Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mi Canio
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 22:02:00 -
[1]
What is the point my money every month just to have to be wiped out by pirate corps using exploits to sit at gates in 1.0 security systems and try and kill/pod people?
I don't have a problem with pirate corps (when i grow up i want to be one) and I actually made some money when I was podded by Stavros (insurance - don't leave home without it.....), but when they start coming into 1.0 space and camping gates it just starts to get boring (by they I mean m3g4 corp). Its hard enough as it is for a small corp to make any money in this game without having to buy a new ship every other day because some pirate thinks it will be fun to pretty much cheat....
I know they say "we do it because we can........" (not really an excuse) but if it carries on the only people left in the game will be the pirate corps.
What fun do they derive from this whole exercise? It just strikes me as being ever so slightly immature.
Any know if it will be resolved in the next patch? Ensign Mi Canio - MIL Div. - Combat Air Patrol
|
drunkenmaster
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 22:14:00 -
[2]
If it makes you feel better one of m3g4's miner came under attack earlier today. The Jovian admiral I was tracking down must have tricked me, or hypnotised me or something. I didn't mean to do it. But the oppotunity to get a little payback for the 3 ships m3g4 have relinquished me of was most welcome, after the fact.
Crikey, those crafty Jove, eh?
.
|
Plasmatique
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 22:24:00 -
[3]
Pirates are here X marks the spot, you go..
Y here
If they get you more than once, shame on you.
Should pirates be allowed to camp a 1.0 gate? No Should pirates be allowed to camp a 0.5 gate? No Should pirates be allowed to camp a 0.1 gate? Maybe for a little while
They can and do, petition it, post your problem, then MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE until it gets fixed. Login when no pirates are on, they have to sleep sometime ya know, bookmark the gate(s) they camp. When the gates are being camped, use the boomarks.
..................................... Proud Owner of a Navy Issue Raven
|
Mi Canio
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 22:28:00 -
[4]
But why should I have to go out of my way just because some pirate reckons its a laugh to kill your average EVE player who's just trying to earn a decent living by what basically amounts to cheating?
I agree I should be where they are not but its just a pain in the arse tbh......... Ensign Mi Canio - MIL Div. - Combat Air Patrol
|
Fuujin
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 22:54:00 -
[5]
because you'll die if you dont?
lifes not always fair _______________
The sword has to be more than a simple weapon; it has to be an answer to life's questions
|
Kimi
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 23:29:00 -
[6]
That minus 10 sec exploit really sucks, and it has been well know by the devs and GM's for days. The pirates and pirate corps have been using it for days.
It is time to BAN the exploiters and stop messing around.
|
Fester Addams
|
Posted - 2003.08.09 23:54:00 -
[7]
No you cant ban the exploiters, they are the ones that make the game fun for everyone, actually CCP should pay them for doing what they do...
Can you imagine how booring the game would be without the pirates blowing your hard earned ship up in 2 sec flat.
and anyone who thought this post was serious...
|
Colonel Jameson
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 00:42:00 -
[8]
Bull****, it's an exploit. I think those that do it need to be banned, plain and simple. They are clearly taking advantages of CCP's sloppy-ass game code to grief other players. They are laughing in the face of the devs everytime they do this.
Ban them I say.
|
Viceroy
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 01:01:00 -
[9]
LOL, its not an exploit. Its not the guys problem if concord cant goddamn shoot him down. I dont see any exploit here. What should he do? Leave good profit out of "good will"?
CCP should put better security into 1.0 system, blame them, dont blame the guy thats smarter than you. -
|
Gan Howorth
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 01:07:00 -
[10]
Viceroy, is it a case of the police do turn up, but they are crap? Rather than not turn up at all, which is what peeps are alluding to.
|
|
Foomanshoe
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 01:59:00 -
[11]
I see an exploit
I see that there is a bug that concord doesnt attack -10 sec people cause they cant drop lower.
I see some people using this bug to camp in 1.0 space, where normally they wouldnt last longer than 5 seconds.
i see this use of a bug as an exploit, because that is what an exploit is. _______________________________________________
|
Beseb
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 02:19:00 -
[12]
By every definition of the word, it is an exploit. There is no way to rationally argue that. Everybody knows that 1.0 is as secure as secure gets.
If pkers are killing indiscrimantly with no concord response, then they *know* the system is broken and therefore they are exploiting the weakness in the code.
Please, do not insult our intelligence further and try to defend this action.
|
Xelios
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 02:22:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Xelios on 10/08/2003 02:25:48 Edited by: Xelios on 10/08/2003 02:24:44 He is using a bug to give him an unfair advantage over other players, sorry that's an exploit.
I think as fair punishment, his ship and his person should be transported to D4-2XN with all his low slots replaced with cargo expanders and any AB's put in his cargo hold. That'll teach him =P
|
Foomanshoe
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 02:23:00 -
[14]
When are CCP going to stop being pussies about the issue and ban the exploiters? or atleast suspend there accounts.
This is getting so stupid, i just want to cancel my account _______________________________________________
|
Nafres Maelstrom
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 03:17:00 -
[15]
they cant afford to lose that many payin subscribers lol CEO/Manufacturing and Research
img/http://www.dbhome.dk/soulclaw/images/obsidiancard.jpg/img] |
Foomanshoe
|
Posted - 2003.08.10 04:03:00 -
[16]
They are loosing alot more by doing nothing. _______________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |