Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Estarthu
Hoover Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 06:33:00 -
[91] - Quote
wow that sounds nice, please listen to that guy |
Rochnarl
Phoenix Co.
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 07:22:00 -
[92] - Quote
I support this message. |
Ashina Sito
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
68
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 07:48:00 -
[93] - Quote
Sigras wrote: Lastly, sov should not be based on PvE, for example, NC. was deployed to fountain to assist TEST, the whole alliance basically did nothing with their space for months; should they be punished for that?
Simple answer, yes.
AFK ownership is a bad thing. Holding sov should be the same as holding NPC space. You have to lice there to "own" it.
Ironic that the only sov space that is working right is Providence.
|
Bruce McRaven
Uncharted Skies Cerberus Unleashed
3
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 08:03:00 -
[94] - Quote
do it CCP! |
KIATolon
Black Omega Security Goonswarm Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 08:07:00 -
[95] - Quote
I think that hi-sec SHOULD be significantly nerfed, as should wormholes |
Covert0ne
Sons Of 0din The Unthinkables
57
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 08:20:00 -
[96] - Quote
I approve. Sons of 0din [0DIN] are recruiting! |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1784
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:09:00 -
[97] - Quote
Have all sov indexes decay when not used. The core Sov level being capped by the other indexes.
Have each index spawn plexes where if an enemy takes them, it damages the index. These plex should be size limited, much like FW plex. Small doing less damage than large. No indexes, no sov.
Shift moon mining into a stand-alone structure which can be hacked to drain some of the moon goo from a silo.
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Matias Otero
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
10
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 09:20:00 -
[98] - Quote
I approve. |
Gheyna
Hoover Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
98
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 11:09:00 -
[99] - Quote
Guud post |
Kazruw Drol
Hoover Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
5
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 11:23:00 -
[100] - Quote
Simply brilliant. Internet spaceships: ship spinning, chat and spreadsheets. What more could you want?
|
|
Re Toralen
FROZEN HEADS Darkspawn.
1
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 11:31:00 -
[101] - Quote
Cool thing, CCP must look at this. |
Okapist
The First Foundation SOLAR FLEET
28
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 12:02:00 -
[102] - Quote
Not bad |
Bum Shadow
Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
45
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 12:10:00 -
[103] - Quote
Well presented good ideas.
I like the broad direction this is going. |
Vizvig
Savage Blizzard Bright Side of Death
111
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 12:47:00 -
[104] - Quote
+1 from me.
but do not think that CCP gamedesigners are blind and do not understand all of this a couple of years ago. |
Photon Ceray
Caesar Lile Directorate
171
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 13:08:00 -
[105] - Quote
why aren't you in CSM yet?
I like most of the changes, CCP better take a good look at this.
You forget one extremely important thing though, Modular POS! |
steave435
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
87
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:09:00 -
[106] - Quote
Tylo Tungsten wrote:As a person looking to get into Moons, I too am against the reduction of profitable moons idea.
It might make some logistics lives easier (though if they didn't like doing it, wouldn't they just quit?), but make an innumerable amount of smaller groups unable to have access to money moons. No, noone likes doing it, but some people are willing to put up with it because they know it's necessary, even though they hate it. It's what drove me to quit the game for about a year when I eventually burnt out. |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1786
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:20:00 -
[107] - Quote
steave435 wrote:Tylo Tungsten wrote:As a person looking to get into Moons, I too am against the reduction of profitable moons idea.
It might make some logistics lives easier (though if they didn't like doing it, wouldn't they just quit?), but make an innumerable amount of smaller groups unable to have access to money moons. No, noone likes doing it, but some people are willing to put up with it because they know it's necessary, even though they hate it. It's what drove me to quit the game for about a year when I eventually burnt out.
Burn out is always a risk. Just because someone is willing to do something /now/, doesn't mean they'll always be willing to do it. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2562
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:50:00 -
[108] - Quote
I don't know what makes you think CCP is going to do any of this. The problem isn't that CCP doesn't have enough to do or know what to do... it's that they just don't do it.
gl tho'
|
Dheeradj Nurgle
Hoover Inc. Test Alliance Please Ignore
517
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 15:59:00 -
[109] - Quote
El Digin is a butt butt.
But I aprove of this. |
Phaade
Debitum Naturae WHY so Seri0Us
31
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 17:41:00 -
[110] - Quote
CCP, check this thread oooouuuttt! |
|
Jason Shaishi
Aether Ventures Surely You're Joking
0
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 18:33:00 -
[111] - Quote
KIATolon wrote:I think that hi-sec SHOULD be significantly nerfed, as should wormholes
While I 100% agree that high-sec should be nerfed, I am puzzled as to why you think wormholes should be nerfed. There are mechanics which should be implemented to make people to want to enter wormholes more (I say this because the entirety of C6 wormholes are dead but for SYJ) and to make wormhole life more interesting, but nerf them? I don't see a reason to. |
Finarfin
Reconfiguration Nation Existential Anxiety
23
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 18:43:00 -
[112] - Quote
Very good general ideas. CCP please take note. |
Allianc
Novatech Armada Against ALL Authorities
6
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 21:52:00 -
[113] - Quote
+1 |
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1206
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 23:19:00 -
[114] - Quote
Quote:- Playing with other people is more fun to some people than playing by yourself
hmm. about that... There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Hybrid tech I ammo boost |
M1k3y Koontz
Thorn Project Surely You're Joking
256
|
Posted - 2013.08.08 23:33:00 -
[115] - Quote
I support the changes to benefits of holding sov I support the changes to NPC space (though I have little experience in that area, and have never done FW)
I think that the sov warfare should have more timers if the defenders have been using the space (running Datas, mining, ratting, etc.). This would force people to use their space or find someone (very active renters) to use it for them, or else it will become an easy target to anyone who wants to start an invasion.
I support decreasing number of moons in exchange for increasing the value of moons, logistics burnout is a serious problem.
Overall, I support this change. It needs a more use-it-or-lose-it approach to sov warfare, but it seems like an improvement over the current system, even if it is a bit confusing. (I would make it a fight for the capital to take the whole constellation) How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp. |
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1206
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 01:03:00 -
[116] - Quote
+1 sticky thread please There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Hybrid tech I ammo boost |
Siobhan MacLeary
BRG Corp Ocularis Inferno
127
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 03:50:00 -
[117] - Quote
Holy ****, I don't even live or play in 0.0 and this made me wet. GÇ£Point out to me a person who has been harmed by an AFK cloaker and I will point out a person who has no business playing this game.GÇ¥ - CCP Soundwave |
DlMFlRE
VanoEG's Mining and Industries
42
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 04:09:00 -
[118] - Quote
+1 Sign |
Kira Doshu
Sol Research and Development Aurora Foundation
5
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 04:27:00 -
[119] - Quote
Damn dude nice. +1 |
Emily Jean McKenna
The Scope Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.08.09 07:18:00 -
[120] - Quote
Jason Shaishi wrote:KIATolon wrote:I think that hi-sec SHOULD be significantly nerfed, as should wormholes While I 100% agree that high-sec should be nerfed, I am puzzled as to why you think wormholes should be nerfed. There are mechanics which should be implemented to make people to want to enter wormholes more (I say this because the entirety of C6 wormholes are dead but for SYJ) and to make wormhole life more interesting, but nerf them? I don't see a reason to.
Nerf nothing, buff everything else.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |