Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Stjaerna Ramundson
59
|
Posted - 2014.03.01 23:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
I would like to request the second weapon systems for Marauders for each faction:
Amarr System: Drone fokus Ship: Armageddon hull for the Tech II
Caldari System: Hybrid Weapon Ship: Rokh hull for the Tech II
Gallente System: Drone fokus Ship: Dominix hull for the Tech II
Minmatar System: Missile Ship: Typhoon hull for the Tech II
There are people like
inventors, producers and pilots wanted to fly it, are waiting for it. :) 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Caleb Seremshur
Capital Storm. The Storm Collective
204
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 01:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Siege marauders are a long desired thing.. but where do they fit in? LP store weapon cost rebalance |
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
361
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 01:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
A Dominix with its current drone bonuses but with access to Bastion seige mode?
Scary.
|
Meandering Milieu
FML LLC
5
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 01:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Since they already have mission marauders, I'd like to see more T2 BSes and BCs fleshed out like cruisers and frigs are with roles like logistics, assault, perhaps a second covops (since there are two different covops for each other covop category), and so on.
Note there are two of each assault category as well, so you could still get another marauder with a secondary weapon focus. Indeed as a drone pilot I am quite disappointed with the fact that there isn't a T2 domi for me to fly outside of the B-ops.
Edit: Also interdiction BS or BCs. |
Jasen Harper
Hancock Development Corp
7
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 02:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
WTB "Command Ship" that doesn't take longer to train into than a tech II battleship. Would love for them to bring out "Heavy Assault" Battlecruisers. Almost identical to command ships but without requiring ~3 months of leadership skill training. They would provide a "next step" after HACs and hopefully lead into Marauders/BLOPS in some kind of logical fashion.
Note: I can fly Command ships, I don't have a horse in this race. The Templis Dragonaurs are an ultra-nationalist Caldari terrorist organization whose origins date back to the Tikiona States. They are the most anti-Gallentean political entity in New Eden, and were secretly involved in the destruction of Nouvelle Rouvenor. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
60
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 13:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Update on Mainpost 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Sublime Rage
Righteous Immortal Pew Darwins Lemmings
1405
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 13:53:00 -
[7] - Quote
the names are terrible and Mimir already exists in eve |
Gimme more Cynos
Du nervst geh sterben
144
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 14:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Imho, bastion is one of the things each ship should have.
Sacrifice of energy from the propulsion to boost other parts of your ship is really sweet in a logical way. Just needs different options and not just "all in one modules".
|
Stjaerna Ramundson
60
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 14:13:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sublime Rage wrote:the names are terrible and Mimir already exists in eve
Most of names in eve are terrible so .. I chose to do the same ^^
Name is corrected, thx :) 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Nariya Kentaya
Phoenix funds
1083
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 18:52:00 -
[10] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:I would like to request the second weapon systems for Marauders for each faction:
Amarr System: Drone fokus Ship: Armageddon hull for the Tech II Name: Akephalos
Caldari System: Hybrid Weapon Ship: Rokh hull for the Tech II Name: Polemaetus
Gallente System: Drone fokus Ship: Dominix hull for the Tech II Name: Demeter
Minmatar System: Missile Ship: Typhoon hull for the Tech II Name: Bestla
There are people like
inventors, producers and pilots wanted to fly it, are waiting for it. :)
Edit: or to prevent the DEV's from to much work:
Only create the drone marauder from the Nestor
Bonus from skill the ship will get from Gallente and Amarr BS. Depending which skill is higher but, it don't get double skill bonus. It only chose the better skill to get bonus. Another idea is that the bonus stil is split to Amarr and Gallente. Example: Amarr give the Armor bonus and Gallente the Drone dmg bonus (classic).
Ship: Nestor hull for the Tech II Name: Agamemnon actually, for once i wouldnt mind getting an amarr drone boat so long as the second marauder was the ABADDON.
like seriously, enter bastion and the side-armor pieces slide out for little landing/takeoff opening on both sides for drones, turn it into a baby-battlestar. |
|
Nariya Kentaya
Phoenix funds
1083
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 18:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:Sublime Rage wrote:the names are terrible and Mimir already exists in eve Most of names in eve are terrible so .. I chose to do the same ^^ Name is corrected, thx :) most of the names arent terrible, maybe not specifically themed after the ship theya re naming, but each of them tends to belong to a certain name-theme that the race follows, whether that be weapons/mythology/christian scripture/etc |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 20:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:Sublime Rage wrote:the names are terrible and Mimir already exists in eve Most of names in eve are terrible so .. I chose to do the same ^^ Name is corrected, thx :) most of the names arent terrible, maybe not specifically themed after the ship theya re naming, but each of them tends to belong to a certain name-theme that the race follows, whether that be weapons/mythology/christian scripture/etc
I know... and I followed also
feel free to create other names. I will list them in first post :) 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
STush T
Capital Sin
16
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 20:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
I like the OPs idea. Crazy wacked out profile pic though. . . |
Jacid
Aliastra Gallente Federation
52
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 21:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
I like the idea of another t2 battleship however i really think the missing role we have between battleships is a high DPS low tracking anti capital / structure ship bs. Think 8-10k dps with 50k tank and terrible tracking. Its defiantly been suggested before maybe instead of a seige cycle completely stopping movement have it reduce mwd and ab effect similar to Heavy interdictors in mechanics.
My 2 Cents |
Khloros Tsero
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.02 21:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
I second this, I really want to see more options for them, not a a bunch but at least 2 per faction that favors their preferred weapons. Like OP said Amarr get a drone boat, caldari get a hybrid turret, ect ect. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.04 22:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
Caleb Seremshur wrote:Siege marauders are a long desired thing.. but where do they fit in?
I don't understand your question.
I only would like to get a second Marauder with the second weapon system for each faction. I think that is reasonable and clear to understand or?
What this happens with a siege modul / siege mode i don't get it. :( 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.04 22:11:00 -
[17] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:A Dominix with its current drone bonuses but with access to Bastion seige mode?
Scary.
Isn't scary it is a question of balance. ^^ Can be done and our DEV's in this game are highly skilled to see this challenge only as a nice side effect :) 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.04 22:27:00 -
[18] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote: actually, for once i wouldnt mind getting an amarr drone boat so long as the second marauder was the ABADDON.
like seriously, enter bastion and the side-armor pieces slide out for little landing/takeoff opening on both sides for drones, turn it into a baby-battlestar.
I would like my Dominix Marauder as a sphere or more formed into a sphere. I also like your idea for the landing / takeoff opened hangars in a bastion mode. :D
But these are still dreams ^^ lets wait :D
... btw... i would also request the second weapon system for the other tech II BS sorts. Like a Black Ops with Rail gun fokus or tempest as missile black ops. :) 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2970
|
Posted - 2014.03.04 23:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
Why exactly do we need a second set of Marauders? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 00:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Why exactly do we need a second set of Marauders?
counter question: "Why exactly do we need a":
1. Mobil Tracot Unit 2. Nestor 3. Stratios 4. Astero 5. Siphon Unit 6. Ring Menu 7. Navy Battlecruiser
You can put in your question to each of all Features & Ideas and all DEV announcements. (In a DEV Post it would be funny, i would like to see the face of chiliad from the DEV who reads the question! ... *imagine* laughting tears *imagine*)
Most people would answer like:
expansion, improvement, gaming deepness, development, possible gaming content planed by players for players... 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
|
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2970
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 00:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:counter question: "Why exactly do we need a": 1. Mobil Tractor Unit 2. Nestor 3. Stratios 4. Astero 5. Siphon Unit 6. Ring Menu 7. Navy Battlecruiser You can put in your question to each of all Features & Ideas and all DEV announcements. (In a DEV Post it would be funny, i would like to see the face of chiliad from the DEV who reads the question! ... *imagine* laughting tears *imagine*) Most people would answer like: expansion, improvement, gaming deepness, development, possible gaming content planed by players for players... 1. For miners, to auto-retrieve NPC wrecks (among other scenarios). 2. We're still asking ourselves thisGǪ 3. Low-SP covert ops cruiser. 4. Low-SP covert ops frigate. 5. To annoy null-sec folk? 6. Future new HUD? 7. If they removed the screen doors they'd be more useful. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 00:58:00 -
[22] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote: 1. For miners, to auto-retrieve NPC wrecks (among other scenarios). 2. We're still asking ourselves thisGǪ 3. Low-SP covert ops cruiser. 4. Low-SP covert ops frigate. 5. To annoy null-sec folk? 6. Future new HUD? 7. If they removed the screen doors they'd be more useful.
So you found answers for yourself, so you also found a answers to this idea. Glad I was able to help people to help themselves. :) back to topic 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2970
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 03:04:00 -
[23] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:So you found answers for yourself, so you also found a answers to this idea. Glad I was able to help people to help themselves. :) back to topic No, I'm still at a loss to understand why we need a second Marauder class when the first one is questionable. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 16:20:00 -
[24] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:No, I'm still at a loss to understand why we need a second Marauder class when the first one is questionable.
Then we are not able to help you cause, the first marauder of each faction isn't questionable. 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
2973
|
Posted - 2014.03.05 17:53:00 -
[25] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:Then we are not able to help you cause, the first marauder of each faction isn't questionable. I'd rather see a Navy Abaddon, Hyperion, Maelstrom and Rokh. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Stjaerna Ramundson
62
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 21:11:00 -
[26] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:Then we are not able to help you cause, the first marauder of each faction isn't questionable. I'd rather see a Navy Abaddon, Hyperion, Maelstrom and Rokh. I think that's a more realistic possibility than another set of T2 Marauders, but who knows.
Than you are since you are started your trolling in the wrong fred... please start your own fred about your idea. Thx for it. 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Lucine Delacourt
The Covenant of Blood
99
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 21:53:00 -
[27] - Quote
If the next T2 Amarr BS isn't a Khanid Abbadon, I and many other people will rage! |
Actaeon Versaea
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 22:05:00 -
[28] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote: Amarr SystemMISSILES Ship: Armageddon hull for the Tech II Name: Impiety
MISSILES/KHANID......!!!!!
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote: Gallente System: Drone fokus Ship: Dominix hull for the Tech II Name: Demeter
As a Masters of Classical History, I find this name laughably peaceful for a warship.. Demeter didn't hurt a fly, and wouldn't. Otherwise, ok. "I just liked it because it was red. What's a Carthum?" -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-Absolution Pilot |
Kapytul Gaynez
Hedion University Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2014.03.06 23:37:00 -
[29] - Quote
3 of the 4 hulls used in the OP already have t2 variants. Abaddon, Maelstrom, Hyperion and Rokh would be the logical choices for any new t2 BS's.
Oh and Khanid BS FTW! |
Stjaerna Ramundson
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 00:11:00 -
[30] - Quote
Actaeon Versaea wrote: DRONES......!!!!!
As you wish o.O ;D
I have understand what you mean, I understand now that Khanid are more focused on missiles. Than I will edit the main Post for it. :)
Actaeon Versaea wrote: As a Masters of Classical History, I find this name laughably peaceful for a warship.. Demeter didn't hurt a fly, and wouldn't. Otherwise, ok.
Demeter (The Ship) don't attack anyone (i forbid turret/missile weapons for example? :D) so only drones would do the attacks and the ship fly behind and bring the peace. Feel free to give us a name for it. :) I am open for new wisdom from a master. I will edit the main post.
Kapytul Gaynez wrote:3 of the 4 hulls used in the OP already have t2 variants. Abaddon, Maelstrom, Hyperion and Rokh would be the logical choices for any new t2 BS's. Oh and Khanid BS FTW!
It doesn't matter that these hulls have another T2 Variant (example dominix as Black Ops) you can chose which one you would like to invent. But I understand the idea/think/mind what you mean. :) Why I chose these hulls: Dominix, is the drone boat, so it would not be sensefull to create a Drone Marauder with a Hull based on Hybrid. Also CreoDron would be have here hands in this development and would use the basic hull and not create the wheel new. :) Thats the idea behind my chosen one and also for the other hulls.
Will put them as another option for hull. :)
Lucine Delacourt wrote:If the next T2 Amarr BS isn't a Khanid Abbadon, I and many other people will rage!
I have changed :) (updated to first post) 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |