Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Marc Scaurus
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
83
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would like to take a moment here on the forums to announce that it is my intention to run for a seat on CSM8 as a lowsec representative. For those that may not know me, here is a brief history:
I have been playing EVE Online since early 2008, primarily as a lowsec resident and pirate, with interludes as a high sec war deccer, ninja, suicide ganker, wormhole resident and nullsec line member. I have blogged about EVE since 2010 and over the years have maintained ownership and management of Evebloggers.com as well as the EVE Blog Pack. In 2012 I joined the staff of TheMittani.com as a lowsec writer and within a month was made an Editor, a post I still hold today.
I am a solo and small gang PVP enthusiast who, for a time, got lost in the reaches of nullsec with Goonswarm Federation. Prior to that I was a member of The Tuskers, one of lowsecGÇÖs most prominent and long standing pirate organizations. I have been both a Director and a CEO of smaller pirate corporations and was proud to start my time in EVE Online as a member of The Guristas Associates alliance, a name that will always be remembered in the annals of pirating history. Currently IGÇÖm getting situated in my new digs with Quantum Cats, in the Gallente Militia.
Love them or hate them, the CSM has been growing ever more influential. Recently, CCP announced their intention to focus more clearly on the big picture. To develop a roadmap for the next 3, 5, and 10 years - and to include the CSM in that development process. While it has become somewhat of a cliche to state that the CSM has GÇÿlaid the groundwork for great things to comeGÇÖ, I believe that to be a particularly true statement coming at the end of CSM7.
I intend to provide a strong, passionate and clear voice for lowsec as a whole - not just pirates, not just faction warfare, but for all the players who have come to know and love the gray area between CONCORDGÇÖs vigilance and nullsecGÇÖs political machinery. With CCPGÇÖs new conceptual/thematic approach to expansion planning, it will be possible for every expansion to contain at least a little lowsec love. Things I will push for include:
- Making lowsec matter in the broader context of the game, with a tangible impact on more than just lowsec itself.
- Pushing forward the idea that, while Faction Warfare is a prominent part of lowsec, it is not the be-all end-all of the area, in order to bring a wider variety of gameplay opportunities.
- Improving the ability for lowsec residents to turn a profit, be they pirate, faction warfare pilot, bounty hunter or industrialist.
- Continuing the good work put in to make faction warfare and bounty hunting successful by pushing for the small, yet vital, improvements they need.
For Pirates: A new method of gaining security status for those that chose to do so. Right now, the most effective method of recouping security status lost in lowsec or highsec is to go to nullsec, which makes no sense. The implementation of either a GÇÿTags for SecGÇÖ program or more inventive methods is a priority.
The extension of faction warfare mechanics to the pirate factions is a change that is both long coming and well deserved. For years pirates have wished they could actually be a GÇÿpirateGÇÖ, joining up with the Guristas or Sansha. This expansion of the faction warfare model would bring renewed focus to lowsec as well as more gameplay opportunities for the PVPer and PVEr alike.
However, new feature implementations in lowsec must also be balanced against the very strong desire for many of lowsecGÇÖs existing residents to be divorced from anything remotely resembling GÇÿsovGÇÖ. The protection of the current way of life for the pirating profession is also a huge part of my campaign.
For Faction Warfare: While facwar can fairly be described as in a GÇÿstableGÇÖ state, there is still work to be done. Providing a means through which Faction Warfare can be a unique source for items (be it faction mods or ships) will go a long way towards ensuring the long term stability and impact of the feature.
Also allowing the war in lowsec to have a meaningful impact on the empires and the game as a whole is a goal I would like to see achieved. Recently the Gallente Federation conquered all of Caldari facwar space in lowsec - and they got a medal. While cool, itGÇÖs not really something to get the engines going. Making your mark on the map is something that excites many players of EVE Online - allowing FW to do so would be a great next step in its evolution.
For Industrialists: While the capital production market is alive and well in lowsec, other areas are virtually nonexistant. Bringing a renewed focus to industry in lowsec, be it through the introduction of unique resources in the area or providing the best profit margins, is something that has long been needed.
While not a lowsec-exclusive item, a POS revamp would also be a boon to lowsec. Making it easier for players to enter the POS arena, as well as making it more worthwhile in lowsec, will provide valuable gains to the lowsec industrialistGÇÖs cause, as well as drive more conflict (which is always good for business!)
For PVE: While static DED complexes and Level 5 missions provide an option in lowsec, they are often seen as GÇÿnot worth the riskGÇÖ to the run of the mill PVEr. I would like to see a more robust and healthy PVE system implemented in lowsec, be it through an expansion on exploration gameplay, the inclusion of lowsec-unique (and very lucrative) PVE activities, or both.
For PVP: I also intend to push forward for improvements to the war dec system, bounty hunting, as well as to help improve the sad state of affairs with such time honored (but swiftly diminishing) gameplay options as the ninjas of high sec. |
Marc Scaurus
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
83
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
For those who canGÇÖt be bothered with large amounts of words, hereGÇÖs a recap:
Marc Scaurus for CSM8
- Increasing lowsecGÇÖs impact across EVE Online
- Bringing a wider variety of gameplay to lowsec
- Revitalizing industry in lowsec
- Continuing improvements to faction warfare
To learn more about my campaign, please check out this blog post and keep an eye on my blog at scaurus.com. If you wish to get ahold of me, here's how:
Twitter - @marcscaurus Skype - marcscaurus Email - [email protected] Evemail - Marc Scaurus
|
Marc Scaurus
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
83
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 04:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Reserved for future use |
Sugar Kyle
The humbleless Crew
209
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
I like this. Tilde soaked words from something kinda like a pirate. |
equincu ocha
The Tuskers
12
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
It's about time you ran Glad we've got a good candidate for the CSM this term, I know you'll represent low-sec well. Baby seal walked into a club |
Davlos
quantum cats syndicate samurai pizza cats
13
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
I am Davlos and I approve of this product and/or service. |
JamesCLK
290
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 21:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Yarr! Malcanis, Marc Scaurus,-áMynnna and Ripard Teg for CSM 8! |
Dyvim Slorm
Spaceriders Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 23:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Some interesting ideas, lowsec really does need a lot of work and in particular a real motive for extending operations there by risk averse highsec corps.
I'll be following this thread with interest |
Cloora
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
111
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 04:59:00 -
[9] - Quote
I endorse this man. He is intelligent and would represent low sec very well http://www.altaholics.blogspot.com
|
Drackarn
quantum cats syndicate samurai pizza cats
30
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 08:32:00 -
[10] - Quote
You have my sword!
..... and my blog too http://sandciderandspaceships.blogspot.com/ |
|
Angry Mustache
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 08:36:00 -
[11] - Quote
I fully support the candidacy of Marc Scaurus, as he possesses the ability to kill multiple T1 cruisers with a talos.
But seriously thou, one of the problems with previous CSM's are that various people with no skills outside of being an alliance representative were elected to the CSM, people who had the wrong skillset for the CSM, people with egos and none of the leadership/teamwork skills to match. And some who were downright useless.
CSM's need to be able to communicate above all, to act as liaison and mitigate the "thorax in mouth" disease that CCP traditionally has. Marc is one of the best communicators in EVE, his blogging and work at TMC shows it very clearly. |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7618
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 10:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
Good enough for Hans Jagerblitzen to endorse; good enough for me to do the same. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
badposting
Doctrine.
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 11:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
What's your opinion on: -Lowsec incursions -0.4 systems being the way they are -The state of capital warfare in lowsec |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7624
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:16:00 -
[14] - Quote
Should 0.4 systems be opened up for moon mining? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
badposting
Doctrine.
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 16:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Should 0.4 systems be opened up for moon mining?
It's not just that, you can't deploy fighters there, you can't anchor reactors and last time I checked the description of POSes still say they need starbase charters in 0.4 when they don't. 0.4 is just in this weird nonsense limbo right now. |
Marc Scaurus
quantum cats syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
106
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:02:00 -
[16] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Should 0.4 systems be opened up for moon mining?
Absolutely. Getting rid of the need for starbase charters awhile back for POSes in .4 systems was a step in the right direction, but in what can kindly be called 'typical CCP fashion', the job was left half done. Increasing the availability of moons by opening 0.4 systems to moon mining is an easy, albeit small, way to help address the revenue issue in lowsec.
I also imagine the 'land grab' aspect of doing away with the restriction could result in a fair number of explosions, which is always good. Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 Owner/operator of Evebloggers.com and the EVE Blog Pack Editor, TheMittani.com |
Marc Scaurus
quantum cats syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
106
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 18:05:00 -
[17] - Quote
badposting wrote:Malcanis wrote:Should 0.4 systems be opened up for moon mining? It's not just that, you can't deploy fighters there, you can't anchor reactors and last time I checked the description of POSes still say they need starbase charters in 0.4 when they don't. 0.4 is just in this weird nonsense limbo right now.
"Weird nonsense limbo" is putting it lightly. Getting 0.4 systems in line with the rest of lowsec is something that I'm frankly surprised hasn't been done yet, and something that I will push to have addressed should I be elected. CCP have shown a willingness to recognize the unique 'lowsec situation' with the recent Crimewatch changes, now it is simply a matter of getting the rest of these inconsistencies dealt with. Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 Owner/operator of Evebloggers.com and the EVE Blog Pack Editor, TheMittani.com |
Dyvim Slorm
Spaceriders Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 22:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Just listened to your interview on Crossing Zebras and you mention a subject close to my heart, improving the wardec system. It has received some attention recently but still needs a lot more work to make it fit for purpose, what do you have in mind for this?
Coming back to your lowsec side here are a couple of ideas (perhaps concepts) I would like to see which may tempt more corps into lowsec.
1/ There should be a real benefit for an industrial corp to set up a lowsec operation, perhaps by having a significant boost to production and research, particularly in a POS
2/ I do have a bit of an rp background and to me lowsec should be the place where respectable highsec corps do their dirty business (slave labour, illegal scientific experiments, corporate assassination etc). Lowsec should be the place where the Board can deny wrongdoing because they didn't know about it (as what happens in rl) so some mechanism to allow corps to deal in unethical but very profitable areas would seem a way forward.
In the early stages of the game 2003/4/5 I have fond memories of lowsec along the Aridia pipe (and elsewhere) with small communities that sprang up, both pirate and non pirate which made areas have a distinct feeling of place. It would be great to get that back, which could come about if lowsec was developed and became the vibrant place it once was. Unfortunately at present lowsec's just the place in the way between highsec and nullsec.
|
Dyvim Slorm
Spaceriders Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2013.02.15 22:31:00 -
[19] - Quote
Sorry, one other thing, the sec status hit needs sorting as well.
If I have +2 sec standing and attack someone from the "Yarr Jolly Roger Corp" who has a sec of -7 I really should take the same sec hit as if I attacked someone with +5 sec from the "Goody Goody Corp". |
subtle turtle
In Exile.
107
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 04:37:00 -
[20] - Quote
Marc Scaurus wrote: For PVP: I also intend to push forward for improvements to the war dec system, bounty hunting, as well as to help improve the sad state of affairs with such time honored (but swiftly diminishing) gameplay options as the ninjas of high sec.
I am glad to see a FW candidate, and VERY glad to see someone say this.
When I first started in Eve, I ran missions, like most newbies. My first experiences with PVP were when Suddenly Ninjas came to town and started wrecking the place up. I don't recall ever losing a ship to them, but I was in awe at the ease in which they tore apart "experienced" missioners in expensive (to me) ships. It was this experience that led me to the PVP dark-side, and it's really sad that I don't see similar things happening anymore.
+1 |
|
Marc Scaurus
quantum cats syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dyvim Slorm wrote:Just listened to your interview on Crossing Zebras and you mention a subject close to my heart, improving the wardec system. It has received some attention recently but still needs a lot more work to make it fit for purpose, what do you have in mind for this?
Coming back to your lowsec side here are a couple of ideas (perhaps concepts) I would like to see which may tempt more corps into lowsec.
1/ There should be a real benefit for an industrial corp to set up a lowsec operation, perhaps by having a significant boost to production and research, particularly in a POS
2/ I do have a bit of an rp background and to me lowsec should be the place where respectable highsec corps do their dirty business (slave labour, illegal scientific experiments, corporate assassination etc). Lowsec should be the place where the Board can deny wrongdoing because they didn't know about it (as what happens in rl) so some mechanism to allow corps to deal in unethical but very profitable areas would seem a way forward.
In the early stages of the game 2003/4/5 I have fond memories of lowsec along the Aridia pipe (and elsewhere) with small communities that sprang up, both pirate and non pirate which made areas have a distinct feeling of place. It would be great to get that back, which could come about if lowsec was developed and became the vibrant place it once was. Unfortunately at present lowsec's just the place in the way between highsec and nullsec.
The main thing with wardecs right now is ensuring that they stay a viable option for pursuing 'non mutual' affairs. There was a disconcerting conversation in the last minutes where the possibility of 'mutual only' war decs was brought up that shouldn't have even been a topic for discussion. A lot of work has been done on wars, especially with regards to crimewatch changes, to get them up to speed for modern EVE Online. However, they do not appear to be on the table for more improvements in the near future, so right now I just want to make sure that we don't lost any more non mutual PVP options.
As for your lowsec points, I do agree that more could be done in lowsec with regards to production and research. The exact nature of the opportunities available obviously won't be known until CCP announces what they have planned for production/research and POSes in general, but I think that giving lowsec an edge in the industry arena is something that is way overdue.
I'm a bit of a closet RP nerd, so when it comes to lowsec I definitely would love to see something done to make the reality of the area match more closely with the concept for the area - a place where police do not go, faction navies operate in a limited capacity, etc. Pirates, drug dealers, all sorts of nefarious character should be able to call lowsec home. Contraband should be available to be made and smuggled throughout lowsec for some tangible benefit that makes an impact on the rest of the game.
Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 Owner/operator of Evebloggers.com and the EVE Blog Pack Editor, TheMittani.com |
Marc Scaurus
quantum cats syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:04:00 -
[22] - Quote
subtle turtle wrote:Marc Scaurus wrote: For PVP: I also intend to push forward for improvements to the war dec system, bounty hunting, as well as to help improve the sad state of affairs with such time honored (but swiftly diminishing) gameplay options as the ninjas of high sec.
I am glad to see a FW candidate, and VERY glad to see someone say this. When I first started in Eve, I ran missions, like most newbies. My first experiences with PVP were when Suddenly Ninjas came to town and started wrecking the place up. I don't recall ever losing a ship to them, but I was in awe at the ease in which they tore apart "experienced" missioners in expensive (to me) ships. It was this experience that led me to the PVP dark-side, and it's really sad that I don't see similar things happening anymore. +1
Your story is one of many that I've heard where, by being exposed to the darker side of EVE Online, a player learns the joys of PVP and all that that entails. The curtailing of the ability for players to be exposed to that side of the game is tragic and something that no one is really addressing in a satisfactory manner, which is something I plan on changing (with the usual caveat of 'if elected' of course).
Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 Owner/operator of Evebloggers.com and the EVE Blog Pack Editor, TheMittani.com |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7700
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:29:00 -
[23] - Quote
Marc, I would like to hear your opinion on a couple of concepts:
(1) At the moment, hi-sec does not offer the opportunity for hi-sec players to experience large scale fights and extended fights. Do you think FW is the correct platform to extend this class of experience to hi-sec players?
(2) Would you like to see FW extended to be able to change the sovereignty of systems from one faction to another? How would you envisage this happening if so?
Additionally, I would like to hear your opinion on something that concerns me: currently, lo-sec is the place where PvPers can go and operate in small groups. If some "Unique Selling Point" is added to lo-sec, isn't there a danger of encroaching on that small group environment? How would you like to see this issue addressed?
Thirdly, as you may be aware, a core tenet of my campaign is the repatriation of nullsec alts from hi-sec to null, by allowing them to viably operate there. Do you forsee any impact on lo-sec from this? What would be your perspective here? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Marc Scaurus
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
114
|
Posted - 2013.02.22 08:45:00 -
[24] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Marc, I would like to hear your opinion on a couple of concepts:
(1) At the moment, hi-sec does not offer the opportunity for hi-sec players to experience large scale fights and extended fights. Do you think FW is the correct platform to extend this class of experience to hi-sec players?
(2) Would you like to see FW extended to be able to change the sovereignty of systems from one faction to another? How would you envisage this happening if so?
Additionally, I would like to hear your opinion on something that concerns me: currently, lo-sec is the place where PvPers can go and operate in small groups. If some "Unique Selling Point" is added to lo-sec, isn't there a danger of encroaching on that small group environment? How would you like to see this issue addressed?
Thirdly, as you may be aware, a core tenet of my campaign is the repatriation of nullsec alts from hi-sec to null, by allowing them to viably operate there. Do you forsee any impact on lo-sec from this? What would be your perspective here?
1 - This would have to depend entirely on your definition of large scale fights. However, facwar has had some very impressive battles in hotly contested systems. As an entry point into PVP in general, both solo and small to mid sized gang varieties, I think faction warfare is doing an admirable job of things. As for it being the 'correct platform...for hi-sec players', I'm not sure if that statement makes much sense. Those fights obviously occur in lowsec among lowsec based entities (the militias). If the thrust of the question is whether it is the correct way to get players from high sec into lowsec, then my answer would be yes - it is a good avenue.
2 - That could be one way to accomplish giving faction warfare some impact on the map as a whole, however I would have to see specifics of such a proposal to see if it actually amounts to changing anything. The goal of providing faction warfare (and lowsec as a whole) a way to make an impact on the game isn't just about changing a system's ownership tag - its about making an impact on the players of the game as well.
As for ways to make this happen, holding a system for XX amount of days would be a simple way to make sovereignty change to the holding faction.
2.5 - The addition of a unique selling point to lowsec should only be done while preserving the existing playstyle of its residents. Outlaws have called lowsec home since its inception, with groups like the Guristas Associates, Tuskers, Blood Money Cartel, Bastards and countless others personifying the sov-less, semi-nomadic, pirating lifestyle. If elected and informed that CCP was changing things in such a way as to kill off that playstyle, there would be no end to the fight I would put up against such a change. I think there are ways to ensure that this doesn't happen, however.
3 - There would probably be some impact, as I'm sure there are at least a few nullsec residents that run L5s or other ISK-generating things in lowsec. However, the impact would in all likelihood be slight - and if a change to the way nullsec income is generated on an individual level is paired with a net boost to the ISK generating potential of lowsec, I'd be happy to make that trade.
Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 Owner/operator of Evebloggers.com and the EVE Blog Pack Editor, TheMittani.com |
Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
283
|
Posted - 2013.02.23 11:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
Marc will be having my vote for sure. Good thoughts a focus of lowsec is what makes him the right choice for mua. LF CSM8 candidate. Are you what lowsec needs? --->-átinyurl.com/afaawrb
|
Endeavour Starfleet
842
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 07:28:00 -
[26] - Quote
Hello there!
I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)
POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?
Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)
Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?
The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.
The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.
Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.
Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.
Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet. |
Xylorn Hasher
Sumiyoshi-Kai
99
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 13:23:00 -
[27] - Quote
Marc Scaurus wrote:For those who canGÇÖt be bothered with large amounts of words, hereGÇÖs a recap: Marc Scaurus for CSM8
- Increasing lowsecGÇÖs impact across EVE Online
- Bringing a wider variety of gameplay to lowsec
- Revitalizing industry in lowsec
- Continuing improvements to faction warfare
To learn more about my campaign, please check out this blog post and keep an eye on my blog at scaurus.com. If you wish to get ahold of me, here's how: Twitter - @marcscaurusSkype - marcscaurus Email - [email protected]Evemail - Marc Scaurus
Funny thing that a guy with -1,8 security status wants to represent lowsec residents, even funnier when you check his killboard and see that he lives and be a part of nullsec blob warfare for a year at least.
Marc Scaurus do me a favour and go be lowsec representative elseware you carebear anf F1 pusher!
All my posts are made shortly after Marihuana-áconsumption. |
Marc Scaurus
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
117
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 16:18:00 -
[28] - Quote
Xylorn Hasher wrote:Marc Scaurus wrote:For those who canGÇÖt be bothered with large amounts of words, hereGÇÖs a recap: Marc Scaurus for CSM8
- Increasing lowsecGÇÖs impact across EVE Online
- Bringing a wider variety of gameplay to lowsec
- Revitalizing industry in lowsec
- Continuing improvements to faction warfare
To learn more about my campaign, please check out this blog post and keep an eye on my blog at scaurus.com. If you wish to get ahold of me, here's how: Twitter - @marcscaurusSkype - marcscaurus Email - [email protected]Evemail - Marc Scaurus Funny thing that a guy with -1,8 security status wants to represent lowsec residents, even funnier when you check his killboard and see that he lives and be a part of nullsec blob warfare for a year at least. Marc Scaurus do me a favour and go be lowsec representative elseware you carebear anf F1 pusher!
Ah my first troll. I was beginning to worry when one of you didn't show up. For someone so well versed in reading killboards and corp history, you should also be able to determine that I wasn't terribly active in null (half my kills were blue kills, RIP Vile Rat) and that of my 1000+ kills, nearly all of them have taken place in lowsec. But let's not let facts get in the way of things, right?
Marc Scaurus for CSM 8 Owner/operator of Evebloggers.com and the EVE Blog Pack Editor, TheMittani.com |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1274
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 18:34:00 -
[29] - Quote
Marc, I just had a listen to your Crossing Zebras interview and I must say I am impressed with you and your platform. I'm very happy to hear that small-time, "casual" jerks like myself and my corp are very welcome (even desired) in your vision of EVE. I have a few questions:
1. I'm not a huge fan of blogs. Do you plan to have an active forum presence and how would you prioritize communication on the forums here as opposed to your blog? Do you consider the forums merely a place to link to your blog?
2. Low-sec is, unfortunately, non-contiguous. Would you support additional "pirate gates" to help the sub -5.0 get around or do you think that's a bad idea? If so, why?
3. Solo PVP: Dead or Undead?
Good luck, you'll be in my top three when the voting starts. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |
JAF Anders
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
39
|
Posted - 2013.03.08 17:11:00 -
[30] - Quote
Friendly bump and endorsement. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |