Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Minmatar Citizen160812
The LGBT Last Supper
256
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 13:08:00 -
[91] - Quote
Cilgil Arbosa wrote: Without very, very careful reading of the career agent debriefing text and/or diving into evelopedia it's practically not possible to stumble over that chain yourself.
Very careful reading??? What the hell happened to this world? It's written in plain English, you move your eyes from left to right and sound out each word to form a sentence. If you read all the sentences and don't understand what they mean then try again from the top and pause at the confusing parts then move your eyes to an information source before continuing to the next sentence.
(It's called learning) |
Manny Moons
New Order Logistics CODE.
125
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 13:42:00 -
[92] - Quote
The learning process is much more efficient if you don't resist so much.
|
Jonah Gravenstein
Khalkotauroi Defence Labs
9260
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 14:21:00 -
[93] - Quote
Manny Moons wrote:The learning process is much more efficient if you don't resist so much.
Resistance is futile
I eat your hatred for breakfast, then wash it down with your tears. |
Sir Substance
I N E X T R E M I S Fidelas Constans
597
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 14:31:00 -
[94] - Quote
Maxx Kilbride wrote: But no. Then people will come here and justify how that's just "EVE" and how it's "Hardcore" , and it's "my fault".
"Your fault" is probably a slight exaggeration, although nobody here would disagree that doing some more research always helps.
Your first mistake was in making faulty assumptions, but that's forgivable. Other games cause obviously single-headed monsters to drop multiple heads of that's the quest item and multiple people killed it.
But you will have to unlearn some of those instincts, because eve tends not to do that sort of pampering.
Your second mistake, and this is important, was in complaining about it. You lose literally nothing by asking a GM to reset the mission and trying again after he does so.
The whole process will probably take less then an hour. Considering what others have historically faced when making assumptions, you got off pretty lightly.
Dust yourself off, chalk that one up as a learning experience and move on, and you'll garner nods of approval. We all did that, at one point or another. My most recent learning experience was mere weeks ago, the last in a long string, and it cost me a battleship. Such is EVE. 6 years, you'd think I'd learn to watch local.
Cry to the devs about "obviously broken" game design principals that have created 10 consecutive years of constant growth and held some of us here for 10 years straight, you'll receive mockery, because we all know you are wrong. Ishtar Starfire: As a pure caldari pilot i feel that with the deployment of the new tier 3 battlecruisers you have given an unfair advantage to everyone except caldari pilots. an example would be like giving a fat kid a whole cake while the skinny kid has to watch and get nothing.
|
Sir Substance
I N E X T R E M I S Fidelas Constans
597
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 14:35:00 -
[95] - Quote
Marmaduke Hatplate wrote: a. totally cover CCP against claims of unfairness and no warning etc
It would be more time effective to just have a disclaimer info box pop up when you click the undock button...
Ishtar Starfire: As a pure caldari pilot i feel that with the deployment of the new tier 3 battlecruisers you have given an unfair advantage to everyone except caldari pilots. an example would be like giving a fat kid a whole cake while the skinny kid has to watch and get nothing.
|
Marmaduke Hatplate
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 15:52:00 -
[96] - Quote
Sir Substance wrote:Marmaduke Hatplate wrote: a. totally cover CCP against claims of unfairness and no warning etc
It would be more time effective to just have a disclaimer info box pop up when you click the undock button...
That would be hugely annoying, whereas an extra line added to the briefing wouldn't be nearly so intrusive. |
|
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
527
|
Posted - 2013.06.15 19:54:00 -
[97] - Quote
Thread locked for cleanup.
On second thought...
Quote:3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
12. Spamming is prohibited.
Spam is defined as the repetitive posting of the same topic or nonsensical post that has no substance and is often designed to annoy other forum users. This can include the words GÇ£firstGÇ¥, GÇ£go back to [insert other game name]GÇ¥ and other such posts that contribute no value to forum discussion. Spamming also includes the posting of ASCII art within a forum post.
18. New player bashing will not be tolerated.
New members of the EVE Online community are encouraged to use, but are not restricted to the EVE New Citizens Q&A forum. This forum is specifically designed to provide a platform for those who are new to the EVE community to ask questions and learn more about EVE. More experienced forum users are encouraged to participate by assisting new players with helpful and courteous responses. All flaming, trolling and posts of a derogatory nature will be deleted, and will be considered a severe breach of the forum rules.
22. Post constructively.
Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.
There are far too many posts breaching these rules for the thread to merit cleaning up. If you would like to discuss lying, theft, or profiteering in Eve, please do so civilly and constructively.
Thread locked. ISD LackOfFaith Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |