Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
4707
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 21:04:00 -
[181] - Quote
http://themittani.com/features/mission-runners-proclaim-exploit . |
IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
579
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 22:08:00 -
[182] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:http://themittani.com/features/mission-runners-proclaim-exploit
Good article! |
Utremi Fasolasi
La Dolce Vita
349
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 23:03:00 -
[183] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:http://themittani.com/features/mission-runners-proclaim-exploit
It's the new can flipping mechanic |
Talon SilverHawk
Ronin Cartel The G0dfathers
636
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 23:41:00 -
[184] - Quote
Jeez even I can't white knight this one ...
Tal
|
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
50
|
Posted - 2014.01.02 23:43:00 -
[185] - Quote
Melvin Earl wrote:Kryptik Kai wrote:Undock (EVE Definition: I hereby consent to PVP)
1/10 PVP is not belong to high sec. All your base are belong to us. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6043
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 00:31:00 -
[186] - Quote
Erufen Rito wrote:Melvin Earl wrote:Kryptik Kai wrote:Undock (EVE Definition: I hereby consent to PVP)
1/10 PVP is not belong to high sec. All your base are belong to us. Someone... set us up the MTU ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |
Xer Jin
Ancient Anomaly and Artifacts Recovery Explorators
76
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 01:08:00 -
[187] - Quote
Melvin Earl wrote:Kryptik Kai wrote:Undock (EVE Definition: I hereby consent to PVP)
1/10 PVP is not belong to high sec. see what you just said is an opinion. When in fact PVP belongs every where in EVE. So no im sorry but you are wrong. learn the rules of the game before you play it. complaining about PVP in high sec is like complaining that i took a piece from you in a game of chess. |
Xer Jin
Ancient Anomaly and Artifacts Recovery Explorators
76
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 01:11:00 -
[188] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Erufen Rito wrote:Melvin Earl wrote:Kryptik Kai wrote:Undock (EVE Definition: I hereby consent to PVP)
1/10 PVP is not belong to high sec. All your base are belong to us. Someone... set us up the MTU you are on the way to destruction. |
Luwc
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:00:00 -
[189] - Quote
Melvin Earl wrote:Missions are boring. The balance is being able to go AFK. Now they don't let that happen and people come kill my friend and he comes back to monitor and is in station, podded. This is high sec. High sec is not for player combat. Is for missions. If I want player combat I go to low sec. I do like Regulators who come kill the guy who killed my tractor beam can, but they don't give me his loot or mine back. Make Concord come and kill the players who kill my tractor beam can.
Long story short :
GTFO of EVE you are ruining this game.
|
Luwc
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
32
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:02:00 -
[190] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Is it really bad that I suddenly get the urge to find a locator agent and a gank fleet after reading this post...
No. people like him need to be ganked until they ragequit and never come back. |
|
Glockshna Quant
Strategic Acquisitions Group Tactical Research Lab
13
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 10:07:00 -
[191] - Quote
tenpages/10
Solid work OP. |
Genseric Tollaris
The Scope Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 12:14:00 -
[192] - Quote
This thread delivers. 10/10.
And week old noobs most certainly buy plex and bling out pirate bs's before taking them into lowsec. I got one in a 3.5bil buffer tanked shield vindi doing a lvl 3 in my old lowsec home. It was the 3rd he'd lost in 3 days all roughly the same 3.5bil failfit and 1 was soloed by a drake. I also narrowly missed a week old toon in a rattler doing a lvl 3. So if they come into low, I'm sure there'd be more in high. |
vextorious
Concordiat Spaceship Samurai
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 12:42:00 -
[193] - Quote
I might be moving back to high sec for a bit. These tears are so delicious!!!!! |
Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
175
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 22:50:00 -
[194] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4060168#post4060168
People are being reimbursed. This is obviously an exploit on the drones AI, as the aggression mechanics are not consistent.
Did anyone really think this was intended design? LOL@ all the morons trying to say this was some kind of new awesome intended gameplay feature.
When suspect flags and green safety button came out.
CCP stated that drones set to aggressive should never perform any action that would get the pilot flagged. CCP stated that drones set to aggressive should never perform any action that would get the pilot flagged if the pilot's button is set to green. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|
IIshira
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
587
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 23:54:00 -
[195] - Quote
Genseric Tollaris wrote:This thread delivers. 10/10.
And week old noobs most certainly buy plex and bling out pirate bs's before taking them into lowsec. I got one in a 3.5bil buffer tanked shield vindi doing a lvl 3 in my old lowsec home. It was the 3rd he'd lost in 3 days all roughly the same 3.5bil failfit and 1 was soloed by a drake. I also narrowly missed a week old toon in a rattler doing a lvl 3. So if they come into low, I'm sure there'd be more in high.
This is nothing new to Eve and adds a fun touch to a sometimes boring game. The best part is sometimes this works for recruiting. Nothing like teaching someone the error of their ways then helping them out. Of course you always have those that can't be or don't want to be helped. This is okay because they keep being good targets and their shiny drops help fund PVP ships for the corp. |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1011
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 23:59:00 -
[196] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4060168#post4060168
People are being reimbursed. This is obviously an exploit on the drones AI, as the aggression mechanics are not consistent.
Did anyone really think this was intended design? LOL@ all the morons trying to say this was some kind of new awesome intended gameplay feature.
This is not NEW. this has been like thatsicne retribution. Jsut hat now there isa clear and easy way to make yourself a valid target to his drones.
A GM that reinbursed taht made a mistake, because we in high sec use this mechanics to get kills for ages and never anythign was reinbursed.
IT is specially used around trade hubs, wehre people undock with suspect timmers to see if anyone that jsut finished a duel have its agressive droens attack automatically him, allowing the secodn part to engage and obliterate the already wekened dueler. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |