Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jaguar Dragon
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 17:49:00 -
[1]
i was blown up by concord for using a ecm on my own jet can. this ecm flagging was a cold war bug that was fixed, well it's back.i'm tierd of getting screwed out of isk mods ships and game playing time. cuz of bugs. and i mean things that cause us players to loose something because of poor programing.. programing that we all pay for with real life money.. we are paying for a sevice .we should get what we pay for.so if a bug costs us. not only should ccp reimburse us in game. but there should be something extra paid out to us. after all ccp does not respond all that fast. we are loosing game time from the loss to when ccp reimburses us.this would be fair since we do pay to play.i'm not sure if anything is in the EULA.that says ccp is not responsible for in game losses do to poor programing. so come on ccp. stand up and be proffesionals. either take care of in game losses within ..lets say 3 hours.. or pay us punitive damages. lets say if you go past the 3 hour time limit. you give the player free game time added on to his account till you do reimburse.or, give the player something in game. equall to what the in game loss was.and this would be say double the in game loss was.
its high time ccp takes responsibility to provide us paying players at least a bug free server. bug free meaning at least we don't get blown up by concord.as well as other bugs that cost us .
i don't think this is unreasonable for us players to ask for from ccp. they are making lots of real life money. earning a good living from us.how about you treat us as proffesional players and be reasonable.
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 17:50:00 -
[2]
Edited by: HippoKing on 23/02/2006 17:52:36 my eyes are bleeding...
oh well, petition it, and should get your stuff back if it was your can. quite why you were ECMing a can is another story though...
edit: i just reread that - you think CCP should pay you real money everytime you hit a bug? i think the most polite reponse i can think of is **** off. you have more that one ship don't you? just play the damn game, and if its screwing you off so much, go play another game. ****, write your own completely bug free game if bugs in a huge project like eve are so terrible. i'll come bugtest for you
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
Sitri
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 17:59:00 -
[3]
consider yourself lucky if you get the ship AND mods back. I doubt if you get both though
|
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:03:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Jaguar Dragon [diarrhea of the keyboard]
(1) Learn to type. (2) Stop being a complete moron. CCP is going to answer your petition when they have time. They have no way of doing it sooner, or they already would. Hence, some "punitive damages" system is totally pointless, and CCP has no incentive to implement it. -------------------------------------[04:04:04] Tom Thumb > for a nut case you rawk
[04:21:15] Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw
[07:38:53] Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
Stop whining about my signature - Wrangler \o/ ~kieron [\"] -Capsicum <3 -eris you wanted colours now you have them :) -eris..again Donuts and cAKe anyone? Jacques' Nikolai can post twice as fast as me, and i'm uber -zhuge liang Uhm, I'm new to this, does this work? *clickety* Oveur |
Minsc
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:06:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Jaguar Dragon i was blown up by concord for using a ecm on my own jet can. this ecm flagging was a cold war bug that was fixed, well it's back.i'm tierd of getting screwed out of isk mods ships and game playing time. cuz of bugs. and i mean things that cause us players to loose something because of poor programing.. programing that we all pay for with real life money.. we are paying for a sevice .we should get what we pay for.so if a bug costs us. not only should ccp reimburse us in game. but there should be something extra paid out to us. after all ccp does not respond all that fast. we are loosing game time from the loss to when ccp reimburses us.this would be fair since we do pay to play.i'm not sure if anything is in the EULA.that says ccp is not responsible for in game losses do to poor programing. so come on ccp. stand up and be proffesionals. either take care of in game losses within ..lets say 3 hours.. or pay us punitive damages. lets say if you go past the 3 hour time limit. you give the player free game time added on to his account till you do reimburse.or, give the player something in game. equall to what the in game loss was.and this would be say double the in game loss was.
its high time ccp takes responsibility to provide us paying players at least a bug free server. bug free meaning at least we don't get blown up by concord.as well as other bugs that cost us .
i don't think this is unreasonable for us players to ask for from ccp. they are making lots of real life money. earning a good living from us.how about you treat us as proffesional players and be reasonable.
Hold on a sec...you want CCP to re-imburse you for your own stupidity? WTF. If this happened once I could see them replacing your items but after that you're on your own.
seriously WTF??
|
Jaguar Dragon
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:16:00 -
[6]
you who have said i'm a moron are asses.. the point of this is 1:ecm's are defensive mods 2: it was a cold war bug 3:its back 4: your not to be flagged for using defensive mods and you who make personnal comments about typing or spelling,, just shut the ;;;;; up. i'm suggesting that ccp answer petitions faster. a player who looses a ship and has to wait 2 weeks for ccp to reimburse cuz of bugs,, IS TIME LOST . that player should be compensated extra.
i didn't post this for dumbys to make personal coments about me.
reaspond to topic. about what you think ccp should be responsible for to us paying players
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:18:00 -
[7]
ECMs are defensive? no, ECMs are offensive. If you activate something on another player to inconvenience them, they are offensive.
otherwise people could run around ECMing miners to make them delock their roids, generally griefing, and the targets could do nothing about it
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
Xelios
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:19:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Xelios on 23/02/2006 18:19:31 Why the hell did you ECM your own can? If you're gonna test fits just target an asteroid.
No game is EVER bug free, it's not possible and it's certainly not possible with a game as complex as EVE. In fact, considering the complexity in this game I'd say CCP has done a damn fine job of keeping bugs to a minimum. They'll always be there, but this isn't some simple first person shooter this is a complete reality replacement. In other words, quitcher*****en.
And as already mentioned, ECM's are offensive modules. ECCM's are defensive.
Signature removed. -Zhuge ([email protected]) Woot.
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:21:00 -
[9]
Edited by: HippoKing on 23/02/2006 18:21:27
Originally by: Jaguar Dragon i didn't post this for dumbys to make personal coments about me.
no, you posted for discussion. thats what forums are for. no-one is making personal comments except you (and maybe minsc)
get off your high horse, if you can't take people disagreeing, i suggest you make your own forum, and make yourself 5 accounts of your own, so you can hold your own discussions with some nice little syncophants, and no risk of "dumbys" disagreeing
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
Tevrai
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:26:00 -
[10]
Seriously try WoW/SWG/DnD online/Everquest/Everquest II. You would make a killing with your idea on those games. Eves' bugs are very minimal when compared to those other games.
Frankly though, they will answer your petition. You may not like the answer but you will receive one. Asteroid death dealer, they never saw it coming!
|
|
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:27:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Jaguar Dragon [more diarrhea of the keyboard]
Look, if you want to make a point, you have to make it clearly. If you don't bother to take an extra minute to type properly, why should I bother to take you seriously?
Can't you understand how unspeakably stupid it is to suggest that CCP answer petitions faster? What do you think they're DOING?
Valar: "Well guys, we have a thousand petitions right now. It will take us about 5 hours to answer them all." GM 1: "I have an idea...each GM could answer just one petition per day! That way, it will take forever for the players to get their stuff!" GMs 2-25: "YEAH! Great idea!" Valar: "Sure! Screw the customers, why the hell should we work as hard as we can?"
Do you SERIOUSLY think that's what's going on? The fact is that they CAN'T process petitions faster just because you want them to. If you think your desires can change simple hard facts, then may I give you the telephone number of my psychiatrist? He's very good, and I think you may need him more than I do right now. -------------------------------------[04:04:04] Tom Thumb > for a nut case you rawk
[04:21:15] Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw
[07:38:53] Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
Stop whining about my signature - Wrangler \o/ ~kieron [\"] -Capsicum <3 -eris you wanted colours now you have them :) -eris..again Donuts and cAKe anyone? Jacques' Nikolai can post twice as fast as me, and i'm uber -zhuge liang Uhm, I'm new to this, does this work? *clickety* Oveur |
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:30:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari Can't you understand how unspeakably stupid it is to suggest that CCP answer petitions faster? What do you think they're DOING?
Valar: "Well guys, we have a thousand petitions right now. It will take us about 5 hours to answer them all." GM 1: "I have an idea...each GM could answer just one petition per day! That way, it will take forever for the players to get their stuff!" GMs 2-25: "YEAH! Great idea!" Valar: "Sure! Screw the customers, why the hell should we work as hard as we can?"
Do you SERIOUSLY think that's what's going on?
that isn't how it goes at all
arkanon: oveur, can i borrow your doll? oveur: sure. you gonna answer some petitions too? arkanon: of course. thanks for the doll
5 hours later....
oveur: wow, that doll has had a good workout arkanon: you bet oveur: about those petitions... arkanon: err... but... the doll....
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:34:00 -
[13]
Originally by: HippoKing that isn't how it goes at all
arkanon: oveur, can i borrow your doll? oveur: sure. you gonna answer some petitions too? arkanon: of course. thanks for the doll
5 hours later....
oveur: wow, that doll has had a good workout arkanon: you bet oveur: about those petitions... arkanon: err... but... the doll....
At some point, Oveur or Valar or somebody is going to come in here and take this the wrong way and we're gonna get our asses kicked -------------------------------------[04:04:04] Tom Thumb > for a nut case you rawk
[04:21:15] Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw
[07:38:53] Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
Stop whining about my signature - Wrangler \o/ ~kieron [\"] -Capsicum <3 -eris you wanted colours now you have them :) -eris..again Donuts and cAKe anyone? Jacques' Nikolai can post twice as fast as me, and i'm uber -zhuge liang Uhm, I'm new to this, does this work? *clickety* Oveur |
Xelios
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:38:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari
Originally by: HippoKing that isn't how it goes at all
arkanon: oveur, can i borrow your doll? oveur: sure. you gonna answer some petitions too? arkanon: of course. thanks for the doll
5 hours later....
oveur: wow, that doll has had a good workout arkanon: you bet oveur: about those petitions... arkanon: err... but... the doll....
At some point, Oveur or Valar or somebody is going to come in here and take this the wrong way and we're gonna get our asses kicked
I bet that doll's taken it the wrong way a few times too
Signature removed. -Zhuge ([email protected]) Woot.
|
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:39:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Xelios I bet that doll's taken it the wrong way a few times too
TIME TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!!
So, as we were saying, STFU Jaguar. -------------------------------------[04:04:04] Tom Thumb > for a nut case you rawk
[04:21:15] Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw
[07:38:53] Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
Stop whining about my signature - Wrangler \o/ ~kieron [\"] -Capsicum <3 -eris you wanted colours now you have them :) -eris..again Donuts and cAKe anyone? Jacques' Nikolai can post twice as fast as me, and i'm uber -zhuge liang Uhm, I'm new to this, does this work? *clickety* Oveur |
Ashelth
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:46:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari
Originally by: Xelios I bet that doll's taken it the wrong way a few times too
TIME TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!!
So, as we were saying, STFU Jaguar.
That exchange brought a tear to my eye :D
|
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:52:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Ashelth
Originally by: Nikolai Nuvolari
Originally by: Xelios I bet that doll's taken it the wrong way a few times too
TIME TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT!!!
So, as we were saying, STFU Jaguar.
That exchange brought a tear to my eye :D
Yeah, that may be going in my bio -------------------------------------[04:04:04] Tom Thumb > for a nut case you rawk
[04:21:15] Mebrithiel Ju'wien > Nik's bio 4tw btw
[07:38:53] Graelyn > Nikolai for Dev 108!
Stop whining about my signature - Wrangler \o/ ~kieron [\"] -Capsicum <3 -eris you wanted colours now you have them :) -eris..again Donuts and cAKe anyone? Jacques' Nikolai can post twice as fast as me, and i'm uber -zhuge liang Uhm, I'm new to this, does this work? *clickety* Oveur |
BlackHawk177
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:52:00 -
[18]
dammit! now i have to clean my monitor and my desk
Originally by: Dark Shikari In soviet russia, game lags you
|
HippoKing
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 18:55:00 -
[19]
look! i see a shiney new topic of conversation coming of the horizon!
@OP, i've been stuck for the last half hour. i'm hereby demanding CCP give me 27p in compensation (though oveur might dock that for the comments earlier)
sigs of the 23/24/25 hijack just as well -eris yarrrr, i shall retake my sig -HippoKing Not a chance, our 1337 sig haXx0r sk1llz are too powerful! - Wrangler Ho-Ho-Hooooooo, Merry Saturday!11 - Immy Yo ho ho and a bottle of BReeEEEEeee.... - Jacques ARRRRRRchambault Stop spamming with "QFT" >:|. - Teblin
|
Kylania
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 19:04:00 -
[20]
Quote: i was blown up by concord for using a ecm on my own jet can. this shooting of my own crap was a mistake I'd thought was fixed, well it's back.i'm tierd of getting screwed out of isk mods ships and game playing time. cuz of my own stupid actions. and i mean things that cause us players to loose something because of poor choices.. total drug induced blackouts that we all pay for with real life money.. we are paying for a sevice .we should get what we pay for.so if doing something really stupid costs us. not only should ccp reimburse us in game. but there should be something extra paid out to us. after all ccp does not respond all that fast. we are loosing game time by shootingour own stufs to when ccp reimburses us.this would be fair since we do pay to play.i'm not sure if anything is in the EULA.that says ccp is not responsible for in game losses do to complete idiots. so come on ccp. stand up and be proffesionals. and use more. totally out of place. periods. either take care of in game losses within ..lets say 3 hours.. or pay us punitive damages. or pie. lets say if you go past the 3 hour time limit. you give the player free game time added on to his account till you do reimburse.or, give the player something in game. like a lobotomy. equall to what the in game loss was.and this would be say double the in game loss was.
its high time ccp takes responsibility. because we wont. to provide us paying players regardless of our actions. bug free meaning at least we don't get blown up by concord when we're morons.as well as other bugs that cost us .
i don't think. this is unreasonable for us players to ask for free stuff from ccp. they are making lots of real life money. earning a good living from us.how about you treat us as proffesional players and be reasonable. because god knows we won't act like. profeesonial players.
Fixed it for ya. -- Lil Miner |
|
|
Jorauk
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 19:08:00 -
[21]
Jaguar: Submit a petition regarding your issue if you haven't already.
Locked for flames and off-topic posts.
*Click*
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |