Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Actaeon Versaea
54
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 00:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:
Demeter (The Ship) don't attack anyone (i forbid turret/missile weapons for example? :D) so only drones would do the attacks and the ship fly behind and bring the peace. Feel free to give us a name for it. :) I am open for new wisdom from a master. I will edit the main post.
Hmm... Actaeon... Oh, wait, I use that name, Scratch that ..... Classical Charicters whom hurt stuf, via proxies... Pallas!
"I just liked it because it was red. What's a Carthum?" -á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-á-Absolution Pilot |
Ines Tegator
Towels R Us
417
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 00:21:00 -
[32] - Quote
A drone marauder is called for. The other 3 new ships would just result in more of what we already have- 3 missile marauders and 2 hybrids total. Useful for those that don't want to cross train, but I'm highly skeptical that this would add much or be worth the in-game manufacturing costs.
Stjaerna Ramundson wrote: counter question: "Why exactly do we need a":
1. Mobil Tracot Unit 2. Nestor 3. Stratios 4. Astero 5. Siphon Unit 6. Ring Menu 7. Navy Battlecruiser
1. Adding new gameplay options. 2. We don't. See massive complaints about it. 3. Adding new gameplay options. 4. Adding new gameplay options. 5. Adding new gameplay options. 6. Improving the usability of the game. 7. We don't, but people wanted them, so shiny.
New marauders fall under the 'shiny' category, and don't really add anything to gameplay. There's nothing wrong with this, but it makes them a very low priority in my book. - Mission Overhaul - Bridging the PVP / PVE Gap - -áIf the game stops teaching people to fear lowsec, maybe people will start going there? |
Stjaerna Ramundson
64
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 01:59:00 -
[33] - Quote
Update to first post.
1. Bonuses are to discuss 1. Eigenen Beitrag mit sachliche Argumentationen, Problemschilderung, Erkl+ñrung, L+¦sungsans+ñtzen formulieren. 2. Beitrag enth+ñlt eine eigene Meinung im Fazit zum Thema. 3. Negative +äu+ƒerungen, Drohungen usw. gegen++ber Nutzern haben in der Meinung nichts zu suchen. |
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
3000
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 03:10:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ines Tegator wrote:A drone marauder is called for. The other 3 new ships would just result in more of what we already have- 3 missile marauders and 2 hybrids total. I'm inclined to agree, and realistically drones are already featured on numerous other platforms. I could definitely get behind a Rogue Drone race - frigate, cruiser and battleship - but a drone Marauder really doesn't hold any appeal for me. Nor do the others, since they're basically a re-hash of existing Marauders. One T2 battleship is enough. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Kiryen O'Bannon
Thrall Nation Brave Collective
63
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 04:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Stjaerna Ramundson wrote:So you found answers for yourself, so you also found a answers to this idea. Glad I was able to help people to help themselves. :) back to topic No, I'm still at a loss to understand why we need a second Marauder class when the first one is questionable. The first is not questionable. More ships are better. You can sit down nuow. |
Arthur Aihaken
Perkone Caldari State
3000
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 06:15:00 -
[36] - Quote
Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:The first is not questionable. More ships are better. You can sit down nuow. That's a matter of opinion, as not everyone likes the new Marauders. They're actually doing fairly poorly in the New Eden Open, contrary to what a lot of people thought going into it. You're not going to see a second set of Marauders, so this is beyond wishful thinking. Command destroyers, new capital ships and even a missile-based Pirate faction have all been hinted at by the devs. So dream if you want to, this idea (and thread) isn't going anywhere. I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week. |
Lucine Delacourt
The Covenant of Blood
101
|
Posted - 2014.03.07 18:56:00 -
[37] - Quote
Arthur Aihaken wrote:Kiryen O'Bannon wrote:The first is not questionable. More ships are better. You can sit down nuow. That's a matter of opinion, as not everyone likes the new Marauders. They're actually doing fairly poorly in the New Eden Open, contrary to what a lot of people thought going into it. You're not going to see a second set of Marauders, so this is beyond wishful thinking. Command destroyers, new capital ships and even a missile-based Pirate faction have all been hinted at by the devs. So dream if you want to, this idea (and thread) isn't going anywhere.
NEO performance is not a sign of ship balance. The reason Marauder teams are losing in NEO is because of the point cost associated with fielding them. It prevents your team from having a full compliment of DPS ships or a full support wing. If anything, during their teams loses you will typically see the Marauders face tanking a tremendous amount of damage. I think the NEO showing is right around where most expected it to be. |
Razefummel
Unknown Dimension Alpha Volley Union
862
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 22:17:00 -
[38] - Quote
I think that an second Weaponsystem for Marauders and Blackops would be nice.
Just to get it straight, if CCP rebalanced Ships so that we got 2 Weaponsystems for each Race so why dont get this completly in Line for all Ships of an single Race even the T2 Variants?
For Caldari for example we have at T2 Ships normaly 1 Hybrid and 1 Missile Ship... with exeption of Marauders and BO-¦s. When we look at the Gallenteans we see Ishkur + Enyo and Ishtar + Deimos ... one with Drone- and one with Turretfocus. Even the Destroyerclass follows this line.
If the Gallenteans realy have that addiction to drones as its seen in its Ships yet, so why wouldn-¦t they build an T2-Drone-BS?
I would like to see more Ships with maybe overhauled Designs (like the Golem for Example).
Greetings
Raze 21 Tage Trial: https://secure.eveonline.com/trial/?invc=5a429c6a-3cfd-4ecd-8ffc-0d8921dbbaad&action=buddy Difficile est saturam non scribere. |
Kasife Vynneve
Capital Storm. The Storm Collective
22
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 23:42:00 -
[39] - Quote
What ever it takes to get a Khanid Innovation Battleship is a task worth doing |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |