Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jonas Staal
Silver Octopus Infernal Octopus
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 09:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hi!
I'm talking about Projectile ammo either AC or Arty.
Is it worth (cost-wise, or faster completion time-wise) to use faction ammo or T2 ammo?
I'm not looking for exact numbers but rather the "feeling" of more experienced players conserning this subject!
Cheers! |
Lina Theist
War Veteran Pension
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 10:05:00 -
[2] - Quote
yes. The ammo pays for itself. As long as you're occupied 100% of the time and not idling about |
Dato Koppla
Rage of Inferno Malefic Motives
133
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 11:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yeah as said above, you have to make the most of it, but it will significantly improve completion times and is definitely worth the money, ACs might be a little pricey to use faction ammo but things like Lasers, Cruises, Heavies, Arties are definitely worth it because laser faction ammo lasts ages and the others have relatively slower cycle times. |
sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
902
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 11:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
I use RF ammo for Mach, 7 rounds every 2.9 seconds. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |
Hakaimono
Stillwater Corporation
55
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
I love using Barrage in L4 missions. With the extra falloff, frigs die farther away. Then I switch to RF and melt everything else. |
Baggo Hammers
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 17:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Barrage for distance, then T1 for me. Mach uses a lot. |
FT Diomedes
The Graduates RAZOR Alliance
139
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
I have no issues using it on my Vargur, but I feel bad using it on a Maelstrom or Mach. |
Velarra
207
|
Posted - 2013.03.27 18:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lina Theist wrote:yes. The ammo pays for itself. As long as you're occupied 100% of the time and not idling about
Does that presume via optimal use of LP & salvaging, or pure generic MRing without taking LP & salvage into the calculation? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |