Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Apollo Zanzibar
Soul Snatchers SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
I think there should be available cloaked space stations..why not?? |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2640
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:10:00 -
[2] - Quote
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |
Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. That... is one of the best answers to a GD thread i've seen so far...
It also made me laugh nicely |
|
CCP Complex
C C P C C P Alliance
21
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
How do you know they are not already in the game? CCP Complex-á|| -áEVE Marketing Team-á|| Capture Artist-á|| @CCP_Complex |
|
Wodensun
ZeroSec
33
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:15:00 -
[5] - Quote
CCP Complex wrote:How do you know they are not already in the game?
because of falcon obviously... |
Apollo Zanzibar
Soul Snatchers SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Complex wrote:How do you know they are not already in the game? I don;t how do we find out?? |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2320
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2320
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
Apollo Zanzibar wrote:CCP Complex wrote:How do you know they are not already in the game? I don;t how do we find out?? Get within 2 km of it to decloak it. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2643
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Complex wrote:How do you know they are not already in the game? It's simple. All you have to do is look for the gravitational wave harmonics characteristic of artificial structures in space and filter that against the optical sensor data to produce a variance table. Compare that with your deep space telemetry probe results, and you can "see" the cloaked stations. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |
Ryuu Shi
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.
This... is THE bestest awesome of all awesomeness answers I have every read on this site in... what? 7 years? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
|
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2643
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:22:00 -
[11] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal? That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |
MadMuppet
Three Fish In A Box
815
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal? That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck.
Cut to the chase... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NhpLCBM3s4
I mine in EVE because I'm too drunk to fish in WoW.-á |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2320
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:27:00 -
[13] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal? That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck. Tried it before I saw your warning. This is a new clone.
You were right, the neutrino conduits did fuse, but the technique worked. The remains of my disintegrated vessel are cloaked. I suppose this isn't an adequate technique for building a station, but it's a starting point. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |
Derpen Zoidberg
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:29:00 -
[14] - Quote
This doesn't make sense! Where's slinky?! NOOOO SLINKY.....
Is this right? |
Gingervitis Plague
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:32:00 -
[15] - Quote
Because:
1.21 gigawatts |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2646
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:36:00 -
[16] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:The remains of my disintegrated vessel are cloaked. There's a fine line between "cloaked" and "blown to bits so small they are indistinguishable from the passing solar winds."
Congratulations, you've crossed it. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |
Apollo Zanzibar
Soul Snatchers SpaceMonkey's Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:36:00 -
[17] - Quote
I also think stations should have the capability to move with out dissemble...just like ships..but maybe slower and to big to go thru gates,,need to build a new kind of gate to move a station to another system.... |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2646
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:38:00 -
[18] - Quote
And then you could put a really big gun on them and call them Titans! Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |
Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
79
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:38:00 -
[19] - Quote
Apollo Zanzibar wrote:I also think stations should have the capability to move with out dissemble...just like ships..but maybe slower and to big to go thru gates,,need to build a new kind of gate to move a station to another system.... Sarcasm? |
Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
265
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 03:48:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nobody would never undock from these cloacked station, cause everyone would think there's someone else AFK cloacked in system.
|
|
Raiz Nhell
Kangaroo Ate my baby Li3 Federation
230
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Every station is cloaked... But decloaks as soon as you undock cause you are within 2000m There is no such thing as a fair fight...
If your fighting fair you have automatically put yourself at a disadvantage. |
Circumstantial Evidence
52
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:01:00 -
[22] - Quote
The Jovians must have lots of cloaked stations... all that advanced tech up in their space, yet we see next to nothing on the map. (Except for a few systems / stations they granted to CCP for R&D work.) |
MadMuppet
Three Fish In A Box
815
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:13:00 -
[23] - Quote
I don't think it is technically possible to cloak a station, heck they can't even make one with more than one exit. I mine in EVE because I'm too drunk to fish in WoW.-á |
stoicfaux
2337
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:22:00 -
[24] - Quote
Think about it. Eventually, you will have to dump the septic system, thus decloaking the station.
|
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
5277
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 06:28:00 -
[25] - Quote
MadMuppet wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal? That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck. Cut to the chase... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NhpLCBM3s4
lol, excellent song and ohh so true.
stoicfaux wrote:Think about it. Eventually, you will have to dump the septic system, thus decloaking the station.
They don't vent it into space. It gets placed in Giant Sealed Containers which are transported by Capsuleers to other stations. Either that or they just beam it to the moon where the station is anchored. |
Desimus Maximus
Adiumentum.
17
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 06:58:00 -
[26] - Quote
Forum Troll.
Not productive or constructive. |
FloppieTheBanjoClown
The Skunkworks
2673
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 07:38:00 -
[27] - Quote
Desimus Maximus wrote:Forum Troll.
Not productive or constructive.
Stater of the obvious. Not helpful or interesting. Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement. |
ChromeStriker
The Riot Formation Unclaimed.
481
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 09:37:00 -
[28] - Quote
Desimus Maximus wrote:Forum Troll.
Not productive or constructive.
You sir are a boob.
- Nulla Curas |
Helgrind Wolf
WaKE Inc
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 06:37:00 -
[29] - Quote
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing. this ^^ |
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers R O G U E
216
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 10:36:00 -
[30] - Quote
Apollo Zanzibar wrote:I think there should be available cloaked space stations..why not??
what the hell are you talking about they are there, ive seen plenty of cloaked stations in game, have you not? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |