Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
JitaJane
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 03:56:00 -
[61] - Quote
i must say the HS griefers complaining of exploits. Oh my. your tears, they really are delicious. I start to see the appeal.... |
Cheeseburger Jesus
The Pearly Gates
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.01 05:14:00 -
[62] - Quote
This was way more funny 5 yrs ago.
-1 for unfunnyness |
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 15:09:00 -
[63] - Quote
8.5 corporations saved right now. Still open for business, now and forever. Since I'm not online at all times with this character, send him an email if you apply. I have Eve Gate open here and I'll see a change if he gets an email, then I can sign on to accept your applications. Free Wardec Removal |
Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 15:24:00 -
[64] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:Note: We have decided not to charge for this service at all. Your move CCP. OP's first post
[quote]Free Wardec Removal[/quote] Sig
[quote]We do free wardec removal. See this thread for details:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=22792[/quote] Bio of character
Corp description
Alliance description
Fine print is pretty fine. |
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 17:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
Aqriue wrote:Alliance description Fine print is pretty fine. You're right. We started this as a pay to use service, but then changed to a free service. Thought I had changed all references to refer to it as free. Thanks for pointing that out, I'll fix it now.
Free Wardec Removal |
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 00:36:00 -
[66] - Quote
Dec Shield is now in 9 wars with 3 more on the way. We're still open for business, and accepting 2-3 corporations a day. Free Wardec Removal |
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 02:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Dec Shield is currently involved in 8 wars, with 2 more incoming. We've serviced 20+ corporations by now. Many of them didn't have time to register on Dotlan because they were with the alliance for only seconds.
Dec Shield corporations Free Wardec Removal |
Frost Mistress
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 03:57:00 -
[68] - Quote
The Zerg Overmind wrote:8.5 corporations saved right now. Still open for business, now and forever. Since I'm not online at all times with this character, send him an email if you apply. I have Eve Gate open here and I'll see a change if he gets an email, then I can sign on to accept your applications.
8.5 LOL So one gpot half the living *&^% blown out of them but the other half made it? Don't let my frosty appearance and cold attitude fool you.Once you get to know me you'll find I'm a complete and total *****-á |
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 04:02:00 -
[69] - Quote
Frost Mistress wrote: 8.5 LOL So one gpot half the living *&^% blown out of them but the other half made it?
I think it was more of a "they haven't quite joined the alliance yet, so I'm not sure if they'll be saved in time" situation.
Free Wardec Removal |
Joshua Aivoras
Tech IV Industries Pandorum Invictus
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 04:25:00 -
[70] - Quote
Just so the haters in this thread know........
Pretty sure this alliance is really a protest of the recent allowance of the Dec shield in the first place. |
|
Cannibal Kane
Count With Teddy Mercenaries
70
|
Posted - 2011.11.14 04:57:00 -
[71] - Quote
I do like this service...
With the corp we were at war with joined DEC SHIELD and surrendered we had on average a 24 hour peroid on about 6 corp everyday we could shoot at.
And I did.... The Crazy South African.
|
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
34
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 10:05:00 -
[72] - Quote
I have now created a chart to show how to abuse wardec mechanics to gain invulnerability for your highsec assets.
http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1111/DecShield.jpg Free Wardec Removal |
Myxx
Atropos Group
147
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 20:16:00 -
[73] - Quote
And this is why, last time, it was declared as an exploit. We've been here before. |
Lunas Whisper
Chillwater Ltd Imperial Ascension
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.16 20:41:00 -
[74] - Quote
Cur wrote:Lithalnas wrote: dawww isnt the 0,0 pet cute.
You're not allowed to say that without following it up with a least a pat on the head or scratch behind the ears, dammit. WHERES MY PATS!?!?!?!
Here, gives you some nice scritches, right behind the ears.
|
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 09:23:00 -
[75] - Quote
Still open for business, still accepting applications. Bring your wars to us and we'll wipe them clean for you. Free Wardec Removal |
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 03:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
I love how some people are against this and calling us pussies (I say us because I just applied to get rid of two wardecs from people who are griefing me over an out of game issue... i'm a four person mining corp, come on guys, seriously?)
The people complaining are bassically saying "I can't believe you are making it impossible for me to be a complete dickhole with no consequences whatsoever!!! You are such insensetive jerks!"
|
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 03:54:00 -
[77] - Quote
To clarify.. I am NOT against war decs... or ganking... bring it...
However... war decs should be mutual.
Simple logic...
In the real world.. if me and you get pissed at each other, and we want to fight, we should be allowed to. It should not be illegal. Duels were legal solutions to disputes for a LONG time and that is a good thing damnit. If two people BOTH want to fight... then what is wrong with that? They are both making a choice to settle their dispute with violence and who are you to deny them that?
However... that is different from screaming at someone "I WANNA FIGHT" and shooting them after they say "But I don't"
That you should be arrested for.
How is this not simple logic?
Suicide gank.. fine... blow up my ship and get raped by cops... fine... fair... sounds good... consequences for your actions and you take the calculated risk.. realistic and agreeable to me in a sandbox.
We both want to fight? Fine... who should stop us? Cops shouldnt step in when two people agree to fight...
You want to beat the **** out of me when I do not want to fight you? and merely sayign "I declare war" makes the cops agree with you instantly because you gave them money?
Yeah... bullshit bullshit bullshit....
Mutual Wardec or none at all...
I intend to abuse the hell out of this system with the help of the good people of Dec Shield until CCP makes a more logical realistic system. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
105
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 03:57:00 -
[78] - Quote
Poland wanted germany to invade them. |
Heinel Sidewind
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 08:11:00 -
[79] - Quote
This thread need some sort of wall of shame type consolidated list of the war-dec'ers for people to poke fun at. Bonus if their name sounds totally asinine. |
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 09:12:00 -
[80] - Quote
Heinel are you saying the ones who declare wardecs and get them dumped or the ones who are utilizing this service? |
|
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 09:52:00 -
[81] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:I do like this service...
With the corp we were at war with joined DEC SHIELD and surrendered we had on average a 24 hour peroid on about 6 corp everyday we could shoot at.
And I did....
Yeah... the alliance has 6 corps that stay in it... all 6 corps have a single member that never undocks.
So.. what did you shoot at exactly?
Lois: "Well sure meg just be sure to practice safe se... HAHAHHA LIAR!!"
|
Sutskop
PILSGESCHWADER Monkey Circus
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 10:05:00 -
[82] - Quote
I rather like the Dec Shield for their display of obvious fail on part of CCP when declaring an old exploit legal, but you have a point: The war system is too one sided and in almost all cases is used for bullying in one way or the other. Some prefer to call it "mercenary work", whatever. |
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 10:11:00 -
[83] - Quote
Just to point out the most common illogical arguments and statements to save further people some time.
"We will just re-wardec them, HAHAHAHA" - You can't.. not until server downtime even if you use another corp. You have to wait until the war is over or the next downtime, at which point you will declare another war, they will have 24 hours to join the alliance and invalidate it again. The timers do line up as he says they do.
"Fine, transfer us to the alliance, then we can kill all the corps, HAHAHAHAHAHA" - Nope. The corp that joins the alliance immediately leaves, so you can't attack your original targets. There are 6 corps in the alliance who stay, and they are all single player corps run by the same person so that corps that do join cannot vote for alliance control and disband it. In other words... you would be lucky to have a brief chance to kill a corp within the alliance that is an actual functioning corp before they leave after their war is transfered. The 6 stationary corps do not undock... good luck killing them.
"You are cowards!!!!" You are fighting in hi-sec against noncombatants. Bassically you are punching babies at an unattended daycare with no cameras.
"Hi-sec combat should be allowed!!" It is... you can fight against anyone who does not mind the war dec, like a corp that enjoys PVP and also does not want to deal with lo-sec, so you can have a nice organized peaceful war that others cannot interfere with.
"Hi-sec combat should be allowed without people running from it by choice!!!" It is... suicide gank us. You can take out my retriever with a well equipped thrasher easily... very little investment. Doing something harmful to someone without their consent has consequences... welcome to reality, asshat.
"I'm an idiot!" This is the one argument you can make that i will agree with if you want to say this is all a bad thing. By saying this, your opinion of this being a horrible thing is a valid opinion based on the argument that you are an idiot, and therefore it is an opinion of an idiot. As long as this is your primary argument for supporting your opinion, then we can all agree on it. |
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 10:18:00 -
[84] - Quote
KrakizBad wrote:If they're avoiding wars in this manner, I doubt alliance history is their biggest concern.
In reference to the image you posted (dumbhiseccers)
Noone is asking for a safe zone, they are saying that cops so easily and cheaply bribed makes everywhere an open warzone. Do not use ridiculous hyperbole.
Even if hi sec was 100% safe from everything, including ganking.. people would not all flood there and stay there, so that's your second ridiculous hyperbole.
Even if players could never ever attack players, ships could still be lost, so that is your third ridiculous hyperbole.
Even if ships were uber invincible, you need new ships when you gain skills to fly them, and you always need ammo.
So even if all the ridiculous stupid assinine hyperboles you put forth are 100% true, you are still wrong.
This makes you quintuply wrong.
You are wrong to the power of 5.
You are, in effect, wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.
|
SiIver Twin
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 11:13:00 -
[85] - Quote
Why not just make a perma solution to this?
Create enough alt corps to Dec the alliance and make them mutual, so no fee is paid. Isn't there a limit to how many war decs can be held against one group?
Once you have the maximum number of alt war decs on. You then just accept anyone into the alliance, under your blanket of protection? They will still show as being war decced. but they will be war decced by characters minutes old that will never log on never mind undock. |
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 11:58:00 -
[86] - Quote
Honestly with the system being abused as it is right now, we can effectively protect ourselves from griefers to such an extent that it is not that big a concern.
I for one wish taht wardeccing was like a divorce...
If it is a mutual thing it should be cheap fast and easy...
If only one side wants it.. it should take a long time, be a royal pain in the ass, and be expensive as all hell. |
The Zerg Overmind
Rule Reversal Dec Shield
52
|
Posted - 2011.11.26 04:02:00 -
[87] - Quote
Lusinara wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:I do like this service...
With the corp we were at war with joined DEC SHIELD and surrendered we had on average a 24 hour peroid on about 6 corp everyday we could shoot at.
And I did.... Yeah... the alliance has 6 corps that stay in it... all 6 corps have a single member that never undocks. So.. what did you shoot at exactly? Lois: "Well sure meg just be sure to practice safe se... HAHAHHA LIAR!!" lol when I read this I was thinking the same thing, but I held my tongue. Free Wardec Removal |
whaynethepain
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 10:29:00 -
[88] - Quote
You high-sec dwellers have no idea how easy you have it.
I do enjoy sneaking up and shooting vulnerables, feels tingly, sometimes I laugh a while and giggle myself to sleep.
But then I have to hang about null/low-sec shooting npc B.S. for hours to get concord back on side.
There needs to be a mechanic where I can give concord a few mill, then just smash stuff up for an hour or two, while they turn a blind eye.
And these new pod KM's and dps ships are just gonna have me sat chaining constellations for too long.
Nerf concord, they are too overpowered, that's the real problem.
I'm all for the law showing up and helping the unaware, but 50,000 police appearing out of nowhere and podding any ship is a little unrealistic?
And why don't wardeccers have to rat for concord as part payment, at least this way I would have a half decent fight in the belts, and it would clear Jita undock for an hour or two.
Rats! Getting you on your feet.
So you've further to fall. |
Cannibal Kane
Count With Teddy Mercenaries
85
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 12:00:00 -
[89] - Quote
Lusinara wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:I do like this service...
With the corp we were at war with joined DEC SHIELD and surrendered we had on average a 24 hour peroid on about 6 corp everyday we could shoot at.
And I did.... Yeah... the alliance has 6 corps that stay in it... all 6 corps have a single member that never undocks. So.. what did you shoot at exactly? Lois: "Well sure meg just be sure to practice safe se... HAHAHHA LIAR!!"
Hmm....
I hate explaining things to people since it makes them look like a ******.
While the war was going with dec shield.... each corp that joined for "DEC Protection" and surrendered gave us a 24 peroid to shoot at them when they surrendered.
It's not that hard to figure out or see how that works...
Sooo.... catch a wake up. The Crazy South African.
|
Lusinara
Unshackled Mineral Management Tribe
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.30 20:48:00 -
[90] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Lusinara wrote:Cannibal Kane wrote:I do like this service...
With the corp we were at war with joined DEC SHIELD and surrendered we had on average a 24 hour peroid on about 6 corp everyday we could shoot at.
And I did.... Yeah... the alliance has 6 corps that stay in it... all 6 corps have a single member that never undocks. So.. what did you shoot at exactly? Lois: "Well sure meg just be sure to practice safe se... HAHAHHA LIAR!!" Hmm.... I hate explaining things to people since it makes them look like a ******. We had a war with a corp that joined DEC SHIELD and surrendered, we just kept it running till the end with DEC Shield.... each corp that joined for "DEC Protection" and surrendered gave us a 24 peroid to shoot at them when they surrendered. It's not that hard to figure out or see how that works... Sooo.... catch a wake up.
"I'm such a **** I was killing hi-sec people I didn't even know just for the sake of killing them!"
Got it, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |