Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1172
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 19:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ishuk-Raata Public Statement >> Syndicate Region >> JQV5-9 Constellation // 98Q-8O Solar system >> Planet V - Moon 4 - Ishukone Corporation Factory // Field Office of the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
Greetings Summit,
As detailed by the following news broadcast, Ishukone corporate sovereignty has once again been breached by the Caldari Provincial Directorate. The continuing violations of corporate and contract law by the CPD are considered very disturbing by Ishuk-Raata. We therefore would like to restate our full support of CEO Mens Reppola in his protest of these actions, and urge Executor Heth to step back from this game of brinkmanship.
Ishuk-Raata, however, will not support violent actions taken by the CPD against Caldari people. The Caldari Navy's activities remain beyond the purview of Ishuk-Raata or Ishukone. We will not presume to question the motives of the Navy, nor demand information we do not have clearance for. Nevertheless, Ishuk-Raata can no longer support the blatant violations of law against the Caldari people committed under direct CPD orders by the Caldari Navy and associated entities.
We understand the Navy must defend the State against all threats both foreign and domestic, and we recognize the Navy's long tradition of upholding this noble duty even when the act is hard to swallow. Unfortunately, we cannot and will not take part in this.
As of YC115.02.09 03:22, the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive has withdrawn our offer support to the Caldari Navy and Marines for any and all operations being taken against Caldari sovereign or occupied worlds and theaters.
The continued use of Templis Dragonaurs, known terrorists, against corporate property and citizens is unacceptable. The continued violations of corporate sovereignty and law is unacceptable. The continued mockery of inter-corporate law is unacceptable.
That being said, Ishuk-Raata will not support the use of violent dissent. Attacks made against any Caldari - whether CPD, Navy, Corporate, or otherwise - is unacceptable. Disapproval of CPD policy is not an excuse for treason or murder. Many fine men and women serve in these capacities, and do not deserve your hatred or attacks. There are still proper legal channels to be taken, and should be observed and respected. Withdraw your support, launch legal proceedings, even speak out against the Executor if you must... but do not attack your fellow Caldari.
Ishuk-Raata will remain in service to Ishukone Corporation, following the laws and rights afforded to us as citizens of Ishukone. We will also make use of our extrajudicial abilities as capsuleers to do what must be done in defense of Ishukone and Ishuk-Raata property, as well as exercise these abilities in selective support of the Caldari Navy.
Thank you for your time.
[I-RED] Sub-Director of Public Relations, Shosho Katrina Oniseki (RDC) |
Kalanaja
Dog Nation United Relativity Alliance
32
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 19:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Pulling out all the stops I see. It's going to make some waves and cause some consequences you know? I doubt they'll let you just get away with it. I also hope for the best for you. |
Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
2043
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 20:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
As of three hours ago, Mixed Metaphor became aware that State-loyal ground military forces are operating on Intaki Prime. This is a direct violation not only of a sovereign Federation homeworld, but a ratified agreement between State megacorporations as dictated in the Ishukone Agreement, which was chartered for the specific purpose of keeping Intaki Prime's people and governments insulated from the danger of interference by foreign political entities or military action on the planet's surface. The current action by State military assets on Intaki not only represents violence against the Intaki Assembly, it represents a violation of State corporate sovereignty.
Heth, clearly no longer satisfied with merely urinating on the laws and customs of the State has decided that he's going to do the same with the laws he himself made up as well.
Although our loyalties and goals differ significantly, we appreciate I-RED's stance on this matter. Mixed Metaphor calls upon the CEP for a swift resolution to this situation. Mane 614
|
Malcolm Khross
State War Academy Caldari State
533
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 20:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
As an individual, I commend I-RED's expedient and straightforward response to these unexpected events. I will pray that you continue to be governed by wisdom and courage in these precarious times and your dedication to serving the Caldari people and upholding your honor toward the Intaki and your contracts is admirable.
~Malcolm Khross
|
James Syagrius
The Philalethes Society
187
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 21:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Malcolm Khross wrote:As an individual, I commend I-RED's expedient and straightforward response to these unexpected events. I will pray that you continue to be governed by wisdom and courage in these precarious times and your dedication to serving the Caldari people and upholding your honor toward the Intaki and your contracts is admirable. I second Msr. Khross's sentiment. Moral fortitude and personal integrity in the face of adversity are to be admired, even in foes. "We are what we do." |
Lucas Raholan
Agenda Industries
55
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 23:25:00 -
[6] - Quote
Again I cannot fathom Heth's madness, he originally claimed to want to return the Caldari to its Golden Age of Tradition...how far he has turned from that, he from my eyes is nothing but a lunatic who has to much power.
I fully Support I-REDS stance on this matter..if it is one more voice against Heth then it is one more voice towards his removal. I'm secretly a unicorn that Sh**ts fairy dust and sings all day-á |
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
72
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 23:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
At bloody last. A Caldari entity that remains Caldari. A reasoned, calm and wise response. A bit too far left and liberal for my personal tastes, but at least this can be respected as Caldari at least. Such a pity it's the only one of the responses so far that stays loyal. Captain Lieutenant Midshipman Ms Lady Dame Dudette Otsito the Third. Lord High Thingamadoodle and Satrapess of the Paper Birds. The One who used to be The Keeper of the Toothbrush Threat Level: lol |
Seriphyn Inhonores
Destiny Foundation
379
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 23:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Personally, I believe the fact that the invasion per se of Intaki V is far more important than these political games. A planet that has never known war has been aggressed against. It is a shame that the deaths brought about by this invasion is being used as a board piece in wider questions of legalities and jurisdictions. |
Pieter Tuulinen
Pyre Falcon Defence Cadre XV-01A Pyre Falcon Defence Combine
363
|
Posted - 2013.02.16 23:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
War is merely the continuation of politics by other means, Msr Inhonores. Why should any one planet in particular be spared?
Let my people return Home and put an end to this nonsense. |
Knoot Enderas
Advenus Classem Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 00:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Without venturing any opinion, I do have a number of questions that arise from this statement. Perhaps Oniseki-haani would be so kind as to answer them? My questions are as follows:
1) Does the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive have evidence that the current Caldari Navy operations are being executed on the direct orders of the Executor or the Caldari Providence Directorate? Or is this merely an inference?
2) Has the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive been asked to take part in any of the ongoing Caldari Navy operations, including police actions?
3) Which corporate laws does the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive allege have been violated by the Caldari Providence Directorate? |
|
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1178
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 02:42:00 -
[11] - Quote
Knoot Enderas wrote: 1) Does the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive have evidence that the current Caldari Navy operations are being executed on the direct orders of the Executor or the Caldari Providence Directorate? Or is this merely an inference?
Our legal team has advised the Ishuk-Raata Department of Public Relations to refrain from answering your question at this time.
Quote: 2) Has the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive been asked to take part in any of the ongoing Caldari Navy operations, including police actions?
Yes.
Quote: 3) Which corporate laws does the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive allege have been violated by the Caldari Providence Directorate?
Our legal team has advised the Ishuk-Raata Department of Public Relations to refrain from answering your question at this time. |
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
234
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 03:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote: That being said, Ishuk-Raata will not support the use of violent dissent. Attacks made against any Caldari - whether CPD, Navy, Corporate, or otherwise - is unacceptable. Disapproval of CPD policy is not an excuse for treason or murder. Many fine men and women serve in these capacities, and do not deserve your hatred or attacks. There are still proper legal channels to be taken, and should be observed and respected. Withdraw your support, launch legal proceedings, even speak out against the Executor if you must... but do not attack your fellow Caldari.
I urge the citizens of the State to listen to these words. Do not let hatred guide your actions, doing so will only create more unnecessary bloodshed and further the goals of those who would seek to harm our great nation. Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu. |
Jinari Otsito
Otsito Mining and Manufacture
74
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 03:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
John Revenent wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote: That being said, Ishuk-Raata will not support the use of violent dissent. Attacks made against any Caldari - whether CPD, Navy, Corporate, or otherwise - is unacceptable. Disapproval of CPD policy is not an excuse for treason or murder. Many fine men and women serve in these capacities, and do not deserve your hatred or attacks. There are still proper legal channels to be taken, and should be observed and respected. Withdraw your support, launch legal proceedings, even speak out against the Executor if you must... but do not attack your fellow Caldari.
I urge the citizens of the State to listen to these words. Do not let hatred guide your actions, doing so will only create more unnecessary bloodshed and further the goals of those who would seek to harm our great nation.
It's remarkable that this even has to be said. There are a hundred viewpoints that can provide valid complaints against the State, same as with any other nation. Where the State rises above, however, is that we've always had ways to deal with our troubles within the system. Remember that no matter the corporation, creche, tube or race we have always prided ourselves on being Caldari. These ties should matter more than this.
If you know honor, lay down your weapons until you remember who they should be pointed at. I-RED may have distanced themselves from both sides here, but so far they've shown the most wisdom in these troubles. Listen. Captain Lieutenant Midshipman Ms Lady Dame Dudette Otsito the Third. Lord High Thingamadoodle and Satrapess of the Paper Birds. The One who used to be The Keeper of the Toothbrush Threat Level: lol |
Sepherim
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
281
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 03:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
That is a wise position, and a cautious one. But as time passes, I believe soon Caldari corporations will have to decide wether to accept the power of the Executor, or actually bring back the tradition in an active way. And I don't think it'll be long before the line has to be drawn and blood will be shed between those that once called themselves brothers.
They say a civil war is the worst kind of war there is. I hope the Caldari don't have to walk that road. I really do, but it is increasingly difficult to see that happening. Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Initiate Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander |
Korsavius
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
74
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 07:09:00 -
[15] - Quote
I am in agreement with the official stance of I-RED, more or less.
However, let it be known that if good men and women truly did serve in the CPD, Caldari Navy, and so forth, the innocent and hard-working citizens of the State would not be subject to unnecessary arrest and death in the first place. |
Knoot Enderas
Advenus Classem Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 11:18:00 -
[16] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:Knoot Enderas wrote: 1) Does the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive have evidence that the current Caldari Navy operations are being executed on the direct orders of the Executor or the Caldari Providence Directorate? Or is this merely an inference?
Our legal team has advised the Ishuk-Raata Department of Public Relations to refrain from answering your question at this time.
Respected Oniseki-haani,
While it is understandeable that the I-RED legal team would refrain from sharing its legal strategy with the public at this juncture, it seems inconsistent to dodge this particular question.
Your Public Statement on behalf of the Department of Public Relations alleges that "corporate sovereignty has [...] been breached by the Caldari Provincial Directorate" and further mentions unspecified "violations of corporate and contract law by the CPD" whereas your parent corporation has merely filed a complaint with the Caldari Provincial Directorate because it has "allow[ed] ground fighting to erupt".
This difference between active and passive voice in the statements of the mother corporation and the capsuleer subsidiary suggests a materially different course of events: either the Caldari Provincial Directorate directly ordered the Caldari Navy to engage in these operations in contravention of existing agreements, as your public statement alleges,or the sin is merely one of omission. In this reading of events the Ishukone Corporation would have liked the Caldari Provincial Directorate to act on its behalf by preventing the Caldari Navy from extending its operations into Ishukone territory, but for some reason it didn't. Because the purpose of these operations remains classified, we can only speculate as to why, but the decision would have been taken in accordance with corporate laws and edicts.
Because foreign entities are openly promoting a Caldari civil war, this question is of more than just legal interest, as I'm sure you understand.
Regards,
Knoot Enderas |
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1189
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 18:12:00 -
[17] - Quote
Knoot Enderas wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote:Knoot Enderas wrote: 1) Does the Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive have evidence that the current Caldari Navy operations are being executed on the direct orders of the Executor or the Caldari Providence Directorate? Or is this merely an inference?
Our legal team has advised the Ishuk-Raata Department of Public Relations to refrain from answering your question at this time. Respected Oniseki-haani, While it is understandeable that the I-RED legal team would refrain from sharing its legal strategy with the public at this juncture, it seems inconsistent to dodge this particular question. Your Public Statement on behalf of the Department of Public Relations alleges that "corporate sovereignty has [...] been breached by the Caldari Provincial Directorate" and further mentions unspecified "violations of corporate and contract law by the CPD" whereas your parent corporation has merely filed a complaint with the Caldari Provincial Directorate because it has "allow[ed] ground fighting to erupt". This difference between active and passive voice in the statements of the mother corporation and the capsuleer subsidiary suggests a materially different course of events: either the Caldari Provincial Directorate directly ordered the Caldari Navy to engage in these operations in contravention of existing agreements, as your public statement alleges,or the sin is merely one of omission. In this reading of events the Ishukone Corporation would have liked the Caldari Provincial Directorate to act on its behalf by preventing the Caldari Navy from extending its operations into Ishukone territory, but for some reason it didn't. Because the purpose of these operations remains classified, we can only speculate as to why, but the decision would have been taken in accordance with corporate laws and edicts. Because foreign entities are openly promoting a Caldari civil war, this question is of more than just legal interest, as I'm sure you understand. Regards, Knoot Enderas
Sincerest apologies, but my hands are tied on this matter. The original post is all we are able to state at this time. Surely you understand.
|
Seriphyn Inhonores
Destiny Foundation
379
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 19:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:Let my people return Home and put an end to this nonsense.
I'm afraid it is extremely unlikely you can fit every single Caldari from across four regions onto that single rock. Besides, you already have it, even if it's nothing but a flag that indicates it as such. So, I do not see the justifications in invading another densely-populated world.
|
Malcolm Khross
State War Academy Caldari State
542
|
Posted - 2013.02.17 20:59:00 -
[19] - Quote
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:Pieter Tuulinen wrote:Let my people return Home and put an end to this nonsense. I'm afraid it is extremely unlikely you can fit every single Caldari from across four regions onto that single rock. Besides, you already have it, even if it's nothing but a flag that indicates it as such. So, I do not see the justifications in invading another densely-populated world.
There aren't any. ~Malcolm Khross
|
Sakaane Eionell
Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative
100
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
Since the concerning events of the weekend, I have been in discussion with members of the IPI Council. The Intaki Prosperity Initiative will be making a formal statement in the next few hours.
But first, I want to confirm that, just as how our allies in I-RED have supported us in the past, the Intaki Prosperity Initiative stands by them and offers its support should they wish it.
We are reassured by I-RED's measured response. Theirs is a clear desire to avoid unnecessary violence and we support them fully in their request for caution. We empathize with the servicemen and women of Ishukone Watch who must be so eager to defend Ishukone assets yet are denied this right by contractual limitations. That they continue to wait is a reflection of their professionalism.
However, I would like to call upon I-RED to confirm as many details as they are able through secure channels with their parent megacorporation, as the article linked above presents one item of major concern that appears thus far to have been overlooked by others.
CEO Mens Reppola is quoted as claiming the Intaki system is "the exclusive property of Ishukone". I would like to remind everyone that Ishukone's presence is actually limited to that of economic development and investment regarding shipping and securityGÇönot dominion. The Intaki Assembly's authority and rights of governance remain whole, and thus the system belongs to no one but its indigenous people. It is a disservice to this forum, the residents of Intaki, and the employees of Ishukone to confuse the actions of other State megacorporations in Placid with those of Ishukone in Intaki.
As a CEO, Mr Reppola should, and would, be well aware of the responsibilities and boundaries which Ishukone negotiated and agreed to with the Intaki Assembly. I hesitate to speculate that Mr Reppola now wishes to breach or exaggerate the terms of said contract, or manipulate the media by spreading propaganda to fan the flames and encourage further open conflict. We have trusted that Ishukone's negotiations were made in good faith, so I rather prefer to question the authenticity of the quote. If Mr Reppola has been misrepresented, the quality of work by the original reporter is severely lacking.
It is our hope that any conflict in Intaki is brought to a swift end. Our sympathy and support goes out to those harmed or otherwise affected by these unfortunate events. Sakaane Eionell Isha-Sainika, ILF; President, IPI
- IPI & ILF Portal | Solitary Pilot - |
|
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1193
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 05:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Sakaane Eionell,
We will be in contact with you shortly. Shosho Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Diplomat ~ [I-RED] Sub-Director of Public Relations |
Okui Sakinamo
State Protectorate Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 10:11:00 -
[22] - Quote
I would like to let it be known that the ongoing combat on the planet of Intaki Prime is between forces working on behalf of the State Protectorate (and only on behalf of the State Protectorate and no other corporations or organizations) and the forces of the Federal Defence Union (and only those forces). No Caldari citizens or their property are being negatively impacted by the operations ongoing there in an effort to dislodge the hostile combatants from the area.
While we understand the frustration Mr. Reppola is feeling at the actions of the State Protectorate, as of today, the Intaki system falls under the occupancy of the Gallente Federation, which under the terms of the Blind Auction temporarily nullifies Ishukone's rights to the system, regardless of any separate agreements they may have signed with the Intaki government which may give them "franchise rights" to the security and shipping contracts. The State Protectorate, by engaging in ground combat with the Federal Defence Union, is in fact attempting to reestablish those rights for the Ishukone Corporation. As a member corporation of the Caldari State, which is a signatory to Yulai Conventions and the CONCORD Emergency Militia War Powers Act, Ishukone has no legal rights to attempt to evict or prevent the State Protectorate from operating within the legally established warzone. |
Seriphyn Inhonores
Destiny Foundation
381
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:57:00 -
[23] - Quote
Could we get a concurrence of that from a senior official in the Caldari Navy, Okui Sakinamo? I'm sure you understand that any capsuleer can post anything with the State Protectorate ident, regardless of your special position, and I think you'll agree that other pilots may not identify your statement as veracious for that reason. |
Desiderya
Pyre Falcon Defence and Security Pyre Falcon Defence Combine
231
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:00:00 -
[24] - Quote
But this doesn't seem to be a matter of the Caldari Navy. You might find that Sakinamo-haan is not a privateer. I see no reason to doubt the validity of his words. Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. |
Andreus Ixiris
Mixed Metaphor
2082
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 16:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
Okui Sakinamo wrote:I would like to let it be known that the ongoing combat on the planet of Intaki Prime is between forces working on behalf of the State Protectorate (and only on behalf of the State Protectorate and no other corporations or organizations) and the forces of the Federal Defence Union (and only those forces). No Caldari citizens or their property are being negatively impacted by the operations ongoing there in an effort to dislodge the hostile combatants from the area. Of course no Caldari citizens or Caldari property are being impacted, you massive dolt. It isn't a Caldari planet, nor will it ever be.
Okui Sakinamo wrote: The State Protectorate, by engaging in ground combat with the Federal Defence Union, is in fact attempting to reestablish those rights for the Ishukone Corporation. This is literally the most transparent excuse I've ever seen. The Intaki system has no significant development opportunities that the Ishukone Corporation can exploit and what little opportunity exists certainly isn't found on the homeworld itself. Ishukone's access to its main source of revenue - that is, the S&S franchise to the Intaki system - is guaranteed regardless of whether the system falls under the illegitimate Provist occupation or rightful sovereignty as a Federal member state. There's literally nothing to reestablish. Mane 614
|
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1196
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 19:05:00 -
[26] - Quote
Okui Sakinamo wrote: While we understand the frustration Mr. Reppola is feeling at the actions of the State Protectorate, as of today, the Intaki system falls under the occupancy of the Gallente Federation, which under the terms of the Blind Auction temporarily nullifies Ishukone's rights to the system, regardless of any separate agreements they may have signed with the Intaki government which may give them "franchise rights" to the security and shipping contracts. The State Protectorate, by engaging in ground combat with the Federal Defence Union, is in fact attempting to reestablish those rights for the Ishukone Corporation. As a member corporation of the Caldari State, which is a signatory to Yulai Conventions and the CONCORD Emergency Militia War Powers Act, Ishukone has no legal rights to attempt to evict or prevent the State Protectorate from operating within the legally established warzone.
Ishukone had been operating without pause in Intaki since the blind auction of YC111 regardless of occupancy changes. With the utmost respect, Brigadier General, your excuse is only that. An excuse.
That said, This is the concern of Ishukone Corporation itself more than it is the concern of Ishukone capsuleer subsidiaries such as Ishuk-Raata. I will leave it in the capable hands of CEO Reppola whether or not to pursue this any further. Shosho Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Diplomat ~ [I-RED] Sub-Director of Public Relations |
Desiderya
Pyre Falcon Defence and Security Pyre Falcon Defence Combine
231
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 00:54:00 -
[27] - Quote
It is unlikely that the STPRO will stop its efforts. May I ask for clarification what this stance - from I-RED - actually means regarding activities of the STPRO or its affiliated parties in the Intaki theatre? Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise. |
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1211
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:17:00 -
[28] - Quote
Desiderya wrote:It is unlikely that the STPRO will stop its efforts. May I ask for clarification what this stance - from I-RED - actually means regarding activities of the STPRO or its affiliated parties in the Intaki theatre?
The State Protectorate has an established legal right to operate within Intaki according to the CONCORD Emergency Militia War Powers Act.
This is neither new nor surprising to us.
We will not attempt to interfere with STPRO aligned ground forces within Intaki, so long as said conflict does not place undue risk or collateral damage to Ishukone assets or operations.
However, for the space-borne capsuleer elements of STPRO, we will continue to observe individual capsuleer standings as the measuring unit for our RoE.
- STPRO capsuleer elements with positive standings will have our full support for their operations. - STPRO capsuleer elements with neutral standings will not be engaged, unless as a measure of self defense. - STPRO capsuleer elements with negative standings will be shot on sight and pursued with extreme prejudice. Shosho Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Diplomat ~ [I-RED] Sub-Director of Public Relations |
Sakaane Eionell
Intaki Liberation Front Intaki Prosperity Initiative
103
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 01:40:00 -
[29] - Quote
Having had my staff reach out to the editorial department at Echelon Entertainment, I'm happy to see Echelon reviewed their data and found they misquoted CEO Reppola after all. The article has been updated accordingly.
Furthermore, I'm pleased to advise that, late in the evening of February 23 the Intaki Prosperity Initiative accepted an anonymous donation of 2,500 units of antibiotics which have since been shipped to the surface. Volunteers and staff at the Intaki Cultural Center have begun distributing these supplies, and others, to those areas most affected by the fighting.
IPI, on behalf of the Intaki people, is grateful for the generosity of the donor. Thank you. Sakaane Eionell Isha-Sainika, ILF; President, IPI
- IPI & ILF Portal | Solitary Pilot - |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |