Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jazmyn Stone
KIRSTONE ALLIANCE
106
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
I would love to see a variation on the Raven hull. Too many ships use the same one.
In another post, a while ago, I suggested that maybe the Raven hull could be changed for the Widow and the Golem. The Widow . . . is after all, a spider. The Golem is not a Raven, it is a mythical creature. ( I think in Jewish lore.)
My suggestion was to make those "ravens" look like a spider. (eek!) Eliminate the "neck and head" from the raven, and balance out the "wings" mirroring the right one with all those spiney things. Can you picture it in your mind? Give me the creeps just thinking about it. But it would look awesome.
-Jaz |
Solhild
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
978
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:42:00 -
[32] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails
That is an absolutely fantastic design. My gripes with it are the off axis lower thrusters and that the structure of the ship impedes the turrets which are sunken in. The sails and general aesthetic of that ship are exactly right. Whoever did it, hat off to you sir!
Now please go and fix the reaper and talwar models, not good at all. The texture work is excellent but the designs simply aren't credible.
I approve of the suggestion to tweak T1 models for their T2 counterparts.
|
Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
330
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 15:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
I dislike they also but still they are good looking,my pass on it would be moving lower sail all the way down that way it would appear more massive as ship and it would look almost as two part ship hold together only with single super structure beam linking two parts...much more minmatar imho.
hell i would even put lower sail under the angle to remove very(overly simplistic) look of a ship say 60 degree angle..stuff like that http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|
Xindi Kraid
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
406
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:04:00 -
[34] - Quote
Yeah sure.
While you're at it, give the Crane it's laterally mounted thrusters back. |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
366
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
Xindi Kraid wrote:Yeah sure.
While you're at it, give the Crane it's laterally mounted thrusters back.
I support this suggestion and OP's one ! G££ <= Me |
Bruce Kemp
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 16:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
Spread the love. +1
|
Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1469
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 17:16:00 -
[37] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails
No comment on the OP at all? :( Ch+½j+ì Katrina Oniseki ~ (RDC) Chief Operations Officer ~ [I-RED] Sub-Director of Public Relations |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
366
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails No comment on the OP at all? :(
Indirectly by choosing not to answer, he answered : "I can't promise anything." G££ <= Me |
Commissar Kate
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
2444
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 18:45:00 -
[39] - Quote
Katrina Oniseki wrote:CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails No comment on the OP at all? :(
Comeon Kat, You know how secrete CCP is on this stuff.
But here is another +1 for the idea. Set Lasers for Fun!!! |
Jessica Danikov
Ubuntu Inc. The Fourth District
85
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 19:08:00 -
[40] - Quote
The reason for stealth bombers getting their own special hulls was that their role made them so removed from their base hulls it didn't make sense for them to be mere reskins. Not all T2 ships are quite that radically different to justify that.
With that in mind, I'd say the heavy dictors deserve a pass at totally custom hulls. The Phobos has a token attempt at a special hull modification, but that's about it. Light dictors are far more justified as a reskin (after all, they launch bubble probes, not generate one).
Logistics would probably be my next port of call, although with the T1 cruiser changes, I might suggest tweaking both hulls in unison to be a bit more logi-like.
The only other T2 that really needs some love are command ships. They need to be more command-y. Mauraders, HACS, AFs, EAWR frigs, Interceptors, they're all fine as they are. |
|
Mizhir
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
15621
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 19:16:00 -
[41] - Quote
Commissar Kate wrote:Katrina Oniseki wrote:CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails No comment on the OP at all? :( Comeon Kat, You know how secrete CCP is on this stuff. But here is another +1 for the idea.
Well, they kind of have to. If they accidently promise to much and it gets delayed, then there will be nothing that will protect them from the storm of angry players. We will never forget you Saede!
I bet you dont see things like this so often in EVE |
AskariRising
8th Day
7
|
Posted - 2013.04.30 20:43:00 -
[42] - Quote
Jessica Danikov wrote:The reason for stealth bombers getting their own special hulls was that their role made them so removed from their base hulls it didn't make sense for them to be mere reskins. Not all T2 ships are quite that radically different to justify that.
With that in mind, I'd say the heavy dictors deserve a pass at totally custom hulls. The Phobos has a token attempt at a special hull modification, but that's about it. Light dictors are far more justified as a reskin (after all, they launch bubble probes, not generate one).
Logistics would probably be my next port of call, although with the T1 cruiser changes, I might suggest tweaking both hulls in unison to be a bit more logi-like.
The only other T2 that really needs some love are command ships. They need to be more command-y. Mauraders, HACS, AFs, EAWR frigs, Interceptors, they're all fine as they are.
thats not why. they redid them because missile turrets were introduced and a battleship sized launcher looked funny on a frigate |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
369
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 08:29:00 -
[43] - Quote
AskariRising wrote:Jessica Danikov wrote:The reason for stealth bombers getting their own special hulls was that their role made them so removed from their base hulls it didn't make sense for them to be mere reskins. Not all T2 ships are quite that radically different to justify that.
With that in mind, I'd say the heavy dictors deserve a pass at totally custom hulls. The Phobos has a token attempt at a special hull modification, but that's about it. Light dictors are far more justified as a reskin (after all, they launch bubble probes, not generate one).
Logistics would probably be my next port of call, although with the T1 cruiser changes, I might suggest tweaking both hulls in unison to be a bit more logi-like.
The only other T2 that really needs some love are command ships. They need to be more command-y. Mauraders, HACS, AFs, EAWR frigs, Interceptors, they're all fine as they are. thats not why. they redid them because missile turrets were introduced and a battleship sized launcher looked funny on a frigate
Still her point is valid, and I strongly agree that heavy dictors could deserve some kind of unique 3D model showing their warp disruption generator, like the phobos.
Because admit it, it's cool ! G££ <= Me |
Xindi Kraid
The Night Wardens Viro Mors Non Est
418
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
AskariRising wrote:Jessica Danikov wrote:The reason for stealth bombers getting their own special hulls was that their role made them so removed from their base hulls it didn't make sense for them to be mere reskins. Not all T2 ships are quite that radically different to justify that.
With that in mind, I'd say the heavy dictors deserve a pass at totally custom hulls. The Phobos has a token attempt at a special hull modification, but that's about it. Light dictors are far more justified as a reskin (after all, they launch bubble probes, not generate one).
Logistics would probably be my next port of call, although with the T1 cruiser changes, I might suggest tweaking both hulls in unison to be a bit more logi-like.
The only other T2 that really needs some love are command ships. They need to be more command-y. Mauraders, HACS, AFs, EAWR frigs, Interceptors, they're all fine as they are. thats not why. they redid them because missile turrets were introduced and a battleship sized launcher looked funny on a frigate Indeed, the models for battleship sized weapons don't fit on frigates, so they had to make new frigates that can actually fit the equipment in question on the model. |
Ivoto
CrapCorp Holdings
36
|
Posted - 2013.05.01 10:51:00 -
[45] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails Lol so much win.
I love this game because the devs dont take bullshit from shitposters. |
TheNewestTwin
Avalon Project Shadow Rock Alliance
25
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 00:49:00 -
[46] - Quote
I support this.
Also put rounded sails on Sleipnir. |
stoicfaux
2644
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 01:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails If that's the rationale behind the decision, then please don't tell me that Lai Dai designed the Moa....
|
YuuKnow
Terra-Formers
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:19:00 -
[48] - Quote
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:stoicfaux wrote:-1,000,000,000 because of what they did to the Vargur. Rounded sails just ruined the look of the ship. I really don't want CCP to get creative with the Golem hull.
you do know, that the vargur has rounded sails because of their tribe, all of the ships from that tribe have rounded sails
The rounded sails look great. Keep up the good work.
yk |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |