Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
3672
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
Any thoughts on reducing the requirements for T2 large rigs then? They will be a lot less useful post-patch. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|
Bl1SkR1N
Dromedaworks inc Tribal Band
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:37:00 -
[32] - Quote
so T2 CCC rigs on archon? really? :D well I guess you will make enough in WH to afford them :P |
Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
349
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:37:00 -
[33] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:Hey
We're putting capital rigs into EVE. Not much else to say, really. They will work pretty much as you would expect them to.
Some things to note: * Rigs that previously did not affect capital modules will affect capital modules ** (Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard, Auxiliary Nano Pump and Nanobot Accelerator rigs) * Tech I BPOs will cost 50 Million ISK * Manufacturing Capital rigs will use 5 times the materials of Large rigs
Questions? Comments?
will salvage drops increase to balance the demand that this will bring or CCP and keep prices steady or will just let the prices go up and mess with the economy? Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
281
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:39:00 -
[34] - Quote
xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote:Love it.
Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP!
Carriers should have their build cost increased 5x to account for this discrepancy. |
Liu Ellens
Blame The Bunny The Dark Nation
83
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:40:00 -
[35] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:Commander Ted wrote:Schmell wrote:So what numbes will they have?
How will, for example, t1 capital trimark and t2 large trimark compare in efficiency?
(considering t1 capital trimark will be around 5-10 times cheaper) They will probably be exactly the same thing as larges. Also tallest cant spell. Shouldn't that be "Also, Tallest can't spell."
To chip in: As there most likely will not be an "Evenysey", I believe it's called "Odyssey" (see title) upro - an online browser application to support navigation in New Eden and beyond. |
Josef North
Repercussus RAZOR Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:40:00 -
[36] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:Commander Ted wrote:Schmell wrote:So what numbes will they have?
How will, for example, t1 capital trimark and t2 large trimark compare in efficiency?
(considering t1 capital trimark will be around 5-10 times cheaper) They will probably be exactly the same thing as larges. Also tallest cant spell. Shouldn't that be "Also, Tallest can't spell."
The last sentence should have a question mark at the end. |
Destoya
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
76
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:41:00 -
[37] - Quote
Will large rigs that are already fitted also work with capital sized modules?
Or would I have to pull off the rigs in order to fit the new capital sized ones?
|
Enochia Starr
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
57
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:42:00 -
[38] - Quote
I hope that you compensate us for our Large T2 Trimarks on our supercapitals / titans. |
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
415
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:42:00 -
[39] - Quote
Liu Ellens wrote:CCP Tallest wrote:Commander Ted wrote:Schmell wrote:So what numbes will they have?
How will, for example, t1 capital trimark and t2 large trimark compare in efficiency?
(considering t1 capital trimark will be around 5-10 times cheaper) They will probably be exactly the same thing as larges. Also tallest cant spell. Shouldn't that be "Also, Tallest can't spell." To chip in: As there most likely will not be an "Evenysey", I believe it's called "Odys sey" (see title) I kind of like the word Oddysey. I'll keep it that way. At the very least, it will attract spelling enthusiasts to this thread. Gÿà EVE Game Designer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ |
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
894
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:43:00 -
[40] - Quote
Gheyna wrote: But t2 (and some t1) rigs for caps will cost alot. (you need to look at that ccp)
Well lets see, right now Trimarks on a battleship run you 21m or ~10% of the cost (for a Tier 3). On a carrier that would be ~105m which is, coincidentally, just under 10% of the cost.
Likewise, T2 trimarks for a BS would run you a billion, five times the cost of the ship. Three times the cost of the ship for a set of T2 trimarks for a carrier seems reasonable to me there, as well.
Enochia Starr wrote:I hope that you compensate us for our Large T2 Trimarks on our supercapitals / titans. Why would they do this? They'll continue to give the bonus just as they do now. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
|
Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
349
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:43:00 -
[41] - Quote
I just hope you grab this opportunity to fix T2 rigs and bring their price range down to acceptable levels!
capital t2 trimarks will cost roughly 5.5 bil Official CSM 8 Campaign HQ * Unforgiven Storm for CSM8 * My Blog
|
Mynas Atoch
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:43:00 -
[42] - Quote
This is a 7.5 Billion isk boost for anyone who already has a T2 rigged supercap. You should seriously consider making existing rigs which are too small for their ship class ineffective to create a level playing field.
Giving the thousands of existing supercapital pilots a 7.5 billion isk advantage over new pilots is too much. |
Dersen Lowery
Laurentson INC StructureDamage
481
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:44:00 -
[43] - Quote
Destoya wrote:Will large rigs that are already fitted also work with capital sized modules?
Or would I have to pull off the rigs in order to fit the new capital sized ones?
Answered upthread; The rigs you currently have will continue to work the same way. Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.
Vote for CSM 8! |
Enochia Starr
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
57
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Enochia Starr wrote:I hope that you compensate us for our Large T2 Trimarks on our supercapitals / titans. Why would they do this? They'll continue to give the bonus just as they do now.
If they change trimarks to Capital Trimarks, then hopefully there is some sort of compensation. However it looks like they wont be changing trimarks over.
|
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
897
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:47:00 -
[45] - Quote
Enochia Starr wrote:mynnna wrote:Enochia Starr wrote:I hope that you compensate us for our Large T2 Trimarks on our supercapitals / titans. Why would they do this? They'll continue to give the bonus just as they do now. If they change trimarks to Capital Trimarks, then hopefully there is some sort of compensation. However it looks like they wont be changing trimarks over.
...why would you need compensation? Whether they change them or not they'd work exactly as before. If anything, were they to change them they really should be deducting several billion isk from your wallet, the difference between the price of large trimarks and capital trimarks. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Enochia Starr
Burning Napalm Northern Coalition.
57
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:48:00 -
[46] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Enochia Starr wrote:mynnna wrote:Enochia Starr wrote:I hope that you compensate us for our Large T2 Trimarks on our supercapitals / titans. Why would they do this? They'll continue to give the bonus just as they do now. If they change trimarks to Capital Trimarks, then hopefully there is some sort of compensation. However it looks like they wont be changing trimarks over. ...why would you need compensation? Whether they change them or not they'd work exactly as before. If anything, were they to change them they really should be deducting several billion isk from your wallet, the difference between the price of large trimarks and capital trimarks.
Price, unless you want to pay NCDOT for changing over 300 supercapitals to Capital Trimark Armor Pump II (probably 1b a pop) |
Fel Wrath
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
4
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:48:00 -
[47] - Quote
Unforgiven Storm wrote:CCP Tallest wrote:Hey
We're putting capital rigs into EVE. Not much else to say, really. They will work pretty much as you would expect them to.
Some things to note: * Rigs that previously did not affect capital modules will affect capital modules ** (Core Defense Capacitor Safeguard, Auxiliary Nano Pump and Nanobot Accelerator rigs) * Tech I BPOs will cost 50 Million ISK * Manufacturing Capital rigs will use 5 times the materials of Large rigs
Questions? Comments? will salvage drops increase to balance the demand that this will bring or CCP and keep prices steady or will just let the prices go up and mess with the economy?
The prices on salvage are already pretty low due to so much supply from ninja salvagers and the noctis. It would be a welcome demand source IMO. |
Destoya
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
76
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:49:00 -
[48] - Quote
Fango Mango wrote:Krell Kroenen wrote:Ivana Twinkle wrote:Because those large trimark II's just aren't expensive enough. Well with these rigs consuming 5 times the resources I imagine that will drive up the costs of other rigs as well, at least a wee bit. I imagine this will drop the prices for battleship sized trimark IIs. No one is going to spend 4.5 billion to rig a carrier or a dread. Therefore demand will drop and prices will drop. -FM
It will raise the price of all rigs since salvage (especially t2 armor plates and ward consoles) is a resource with a fairly limited supply. Since every new super capital, bling WH cap, or dreads with gun rigs will be using 5x the supply of T2 salvage this will bring the price up.
Probably won't have too much of an effect on the t1 market, at least in the long run, both because supply of materials is larger and the amount of capitals that get rigged everyday is nothing compared to how many battleships do the same. |
Llyona
Posthuman Society 10110001100111101000
13
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:49:00 -
[49] - Quote
xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote:Love it.
Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP!
Look at the tools posting like they know what's up. Let's all point and laugh at them!
Seriously, if the MATERIAL price increases by 5x, then that means a T2 rigged carrier will cost you 2.3-2.4b isk.
The math is pretty easy:
Intact Armor Plates x70 - 1.12b
Interface Circuit x85 - 22m
Nanite Compound x55 - 4.73m
RAM x0.2 - 20k
Total: 1.147b
So, we'd get the following as a price calculation: 1.147*2 , then we'd add another 40m for the 3rd rig, which will be T1.
2.334b (This includes a 15% markup)
EVE is an illness, for which there is no cure. |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
897
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:50:00 -
[50] - Quote
Enochia Starr wrote:
Price, unless you want to pay NCDOT for changing over 300 supercapitals to Capital Trimark Armor Pump II (probably 1b a pop)
You're completely illiterate aren't you?
CCP Tallest wrote:Jane Wade wrote:do ships with large rigs already in them keep their bonuses?
Yes. Your currently fitted rigs will stay in place and keep their bonuses.
Mynnna for CSM 8 |
|
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
282
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:52:00 -
[51] - Quote
Llyona wrote:xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote:Love it.
Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP! Look at the tools posting like they know what's up. Let's all point and laugh at them! Seriously, if the MATERIAL price increases by 5x, then that means a T2 rigged carrier will cost you 2.3-2.4b isk. The math is pretty easy: Intact Armor Plates x70 - 1.12b Interface Circuit x85 - 22m Nanite Compound x55 - 4.73m RAM x0.2 - 20k Total: 1.147b So, we'd get the following as a price calculation: 1.147*2 , then we'd add another 40m for the 3rd rig, which will be T1. 2.334b (This includes a 15% markup)
I don't get it.
|
Sofia Wolf
Ubuntu Inc. The Fourth District
181
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
Woot! Finally time has come for them capital blobbers to pay their pound of flesh to us poor salvagers. CFC, HBC I want your iskies, and you gonna give them to us if you want your capitals rigged.
P.S. Love you long time CCP! Jessica Danikov > EVE is your real life. the rest is fantasy. caught in a corporation. no escape from banality. open up yours eyes, peer through pod good and seeeeeee. I'm just a poor pilot, I need no sympathy. because I'm easy scam, easy go, little isk, little know. anyway the solar wind blows... |
Sushi Nardieu
Bite Me inc Bitten.
117
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
Yes I like this a lot. The Guns of Knowledge-á |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
898
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 16:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
XXSketchxx wrote:Llyona wrote:xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote:Love it.
Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP! Look at the tools posting like they know what's up. Let's all point and laugh at them! Seriously, if the MATERIAL price increases by 5x, then that means a T2 rigged carrier will cost you 2.3-2.4b isk. The math is pretty easy: Intact Armor Plates x70 - 1.12b Interface Circuit x85 - 22m Nanite Compound x55 - 4.73m RAM x0.2 - 20k Total: 1.147b So, we'd get the following as a price calculation: 1.147*2 , then we'd add another 40m for the 3rd rig, which will be T1. 2.334b (This includes a 15% markup) I don't get it. He's pointing out, probably incorrectly, that you won't be able to fit three T2 trimarks to a carrier. Large T2 trimarks are 75 calibration, though, and a carrier has 400. They'll be fine.
Also, seeing as best case for a Tech II large trimark right now is 18 interface circuits, 16 intact armor plates and 12 nanite compound. That makes it more like 80 IAP, 90 IC and 60 NC for a Tech II capital trimark, which in turn makes the cost more like 1.3b each. Add a 15% markup and hey, wouldn't you know it, the people saying 1.5b per were correct. Mynnna for CSM 8 |
Skia Aumer
Atlas Research Group
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 17:00:00 -
[55] - Quote
All large rigs on capitals should be un-fitted on a patch day, that would be fair. Other than that - great change. |
Quesa
D00M. Northern Coalition.
25
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 17:01:00 -
[56] - Quote
Unless this is a way to lower the cost of large rigs and not a way to increase the cost or component requirements for capital sized mods vs large, this is going to be a bad change.
I can't see a reason to increase the investment needed for a standard capital and we all know that cost has little to do with the proliferation issues this game is having. |
Skia Aumer
Atlas Research Group
6
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 17:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
And btw, is Orca a capital ship? Edit: obviously not, over-reacting here. |
Smoking Blunts
ZC Industries Dark Stripes
401
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 17:02:00 -
[58] - Quote
unless I missed it, when?
expansion, 1.1 or sometime soon? OMG when can i get a pic here
|
Chinicata Shihari
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 17:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
Llyona wrote:xXyoloxXxbroswagxXx420Xx wrote:Love it.
Spend 1.3b on an Archon then 4.5b on T2 rigs. Good job CCP! Look at the tools posting like they know what's up. Let's all point and laugh at them! Seriously, if the MATERIAL price increases by 5x, then that means a T2 rigged carrier will cost you 2.3-2.4b isk. The math is pretty easy: Intact Armor Plates x70 - 1.12b Interface Circuit x85 - 22m Nanite Compound x55 - 4.73m RAM x0.2 - 20k Total: 1.147b So, we'd get the following as a price calculation: 1.147*2 , then we'd add another 40m for the 3rd rig, which will be T1. 2.334b (This includes a 15% markup) Your maths is very poor. It will cost 1.5bil per Capital T2 trimark at mineral cost. That means 4.5bil for 3 before markup. Thats going to make the price on a armour super sky rocket. So if a fitted aeon costs 22bil now then a fitted aeon afterwards would cost at least 26bil. |
XXSketchxx
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
282
|
Posted - 2013.04.23 17:02:00 -
[60] - Quote
He's pointing out, probably incorrectly, that you won't be able to fit three T2 trimarks to a carrier. Large T2 trimarks are 75 calibration, though, and a carrier has 400. They'll be fine.
Also, seeing as best case for a Tech II large trimark right now is 18 interface circuits, 16 intact armor plates and 12 nanite compound. That makes it more like 80 IAP, 90 IC and 60 NC for a Tech II capital trimark, which in turn makes the cost more like 1.3b each. Add a 15% markup and hey, wouldn't you know it, the people saying 1.5b per were correct.[/quote]
Are you sure? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 13 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |