Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Stacy Knox
The CheRookies
9
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 12:34:00 -
[91] - Quote
Sohkar audio, the Happy Miner Payout, and the Erotica 1 customer.
Here are some more .... ON THIS ONE "Happy Miner Payout" you can clearly hear Phsychotic Monks voice.
And how they sadistically humiliate a father of 3 kids in fromt of his wife ans children.
Don't tell me things like that are part of the game or call me carebear ... this has nothing to do with the game AT ALL ..., THATS PERSONAL |
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 14:51:00 -
[92] - Quote
Stacy Knox wrote:...Here are some more .... ON THIS ONE "Happy Miner Payout" you can clearly hear Phsychotic Monks voice. And how they sadistically humiliate a father of 3 kids in fromt of his wife ans children. It appears that Monk was not asked about the Bonus room in this thread until five days ago, and identified as a participant only yesterday...but hasn't posted to this thread for ten days. I hope no real-life issues are interfering with his candidacy, and that we will hear more from him.
|
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
33
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 16:36:00 -
[93] - Quote
Forum says his last post anywhere was on 3/20. Is his candidacy still alive? |
Stacy Knox
The CheRookies
20
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 17:19:00 -
[94] - Quote
Snupe Doggur wrote:Stacy Knox wrote:...Here are some more .... ON THIS ONE "Happy Miner Payout" you can clearly hear Phsychotic Monks voice. And how they sadistically humiliate a father of 3 kids in fromt of his wife ans children. It appears that Monk was not asked about the Bonus room in this thread until five days ago, and identified as a participant only yesterday...but hasn't posted to this thread for ten days. I hope no real-life issues are interfering with his candidacy, and that we will hear more from him.
He should be disqualified from the CSM Campaign , if not even get banned aswell |
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1959
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 19:16:00 -
[95] - Quote
I am in fact still here, yes. I'm in the middle of moving and my internet access is severely limited until the 4th. My apologies.
I know that's unfortunate timing, but you know how real life gets sometimes. Belligerent Undesirables Selling Griefer Immunity |
Esha Amphal
Hedion University Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 19:28:00 -
[96] - Quote
On what grounds are you basing this judgement and sentence? Something more than huff puff emotion I hope.
This recording is mild at best. The only thing the father had to do in front of his wife and 3 children was refuse to sing songs and read aloud a wiki article. Your version of being sadistically humiliated would give the average person a rosy cheeked blush.
Tsk. Put that pitchfork away.
I think you've gazed too long into the abyss. The abyss is gazing into you. |
Brusanan
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
257
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 19:50:00 -
[97] - Quote
Esha Amphal wrote:On what grounds are you basing this judgement and sentence? Something more than huff puff emotion I hope.
This recording is mild at best. The only thing the father had to do in front of his wife and 3 children was refuse to sing songs and read aloud a wiki article. Your version of being sadistically humiliated would give the average person a rosy cheeked blush.
Tsk. Put that pitchfork away.
I think you've gazed too long into the abyss. The abyss is gazing into you. This. The character is a month old and his only posts on the forums are on the Erotica 1 issue. It appears to just be a personal attack by one of Ripard's lapdogs. Psychotic Monk and DJ FunkyBacon for CSM! |
Morihei Akachi
Nishida Corporation
51
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 19:56:00 -
[98] - Quote
I'm not in a position to speculate about anyone's motives in this thread, nor is anyone else. i *am* interested to hear Monk's position on the E1 affair, though. If none is forthcoming, I won't be voting for him. |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1067
|
Posted - 2014.03.30 20:26:00 -
[99] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Yi-Ming Gren
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
50
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 03:59:00 -
[100] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:I am in fact still here, yes. I'm in the middle of moving and my internet access is severely limited until the 4th. My apologies.
I know that's unfortunate timing, but you know how real life gets sometimes.
So you have your answers he is not banned, and this thread is about Monk's run for CSM not others so lets get it back on topic. |
|
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
1197
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 05:23:00 -
[101] - Quote
Yi-Ming Gren wrote:Psychotic Monk wrote:I am in fact still here, yes. I'm in the middle of moving and my internet access is severely limited until the 4th. My apologies.
I know that's unfortunate timing, but you know how real life gets sometimes. So you have your answers he is not banned, and this thread is about Monk's run for CSM not others so lets get it back on topic. If you look the question was about his run and if that is the sort of behaviour he considers acceptable in EVE as well as his opinion on the outcome of the recent events. I'd say it's very much on topic to be asking pointed questions like this of potential CSM members. |
Yi-Ming Gren
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
50
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 08:57:00 -
[102] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Ranamar wrote:
Then Ero should do that.
I'm not here making death threats. I'm just trying to ascertain Monk's opinion of Erotica 1's actions, because there's a difference between suicide ganking miners (which some of my buddies do) or scamming, on the one hand, and inciting mental breakdowns on the other hand. I'd be interested in a rep for the gankers. I'm not interested in a rep for people whose primary target is, apparently, not related to EVE Online.
A closed GD thread indicated that P.M. was actually involved along side Ero in at least several if not a significant portion of the bonus rounds. If this is true it would appear that P.M. is actually on side with that being the direction they would like EVE to become.
Nope, I saw no question just posts that brought ISD in to fix them, and you saying you saw a thread somewhere that linked Monk to Ero1. You did not like the thread, or ask if he was apart of it, or if that is the direction he would like to see the game go.
For me I would like to know what Monk's view of the game future is? Something to help new players not get so attached to the ships? Some Tutorial's added on concord mechanics/ how to turn off the safety in Hi-sec? People talk how Hi-sec needs to be safer, but I disagree I feel it being made safer instills a fear of null sec or doing anything that might risk their ship. Worse yet when they get War Dec'd and/or ganked they rage quit in some cases or in others they rage in local and spew death threats. Rate Over.
Monk Where do you see Hi-Sec going? How to help bring new players/get new players into the game and not the grid? |
TheSmokingHertog
TALIBAN EXPRESS
203
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 19:49:00 -
[103] - Quote
You have my votes, considering I wouldn't like the fruits of your labor in my own surroundings, I like the meta-game associated with it completely, a roller-coaster like safe 'high sec / EVE' would be a thing that would make me leave EVE instantly. |
Eva Darke
The Scope Gallente Federation
2
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 07:01:00 -
[104] - Quote
Hi Monk,
You were in my top 3 last year, so I'm glad to see you running again. However, your blog hasn't been updated in several months, so I have very little idea what you've been doing recently.
I too am interested in hearing your opinion on (and address your involvement in) the recent Erotica 1 Bonus Round drama. Specifically, I'd like to know where you draw the line (if at all) on what is, and is not, acceptable player behavior.
For example, I remember you talking once about a reverse safari that you decided not to go through with, because it became clear on comms that the player had a mental disability. But then there are situations where you or your associates have engaged in repeated, long-term harassment of players you don't like.
Do you feel that this sort of behavior contradicts your stated desire for players to be excited about logging in and interacting with each other?
If a player experiences continual bullying within the game to the point of having an emotional breakdown, or decides to quit as a result, is it simply a case that they were playing the wrong game?
Do you believe that players should afford each other a certain level of respect in the spirit of healthy competition? |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
183
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 15:27:00 -
[105] - Quote
Monk,
What is your position on CCP taking in-game disciplinary action against players for things they do outside of the game on privately-owned blogs, message boards, and Teamspeak servers?
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
4905
|
Posted - 2014.04.01 21:56:00 -
[106] - Quote
Morihei Akachi wrote:I'm not in a position to speculate about anyone's motives in this thread, nor is anyone else. I am interested to hear Monk's position on the E1 affair, though. If none is forthcoming, I won't be voting for him.
If he shows up in more than one of those recordings as a participant in Erotica1's antics. Do you really need some lame justification?
You already have the answer you are looking for.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass! |
Morihei Akachi
Nishida Corporation
55
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 06:41:00 -
[107] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Do you really need some lame justification?
No, not really. But I want to give people the benefit of the doubt. Does Monk still stand to the whole bonus room thing? Or has the discussion of recent days led to a reconsideration in any respect? I don't want to assume his present stance purely and simply on the basis of his past involvement. |
Reiisha
Splint Eye Probabilities Inc. Dawn of Transcendence
527
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 07:37:00 -
[108] - Quote
Just because it's allowed or possible in EVE doesn't mean it needs to be represented...
If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all... |
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:34:00 -
[109] - Quote
Hello Psychotic Monk,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? |
TheSmokingHertog
TALIBAN EXPRESS
204
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 15:52:00 -
[110] - Quote
CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Psychotic Monk,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ?
I really don't get your and other players pretext for question like this, bans by CCP are never open for discussion, so why would CSM candidates mix into such affairs? The play style of E1 was fun for as long as it lasted and on a certain moment CCP decided she committed a bannable offense, its simple as that. This was simply based on EULA, ToS or other directives clearly set out by CCP on harrasement (see the mining bumping statement).
So, supporting such a thing is never up to a CSM member, but just a CCP internal matter. |
|
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 16:47:00 -
[111] - Quote
TheSmokingHertog wrote:CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Psychotic Monk,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? I really don't get your and other players pretext for question like this, bans by CCP are never open for discussion, so why would CSM candidates mix into such affairs? The play style of E1 was fun for as long as it lasted and on a certain moment CCP decided she committed a bannable offense, its simple as that. This was simply based on EULA, ToS or other directives clearly set out by CCP on harrasement (see the mining bumping statement). So, supporting such a thing is never up to a CSM member, but just a CCP internal matter.
Please allow the candidate to answer the question, I am not here to converse with you, I am here to ask a question of the candidate.
Whether or not a candidate supports something is still important, no matter whether they can change it.
So I ask the candidate please.....
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ?
|
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
934
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 00:45:00 -
[112] - Quote
Psychotic Monk wrote:Sephira, if letting the air out of the balls was a legal move in a game that strongly featured letting the air out of the balls, I would be all for it.
Zappity, having been on the defense and having been successfully defended against in these situations, I feel that defenders have a great number of advantages in these situations. I don't think they need more of them in a generalized non-specific way, but I do feel like they should know more about them. Honestly, each of the major types of content creating gameplay has several very strong counters, the shortcoming is only in the knowledge or will of those that would apply them. Care to comment further on the quote below? This is along the lines that I was thinking:
CCP Fozzie wrote:Asking a dedicated PVP ship to defend a mining fleet can often lead to mind numbing boredom for the PVP pilot, so we're providing the option for players to make sacrifices in their mining ships to allow self-defense. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1964
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 02:31:00 -
[113] - Quote
I'm not sure exactly what your question is, but let me try and take a stab at what I think it might be.
The answer does not need to lie in a combat ship waiting around with a mining fleet to defend it.
Since you brought up a quote about sitting around defending a mining fleet, I'm going to assume that you're talking about either suicide ganking or safari, so let me be explicit about some of the options that allow someone to defend against these things without having some extra dude sitting around doing nothing.
Suicide ganks:
1) Put a fleet boost that helps your raw EHP on the Orca you were grouped with anyways. That wildly increases your gank-resistance. 2) Be in any way a less desirable target than the miners in the next belt. Methods of doing this might include: a) flying a tankier mining boat b) showing a tanking effect of some kind, like you see when an invuln is active c) have ECM drones out d) Fit a damage control (assuming your gankers are ship scanning, which they often are) 3) Take note when -10s come into system or undock. Start aligning as soon as you notice this 4) Hit dscan and take note when suicide-gank ships appear on close scan (for reference, popular ones are the Catalyst, Vexor, Thorax, Brutix, Talos and Tornado.) Leave when this happens.
Safaris (I'm going to assume you've already made the mistake of letting the awoxer into your corp):
1) Have ECM drones avalible 2) When you invite someone to your fleet, take note in the fleet composite window what boat they're flying. Seeing a combat boat coming to a mining op is a bad sign. 3) Have a blackbird in the ship bay of your Orca. 4) Have any kind of remote reps or jams either in the cargohold of your orca or in your cargo hold alongside a mobile depot to refit even some unbonused ships (remember, all it takes is one jam to thwart an awox.)
This is just a quick bit of 30 second advice that does not touch on the larger issues of the subtleties of your playstyle or where you're based or any of that more ephemeral stuff that can protect you.
So if you're trying to make the arguement that miners in highsec must be immune or even safer because they are too vulnerable, I would strongly argue that the only tool they need in addition to what they already have is education. Belligerent Undesirables Selling Griefer Immunity |
Ali Aras
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
673
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 03:25:00 -
[114] - Quote
Yeah, the Procurer/Skiff buff matters a lot more in nullsec, where no way in hell do you have an Orca in the belt with you (helloooooooooo target) and one of the main threats is an AFK cloaky camper. Improved combat capabilities mean that Procurers and Skiffs can be used in place of higher-yield boats to better thwart solo troublemakers (and maybe even small blops groups, depending on pilot skill). Awox logi mean that adding more DPS to some mining boats will do ****-all to kill an awoxer, and suicide ganks are meant to be completed so quickly that applied DPS is likely useless. After all, CONCORD will do way, way more than you can. http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog |
Zappity
Stay Frosty. A Band Apart.
934
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 05:15:00 -
[115] - Quote
To be honest I don't really know what I'm asking, having never mined. I just sense missed gameplay and player interaction opportunities in highsec in particular.
At the moment, a miner is interacted with (ganked). No problem. I would like to see additional mechanics which promoted team play to defend against this without resulting in the boredom Fozzie mentioned. Don't know what and just thought that you might have had insights given your play style.
If such mechanics could be figured out I'd actually ask for a nerf to solo miner safety. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |
Ssabat Thraxx
Dominion Tenebrarum
270
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 07:24:00 -
[116] - Quote
Ali Aras wrote:Yeah, the Procurer/Skiff buff matters a lot more in nullsec, where no way in hell do you have an Orca in the belt with you (helloooooooooo target) and one of the main threats is an AFK cloaky camper.
Monk,
Do you agree with the above poster that AFK players represent a threat to other players? If so, in what way do you feel they are a threat?
Either the rules apply to everyone, or they don't justly apply to anyone.
|
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887 EVE Alliance 1236539078
1
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 14:13:00 -
[117] - Quote
Hello Psychotic Monk,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer. Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? |
Snupe Doggur
Republic University Minmatar Republic
43
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 17:58:00 -
[118] - Quote
Snupe Doggur wrote:What was the most enjoyable part of your Bonus Round participation, Monk? What was least enjoyable? How did you happen to become involved? I would like to add one more question: to what extent did you share in the "take" of Bonus Rounds, Psychotic Monk? |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1090
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 20:48:00 -
[119] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting them.
The Rules: 10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties. ISD Ezwal Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
Elmnt80
Life. Universe. Everything. Clockwork Pineapple
14
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 02:28:00 -
[120] - Quote
Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |