Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ruby Hotrod
X Generation
4
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 13:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
I don't see any trolls in this thread |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
528
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 13:31:00 -
[32] - Quote
Aqriue wrote:I would agree with you, but I don't. Since caps are loosing drones for self defense and have to rely on lesser ships now for protection then the reverse is true- What goes down must go up as well.
Frigs should no longer be able to kill a BS, their little ittbbitty weapons should do 1 points of damage to anything thats not another frig or small drone (5 points of damage to a cruiser/BC). No more 15 minute rifter solo kills for a BS, you got to bring 200 rifters to kill 1 BS as they self rep it back. Hulks will no longer be able to be soloed by a rifter in lowsec, even if that exhumer pilot was an idiot to bring it in. .
Read as far as this, realised post was either a deliberate troll or a product of solvent abuse.
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Ang Min
CPD Adventures Pte. Ltd.
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.27 11:00:00 -
[33] - Quote
Just Another Toon wrote: Ill say it again - CARRIERS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE LOGISTICS SHIPS NOT OFFENSIVE SHIPS .
You can say it again and again and again, but it still wont' make it true. Carriers are supposed to be one of the most devestating offensive weapons of any navy (just as in the real world). If it was supposed to be a logistics ship, then it would not have fighters, and it would be called a "Capital Logistics Ship" or something instead of a carrier. Sure, it can fulfil a logistics role effectively, but that does not mean it must be restricted to that (most ships in Eve can have multiple roles).
I'm glad CCP came to their senses and removed the fighter nerf, as it's bad enough already when you can't even hit a cruiser with something that's about the same size (fighter). But I do get the point about the "I win button" and carrier blobs. Maybe the better solution to that is to make carriers far more expensive to build and maintain. This is how it works here on Earth - no nation can show up on the shore of another nation with 25 carriers and wipe them out...in fact, most countries can't even afford to build/maintain one single carrier group. Even the most powerful military on the planet (USA) can only maintain around ten carrier battle groups, I believe (and the nation is trillions of dollars in debt, by the way).
They should also be very vulnerable without a support group, but that's pretty much the case now.
Cheers! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |