would be very nice.
|
Ravenstain
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
9
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:56:00 -
[73] - Quote
Since this thread has at least some dev activity ->
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194625&find=unread
@DEVS : Start at the top and go through the thread
This duel thing is nice and all, but seriously... devs especially CCP Unifex and CCP Seagull need to take a look at that thread and come up with some sort of response!!! |
Aprudena Gist
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
21
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:56:00 -
[74] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:This is not a thread about the POS system, thanks. Please allow this thread to be about the contents of the blog. How about you stop ******* developing worthless things like this and do something useful as a company. |
Borlag Crendraven
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
226
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:58:00 -
[75] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:This is not a thread about the POS system, thanks. Please allow this thread to be about the contents of the blog.
Alright, sorry for this. We are eternally grateful for having CCP work hard on features that get PVP in EVE closer to what it is in highly succesful games such as World Of Warcraft and Diablo III. Thumbs up. |
|
CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
3139
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:58:00 -
[76] - Quote
Salpad wrote:Commissar Kate wrote:The comments link on the blog does not lead to this forum. It just redirects to the blog. That's a common error, in the first few minutes after a new Dev Blog has been published. AFAIK it's automatically corrected. Or if not then CCP has a manual procedure for fixing it.
This is caused by the fact that we need to publish the blog to be able to put the link in the comment thread and then we need to attach the comment thread to the blog and republish it. There's 30 seconds of cache issues after the republish causing the blog to come up as blank or the link leading back to the blog. It's a little bit silly but tolerable in the grand scheme of things :) CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
|
CCP Masterplan
C C P C C P Alliance
1000
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:59:00 -
[77] - Quote
Arias Menlar wrote:Just to point out, in the screenshot in the blog it says "we will enter into an Limited Engagement" where it should be "we will enter into a Limited Engagement", proper use of "a" and "an" is the sign of a caring and professional dev I blame placeholder text and the fact we haven't done an content review pass on this yet. ;)
Bloodpetal wrote:I would like to point out you're being disinformative.
"settle our difference in single combat without interference..."
That's a lie. You really need to phrase that more accurately.
Otherwise, I think it's a great step to blappage. Can you challenge multiple people to a duel and have 4v1 battles or 4v4 battles? As much as anything in EVE can be done without interference, I think this is valid. And yes, you can challenge multiple people in turn. As soon as the first one accepts, you can move on to the next until everyone is engaged as you wish.
Aurelius Harrison wrote:Quote:However, if the target accepts the challenge, then a 5-minute Limited Engagement is created between the two characters. Question for clarification. is this 5 minute timer the time in which combat can start? Or a limit on how long the fight can last? I can't imagine many fights created this way lasting more than 5 minutes but it could happen. It is the time during which combat may start. As soon as one party is shooting the other, the timer is reset and paused at 5 minutes. Once they stop fighting, then the 5 minutes will start counting down. This can be repeated as often as necessary, so the fight can go on as long as you like, provided there is not a single pause for 5 minutes without any fighting.
"This one time, on patch day..." CCP Masterplan -á| -áTeam Five-0: Rewriting the law |
|
Nair Alderau
EVE University Ivy League
44
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 16:59:00 -
[78] - Quote
Aprudena Gist wrote:CCP Guard wrote:This is not a thread about the POS system, thanks. Please allow this thread to be about the contents of the blog. How about you stop ******* developing worthless things like this and do something useful as a company.
You aren't likely to help us doing it like this. Contribute in the POS thread itself (which CCP is aware of). It is about the summer expansion. We all knew that they haven't worked on POSes yet. This is about convincing them that starting now (rather after the design phase), they need to work on POSes.
So don't dump on other good work CCP does... This is nice for lowsec dwellers (and for highsecers, too, i guess). |
AutumnWind1983
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
8
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:01:00 -
[79] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:This is not a thread about the POS system, thanks. Please allow this thread to be about the contents of the blog.
I only post in threads that affect a small number of people. |
Alx Warlord
SUPERNOVA SOCIETY Tribal Conclave
314
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:01:00 -
[80] - Quote
CCP Masterplan.
If we ask for a duel, the target refuses, and then we shot at him and get cancorded... can we receive in the nearest station the item [Concordoken] ??? Please read this! > New POS system (Block Built) Please read this! > Refining and Reprocess Revamp |
|
Denidil
Turalyon Plus
564
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:01:00 -
[81] - Quote
incoming tears about "OMG THEMEPARK!"
but i like this idea. Tedium and difficulty are not the same thing, if you don't realize this then STFU about game design. |
Iax Masali
Vent Mob
10
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:02:00 -
[82] - Quote
Now all we need is a Wager System or a Third party App or something so we can bet Ship, ISK basically anything we want! |
Aurelius Harrison
Aperture Harmonics K162
11
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:02:00 -
[83] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:This is not a thread about the POS system, thanks. Please allow this thread to be about the contents of the blog.
I applaud the idea of a dueling mechanic and have mentioned it to Two step atleast once.
But that doesn't mean people shouldn't miss the opportunity to draw the attention of developers to the things they think need attention. Cato the Elder didn't let little things like discussions on agriculture to point out his ardent belief that Carthage needed to be destroyed.
On that note, please fix pos's. |
Spacing Cowboy
Ordo Drakonis Nulli Secunda
61
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:03:00 -
[84] - Quote
A nice option for the highsec-boys , *aproved* ( not that anyone cares )
|
Bloodpetal
Sal's Waste Management and Pod Disposal The Mockers AO
1172
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:03:00 -
[85] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:Bloodpetal wrote:I would like to point out you're being disinformative.
"settle our difference in single combat without interference..."
That's a lie. You really need to phrase that more accurately.
As much as anything in EVE can be done without interference, I think this is valid.
If I may offer some word-smithing for you :
"...settle our differences in private combat without legal interference."
#1 - If you can duel multiple people, then it's not Single combat, it's private combat. #2 - You're really getting around the CONCORD/Gate Gun/Sec Status interference. AKA Legal interference, not player interference.
Consider it. Where I am. |
Arden Elenduil
The Skunkworks
11
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:04:00 -
[86] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:Do you prefer pistols or swords?
Fisticuffs at dawn I say, tally ho and have at you good sir |
|
Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
6931
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:05:00 -
[87] - Quote
CCP Masterplan wrote:Chribba wrote:I prefer mining lasers! No surprise huh? Very well. Bring your best Strip Miner and I'll see you at dawn. lol why do I have a feeling I already know the outcome of that duel? haha but I'll see you there!!
|
|
Othran
Route One
409
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
Open question for CCP :
Given high-sec protects people then why should you circumvent that?
I'd like more people in PvP but this nonsense isn't the way to do it |
Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
549
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:05:00 -
[89] - Quote
Nair Alderau wrote:This is nice for lowsec dwellers (and for highsecers, too, i guess).
I'm sorry but in what part of lowsec you need a dueling mechanics?
I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |
Molly Modee
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 17:13:00 -
[90] - Quote
Iax Masali wrote:Can we also get some Tekken or Street Fighter sound for when the round starts and the Opponent dies? A rousing cheer like a gladiator received in the arena upon victory would be nice also |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 14 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |