Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
135
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 20:50:00 -
[181] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Somehow critique with "bad English" is more thought provoking than your zealous brown nosing, even with your "good English."
You mean "Somehow a critique", no wonder you write for EN24. Do you not have enough money for a spellcheck?
Yes because suggesting when making accusations you actually use logic and not farfetch'd interpretations of EULA/TOS is brown nosing. Or were you referring to me pointing out you have an unhealthy obsession with someone who played the game and caused you to become enraged with sperg posts and "articles"? Please though, keep up the attempts to derail the thread and argue that it is in fact a conspiracy that will get Jayne elected and not people wanting to distance themselves from the idiocy that is your "argument."
Jayne Fillon wrote:Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Jayne,
In regards to the recent deployable units, specifically the ESS, how do you feel these have affected the gameplay in EVE? Do you believe them to be appropriate and meeting the goals CCP stated publicly for them to serve or do you feel they are lacking?
"meeting the goals CCP stated publicly" Not going to lie, tried to find this and couldn't - if you have a link I'd appreciate it. Anyway, I'm enjoying the release of the deployables so far a couple reasons: first, I see this trend as CCP trying to promote a "farms and fields" concept to sovereignty by providing new and very dynamic mechanics that can change from system to system, or even from different areas within a system. This focus on easily destroyed and anchored structures add a lot of utility not just in sov, but in a lot of other aspects of the game limited only by the creativity of the player. The ESS specifically has added a brand new incentive not only for PvE pilots, but for PvP pilots of all varieties. Anything that motivates a player to engage in an activity that encourages combat - or any other type of multiplier activity - is a good thing in my book. This is what I was hoping to find when looking for an official statement from CCP. It's obvious from the mechanics of the ESS that it's meant to be encouraging and enabling piracy, from the share/take options to the warp disruption effect. Even so soon after the ESS was deploed we've seen ratting carriers actively warping to their ESS to defend it, or pirates setting up traps with Marauders and other ridiculous escalation. All of these events were born from an activity that was previously isolationist in nature. Now people are encouraged to defend a single system with an ESS in order to reap the rewards, and everything falls in line after that. So whether or not I can find the exact intent of CCP when producing this module, I think they've done a great job in encouraging interaction between players, both cooperatively and antagonistically.
Thank you for your take on the deployable units, specifically the ESS which was arguably the most controversial of them.
It was stated by CCP Manifest, or someone else from CCP, that the ESS was designed to cause more small scale fights in Null. I believe it was in the megathread that it was said. LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect Surely You're Joking
219
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 20:53:00 -
[182] - Quote
I don't know why you're still on about that topic. The facts are there for anyone to look at, yet you continue on your obessive tirade about me. My friend the thread isn't about me. |
Jayne Fillon
217
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:04:00 -
[183] - Quote
More questions! I didn't see this one until now.
Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Back on topic, I have another question for you Jayne.
Assuming you are elected, how do you feel your contributions to the EVE community outside of your CSM role will be affected. For example, you write for an EVE centered video game news site, do you plan to use your CSM status to promote various things CSM are attempting to accomplish (assuming it were permitted under the NDA) or do you plan to maintain a tight lip while allowing for others around you to discuss the topic you may be working on with CCP? Arguably one of your CSM mentors Ali Aras doesn't tend to output much in the way of articles, mostly due to her role as an editor for the same publication, on the subject of EVE and the mechanics therein. I'm curious how you'll address that sort of situation if it were to arise. Would we expect to see your take on such a publication or would it be on a non-polarized location such as a CSM9.org website? One could say it is better for "politicians" to be insulated from news sources, though that's more so about real politics and not internet spaceship pixel land dreamed up by some alcoholic Icelandic guys in the early 2000s.
... and it's a good question to boot.
So far, the majority my articles have been based on things I'm interested in personally or that have been the source of great controversy. I doubt this would change post-CSM, although I would obviously be unable to publish any work on NDA projects, which will probably those still broken/unaltered and in most need of said articles. If I have an opinion on a subject, I will still share my opinion with those who are interested, and I don't see any reason to move my point of publication away from TMC.
As for those currently on the CSM, such as Ali, I've heard that the reason they publish less is the difficulty in discussing a topic currently of public interest while purposefully stunting your article or analysis because you know more than you're allowed to let on. In this case, even if you are unbiased, the CSM title lends just as much suspicion as it does credibility to the words you commit to print. I don't envy the position, but being elected to the CSM won't change my passion, my opinions, or my desire to share with those who are interested.
tl;dr - I'm still going to post what I think about the game on TMC, I just might have to be more delicate.
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Jayne Fillon
217
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:05:00 -
[184] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:yet you continue on your obessive tirade about me. heh Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
135
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:24:00 -
[185] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:I don't know why you're still on about that topic. The facts are there for anyone to look at, yet you continue on your obessive tirade about me. My friend the thread isn't about me.
An "obsessive tirade" isn't actually indicative of what is happening but good to know you're still trying to spin a narrative where you're the victim. You made accusations supported by incredibly weak evidence making numerous threads and posts here that the ISD determined to be in violation of the rules. You then kept up accusations and trolling despite being reprimanded for it previously.
For someone who blubbered on in a dimwitted article about "rules must be respected" you sure don't seem to comprehend any of the rules nor understand what constitutes violating them. According to you, Jayne broke EULA. Given that the GMs haven't taken any action against him nor made him ineligible for CSM 9, it appears they agree that you're just stirring up **** because someone played EVE better than you and did more in a shorter amount of time.
In short, you're butthurt someone made you look the fool and you're even more butthurt now that your attempt at revenge blew up in your face. I don't see the point in you continuing to post but hey, maybe you're a masochist and enjoy being stomped on or something.
Jayne Fillon wrote:More questions! I didn't see this one until now. Hendrick Tallardar wrote: Back on topic, I have another question for you Jayne.
Assuming you are elected, how do you feel your contributions to the EVE community outside of your CSM role will be affected. For example, you write for an EVE centered video game news site, do you plan to use your CSM status to promote various things CSM are attempting to accomplish (assuming it were permitted under the NDA) or do you plan to maintain a tight lip while allowing for others around you to discuss the topic you may be working on with CCP? Arguably one of your CSM mentors Ali Aras doesn't tend to output much in the way of articles, mostly due to her role as an editor for the same publication, on the subject of EVE and the mechanics therein. I'm curious how you'll address that sort of situation if it were to arise. Would we expect to see your take on such a publication or would it be on a non-polarized location such as a CSM9.org website? One could say it is better for "politicians" to be insulated from news sources, though that's more so about real politics and not internet spaceship pixel land dreamed up by some alcoholic Icelandic guys in the early 2000s.
... and it's a good question to boot. So far, the majority my articles have been based on things I'm interested in personally or that have been the source of great controversy. I doubt this would change post-CSM, although I would obviously be unable to publish any work on NDA projects, which will probably those still broken/unaltered and in most need of said articles. If I have an opinion on a subject, I will still share my opinion with those who are interested, and I don't see any reason to move my point of publication away from TMC. As for those currently on the CSM, such as Ali, I've heard that the reason they publish less is the difficulty in discussing a topic currently of public interest while purposefully stunting your article or analysis because you know more than you're allowed to let on. In this case, even if you are unbiased, the CSM title lends just as much suspicion as it does credibility to the words you commit to print. I don't envy the position, but being elected to the CSM won't change my passion, my opinions, or my desire to share with those who are interested. tl;dr - I'm still going to post what I think about the game on TMC, I just might have to be more delicate.
Splendid. Do you then feel that perhaps CSM members in CSM 9 should work with such publications to put out their statements and/or opinions on changes CCP are making, so long as they are not in violation of the NDA? Much like how Two-Step commented on CCP's actions numerous times, and so forth?
Although it was previously asked, with how you plan to continue communication. What do you feel CSM 8 did wrong in the way of communicating with the player base? What do you feel they did correct?
As an EVE player do you look towards any person and/or group as inspiration? As a potential "politician" do you have any real world experience in managing a community and the communications therein that would apply to your role on CSM? (not so much as a game designer etc. but as a "people person") LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect Surely You're Joking
219
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:35:00 -
[186] - Quote
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:An "obsessive tirade" isn't actually indicative of what is happening but good to know you're still trying to spin a narrative where you're the victim. You made accusations supported by incredibly weak evidence making numerous threads and posts here that the ISD determined to be in violation of the rules. You then kept up accusations and trolling despite being reprimanded for it previously.
For someone who blubbered on in a dimwitted article about "rules must be respected" you sure don't seem to comprehend any of the rules nor understand what constitutes violating them. According to you, Jayne broke EULA. Given that the GMs haven't taken any action against him nor made him ineligible for CSM 9, it appears they agree that you're just stirring up **** because someone played EVE better than you and did more in a shorter amount of time.
In short, you're butthurt someone made you look the fool and you're even more butthurt now that your attempt at revenge blew up in your face. I don't see the point in you continuing to post but hey, maybe you're a masochist and enjoy being stomped on or something.
Considering my responses have been very short and have nothing to do with any EULA violation for a while, i'd call what you are doing an obsessive tirade. Evidence is up for people to look for themselves. ISD didn't reprimand anyone, simply cleaned up the thread, something which you seem keen on reversing by pulling the discussion into the mud.
In short, shush.
Jayne since we're doing this here anyway, would you like to provide some examples of mechanics you would like to see in place to give the small gang groups meaningful impact in 0.0 sov politics and warfare? |
Jayne Fillon
217
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:47:00 -
[187] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Jayne since we're doing this here anyway, would you like to provide some examples of mechanics you would like to see in place to give the small gang groups meaningful impact in 0.0 sov politics and warfare?
No
Can't shoot blues if you don't have any. Long Live NPSI. |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect Surely You're Joking
220
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:52:00 -
[188] - Quote
Jayne Fillon wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Jayne since we're doing this here anyway, would you like to provide some examples of mechanics you would like to see in place to give the small gang groups meaningful impact in 0.0 sov politics and warfare?
No
So you would not like to see mechanics in place that further small gang influence in 0.0 status quo? Why not? |
Jasmine Panzer
State War Academy Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 01:01:00 -
[189] - Quote
A' Ser+áf, e mo' per+¦ c'hai scassato la minchia!
Could some kind person translate that for Seraph please? I don't know how to say it properly in English. |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect Surely You're Joking
220
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 01:10:00 -
[190] - Quote
Jasmine Panzer wrote:A' Ser+áf, e mo' per+¦ c'hai scassato la minchia!
Could some kind person translate that for Seraph please? I don't know how to say it properly in English.
You should probably stick to only saying things you're smart enough to figure out. |
|
Rhiannon Marius
Marius Family Enterprises Unlimited
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 05:01:00 -
[191] - Quote
Seraph has convinced me! All 4 of the accounts I have will have Jayne Fillion as number one on the ballot! Thanks Seraph! |
Rhiannon Marius
Marius Family Enterprises Unlimited
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 05:39:00 -
[192] - Quote
Rhiannon Marius wrote:Seraph has convinced me! All 4 of the accounts I have will have Jayne Fillion as number one on the ballot! Thanks Seraph!
The above was a bit of a comment on one persons obsession. I have no Idea who Jayne is in game. Having read Mr. Jayne's platform he will be on my ballot |
Anya Klibor
Guy Fawkes Trust Fund 31ST Reliables Division
659
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 06:00:00 -
[193] - Quote
When ti comes right down to it, the two most important issues in the past three years have had the CSM be more reactive, and only getting involved after the general public begins to voice their discontent with decisions CCP has made. Those two times would be "Monoclegate" and the rollout of the NEX with Incarna, and more recently with the issues surrounding SOMER, CCP's favoritism, and what came to be RMT.
Now, while most people consider SOMER to be nothing more than overhyped issues and people looking to cause problems. I agree, to an extent. And I admit, that extent stops very close to where it starts off as far as I'm concerned. However, my issues go beyond that, and more towards how CCP handles it.
Concerning these issues, CCP has generally been unwilling to comment until a certain point is hit and the uproar becomes too much. As we saw especially with Monoclegate, it took articles being written before we got aywhere, and even then the response was lackluster. The hype was large, and only after the players were appearing in droves did the CSM show up to voice their "concerns" and what-have-you. With regards to the SOMER issue, much of the CSM was missing, and the ones who were there took the same approach: they really just appeared to be watching how the political winds were blowing.
Generally, CCP tends to ignore negative feedback, promising an answer and then either not giving it, or doing it in such a way where the fans find out second-hand. In the most recent episode, the way anyone found out was when third parties came and said CCP told them to stop giving away ISK incentives for buying GTCs through select groups.
Since the CSM has been as reactive, and CCP tends to ignore the public when we disagree vehemently, how do you plan to fix this perception that is shared by quite a number of people not only on these forums, but also in-game? |
Hendrick Tallardar
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
137
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 17:15:00 -
[194] - Quote
Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Jayne since we're doing this here anyway, would you like to provide some examples of mechanics you would like to see in place to give the small gang groups meaningful impact in 0.0 sov politics and warfare?
No So you would not like to see mechanics in place that further small gang influence in 0.0 status quo? Why not?
Reading comprehension must be hard for you. I weep for the wasted efforts your school teachers took in trying to educate you. LeeSsang. Never Forget. |
Seraph IX Basarab
Hades Effect Surely You're Joking
220
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 17:56:00 -
[195] - Quote
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote:Jayne Fillon wrote:Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Jayne since we're doing this here anyway, would you like to provide some examples of mechanics you would like to see in place to give the small gang groups meaningful impact in 0.0 sov politics and warfare?
No So you would not like to see mechanics in place that further small gang influence in 0.0 status quo? Why not? Reading comprehension must be hard for you. I weep for the wasted efforts your school teachers took in trying to educate you.
Shush you might get your leash yanked.
Anyway, obnoxious pestering aside, I think it would be well worth noting what Jayne's plan is to introduce more small gang into 0.0. |
|
ISD Flidais Asagiri
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
117
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 21:59:00 -
[196] - Quote
Greetings
*** Thread is being locked ***
To the candidate please feel free to open another thread to get your ideas into the arena for discussion. This thread has become what appears to be a personal back and forth between a few individuals and not about your ideas. Good luck. ISD Flidais Asagiri Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |