Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
14126
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
No PvP in 1.0 space?
So you would lose the following:
Mining. Missions. Industry. Trading. The market. Ship spin counter. Shooting ships.
I'm sure there is more. Basically everything worth while in Eve.
So why?
Vote Malcanis for CSM 8 |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2483
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:12:00 -
[32] - Quote
Irya Boone wrote:No incursions In high sec it's a non sense never understood Why and How sanshas can come in a system do what they want without intervention of Concord or the navy BUTTTTTTTTTTTT if you have a sec status below -5 and in millitia you get hunted To death by the navy forces But sansho ?? no ? really ?
The chronicals & short stories about the Sansha Incursions covered this really well. Apparently booking your flight & accomodation to Iceland BEFORE you buy the tickets for the convention which is pretty much the only reason you wanted to go there in the first place is popular. |
TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace That Red Alliance
432
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:18:00 -
[33] - Quote
can't see it being a good idea
You'd need to also add
1.0 - no bargers or exhumbers 1.0 - lvl 1-2 missions only 1.0 - no incursions\towers etc
make it a proper "newbies only" type area |
Generals4
Liandri Covenant
1724
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:21:00 -
[34] - Quote
Krazynikomo wrote:Allow bubbles and bombs everywhere.
Bombs ok, bubbles hell no. -Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |
SoOza N'GasZ
Geese Jugglers
31
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Another nerf highsec thread? your powers to plea for lazyness, total acceptance of the present and to supergeneralize everything is beyond me. |
Whitehound
880
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:32:00 -
[36] - Quote
Dear Molenius Morrowinger,
not only have you posted into the wrong forum section (see Features and Ideas Discussion), but your idea violates the fundamental principles of EVE Online, which in its nature is a PvP game.
You have 24 hours time to retract your suggestion, either by deleting your comment or by asking a moderator to lock your thread.
Failure to comply will result in a 100m ISK bounty. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
991
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:45:00 -
[37] - Quote
Molenius Morrowinger wrote:As subj states if this is fair enough to do some changes which will acomodate both sides: 1.0 - becomes carebear heaven, 0.6 and 0.5 - becomes low sec.
Advantages: 1. High sec population get their pvp free zones (I think nobody suicides in 1.0 anyway), 2. Low sec expanded splitting high-sec in to isles fixing risk / reward issue when you need to take risk to trade between hubs, 3. mining in 1.0 will be depleted soon, meaning more miners need to play MMO style asking others for protecting and ops in mining in low sec, 4. Prices will go high fixing the economy inflation and increasing ship demand due to more losses.
Anything else?
if they want to be pvp free then access to the market and manufacturing would have to be removed from highsec, and any minerals, modules, etc you get couldn't be transferred to other areas of space
|
Solstice Project
Brave Newbies Inc.
2773
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 12:45:00 -
[38] - Quote
Molenius Morrowinger wrote:He he, I'm still quite new to the game and trying to throw some crap in to other's face. It seems not the general rule in EVE trying to be constructive. Thanks for pointing out the right forum though.
Why do you think it's a constructive idea ? You don't even know this game!
How can you really think that you have any idea about what a constructive idea is, if you DON'T EVEN KNOW THE ******* GAME ??
You haven't thought this through at all and just see what you wanna see.
Making 1.0sec, or ANY system, combat free totally works against the virtual realism of the game. Not only that, it would make 1.0secs a veeerrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyy crowded place and it that would ruin the economy in the long run, because not enough ships are getting blown up.
That's what you want. A COMBAT free zone, not a PVP free zone ! If you remove PVP, then you won't be able to buy anything, won't be able to sell anything, you won't be able to mine (because other miners would mine the same roid you do, which ALSO is PvP because miners can get really pissed off when somebody mines their roid!) ... ... hell, you couldn't do ANYTHING that involved anybody else in some way or the other ... ... but EVERYTHING in this game involves somebody else !
Please, before trying to throw crap at our faces, at least learn and understand what the game is about.
Now get the **** out. Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Khai Mann
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 13:56:00 -
[39] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote: "bounty from forums" feature doesn't exist.
I want this as a new feature please. |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
703
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:00:00 -
[40] - Quote
Complete with nonsensical economic explanation pulled directly from his bum. |
|
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
763
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tah'ris Khlador wrote:This thread is new and original and certainly doesn't belong in the Features and Ideas forum.
But no, seriously, this thread concept has been beaten to death. No good will come of this thread. If I could login right now, I would bounty you for lawls, because your post makes me think you're the type of person who thinks this will create a killright. Too bad the "bounty from forums" feature doesn't exist. (Also a topic that has been beaten quite a bit)
Also..."no one suicides in 1.0 anyway" is a false statement based on an assumption which you didn't bother to look up. People definitely get ganked in 1.0s.
EDIT: Got the subforum name wrong. These idiot ideas will continue to spawn. Because there's a never-ending supply of idiots.
I, too, wish for the 'apply bounty' button in the fora.
Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Malcanis for CSM8 |
Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point I Know Right
87
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 14:43:00 -
[42] - Quote
Arronicus wrote:Molenius Morrowinger wrote:As subj states if this is fair enough to do some changes which will acomodate both sides: 1.0 - becomes carebear heaven, 0.6 and 0.5 - becomes low sec.
Advantages: 1. High sec population get their pvp free zones (I think nobody suicides in 1.0 anyway), 2. Low sec expanded splitting high-sec in to isles fixing risk / reward issue when you need to take risk to trade between hubs, 3. mining in 1.0 will be depleted soon, meaning more miners need to play MMO style asking others for protecting and ops in mining in low sec, 4. Prices will go high fixing the economy inflation and increasing ship demand due to more losses.
Anything else? Disadvantages: 1. Eve is no longer hard, or dark, with complete safe zones, ruining the core component of the game 2. People DO suicide gank in 1.0s, just not freighters 3. Low sec is currently terribly broken, with abysmall risk versus reward outside of Faction warfare. This will only further the amount of garbage space 4. This won't change where miners mine. Theres no ice 1.0 systems anyway, nor are there hardly any worth mining in anyway. Miners currently already have a way to be near gank immune (Tanked Skiffs), and choose not to do so, in favour of higher profits. 5. Prices will only go high as a result of the complete and ultimate collapse of trade in eve, which leads to point 6. 6. All highsec trade routes go through at least one 0.5 or 0.6 between trade hubs. It will become impossible, short of jump freightering, to safely move goods between, or eve TO trade hubs. Not to mention some of the current trade hubs will become low sec. Thus, CCP will be forced to re-do the security status of every region of highsec, effectively to a map of the way it is now, with the only true change being that there will be significantly less high sec systems to drop towers in, and missions will pay out less (due to everything in highsec now being 0.7-1.0). TL:DR If you think this is even remotely plausible, you haven't the faintest idea how Eve works. Dont you dare touch my lowsec. its risk v reward is there and worth it already. its 2 to 3x more profitable than hisec in every aspect. you just get to get shot at for trying! if anything hisec's ability for risk adversity stops people from going to lowsec "I swear there are more people complaining over "nullsecers complaining" then actual nullsec people complaining." |
Mai Khumm
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
478
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 17:43:00 -
[43] - Quote
No....just...no...
If 1.0 becomes PvP free, I'm willing to bet that 80% of all highsec carebears move there... *insert witty saying here* twitter - @AzamiNevinyrall |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |