Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zeropa
OXYCLEAN Mining Industries
2
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Would like to know what's getting looked at next, haven't heard or read anything about rebalance since Rubicon release. Please and thank you. |
Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
1126
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
At a guess, capitals or pirate ships. Off the top of my head:
Revelation needs a serious range advantage over the Moros. Phoenix and Thanatos need reasons to be used. Archon needs to not be the best armour carrier in almost all situations. Nidhoggur might find a local tank boost/rep amount bonus useful.
The pirate ships are trickier but Worm, Succubus, Phantasm and Cruor all all deeply lacklustre. |
Lephia DeGrande
The Scope Gallente Federation
249
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
There are some T2 Ships still untouched. |
Ellendras Silver
My second corp
128
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 13:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Gypsio III wrote:At a guess, capitals or pirate ships. Off the top of my head:
Revelation needs a serious range advantage over the Moros. Phoenix and Thanatos need reasons to be used. Archon needs to not be the best armour carrier in almost all situations. Nidhoggur might find a local tank boost/rep amount bonus useful.
The pirate ships are trickier but Worm, Succubus, Phantasm and Cruor all all deeply lacklustre.
i believe capitals and T3s are the last ones (and the hardest ones) to be rebalanced. FIX FORUMS |
Soldarius
Deadman W0nderland Test Alliance Please Ignore
540
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 15:24:00 -
[5] - Quote
Recons Free Ripley Weaver! |
Mr Doctor
Sex Machineguns Happy Cartel
89
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 15:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Curse my buff.
I mean buff my Curse.
Yes -¼_-¼ |
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2455
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 15:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nothing. CCP has moved on to rebalancing ship cargo allocation by producing many useless/gimmicky deployables. Ship rebalance has obviously been abandoned in favor of The Plan. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |
Viyaja
New Republic The Initiative.
0
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 19:57:00 -
[8] - Quote
Domanique Altares wrote:Nothing. CCP has moved on to rebalancing ship cargo allocation by producing many useless/gimmicky deployables. Ship rebalance has obviously been abandoned in favor of The Plan.
Sadly i belive you. Every Time CCP touches something they didnt bring it to a propper end. All things thend to be forgotten half way. See
- Walking in Station - Storyline Missions - T3 Ships
and so on |
Leyete Wulf
Dark Fusion Industries Limitless Inc.
17
|
Posted - 2014.02.21 20:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Judging by comments in the forums and on the devblogs: Recons Black Ops BS Pirate faction hulls (esp. Gurista)
After that we will probably see some 'iteration' on the strategic cruisers and then maybe capital ships. (CSM minutes from 2012 laid out a lengthy road map for capital ships, not that that means much now)
And, as has been mentioned we will no doubt be inundated with miscellaneous deployables and more useless or obscure modules (target spectrum breaker for the win). |
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
1070
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 00:41:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP are obviously dragging their feet, I can't believe that ship re balancing can take all of this time. Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |
|
Rowells
Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans
230
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 01:01:00 -
[11] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:CCP are obviously dragging their feet, I can't believe that ship re balancing can take all of this time. Thats because it's not as easy as it sounds. There has to be meetings, testing, feedback, changes, changes again, and then wait for final deployment all while working on other projects as well.
That being said I'm curious to see if they rebalance ALL ships. Do they need to touch on logistics ships? HICs? Maybe even jump freighters? |
Dr Cedric
Independent Miners Corporation Care Factor
26
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 01:24:00 -
[12] - Quote
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:CCP are obviously dragging their feet, I can't believe that ship re balancing can take all of this time.
I agree that it would be nice if happened faster, but think about it:
They have (Im guessing at the number here) a multi-million dollar game that has its hands in economies across the world, with lots of players who are having fun within the means the game provides.
Then you have the RMT folks, who are just looking for a 'mistake' that CCP makes in balance. Can you imagine what would happen to our game, that we are all pretty passionate about, if for even a day, CCP let a mistake out. The entire meta-game would change, the economy inside and outside of Eve could potentially be ruined, and we would say "goodbye" to our beloved eve.
Patience is a virtue. Play the game, enjoy it as much as you can and let the pro's do what they do.
Ced Cedric
|
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2935
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 02:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
Is the Nestor included in the Pirate rebalance? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Sylveria Relden
Spartan Shipyards THE H0NEYBADGER
17
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 02:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
Viyaja wrote:Domanique Altares wrote:Nothing. CCP has moved on to rebalancing ship cargo allocation by producing many useless/gimmicky deployables. Ship rebalance has obviously been abandoned in favor of The Plan. Sadly i belive you. Every Time CCP touches something they didnt bring it to a propper end. All things thend to be forgotten half way. See - Walking in Station - Storyline Missions - T3 Ships and so on
It sure sounds like CCP is ADH.... oh look, a squirrel! :P You must be THIS tall to use the "I WIN" button. |
Catherine Laartii
Providence Guard Templis CALSF
77
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 18:21:00 -
[15] - Quote
I'm hoping they lump a Logistics rebalance in there; it seems pretty straightforward that they'd drop some of the drone bonuses in favor of rep and/or resist bonuses. That being said, I would very much like to see how they'd work on rebalancing recon boats and blops. Maybe even covops frigs; would be nice if they made them like "force recon" versions to the "combat recon' types with the EAFs. |
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
263
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 19:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Sylveria Relden wrote:Viyaja wrote:Domanique Altares wrote:Nothing. CCP has moved on to rebalancing ship cargo allocation by producing many useless/gimmicky deployables. Ship rebalance has obviously been abandoned in favor of The Plan. Sadly i belive you. Every Time CCP touches something they didnt bring it to a propper end. All things thend to be forgotten half way. See - Walking in Station - Storyline Missions - T3 Ships and so on It sure sounds like CCP is ADH.... oh look, a squirrel! :P
Yup!
|
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
650
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 21:32:00 -
[17] - Quote
Catherine Laartii wrote:I'm hoping they lump a Logistics rebalance in there; it seems pretty straightforward that they'd drop some of the drone bonuses in favor of rep and/or resist bonuses. That being said, I would very much like to see how they'd work on rebalancing recon boats and blops. Maybe even covops frigs; would be nice if they made them like "force recon" versions to the "combat recon' types with the EAFs.
WHAT!! logis already have max resists too begin with they aren't meant to be tanky like HAC's really they need to knock down the resists to either partial T2 resists or remove them entirely down to T1 resists ... i also think the range of their reps need too be toned down a little Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name.. remove drone assist mechanic. Nerf web strength ..... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |
Jeanne-Luise Argenau
Cruis3r's Cr3w Inc.
73
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 21:54:00 -
[18] - Quote
Harvey James wrote:Catherine Laartii wrote:I'm hoping they lump a Logistics rebalance in there; it seems pretty straightforward that they'd drop some of the drone bonuses in favor of rep and/or resist bonuses. That being said, I would very much like to see how they'd work on rebalancing recon boats and blops. Maybe even covops frigs; would be nice if they made them like "force recon" versions to the "combat recon' types with the EAFs. WHAT!! logis already have max resists too begin with they aren't meant to be tanky like HAC's really they need to knock down the resists to either partial T2 resists or remove them entirely down to T1 resists ... i also think the range of their reps need too be toned down a little
wtf. ok just to get it straight t1 cruisers equal the rr amount of t2 logis. the only reason u would chose t2 is because of the better tank and in case of guardian or basilisk the better cap xfer.
Other thing is he is a troll then fine ignore me ^^ |
Abyss Azizora
Vasta Enterprises
76
|
Posted - 2014.02.22 23:36:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jeanne-Luise Argenau wrote:Harvey James wrote:Catherine Laartii wrote:I'm hoping they lump a Logistics rebalance in there; it seems pretty straightforward that they'd drop some of the drone bonuses in favor of rep and/or resist bonuses. That being said, I would very much like to see how they'd work on rebalancing recon boats and blops. Maybe even covops frigs; would be nice if they made them like "force recon" versions to the "combat recon' types with the EAFs. WHAT!! logis already have max resists too begin with they aren't meant to be tanky like HAC's really they need to knock down the resists to either partial T2 resists or remove them entirely down to T1 resists ... i also think the range of their reps need too be toned down a little wtf. ok just to get it straight t1 cruisers equal the rr amount of t2 logis. the only reason u would chose t2 is because of the better tank and in case of guardian or basilisk the better cap xfer. Other thing is he is a troll then fine ignore me ^^
Uh... wrong, completely wrong. T2 logis rep "WAY" more than T1 logis, they use large remote reps, whereas a T1's use medium remote reps. They also have more range, more hp, more tank, more fittings, etc, etc.
However I agree that logis are fine as-is, though I also agree the remote rep drone bonus is useless and should be replaced with "something". |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |