Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Smug face Makbema
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 18:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
Make the MWD signature effect always be active when fitted, and at the same time make it so you can stack two afterburners to one ship and reach 70-80% of the MWD speed for the same size. The stacking penalty could even take the form off a smaller signature radius increase to dual AB`s.
This removes the MVD pulsing tactic that makes a MWD an actual afterburner with the speed of an MWD, Rendering afterburners close to useless except some small ships and dual fits with AB/MWD.
Two afterburners would mean more fitting/Cap/stacking cost but still move the sig tanking to after burner s from MWD`s, making afterburners a stronger alternative to MWD while MWD still have its speed.
The MWD could even get a slight buff to its top speed if the sig radius effect is always active.
Flame on.
|
Nolen Cadmar
Nexus Ore Technologies and Excavations Surely You're Joking
36
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 18:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
-1. Nope. Leave it as is. Nothing wrong with current system. Pulsing your MWD is one of the tactics you can/should use. Nolen's Spreadsheet Guru Services: Need a spreadsheet created, maintained, updated or repaired? Learn more about my services at:-á https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3865379 |
Smug face Makbema
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well i think it is something wrong with the current system if you have propulsion module that`s basically twice as good as an other propulsion module when used the right way. At the very least AB`s should have the option of dual fitting. |
HiddenPorpoise
BG-1 The Craniac
116
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Afterburners are useless until you're scrammed, fleet primary, running from a bomb, or any multitude of times when a sig bloom is bad. |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
815
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
What I would like are 2MN 20 MN and 200 MN AB. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
7522
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
MWDs already have cap penalty when online, even if theyre not active....and a 500% sig bloom when active as well. Why does this one module deserve 3 downsides while the AB currently has none?
This idea is awful and self serving, and takes all the skill out of being a solo bomber waiting to pick off inties/firgs/desis/ tier3 BCs with a well placed bomb. Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |
Lunkwill Khashour
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
176
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
I think the basic issue is the relative uselessness of 100mn AB's on BS'es. |
Smug face Makbema
Hedion University Amarr Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:48:00 -
[8] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:MWDs already have cap penalty when online, even if theyre not active....and a 500% sig bloom when active as well. Why does this one module deserve 3 downsides while the AB currently has none?
This idea is awful and self serving, and takes all the skill out of being a solo bomber waiting to pick off inties/firgs/desis/ tier3 BCs with a well placed bomb.
Even with all those penaltys its stil way better for PVP when you dont know your opponent.
Let me ask you this then how often do you se people choose an Afterburner over a Micro warp drive when fitting for PVP and they donGÇÖt know who the opponents are going to be? |
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
2906
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 20:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Smug face Makbema wrote:Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:MWDs already have cap penalty when online, even if theyre not active....and a 500% sig bloom when active as well. Why does this one module deserve 3 downsides while the AB currently has none?
This idea is awful and self serving, and takes all the skill out of being a solo bomber waiting to pick off inties/firgs/desis/ tier3 BCs with a well placed bomb. Even with all those penaltys its stil way better for PVP when you dont know your opponent. Let me ask you this then how often do you se people choose an Afterburner over a Micro warp drive when fitting for PVP and they donGÇÖt know who the opponents are going to be?
I often fly an AB Scram Web taranis for soloing ships... The AB is very much superior in 1 on 1 situations where range control and/or getting under the guns of an opponent is important.
I will admit ab-only fits on larger ships isn't as useful, but there are still times its helpful.
And over-sized AB's (10 mn Thrashers, 100mn Tengu's) are often quite potent!
|
hujciwdupe22
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 20:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
better one,
remove cap penality of mwd and decriese cap use, then make ab same top speed levels with bigger mass aswell as decriesed acceleration and bigger fitting costs. change T3 ab subsystem stops giving speed bonus, put something different on that. |
|
Batelle
Komm susser Tod
442
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 21:04:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lunkwill Khashour wrote:I think the basic issue is the relative uselessness of 100mn AB's on BS'es.
They work pretty good on PVE machariels. That's all though. Why can't I delete this signature? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |