Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 86 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Lee Anderson
EVE Portal INC Portal INC
44
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 23:22:00 -
[2461] - Quote
Misanth wrote:Well CCP, thanks for removing my initial post. I did not violate any forum rules. However, I'll explain since you didn't get it:
Removed again. Navigator.
Edit; to elaborate, as we know populist choices gets the blind sheeps running and they might miss the goal..
1) removing regular drones on motherships is ******** beyond belief, this is what Zulu and CCP wanted and tried to do repeatedly. Everytime this has idea has been put to rest. Now that moms need a rebalance, CCP finally can do their long-wet-dream - something that isn't even required.
2) the only issue with supers is their damage output, they had a hp boost for a reason, remember how even small industrialist corps in lowsec would drop a few mixed shield/armor carrier/dread-groups and kill them like they were nothing? Their hp is reasonable, after years of being nerfed, but their damage isn't. Fighterbombers and changed doomsdays made them from "laughable and mocked" to "way overpowered". The nerf should be to FB's and Fighters, not to dronebays and hp.
(and quite frankly, with supers doing same ridicilous damage to other supers and structures, they will have same strenght in sov war so this nerf could end up still promoting super-blobs)
3) The logoff timer change should be universal, for all ships, or it's a stupid change. The blog does not specify if this is for capitals only, but the blog is for capitals only. This needs to be addressed. Game mechanics should in general be universal, else they by themselves become a balance issue. TL;DR state if this is for capitals only, or all ships.. should be the latter.
CCP is showing ignorance on this issue, ignorance, populism, and of course they got their holy grail "death to all drones" slotted into this. I hope players arn't ignorant enough to miss out on this, it's quite embarrassing how you might just finally after four years get away with a stupid change nobody asked for. Nobody but you, CCP. CCP Navigator owning ppl again with his awesomeness... oh god this might be DEL to... god forbid as a paying customer we can talk to a company that we help make... Its are money that we spent that pays your paycheck... Don't forget if everyone in EVE stopped paying then there is no CCP
http://eveportal.net Great site for Mission Reports and more.
|
Velin Dhal
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
74
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 02:10:00 -
[2462] - Quote
Lee Anderson wrote:Misanth wrote:Well CCP, thanks for removing my initial post. I did not violate any forum rules. However, I'll explain since you didn't get it:
Removed again. Navigator.
Edit; to elaborate, as we know populist choices gets the blind sheeps running and they might miss the goal..
1) removing regular drones on motherships is ******** beyond belief, this is what Zulu and CCP wanted and tried to do repeatedly. Everytime this has idea has been put to rest. Now that moms need a rebalance, CCP finally can do their long-wet-dream - something that isn't even required.
2) the only issue with supers is their damage output, they had a hp boost for a reason, remember how even small industrialist corps in lowsec would drop a few mixed shield/armor carrier/dread-groups and kill them like they were nothing? Their hp is reasonable, after years of being nerfed, but their damage isn't. Fighterbombers and changed doomsdays made them from "laughable and mocked" to "way overpowered". The nerf should be to FB's and Fighters, not to dronebays and hp.
(and quite frankly, with supers doing same ridicilous damage to other supers and structures, they will have same strenght in sov war so this nerf could end up still promoting super-blobs)
3) The logoff timer change should be universal, for all ships, or it's a stupid change. The blog does not specify if this is for capitals only, but the blog is for capitals only. This needs to be addressed. Game mechanics should in general be universal, else they by themselves become a balance issue. TL;DR state if this is for capitals only, or all ships.. should be the latter.
CCP is showing ignorance on this issue, ignorance, populism, and of course they got their holy grail "death to all drones" slotted into this. I hope players arn't ignorant enough to miss out on this, it's quite embarrassing how you might just finally after four years get away with a stupid change nobody asked for. Nobody but you, CCP. CCP Navigator owning ppl again with his awesomeness... oh god this might be DEL to... god forbid as a paying customer we can talk to a company that we help make... Its are money that we spent that pays your paycheck... Don't forget if everyone in EVE stopped paying then there is no CCP
Everyone raging about this patch should sit outside of Jita and destroy anything that comes out of 4-4. Fill out local with pissed off people and when no one can do **** in Jita for a month, maybe CCP will listen. They certainly don't listen to anyone on here. |
Pastachick
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 18:00:00 -
[2463] - Quote
Velin Dhal wrote:Well as of right now, I'm on the test server with the new patch. Way to drop the ball CCP.
Hybrid balancing is great stuff, but I'm glad to see that once again, the older players in eve get screwed over. From the nerfs I'm seeing on here, you didn't listen to anyone in this thread. The massive Super nerf I'm seeing here is insanity. They are completely worthless.
Good job CCP on making Test and Goons now strong enough to push just about anyone they want out of Null. Seeming you just made the counter to their high member count disappear. Who needs skills points anymore when you can just have 3000 noobs.
Its getting more and more pointless to keep paying for a game that keeps alienating its older players.
our rifters shall block out the sun etc~ |
Xhondo Dhoru
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 18:15:00 -
[2464] - Quote
Passive62 wrote:Some ppl talk about real-life situations with the carriers etc. Please dont forget that no navy is sailing out with just a carrier. They have carrier battle groups with dps agains submarines, ships and aircraft. If you cant kill a hic with a carrier, then ensure you have enough support in the form of sub-caps to counter that. maybe the era of the "cap-fleet" is dying now, with the start of the era of "carrier batlegroups" or "CAP-battlegroups" where all players can take part in, even the noob with a rifter
Sometimes I truly wonder if people who make posts like these have fetal alcohol syndrome or some other terrible and debilitating handicap.
One thing that I can say for certain though is that you have absolutely no comprehension of the capabilities of a Nimitz class supercarrier and should stop referencing them entirely. |
Pastachick
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 18:33:00 -
[2465] - Quote
Xhondo Dhoru wrote:Passive62 wrote:Some ppl talk about real-life situations with the carriers etc. Please dont forget that no navy is sailing out with just a carrier. They have carrier battle groups with dps agains submarines, ships and aircraft. If you cant kill a hic with a carrier, then ensure you have enough support in the form of sub-caps to counter that. maybe the era of the "cap-fleet" is dying now, with the start of the era of "carrier batlegroups" or "CAP-battlegroups" where all players can take part in, even the noob with a rifter Sometimes I truly wonder if people who make posts like these have fetal alcohol syndrome or some other terrible and debilitating handicap. One thing that I can say for certain though is that you have absolutely no comprehension of the capabilities of a Nimitz class supercarrier and should stop referencing them entirely.
I too get my my top notch top seekret military information from playing vidya all day |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 19:01:00 -
[2466] - Quote
Velin Dhal wrote:Well as of right now, I'm on the test server with the new patch. Way to drop the ball CCP.
Hybrid balancing is great stuff, but I'm glad to see that once again, the older players in eve get screwed over. From the nerfs I'm seeing on here, you didn't listen to anyone in this thread. The massive Super nerf I'm seeing here is insanity. They are completely worthless.
Good job CCP on making Test and Goons now strong enough to push just about anyone they want out of Null. Seeming you just made the counter to their high member count disappear. Who needs skills points anymore when you can just have 3000 noobs.
Its getting more and more pointless to keep paying for a game that keeps alienating its older players.
Death to all supercaps. |
Jita Alt666
950
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 19:06:00 -
[2467] - Quote
This is my new favourite thread: Thanks for bumping it CCP; I know you just wanted to share the tears with everyone.
To ensure I am on topic: Thank you for the changes CCP, I look forward to leading small subcap gangs (10-15) through 0.0 without having to watch for the inevitable cyno alt attempting to get on grid with us to drop 15 unsupported super capitals on us for lols. |
Vile rat
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
813
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 19:07:00 -
[2468] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:This is my new favourite thread: Thanks for bumping it CCP; I know you just wanted to share the tears with everyone.
To ensure I am on topic: Thank you for the changes CCP, I look forward to leading small subcap gangs (10-15) through 0.0 without having to watch for the inevitable cyno alt attempting to get on grid with us to drop 15 unsupported super capitals on us for lols.
They are still welcome to try this kind of garbage if they really want to :) |
CoLe Blackblood
the united Negative Ten.
24
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 19:46:00 -
[2469] - Quote
Lookin good CCP. The tears will be endless. |
Cid SilverWing
Grim Determination Clockworks Inc. Nulli Tertius
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:06:00 -
[2470] - Quote
Dreadnoughts are already sitting ducks when Sieging, they shouldn't be so unable to hit anything when not moving. The Tracking penalty on the Siege needs to go, badly. This will give Dreadnoughts the buff they've been crying for since the start and make them much more viable again. They're not supposed to be pigeonholed into POS-bashing, they should be able to shoot enemy caps and maybe even battleships. They ARE already vulnerable, so any more nerfing is just cruel on Dread pilots that enjoy being in the big ships.
And it seems to me it's the Titans that should have Tracking penalties, or be unable to fit/receive Tracking assistance. This to further stop people from simply replacing SC blobs with Titan blobs.
Further testing should be committed into this epic nerfing of carriers and supercarriers, however, because I have a terrible feeling they're being overnerfed into useless. I've seen people who like taking carriers out to ratting, even supercarriers. |
|
A Reynolds
Atlas Jupiter Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:08:00 -
[2471] - Quote
moros just got castrated. time to sell quick before palyers find out. Capital gallente ship with no drone bay lol |
zero2espect
ZERO HEAVY INDUSTRIES
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:26:00 -
[2472] - Quote
forget shooting stuff in jita 4-4. i'm waiting to see the unsubs. my super training toon is definately being put to sleep. |
Suiteii
Raven's Flight Vanguard.
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:33:00 -
[2473] - Quote
I love the changes.
Even for small alliances, the natural escalation of a fight will be as follows:
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) engages subcap fleet B (SF-B)
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) drops triage carrier to support the fleet.
- Subcap fleet B (SF-B) drops dreadnought + carrier to counter triage carrier from SF-A
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) drops mothership to counter dreadnought + carrier from SF-B
- Subcap Fleet B (SF-B) drops titan to counter mothership.
This is how Eve was meant to be played. Blobbing is an unforunate side-effect of Eve, but it happens. If you wanted even 10v10 fights matched isk for isk... you can try every other game on the market.
Having a mothership won't mean "I win" anymore. It's merely adding another tier to the escalation process.
As it is currently, you can just skipp this whole escalation process:
- SF-A warps in to SF-B
- SF-B drops a mothership.
- Over.
With the new changes, when SF-B drops its MOM, SF-A can still win with superior fighting ability/numbers |
zero2espect
ZERO HEAVY INDUSTRIES
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:43:00 -
[2474] - Quote
^^
if you think this is what is going to happen, i can't help you.
now what will happen is you will either see no supers or you will be dropped by 40 of them.
this is the kind of post which got us into this situation in the first place. |
S8nt
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:47:00 -
[2475] - Quote
CCP you are being ******** and short sited by making these changes to super carriers and Titans... you are only going to make the problem worse... get someone that can see what you are actually doing by making these changes...
A simple RL example:
I buy a Farrari which I spent years saving for. Now all of a sudden there is some emmisions concerns with it. So I take it in for a service. When they return it to me I find they have no put a mini's engine in because it was a problem before. Would you accept that change made or would you want something equivalent or better?
By making the changes to the ships and log of mechanics you are forcing corps and alliances to stay away from them, if they cannot fund or support them or you are going to force them to have hundreds of them so that if they do need to commit they are sure they are going to win...
I said this when you changed them in Dominion... you are not looking at the big picture and you are destroying your game. This is going to push it even further into the crap.
Please listen to reason and stop butchering features in this game for the sake of profit and your shareholders!
S8nt |
GRIEV3R
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 20:50:00 -
[2476] - Quote
I am a proud ally of Goons. I have flown my Nyx on numerous ops with the CFC Super Club. I have great respect for the Mittani and other highly placed members of Goons. Having flown with them, I can vouch for them being very smart players, and, as Malcom Reynolds would say, "kind and decent folk."
But I disagree very strongly with their thesis of "death to all supercaps"
I think SCs and Titans are awesome ships that could really add to the game, if they were balanced right. I was very sad to get rid of my Nyx, and in spite of this nerf I still dream of flying an Erebus. I hope CCP takes "death to all supers" under consideration as just one of many opinions. Please don't just automatically give Mittani everything he wants as far as supers are concerned and ignore all other views.
Mittani is almost always right, but this time, on this issue, he's got it all wrong. |
Suiteii
Raven's Flight Vanguard.
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:40:00 -
[2477] - Quote
Suiteii wrote:Blobbing is an unforunate side-effect of Eve, but it happens. If you wanted even 10v10 fights matched isk for isk... you can try every other game on the market.
zero2espect wrote:^^
if you think this is what is going to happen, i can't help you.
now what will happen is you will either see no supers or you will be dropped by 40 of them.
this is the kind of post which got us into this situation in the first place.
When someone drops 40 supercapitals to fight your one, you're going to lose. CCP isn't trying to nerf blobbing. Blobbing is a part of Eve.
CCP is only trying to stop those 40 supercarriers from being the answer to -every- situation. |
sarsa
FinFleet Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:42:00 -
[2478] - Quote
Vile rat wrote:Velin Dhal wrote:Well as of right now, I'm on the test server with the new patch. Way to drop the ball CCP.
Hybrid balancing is great stuff, but I'm glad to see that once again, the older players in eve get screwed over. From the nerfs I'm seeing on here, you didn't listen to anyone in this thread. The massive Super nerf I'm seeing here is insanity. They are completely worthless.
Good job CCP on making Test and Goons now strong enough to push just about anyone they want out of Null. Seeming you just made the counter to their high member count disappear. Who needs skills points anymore when you can just have 3000 noobs.
Its getting more and more pointless to keep paying for a game that keeps alienating its older players. Death to all supercaps.
So if 5000 goons voted CSM Mittani and Vile Rat the new brainiacs of eve that means they are the voice of eve community ? I must remind CCP of the times when there were 47.000 players online well now there are 35.000 soon there will be 25.000 in the way you are going. You just made a favor to the blobs that have the same capital capability but not the balls to field them. The problem was not that supers were to hard to kill because that works in both ways doesn't it ? You are failing to deliver what the community asks since 3 years. I like how Tallest responds in that blog saying "I" want to make some changes dude change away what ever you like soon you will play it as a network game. And you might rethink you strategies because you guys might have a surprise when Diablo 3 will be released. I play this game for 8 years in each year you bring only disappointment to the community you encourage blobs all the time. YOU as CCP made this game a BLOB FEST.
Remember the upper you get the bigger is the fall.
Pointless to say anything to people like Vile Rat and Mittani they are people that think they are always right. CSM members should be people with extensive knowledge about game mechanics and with good ideas CCP should recruit them through interviews/test not to put 5000 goons to vote them.
This is my opinion and how i had to put up to YOUR CHANGES patch after patch now you put up with My OPINION. |
algorythm
Evolution
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:45:00 -
[2479] - Quote
This makes me think about posting something on the lines of:
Will sell 100M SP supercap char with nyx for a couple of plexes. or extra quafe
This is just another step by CCP on making people who play the game for years to leave it.
Just a reminder dear CCP, Supercaps are hard to build, hard to fit, and on top they require a dedicated pilot to fly them, why the hell wont they be Super?!
From this day forward I shall call my Nyx Willy and will reffer to supercaps has littlecaps.
P.S. I've always called her willy |
xxxak
Intergalactic Syndicate Nulli Secunda
153
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:48:00 -
[2480] - Quote
Suiteii wrote:I love the changes.
Even for small alliances, the natural escalation of a fight will be as follows:
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) engages subcap fleet B (SF-B)
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) drops triage carrier to support the fleet.
- Subcap fleet B (SF-B) drops dreadnought + carrier to counter triage carrier from SF-A
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) drops mothership to counter dreadnought + carrier from SF-B
- Subcap Fleet B (SF-B) drops titan to counter mothership.
This is how Eve was meant to be played. Blobbing is an unforunate side-effect of Eve, but it happens. If you wanted even 10v10 fights matched isk for isk... you can try every other game on the market.
Having a mothership won't mean "I win" anymore. It's merely adding another tier to the escalation process.
As it is currently, you can just skipp this whole escalation process:
- SF-A warps in to SF-B
- SF-B drops a mothership.
- Over.
With the new changes, when SF-B drops its MOM, SF-A can still win with superior fighting ability/numbers
Are you a noob? Have you ever been in a 0.0 alliance?
People don't deploy caps (much less supers) as you just outlined. It simply does not happen that way.
lol..........
The nerfs to supercaps will cause more super pilots to join the largest alliances who can properly "support" their deployment, further concentrating firepower/wealth in EVE. The end result will be fewer "fun" fights, and will hurt EVE in the long run. |
|
xxxak
Intergalactic Syndicate Nulli Secunda
153
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:51:00 -
[2481] - Quote
The most egregious change is the fact that Supercarriers cannot even carry a full flight of fighters and fighter bombers.
That is simply silly and insulting. I would rather have the ships taken out of the game, and receive a full reimbursement.
But beyond that, and mark my words, these changes on the whole simply mean that supers will ONLY be flown in HUGE blobs.
They will be used less, which might or might not be good for EVE, but when they are used, they will be used in ways that newer/weaker players find even MORE unfair. The nerfs to supercaps will cause more super pilots to join the largest alliances who can properly "support" their deployment, further concentrating firepower/wealth in EVE. The end result will be fewer "fun" fights, and will hurt EVE in the long run. |
Suiteii
Raven's Flight Vanguard.
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 21:57:00 -
[2482] - Quote
xxxak wrote:Suiteii wrote:I love the changes.
Even for small alliances, the natural escalation of a fight will be as follows:
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) engages subcap fleet B (SF-B)
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) drops triage carrier to support the fleet.
- Subcap fleet B (SF-B) drops dreadnought + carrier to counter triage carrier from SF-A
- Subcap fleet A (SF-A) drops mothership to counter dreadnought + carrier from SF-B
- Subcap Fleet B (SF-B) drops titan to counter mothership.
This is how Eve was meant to be played. Blobbing is an unforunate side-effect of Eve, but it happens. If you wanted even 10v10 fights matched isk for isk... you can try every other game on the market.
Having a mothership won't mean "I win" anymore. It's merely adding another tier to the escalation process.
As it is currently, you can just skipp this whole escalation process:
- SF-A warps in to SF-B
- SF-B drops a mothership.
- Over.
With the new changes, when SF-B drops its MOM, SF-A can still win with superior fighting ability/numbers Are you a noob? Have you ever been in a 0.0 alliance? People don't deploy caps (much less supers) as you just outlined. It simply does not happen that way. lol..........
Exactly. They drop MOMs because there's no point to anything else.....
PS. Yes. I fought in the NC war. As per the last part of my post. Fights were decided by who had more supercaps under the cyno blocker.
Edit: in case it wasnt clear. With these changes it's actually possible for a subcap fleet to go in under a cyno blocker, and take out said blocker without a fleet of MOMs/titans to **** your face. |
Edsback
MineOne
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:00:00 -
[2483] - Quote
xxxak wrote:The most egregious change is the fact that Supercarriers cannot even carry a full flight of fighters and fighter bombers.
That is simply silly and insulting. I would rather have the ships taken out of the game, and receive a full reimbursement.
But beyond that, and mark my words, these changes on the whole simply mean that supers will ONLY be flown in HUGE blobs.
They will be used less, which might or might not be good for EVE, but when they are used, they will be used in ways that newer/weaker players find even MORE unfair. something that have not been said in any of the blogs is that after this hurf super carrier will need more drone bay parts in order to make them, yes i said more drone bays so try and work that one out.
also due to having the drone bay taken away from titans and dreds ccp have added more parts to what is needed to make up for the change so if you where thinking dreds and titan build cost will be lower due to this you are wrong. |
Edsback
MineOne
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:02:00 -
[2484] - Quote
great job ccp now back to this thread for more good nights of fits and giggles |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
5425
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:14:00 -
[2485] - Quote
S8nt wrote:A simple RL example: GǪwhich by very definition of GǣRLGǥ is completely irrelevant to EVE balancing.
Quote:By making the changes to the ships and log of mechanics you are forcing corps and alliances to stay away from them, if they cannot fund or support them Good. That's the goal here: get a support fleet, or die.
Quote:Please listen to reason They did. That's why the all-in-one-mobiles are getting nerfed to the point where they need some support ships to survive. It's the reasonable thing to do.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Find more rants over at Tippis' Rants. |
xxxak
Intergalactic Syndicate Nulli Secunda
153
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:25:00 -
[2486] - Quote
Tippia wrote:S8nt wrote:A simple RL example: GǪwhich by very definition of GǣRLGǥ is completely irrelevant to EVE balancing. Quote:By making the changes to the ships and log of mechanics you are forcing corps and alliances to stay away from them, if they cannot fund or support them Good. That's the goal here: get a support fleet, or die. Quote:Please listen to reason They did. That's why the all-in-one-mobiles are getting nerfed to the point where they need some support ships to survive. It's the reasonable thing to do.
Do you deny that these changes will force even more Blobbing with massive, face-crushing subcap "support" blobs to support the rich "Knights and Lords" in their supers?
Tippia, I want to hear you deny that once from your own lips, so I can make you eat crow in 6 months. The nerfs to supercaps will cause more super pilots to join the largest alliances who can properly "support" their deployment, further concentrating firepower/wealth in EVE. The end result will be fewer "fun" fights, and will hurt EVE in the long run. |
Suiteii
Raven's Flight Vanguard.
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:39:00 -
[2487] - Quote
xxxak wrote:Do you deny that these changes will force even more Blobbing with massive, face-crushing subcap "support" blobs to support the rich "Knights and Lords" in their supers?
Tippia, I want to hear you deny that once from your own lips, so I can make you eat crow in 6 months.
So you're admitting that these changes will bring subcaps back into the playing field without completely removing supercapitals from the fight.
Sounds like balance, to me. |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5719
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:41:00 -
[2488] - Quote
sarsa wrote:Vile rat wrote:Velin Dhal wrote:Well as of right now, I'm on the test server with the new patch. Way to drop the ball CCP.
Hybrid balancing is great stuff, but I'm glad to see that once again, the older players in eve get screwed over. From the nerfs I'm seeing on here, you didn't listen to anyone in this thread. The massive Super nerf I'm seeing here is insanity. They are completely worthless.
Good job CCP on making Test and Goons now strong enough to push just about anyone they want out of Null. Seeming you just made the counter to their high member count disappear. Who needs skills points anymore when you can just have 3000 noobs.
Its getting more and more pointless to keep paying for a game that keeps alienating its older players. Death to all supercaps. So if 5000 goons voted CSM Mittani and Vile Rat the new brainiacs of eve that means they are the voice of eve community ? I must remind CCP of the times when there were 47.000 players online well now there are 35.000 soon there will be 25.000 in the way you are going. You just made a favor to the blobs that have the same capital capability but not the balls to field them. The problem was not that supers were to hard to kill because that works in both ways doesn't it ? You are failing to deliver what the community asks since 3 years. I like how Tallest responds in that blog saying "I" want to make some changes dude change away what ever you like soon you will play it as a network game. And you might rethink you strategies because you guys might have a surprise when Diablo 3 will be released. I play this game for 8 years in each year you bring only disappointment to the community you encourage blobs all the time. YOU as CCP made this game a BLOB FEST. Remember the upper you get the bigger is the fall. Pointless to say anything to people like Vile Rat and Mittani they are people that think they are always right. CSM members should be people with extensive knowledge about game mechanics and with good ideas CCP should recruit them through interviews/test not to put 5000 goons to vote them. This is my opinion and how i had to put up to YOUR CHANGES patch after patch now you put up with My OPINION.
Wow, how did I somehow miss this thread full of ex-BoB tears?
Oh, right - Skyrim. The Mittani, CSM7: Vote Here - One EVE. One Vote. One Chairman
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
xxxak
Intergalactic Syndicate Nulli Secunda
153
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:44:00 -
[2489] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:sarsa wrote:Vile rat wrote:Velin Dhal wrote:Well as of right now, I'm on the test server with the new patch. Way to drop the ball CCP.
Hybrid balancing is great stuff, but I'm glad to see that once again, the older players in eve get screwed over. From the nerfs I'm seeing on here, you didn't listen to anyone in this thread. The massive Super nerf I'm seeing here is insanity. They are completely worthless.
Good job CCP on making Test and Goons now strong enough to push just about anyone they want out of Null. Seeming you just made the counter to their high member count disappear. Who needs skills points anymore when you can just have 3000 noobs.
Its getting more and more pointless to keep paying for a game that keeps alienating its older players. Death to all supercaps. So if 5000 goons voted CSM Mittani and Vile Rat the new brainiacs of eve that means they are the voice of eve community ? I must remind CCP of the times when there were 47.000 players online well now there are 35.000 soon there will be 25.000 in the way you are going. You just made a favor to the blobs that have the same capital capability but not the balls to field them. The problem was not that supers were to hard to kill because that works in both ways doesn't it ? You are failing to deliver what the community asks since 3 years. I like how Tallest responds in that blog saying "I" want to make some changes dude change away what ever you like soon you will play it as a network game. And you might rethink you strategies because you guys might have a surprise when Diablo 3 will be released. I play this game for 8 years in each year you bring only disappointment to the community you encourage blobs all the time. YOU as CCP made this game a BLOB FEST. Remember the upper you get the bigger is the fall. Pointless to say anything to people like Vile Rat and Mittani they are people that think they are always right. CSM members should be people with extensive knowledge about game mechanics and with good ideas CCP should recruit them through interviews/test not to put 5000 goons to vote them. This is my opinion and how i had to put up to YOUR CHANGES patch after patch now you put up with My OPINION. Wow, how did I somehow miss this thread full of ex-BoB tears? Oh, right - Skyrim.
Mittens, your vile goal of the concentration of power in 2-3 power blocs and the destruction of fun in EVE is nearly complete.
Can I get an exclusive first-quote?
I, for one, look forward to seeing the Lords and Knights of EVE ride on their supercaps atop a wave of human filth and misery as the peasants in subcaps batter freemen out of their nullsec homes. The nerfs to supercaps will cause more super pilots to join the largest alliances who can properly "support" their deployment, further concentrating firepower/wealth in EVE. The end result will be fewer "fun" fights, and will hurt EVE in the long run. |
Sesshru
Lacking In Diplomacy RED.OverLord
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 22:46:00 -
[2490] - Quote
i've spent the last several months, training up all my skills to perfect for a niddy
and now i see this
capitals getting nerfed but the cost of them remains the same, and what it takes to make them remains the same
so i pay the same price for a nerf
why should it take the same materials for a lesser ship with these nerf's, i find this quite unfair to the eve community |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 .. 86 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |