Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia pwn-O-graphy
20
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 15:39:00 -
[61] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:op you are the reason this game sucks.
stop soloing lowsec exploration like a $#%&@.
and you don't want to stop soloing, get used to losing sites the moment some group of carebears lands on the entry gate, because your risk adverse ass cant help but warp off the moment they start warping in your room.
also, he was multiboxing 2 chain logis, one AC t3 and one pirate blaster cruiser?
...
no he wasn't. you cant control those ships...
its incredible, people in this game see a group of people doing a group activity the way its supposed to be done, and intermediately think its some dude shitting plex.
you were never supposed to run lowsec sites like a carebear, warping off the moment there's a neut in local, you were always supposed to run them with a group of people blapping any idiot that warps in your room or forcing people to look for easier targets.
and if he does decide to multibox the site with 50 caracals and 20 t1 logis, here is a list of things you can do:
- phone someone with bigger balls than yours, who will gladly accept the challenge and will congratulate said multiboxer for creating content, after killing everything he owns.
- warp an AOE jam BS in the room, plus a few dps boats and kill everything.
- alpha one logi from the warp in beacon, then warp off. over, and over again.
- stop flying bling for lowsec exploration like a $#%*@#, and start killing stuff.
im mean, wtf... i can understand people being kinda pissed months ago when multiboxers were making billions a day mining ice AFK. nowdays i can hardly think of a less AFK activity than highsec ice mining with more than ONE account, yet people still *****.
but now you are crying about some dude fielding billons in lowsec? IN LOWSEC? either welcome your new overlord or shoot artillery shells in his general direction. play eve for once instead of "OMG MUST BE ALIGNED NEUTRAL IN LOCAL IM GOING TO LOSE MY STABBED 200 DPS CLOAKY T3 OHNOES"
With 1 loss in your whole career, you won't tell me what to do. |
GreenSeed
612
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 15:43:00 -
[62] - Quote
with 22 characters in total, i can gank your crap in t1 rifters.
don't **** me off, because im bored enough. |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3247
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 15:44:00 -
[63] - Quote
Multiple players are ruining PVP too.
Sorry, couldn't help it. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3966
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 15:46:00 -
[64] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:with 22 characters in total, i can gank your crap in t1 rifters.
don't **** me off, because im bored enough. Slashers are the new T1 frigate king, really. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
GreenSeed
613
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 16:04:00 -
[65] - Quote
i don't acknowledge advice from people that kill my stuff on TEST space.
goons are mean, and im not good at picking sides. |
De'Veldrin
Norse'Storm Battle Group Circle-Of-Two
1813
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 16:11:00 -
[66] - Quote
Doc Severide wrote:OP
Just stop already...
Adapt or play something else....
This is NOT going to change...
I am sure someone said this the day before they made CONCORD OMGWTFSUPERPWNBBQ everything too. If there is one thing I have learned playing this game for nearly five years, it's that eventually CCP follows the money, just like every other for profit enterprise.
If enough of their customers ***** long enough, and loudly enough, they will do something about it. The only questions are what and when. GÇ£SandboxGÇ¥ does not mean that you will succeed at anything you attempt; it means you can attempt anything you want to succeed at. One of the largest obstacles in the way of your success is other players. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3967
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 16:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:Doc Severide wrote:OP
Just stop already...
Adapt or play something else....
This is NOT going to change... I am sure someone said this the day before they made CONCORD OMGWTFSUPERPWNBBQ everything too. If there is one thing I have learned playing this game for nearly five years, it's that eventually CCP follows the money, just like every other for profit enterprise. If enough of their customers ***** long enough, and loudly enough, they will do something about it. The only questions are what and when. Yep.
Also, nerf ganking more, I saw a jump freighter gank killmail not too long ago. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
719
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 16:45:00 -
[68] - Quote
How will people ever have 2000 man fleets without ISBoxer?
I too am excited about trading playability for more lag and shiny pictures.....:( Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|
|
ISD Cura Ursus
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
176
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 17:07:00 -
[69] - Quote
Deleted spam post. ISD Cura Ursus Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia pwn-O-graphy
21
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 18:27:00 -
[70] - Quote
Guys just try to be serious with this, I think this is a serious problem. |
|
Whitehound
1760
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:12:00 -
[71] - Quote
TKL HUN wrote:Guys just try to be serious with this, I think this is a serious problem. Someone has got one over you. Big deal. Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling. |
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
730
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:13:00 -
[72] - Quote
TKL HUN wrote:Hi!
I know there are some topics about these softwares on the forums, but in those topics the player's problems was related to pve, as far as I saw.
My problem is related to pvp and multiboxing softwares.
Let me tell you an example:
I was trying to do a sansha 6/10 with my alt, but the guy who uses one of these softwares was on local, tried to probe me down a few times, and a bit later he probed down the complex, and started to do it with a vigilant, a loki, and 2 guardians, all alone.
Now tell me, what the hell can I do about that, with my main, and with my combat alt?? What if he brings more dps, or more guardians, because he can, he has like 15-20 accs, and he can control all at the same time.
On the other hand, I wouldn't care if a 10 man gang would steal the complex I'm doing, because they can, it can happen.
Before you start trolling:
I know this is crying and I should do the same, because CCP allows it, and I know I should quit eve and bla bla bla.
I don't care about all of this.
I'm plaiying EVE for almost 3 years now, for me EVE is about pvp (and for many other players), my priority is pvp, I don't care if someone can make money alone with 20 accs, or 50 accs, or 100 accs, I really don't give a damn.
But CCP, don't give someone a huge advantage by allowing him to control a full fleet of combat ships with a few clicks, because IT IS RUINING THE GAME.
And really, don't tell me to do the same. What if I don't have the hardware for this, or I don't have the money to buy the hardware? Will I be discriminated?
And of course I know, I should take it as it was a gang of players, not one player... But it was one player.
I know you want to kill solo, and small gang pvp, but come on... Should I have to organise a 50 man gang to kill 1 guy???
And I know CCP, you allow multiboxing softwares, because more multiboxers = more accounts = more money for you. This is how most companies think, but hey... I think you should think it twice what worth more...
I know plenty of people that quad box with no software, your argument is completely irrelevant. One of my good friends triple boxes effectively with the use of only 7 fingers.
We actively hunt "PvPers" using MB software because they are no where near as efficient.
In short, you should be ashamed of yourself, this post, and the replies you've harvested from people who had better things to do.
No offense. Eve is Real |
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia pwn-O-graphy
21
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:21:00 -
[73] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:TKL HUN wrote:Hi!
I know there are some topics about these softwares on the forums, but in those topics the player's problems was related to pve, as far as I saw.
My problem is related to pvp and multiboxing softwares.
Let me tell you an example:
I was trying to do a sansha 6/10 with my alt, but the guy who uses one of these softwares was on local, tried to probe me down a few times, and a bit later he probed down the complex, and started to do it with a vigilant, a loki, and 2 guardians, all alone.
Now tell me, what the hell can I do about that, with my main, and with my combat alt?? What if he brings more dps, or more guardians, because he can, he has like 15-20 accs, and he can control all at the same time.
On the other hand, I wouldn't care if a 10 man gang would steal the complex I'm doing, because they can, it can happen.
Before you start trolling:
I know this is crying and I should do the same, because CCP allows it, and I know I should quit eve and bla bla bla.
I don't care about all of this.
I'm plaiying EVE for almost 3 years now, for me EVE is about pvp (and for many other players), my priority is pvp, I don't care if someone can make money alone with 20 accs, or 50 accs, or 100 accs, I really don't give a damn.
But CCP, don't give someone a huge advantage by allowing him to control a full fleet of combat ships with a few clicks, because IT IS RUINING THE GAME.
And really, don't tell me to do the same. What if I don't have the hardware for this, or I don't have the money to buy the hardware? Will I be discriminated?
And of course I know, I should take it as it was a gang of players, not one player... But it was one player.
I know you want to kill solo, and small gang pvp, but come on... Should I have to organise a 50 man gang to kill 1 guy???
And I know CCP, you allow multiboxing softwares, because more multiboxers = more accounts = more money for you. This is how most companies think, but hey... I think you should think it twice what worth more... I know plenty of people that quad box with no software, your argument is completely irrelevant. One of my good friends triple boxes effectively with the use of only 7 fingers. We actively hunt "PvPers" using MB software because they are no where near as efficient. In short, you should be ashamed of yourself, this post, and the replies you've harvested from people who had better things to do. No offense.
I think you should be ashamed, because of not reading and understanding everything , and barking.
That 4 account "fleet" was just an example, hes usually using 15-20 accounts at the same time.
And ofc if you have better things to do, do your better things instead of insulting me. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3977
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 20:54:00 -
[74] - Quote
Beekeeper Bob wrote:How will people ever have 2000 man fleets without ISBoxer? One wonders, it would have a lot of players There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
E-2C Hawkeye
State War Academy Caldari State
243
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:01:00 -
[75] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:TKL HUN wrote:War Kitten wrote:TKL HUN wrote: Do you know how I know hes using a multiboxing software? Logging in at the same time, and camping a station at the same time with 20 tornadoes is a proof enough. Anyway, everyone knows that hes multiboxing.
The problem is, that hes not forced to control 20 clients at the same time, a software does it for him, that's the problem.
Guess what 20 Tornadoes all doing the same thing in the same spot can't do: Hit a frigate at close range. L2Eve and exploit his weaknesses. Hes also outside with a machariel and a loki on other accounts, so... So....you're going to keep finding excuse as to why you can't deal with your own problems? Why is it so many other people can defeat multiboxers yet you're having a hard time even accepting the idea? Your solution to every problem is always the same copy paste reply which really is not a valid answer only one you think is valid in your own limited mind. |
Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
8
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:04:00 -
[76] - Quote
TKL HUN wrote:Pohbis wrote:ITT dual-boxing PvPer complains other PvPers box more than him I'm dualboxing, not using 20-25 clients.
Hmmm .... and what is the difference ... what is allowed? One client? Two clients 20 clients? For a player with one account playing one character you are doing exactly the same thing you complain about. And I remember you from our encounters in and near Rahadalon when you and ALL your team mates used the same tactics. Blegh.
You are outnumbered. Suck on it!
|
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3977
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:05:00 -
[77] - Quote
You should add a falcon alt to make your pvp complete. Or a booster alt if you were using the falcon. There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia pwn-O-graphy
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:17:00 -
[78] - Quote
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:TKL HUN wrote:Pohbis wrote:ITT dual-boxing PvPer complains other PvPers box more than him I'm dualboxing, not using 20-25 clients. Hmmm .... and what is the difference ... what is allowed? One client? Two clients 20 clients? For a player with one account playing one character you are doing exactly the same thing you complain about. And I remember you from our encounters in and near Rahadalon when you and ALL your team mates used the same tactics. Blegh. You are outnumbered. Suck on it!
I don't care if hes using 20 clients, but think he should operate all of them, not a 3rd party software |
|
ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
144
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:33:00 -
[79] - Quote
Post removed that supported questionable activities relative to real world issues.
ISD Tyrozan Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
CompleteFailure
Polaris Rising Gentlemen's Agreement
78
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 21:38:00 -
[80] - Quote
TKL HUN wrote: Yes, you can look after 4 clients if you have 4 monitor.
You could look after four clients with one monitor if you really wanted to. I have a corp mate who routinely triple-boxes "solo" on a single monitor, no multi-boxing software, and he destroys people all day long (I've actually been to his house and watched him do it, it's a bit insane TBH). In your mind, does this make it OK because he doesn't use ISBoxer?
If this guy you're complaining about weren't using ISBoxer, and just had a bunch of clients running, then what? Ban running multiple accounts at once? Ban people who are really good at multitasking? Good luck with that. |
|
Sentamon
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
1097
|
Posted - 2013.08.02 23:00:00 -
[81] - Quote
OP is a serious problem. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
2562
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 00:53:00 -
[82] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Jenn aSide wrote:TKL HUN wrote:War Kitten wrote:TKL HUN wrote: Do you know how I know hes using a multiboxing software? Logging in at the same time, and camping a station at the same time with 20 tornadoes is a proof enough. Anyway, everyone knows that hes multiboxing.
The problem is, that hes not forced to control 20 clients at the same time, a software does it for him, that's the problem.
Guess what 20 Tornadoes all doing the same thing in the same spot can't do: Hit a frigate at close range. L2Eve and exploit his weaknesses. Hes also outside with a machariel and a loki on other accounts, so... So....you're going to keep finding excuse as to why you can't deal with your own problems? Why is it so many other people can defeat multiboxers yet you're having a hard time even accepting the idea? Your solution to every problem is always the same copy paste reply which really is not a valid answer only one you think is valid in your own limited mind.
It just shows that self reliance, creativity and personal responsiblity are foriegn concepts to you. I always say the same things because those things are always right. A player should 1st try to rely on themselves, then their friends and only after that should they consider asking for changes to the game.
But that's not what they do, they encounter a problem which usually isn't a problem and the FIRST thing they do is run to the powers that be and ask for self serving changes (like in this guys, case, HE multiboxes but it's ok because his computer can only handle 2 clients lol). Not to put too much real life into it, but that behavior is no different that people who run straight to the government when they can't cope rather than find personal, familial, local and community based ways to deal with their problem.
Well in real life of here, it's the wrong way to think. This is a GAME that demands thinking, people should stop asking for changes to OTHER folks gameplay because they refuse to think and be innovative. |
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia pwn-O-graphy
24
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 03:31:00 -
[83] - Quote
Ok, from now on, I won't reply to dumb posts.
If you don't have the brain to think about what I say, then get lost, and don't post here.
If you are afraid, because banning multiboxing software puts your mining fleet in danger, get lost.
And I say again and again and again:
The problem is not dual or triple or multiboxing IF A PLAYER DOES IT.
The problem is dual or triple or multiboxing IF A 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE DOES IT FOR THE PLAYER.
I won't say this again, and I will just ignore dumb posts. |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3339
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 03:37:00 -
[84] - Quote
TKL HUN wrote:Ok, from now on, I won't reply to dumb posts.
If you don't have the brain to think about what I say, then get lost, and don't post here.
If you are afraid, because banning multiboxing software puts your mining fleet in danger, get lost.
And I say again and again and again:
The problem is not dual or triple or multiboxing IF A PLAYER DOES IT.
The problem is dual or triple or multiboxing IF A 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE DOES IT FOR THE PLAYER.
I won't say this again, and I will just ignore dumb posts.
So I assume you're going to ignore your own posting from now on? May I suggest that you do not post at all? Thanks in advance.
The guy who was sitting next to me in the first nullsec round table who had obviously not had a shower since before boarding his flight to Iceland, you really stank. You know who you are. |
Grimpak
Midnight Elites United Federation of Commerce
1019
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 03:50:00 -
[85] - Quote
TKL HUN wrote:The problem is dual or triple or multiboxing IF A 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE DOES IT FOR THE PLAYER.
BY THE GODS NOT THIS AGAIN!
last thread on this issue descended into a cyclic redundancy error before CCP locked the damn thing. [img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]
[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3987
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:01:00 -
[86] - Quote
Grimpak wrote:TKL HUN wrote:The problem is dual or triple or multiboxing IF A 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE DOES IT FOR THE PLAYER. BY THE GODS NOT THIS AGAIN! last thread on this issue descended into a cyclic redundancy error before CCP locked the damn thing. Did CCP ban isboxer, is that what this is about? There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
731
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:14:00 -
[87] - Quote
Quote:I think you should be ashamed, because of not reading and understanding everything , and barking.
That 4 account "fleet" was just an example, hes usually using 15-20 accounts at the same time.
And ofc if you have better things to do, do your better things instead of insulting me.
Please do explain. You have 2 accounts he has 20. Anyone with 3, 4, or more that knows how to use em can completely blob you and own you. So your situation is relevant to 20 using accounts multiboxing software how exactly? Eve is Real |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3987
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:26:00 -
[88] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:Quote:I think you should be ashamed, because of not reading and understanding everything , and barking.
That 4 account "fleet" was just an example, hes usually using 15-20 accounts at the same time.
And ofc if you have better things to do, do your better things instead of insulting me. Please do explain. You have 2 accounts he has 20. Anyone with 3, 4, or more that knows how to use em can completely blob you and own you. So your situation is relevant to 20 using accounts multiboxing software how exactly? Can I use a 5 account "fleet" as an example?
What about 5 player fleet? There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
MacKael
Segmentum Solar Nulli Secunda
80
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:40:00 -
[89] - Quote
I love the guy in GSF that multis like 8 bombers at a time, even though he loves more then he kills I still find him funny. |
MacKael
Segmentum Solar Nulli Secunda
80
|
Posted - 2013.08.03 06:42:00 -
[90] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Grimpak wrote:TKL HUN wrote:The problem is dual or triple or multiboxing IF A 3RD PARTY SOFTWARE DOES IT FOR THE PLAYER. BY THE GODS NOT THIS AGAIN! last thread on this issue descended into a cyclic redundancy error before CCP locked the damn thing. Did CCP ban isboxer, is that what this is about?
Not yet but they should. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |