Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mer88
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 21:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
looks like the old model with less details ? have they gone backwards? the rear end looks like a plastic toy now with no details. i hope this is just temp. Also, will the golem get a brand new model? |
marVLs
441
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 22:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
It it the new model... just it don't have yet all that texture/lightning effects etc |
EXIA MIKOSZ
Strike Birds Zero
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 22:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
I Realy Loved a Raven/Golem Hulls but this new Golem Loooks realy without some imagination:/ Im realy dissapointed |
valdo ryia
Imperial Marshland Estate
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 22:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mer88 wrote:looks like the old model with less details ? have they gone backwards? the rear end looks like a plastic toy now with no details. i hope this is just temp. Also, will the golem get a brand new model?
because its not finished? |
Mer88
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 22:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
i mean i looked at some old videos like 3 years old and the golem looks like this plain and flat. Are you sure they didnt use the last generation model? |
Panhead4411
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services The Possum Lodge
341
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 00:01:00 -
[6] - Quote
because everyone was complaining about how ugly it was...
So, they figured they'd beat it with the ugly stick to show us just how ugly it really could get...
Change for change sake strikes again! http://blog.beyondreality.se/shift-click-does-nothing -á-á < Unified Inventory is NOT ready... |
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
668
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 00:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
Panhead4411 wrote:because everyone was complaining about how ugly it was...
So, they figured they'd beat it with the ugly stick to show us just how ugly it really could get...
Change for change sake strikes again!
Enough with the "Change for change's sake" when you really know less than nothing of what you're talking about.
The old Golem model wasn't compatible with having animations and was just a recolor of the T1 Raven. All four Marauders are due to have models that are distinct from their T1 progenitors and the Golem is no exception to that.
That doesn't mean that the Golem model looks particularly good compared to the other three, however... |
Panhead4411
Rothschild's Sewage and Septic Sucking Services The Possum Lodge
341
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 00:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
The old Golem model wasn't compatible with having animations and was just a recolor of the T1 Raven.
The areas that the 'animation' currently resides are essentially the same. They very well could have animated those very same texture areas on the old model, and it would have been just fine. You didn't actually go back and compare the models side by side did you? Prove me wrong. The two top panels are nearly identical. And the bottom ones, though not identical, have no visible hindrance to being animated. http://blog.beyondreality.se/shift-click-does-nothing -á-á < Unified Inventory is NOT ready... |
Mer88
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
28
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 01:22:00 -
[9] - Quote
why did they have to change the whole ship if they are only modifying the top and bottom of the golem? i mean the wings has been flatten out , all the lines and crurves are gone the rear end looks plain all the details are removed. i dont understand |
Johann Rascali
Crunchy Crunchy Zero Hour Alliance
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 06:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
Having seen how horrid other models looked on Sisi as they were getting updated, I like the look of the Golem. I liked the look of it before, now I'm REALLY liking it. The gull wings are spiffy. |
|
Rain6637
Team Evil
1668
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 09:54:00 -
[11] - Quote
Raven.
I see the resemblance in the old model.
so.... what................. the **** Rainf1337 on Twitch |
Lady Joan
Solum Perimit
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
I do not know what is happening with the CCP, can create a awesome ship as they did with the scorpion, with the tempest, with the maller, the stabber, or more recently with the apocalypse that are ships that were well done with lots of details and beautiful.
Then make a new model golum that looks more like a model of paper or card and not one spacecraft.
In my opinion if you want the model to be different from the raven that gives origin okay, but do something that is in accordance with the standards that have been set up in recent alterations to ships.
The model remains I refuse to be seen flying a golem, even if it might be able to equip doomsday devices, and have infinite tank. |
Xhiucoatl Montezuma
Devils Diciples League of Infamy
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 09:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
The golem model in SISI looks... looks like my nephew designed it.
As good a job as ccp did with the Kronos, why do they have to destroy the ICONIC design of the Golem?
I do hope they rethink it before it rolls out in Rubicon; I have only flown my golem for 3 weeks or so, if it rolls out looking this horrid, I am simply going to park it and go back to my CNR (until they ruin that too)
CCP you made a mistake, please fix it.
Xhiu |
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
664
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 14:08:00 -
[14] - Quote
Please fix the Golum. G££ <= Me |
Rexxorr
Zero Corp Tax2
48
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 16:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
Actually if you flip the Golem upside down, it looks quite good imo. |
Joe Risalo
State War Academy Caldari State
615
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 04:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
My problem is the bastion animation. I mean, I didn't expect a transformer, but I did expect something a good bit more goddie than what we got |
Dachhan
Pnex Pwn Squad
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 05:20:00 -
[17] - Quote
Joe Risalo wrote:My problem is the bastion animation. I mean, I didn't expect a transformer, but I did expect something a good bit more goddie than what we got
I would take a go-bot over whats on sisi atm..
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |