Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Double TaP
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 03:55:00 -
[1]
I dont know if Im the only one who wants to see it, but id like to see different ship classes with the assault frigs. They have both the tier 1 and tier 2 cruisers with tech 2 versions, why not another frig. And not just with the kessie, Im sure there are other races that want that t2 frigate. Now all the races have crap frigates that would be less useful than a t2 shuttle, but I still think they could add another class. After all, if t2 is the wave of the future, you want everyone to be flying around different t2 frigates , with t2 cruisers as support. And maybe even a couple tech 2 bs's in a fleet!
|
Elgwapo
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 04:05:00 -
[2]
isnt the t2 kessie under covert ops? A cloaking frig that can carry 3 cruise missile launchers.
|
ZelRox
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 04:46:00 -
[3]
Its manticore. It could fit 3 cruise launchers, i dont think it can anymore, because of the PG changes for missile launchers. ----------------------
I wanna tuc tuc .. |
Sorja
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 06:06:00 -
[4]
I have 3 cruises on my Manticore, no problem.
Only problem is the ship is a complete joke. Cruise are so-so on a Raven, but on a frig!
On topic, the hawk should fit this role of tech II missile boat, with 4 (or even 3) launchers, while the Harpy has 4 guns.
Unfortunately, the Hawk (while nice looking) is one of those Caldari ships plagued with hybrid bonuses/layouts, and so only good for NPCing (not even close to the harpy, but anyways )
Kill mails |
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 06:52:00 -
[5]
The T2 version should be a Hawk made usefulll with 4 missile slots.
|
Mangus Thermopyle
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 11:21:00 -
[6]
I fly a crow now, and train rockets. When I am done and want to move on, it would be nice with an assault ship with missiles.
So yes, please make hawk with 4 launcher hardpoints.
|
Jacob Majestic
|
Posted - 2005.09.12 11:41:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Jacob Majestic on 12/09/2005 11:41:55 I think the Hawk would be best served by changing its slots to 4/5/2 and making its turrets/launchers be 3/3.
I have posted my thoughts on AF changes for the MK2 project here.
|
Triscuit
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 02:23:00 -
[8]
I feel exactly the same way. I wish there was a missile based Caldari AF.
|
Kyoko Sakoda
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 02:31:00 -
[9]
One of the two AFs should be missile based, yes. Signed.
Loving my Manticore atm though
|
Kyozoku
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 03:11:00 -
[10]
the entire concept of a hybrid ship needs scrapping.
give raptoor some love as well!
|
|
Double TaP
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 03:42:00 -
[11]
Well i just think that if CCP wants to ever have a tech 3 they are going about organizing tech 2 the wrong way. Every tech 1 frig should have a tech 2 version with proportional stats. For instance, merlin/kestral are best caldari frigates, so they should be best t2 caldari frigates. Condor was mediocer (pardon spelling) so it should have a mediocer t2 version. What ccp is doing now is coming out with all these ships in specialized versions, ie interceptors are condors, af are merlins, the (completely useless) stealth bomber is a kestral, and there is no equivilant for the heron and the other one. They do the same with the other races. IMO, and its just my opinion, so dont bash, They should make these interceptors and covert ops a seperate ship class like battlecruisers, and make a t1 and t2 versions. This would be more friendly to beginners as well i bet. After you make intys and covert ops seperate ship classes, make all the t1 frigates that our out now, an assault ship version, with proportional capabilities. Anyone understand what i mean?? |
Kelgen Thann
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 03:55:00 -
[12]
Herron = Buzzard
they used the hulls form the T1 to make T2. T2 is supposed to be specilized. Wait for the T2 BC and BS. Those will be specilized ships for using command modules, maybe cloaks. who knows. They just won't be like HACs look for that in T3 perhaps
|
marioman
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 04:47:00 -
[13]
Griffin shoulda been Cov Ops not that crappy Heron lol
I wouldnt mind seeing a Logistic style Griffin specifically for EW.
Just always liked the griffin and always thought it was ALOT better than the heron, it should get a T2 version imo. |
theRaptor
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 05:21:00 -
[14]
Originally by: marioman Griffin shoulda been Cov Ops not that crappy Heron lol
I wouldnt mind seeing a Logistic style Griffin specifically for EW.
Just always liked the griffin and always thought it was ALOT better than the heron, it should get a T2 version imo.
Please put down the ***** pipe. The griffin is ... I don't know how to describe it but its one of the worst looking ships in EVE. Its probably the first ship CCP ever made.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die. -- Ancient "Dirt" Religious figure. |
marioman
|
Posted - 2005.09.14 09:16:00 -
[15]
Edited by: marioman on 14/09/2005 09:16:55
Originally by: theRaptor
Originally by: marioman Griffin shoulda been Cov Ops not that crappy Heron lol
I wouldnt mind seeing a Logistic style Griffin specifically for EW.
Just always liked the griffin and always thought it was ALOT better than the heron, it should get a T2 version imo.
Please put down the ***** pipe. The griffin is ... I don't know how to describe it but its one of the worst looking ships in EVE. Its probably the first ship CCP ever made.
Hey we Caldari arent known to be the best ship designers looks wise LOL but i never said it looks good, just think its better than the heron (the heron is supposed to be "electronics" king of frigs judging from the description when the Griffin has everything better)
And yes i still have my griffin, was the 1st combat ship i ever bought and yes its fugly i mean wtf are those 2 thrusters on the SIDE doing anyway? lol |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |