Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 07:30:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:45:02 Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:44:41 It is just an idea, but....I would like to know your opinions about NAP between war parties among particular empire systems. 50 on 50 is laggy enough...and when you have another 200 pilots next to you it is even more laggy. So maybe we can write down few system that have big population to be forbiden for fights in this war. It is an idea...it doesnt have to be good...but then again it might help us having even more fun then we do now .
Well, at least NAP at particular EVE time when majority of population play Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 07:30:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:45:02 Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:44:41 It is just an idea, but....I would like to know your opinions about NAP between war parties among particular empire systems. 50 on 50 is laggy enough...and when you have another 200 pilots next to you it is even more laggy. So maybe we can write down few system that have big population to be forbiden for fights in this war. It is an idea...it doesnt have to be good...but then again it might help us having even more fun then we do now .
Well, at least NAP at particular EVE time when majority of population play Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 07:53:00 -
[3]
How about a NAP in ALL empire systems for the course of the war too?
|
Sarah Ponytails
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 07:59:00 -
[4]
Five is trying to get themselves safe systems for five characters to restock and fit
|
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:01:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 08:02:55
Originally by: Shin Ra How about a NAP in ALL empire systems for the course of the war too?
Thank you for your kind respons...now go back posting killmails and making your ego bigger then it is.
This NAP idea between...lets say 19-21 EVE time in 4-6 major empire systems where 200-300 ppl could be found easily in local woldnt make less fights then now...but would cut down laggy impact a bit
Originally by: Sarah Ponytails Five is trying to get themselves safe systems for five characters to restock and fit
If its so, it could be aplied to all parties included in WAR...but you can flame if you want. As i said...it was just an idea for making fights eaiser for all of us Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Silvitni
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:03:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Darcuese Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:45:02 Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:44:41 It is just an idea, but....I would like to know your opinions about NAP between war parties among particular empire systems. 50 on 50 is laggy enough...and when you have another 200 pilots next to you it is even more laggy. So maybe we can write down few system that have big population to be forbiden for fights in this war. It is an idea...it doesnt have to be good...but then again it might help us having even more fun then we do now .
Well, at least NAP at particular EVE time when majority of population play
Just surrender m8, if you canŠt take the heat
|
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:06:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Silvitni
Just surrender m8, if you canŠt take the heat
Damn...you cant even post idea on this forums without puting yourself in danger of
A: being flamed B: thrown out from corp/alliance Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Phoenicia
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:09:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Phoenicia on 19/10/2005 08:10:49 Edited by: Phoenicia on 19/10/2005 08:09:57 Please note that the Five are the ones thinking about the innocent population in Empire, who will surely lag out at the impending onslaught, and their enemies are the ones who want to abuse this fact as a propaganda attempt towards "cowardice" on the part of the Five.
Perhaps because F-E, NBSI and PA know their own members and know they lack the discipline to uphold such a valiant agreement?
"There is no peace, there is only BOOBIES!" |
pershphanie
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:12:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Darcuese Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:45:02 Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:44:41 It is just an idea, but....I would like to know your opinions about NAP between war parties among particular empire systems. 50 on 50 is laggy enough...and when you have another 200 pilots next to you it is even more laggy. So maybe we can write down few system that have big population to be forbiden for fights in this war. It is an idea...it doesnt have to be good...but then again it might help us having even more fun then we do now .
Well, at least NAP at particular EVE time when majority of population play
It is a great idea, however i fear that if we did that both sides would abuse it by useing those systems as a SS. So its not going to happen. |
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:15:00 -
[10]
Jesus...I think this game made lots off ppl ready for psychotherapy. You dont take anything without thinking first "Hmm, whats he hiding behind back?".
Its only 2-3 hours NAP...FFS Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
|
Equinox II
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:15:00 -
[11]
Will never work on a large alliance scale, it's impossible to control everyone when you have 1000 of people in your alliance..
And, I bet a lot of accidents would happen, say you are trying to catch up with someone, and follow him for 2-3 jumps and then you finally get him in one of these "protected" systems, most people would just blast him without noticing the system-name..
Also, systems like this would just be used as safe havens...
Bad idea in my book... could maybe work on a small scale, say two small corps having a war just for kicks.. - but then on a small scale, you don't really have the lag problems of 50vs50 fleets..
|
Phoenicia
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:15:00 -
[12]
Originally by: pershphanie
It is a great idea, however i fear that if we did that both sides would abuse it by useing those systems as a SS. So its not going to happen.
Apologies for naming F-E in my last statement. This is actually a sensible reason to say no
"There is no peace, there is only BOOBIES!" |
Darken Two
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:28:00 -
[13]
Its a good idea mate, but sooner or later someone would ***** up and you know how it is, all the massive egos on both sides would explode and we would all be bathing in flames. The actual forum flaming between both sides, has gone down a lot in the past couple days, lets try keep it that way.
Originally by: Blind Fear Generally, when trying to be a puppetmaster, it is considered good form not to wrap the strings around your neck and choke yourself.
|
StiZum Hilidii
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:29:00 -
[14]
Darcuese put the drugs down man STAN
FACTA NON VERBA ALTS FTL |
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:31:00 -
[15]
Originally by: StiZum Hilidii Darcuese put the drugs down man
Its only salvation I have
Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Muthsera
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 08:32:00 -
[16]
Just deal whit it mate. Hopefully the lag will be a bit better after the box upgrade. SoonÖ
|
Drilla
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 09:40:00 -
[17]
No, never, no NAP in any empire system.
Seek not to bar my way, for I shall win through - no matter the cost! |
Pehova Mindtriq
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 09:47:00 -
[18]
To many things can go wrong with that sort of NAP. First of the systems that the NAP concerns will be used as safespots which will frustrate the enemy. And lets say on side is in one of these systems and a enemy hauler enters, how likely would it be for 40-50 ppl to let a wartarget pass unharmed? Let ccp sort these problems.
|
Pastora
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:08:00 -
[19]
And who cares about the population in those systems anyway? No, that sounds too bad...
I'll rather say it's better for them. When we were fighting in empire in those populated systems there were always those scavengers or alts flying around and trying to loot the cans of the enemies we shot down. So, free loot for them.
Also, at the time when I was myself a newbie (yeah, those good old beta days ), though I still am, it was nice to come to some gate and watch how the big boys fight it out.
As for the lag. As people said, let's hope hardware upgrade makes it a lesser factor. _______________________________________________ If ifs and ands were pots and pans, I would grow mushrooms in my pants. |
DjDangle
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:11:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Darcuese Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:45:02 Edited by: Darcuese on 19/10/2005 07:44:41 It is just an idea, but....I would like to know your opinions about NAP between war parties among particular empire systems. 50 on 50 is laggy enough...and when you have another 200 pilots next to you it is even more laggy. So maybe we can write down few system that have big population to be forbiden for fights in this war. It is an idea...it doesnt have to be good...but then again it might help us having even more fun then we do now .
Well, at least NAP at particular EVE time when majority of population play
Good idea m8.
Some of the fights up in the Northern regions have been a joke over the past few days. especially if youve just jumped through a gate...
Honestly speaking though there is no way other alliances would hold up on the nap, mentioning no alliance names that have recently been decced for doing just that, breaking agreements...
Ho hum :p ------------
"On My Signal, Unleash Hell"
-I speak for my corp. Not our Alliance- |
|
Velios
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:22:00 -
[21]
Darcuese, there will be no NAP's and you should think about running these ridiculous ideas past your fellow corp mates before going public with them. |
Mortuus
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:28:00 -
[22]
While it would make my life easier, I would have to say no so we can lag or crash the empire nodes just to annoy those carebears. Too bad we can't just shoot em all.
|
Jungle Jim
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:32:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Velios Darcuese, there will be no NAP's and you should think about running these ridiculous ideas past your fellow corp mates before going public with them.
I remember last time someone from M.Corp suggested something like this...
*** Proud First Time Winner of the MLM Muppet Award *** |
Commisar
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:34:00 -
[24]
Originally by: Jungle Jim
Originally by: Velios Darcuese, there will be no NAP's and you should think about running these ridiculous ideas past your fellow corp mates before going public with them.
I remember last time someone from M.Corp suggested something like this...
I remember the last time F-E wanted a NAP.....and left an alliance.
|
Darcuese
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:42:00 -
[25]
Well pll, this thread was a caise of how something can be interpreted wrongly. 1.--..there wasnt concern (bad grammar, I know) about hundreds and hundreds neutral pilots in those BIG systems. 2.--....it wasnt mented to make those systems as safe spots for some. 3.--....primary objective was to make fights less laggy as posible 4.--....not mented to avoid fights. 5--....it was motivated by blood lust. 6.--..NAP intention would be take time for only cupple of ours per day when server is full with over 16000 ppl.-A bit like Switzerland (it did exist in 2.WW) 7--...these few main systems are surrounded by hundreds "smaller" that are more then enough to have masacres. 8--..it was personal opinion but i guess it should have been writen down in first post 9--..it would be writen down even if there would be different parties involved 10-..It was my personal opinion Can someone point me out to Minmatar Vengance? I have ammo i have to get ridd of |
Fred0
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:47:00 -
[26]
Lag happens. Everywhere. Escpecially if your squabble happens to transform into a real blobwar. But there's no reason to go "kiddierules" on the game for that.
|
Kerosene
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:54:00 -
[27]
All I can do really is ask gang leaders from NBSI to try to avoid the heavy systems but it's not guaranteed. If there's a 25 man fleet sighted in Jita, that's where we'll be heading. So it's got to be a kind of 'Try to plot around them systems but it's no great shakes if we can't'.
Sort of thing. __
|
Velios
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:54:00 -
[28]
Check your mail pls Darcuese. |
NAFnist
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 10:58:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Commisar
Originally by: Jungle Jim
Originally by: Velios Darcuese, there will be no NAP's and you should think about running these ridiculous ideas past your fellow corp mates before going public with them.
I remember last time someone from M.Corp suggested something like this...
I remember the last time F-E wanted a NAP.....and left an alliance.
How can an alliance leave an alliance?
|
Chowdown
|
Posted - 2005.10.19 11:07:00 -
[30]
I would also like to propose a no shooting Chow policy, its highly antisocial.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |